![]() |
Well, we will all know soon enough if this is fake news or not. In the meantime, JamesDL posted more:
Hi all, word is that a rendering showing the tower integrated in the New York skyline will be available soon. High resolution renderings will follow by the end of the month, most likely developed by DBOX. A homepage (just like with 0ne57) is currently under development, although a proper name has not been chosen yet. Just this morning I spoke with a friend of mine about the project . We are both very eager to watch this beautiful tower rise in the next years and grace our skyline. Also, I'd like to add that new D.O.B. filings will be submitted pretty soon. If everything goes according to plan, a construction start by the end of the year is very likely. Regards, James Quote:
Don't worry about the cladding, it will be of the highest quality. The rendering shows a dark green cladding with some black panels (more like lines) in between. A very interesting pattern if you ask me. I gotta get back to work. Have a nice day all, Regards, James |
U know what, my mom's brothers sister in law's daughter's boyfriends dad says he knows donald trump, and he heard on the telephone he will be riding on a flying turkey... Oh what is that u say? Going to a giant circus? oh the TELEPHONE made it sound different. (SARCASM) See, classic case of telephone. whether it's taller, shorter, fatter or actually a mammal wait 'til the actual press release. JamesDL's statements mean NOTHING as far as I'm concerned, and if I am wrong than u can go and call me "Fred Farty Pants".
Sorry for so many posts. :) PS. Maybe I want to be called that. ;) |
Green can work *exceptionally* well if done right.
This architecture firm is well noted for working local regional influences into their designs. I see no reason why this can't be pulled off. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I was very disappointed with this "news", but rather wait for confirmation before me disappointed for complete. :dunno: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Although not realistic the design concepts are certainly original from the sound of it. |
Curvy and green with a crown.....hmm.. KING CUCUMBER! :frog:
|
^Haha, and while we're at it we should say hello to queen tomato over at 107 W 57th. :)
|
Quote:
|
Zapatan, it's freaky but your number of posts happens to be 1550!
|
Quote:
|
I believe there was too much buildup for the height to be reduced this much, If it is reduced then Barnett was a fool and will lose all his wow factor with the status of "1550' to the highest occupiable floor", "Taller than 432 park" and "Tallest building in the western hemisphere by roof height" tied to this project. It seems unusual and a bit like an architectural soap opera.
|
Quote:
Those 1550 feet is indeed official information, if the devoloper decided to decrease the height, for whatever reason, it is another thing. Anyway, we'll have to wait and see what is the true truth. Quote:
You can be sure that if it the decreased height end up being true, Barnett would have a good reason for that. If for him is more convienent to build a 1250 ft. tower instead of 1550 one he would do the former. His primary objetive is not to build the tallest tower in New York, that is just a plus. And architectural soap opera has been a lot, how many projects has been announced to much fanfarre and ended up at nothing at all? At least this one, with more or less height, seems to be build. |
I believe there is a word for what this guy is doing... it's called TROLLING
Quote:
1. I'd say more Like 98.23% ;) but those majority NYers are not his customers. 2. Not with all the hubbub his to-be customers are reading about, going from topping all the buildings in the western hemisphere to barely taller than the soon-to-be 3rd tallest? I don't think so, he would lose the appeal. 3."Next Time on Days of our Skyscrapers..." :) |
Quote:
Quote:
Honestly, if it somehow ends up 1550 or beyond (I highly doubt it will) we are very lucky but I think you're silly if your hopes are too high. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Let's revisit some earlier posts on the topic: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I wouldn't be surprised if the tower height was reduced, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were higher. Either way, it will be a brand new addition to the City's skyline, will no doubt be a quality design, and will be under construction soon. When the renderings are revealed, the excitement will jump up a notch, despite whatever the final height will be. |
You Know what, Whatever the truth is I'll just be happy with a building over 1000'. If this new construction continues at this rate then 1000 footers will be fillers quite soon. And If it does turn out to be shorter I can bet on getting a new tallest under construction by 2015.
PS. I am gonna restate some facts but what 1250' tower takes 5 years to build? Don't forget the new signs up at the lot "Work on this project Is scheduled to be completed by November 2018. Thank you for your patients". ??????? :| I still don't trust it. |
The saga of JamesDL continues. I guess ill just keep posting his comments here for those who haven't gone over to SSC yet:
Well, the Nordstrom Store will occupy the base, which will be quite massive. If I remember correctly the first 7 or 8 floors will have a slightly different cladding than the rest of the tower. Still green, but not that dark. According to the rendering the base won't be very visible anyway. The crown won't be that big. It is my understanding that the mechanical floors will be integrated somehow. The illumination will be classy, with some interesting patterns. Regarding the shape of the tower, there will be 3 setbacks. Hope I could help. Regards, James |
I'd bet the building will end up being closer to 1,550' despite the rumors. The higher floors are worth the most due to the views.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.