SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Completed Project Threads Archive (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=348)
-   -   NEW YORK | Central Park Tower (Nordstrom)| 1,550 FT | 131 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=191095)

NYguy Sep 6, 2020 1:58 AM

taigatrommelchen

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...da1253fb_h.jpg



https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...92fa85a0_k.jpg



https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...7e3b948_3k.jpg




STC4blues

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...89508a4d_h.jpg



https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...44e11098_k.jpg



https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...3ae424b6_b.jpg

NYguy Sep 6, 2020 2:12 PM

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/n...?adppopup=true

https://media.gettyimages.com/photos...62?s=2048x2048




https://www.instagram.com/p/CEx7YlUDeNI/

https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...1e&oe=5F7EB5F4



https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...cb&oe=5F7CB178



https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...1d&oe=5F7D31AB

Prezrezc Sep 6, 2020 4:42 PM

That projection to the right which causes the vertical sliver of sunshine at the right times of the day makes me happy....
That LilianMarlen shot is precious. How it sparkles(!) I have no clue, except to call it an optical illusion/trompe l'oeil.

Edit via Question: It it me or does that projection in the abovementioned photo actially rise ever so slightly higher than the parapet?

faridnyc Sep 6, 2020 9:52 PM

I noticed that the tower crane is pulled down .
So right now there is no hope that the spire will come back
I hope that peen station will give birth a 2100ft tower .

BXFrank Sep 6, 2020 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faridnyc (Post 9033971)
I noticed that the tower crane is pulled down .
So right now there is no hope that the spire will come back
I hope that peen station will give birth a 2100ft tower .

You never know, they might pull a Chrysler Building stunt

NYguy Sep 6, 2020 11:19 PM

https://www.instagram.com/p/CDYJCWygwV9/

https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...cb&oe=5F7EF392



https://www.instagram.com/p/CEz-7ToDQaP/

https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...e2&oe=5F80C624



nyclovesnyc

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...fb7e2932_k.jpg

Skyy Sep 7, 2020 12:08 AM

It's absurd how tall this is (in a good way!) Great photos

NYguy Sep 7, 2020 2:13 PM

Michael Lee

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...c797f45a_h.jpg



https://www.instagram.com/p/CE1gwpqp3hT/

https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...43&oe=5F7E90F8

citybooster Sep 7, 2020 2:30 PM

It's not the greatest design...would have benefitted so mightily from a graceful, soaring crown or a real spire(not a cheapo stick it on job, but an Empire State Building or Chrysler Building spire) but it still is massive and isn't bad to look at, even if it wasn't designed really with aesthetics in mind. I think though that it may eventually be considered underrated, and it does impress because of its height even if it doesn't inspire great appreciation for its design. And at that point, "underrated" wouldn't be wrong.

InTheLoopFromNYC Sep 7, 2020 7:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by citybooster (Post 9034398)
It's not the greatest design...would have benefitted so mightily from a graceful, soaring crown or a real spire(not a cheapo stick it on job, but an Empire State Building or Chrysler Building spire) but it still is massive and isn't bad to look at, even if it wasn't designed really with aesthetics in mind. I think though that it may eventually be considered underrated, and it does impress because of its height even if it doesn't inspire great appreciation for its design. And at that point, "underrated" wouldn't be wrong.

Agree on the spire, would really accentuate the verticality, especially at that corner with the chamfer/bevel. But disagree with it not being designed with "aesthetics in mind." Don't confuse a lack of aesthetics (ANYTHING in NYC by Gene Kaufman for instance) with individual preference. I think many of us like this building's massing, use of the canteliever, quality of glass, etc. Ultimately all commercial/residential building are designed with function in mind - they are generating revenue and aren't museum sculpture pieces. Not everything will be designed like Steinway and 57W57 (that would get boring too). This could have been a disaster, particularly at such a high profile location and with its mamoth proportions. I for one am pretty pleased with the result.

citybooster Sep 7, 2020 9:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InTheLoopFromNYC (Post 9034682)
Agree on the spire, would really accentuate the verticality, especially at that corner with the chamfer/bevel. But disagree with it not being designed with "aesthetics in mind." Don't confuse a lack of aesthetics (ANYTHING in NYC by Gene Kaufman for instance) with individual preference. I think many of us like this building's massing, use of the canteliever, quality of glass, etc. Ultimately all commercial/residential building are designed with function in mind - they are generating revenue and aren't museum sculpture pieces. Not everything will be designed like Steinway and 57W57 (that would get boring too). This could have been a disaster, particularly at such a high profile location and with its mamoth proportions. I for one am pretty pleased with the result.

I really can't argue your point... we still do have a number of outstanding designs like Steinway and 57 W 57th, and yes... all in all, Central Park Tower makes for a stunning site in its sheer height and there weren't any egregious mistakes. Overall, it's a functional, nice tower that will be underrated and people will grow to really like it despite its flaw of not having a memorable exclamation point of a spire or crown.

NYguy Sep 8, 2020 4:19 PM

Here's the thing about the Central Park Tower. The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were NOT great architectural towers. Before 9/11, most people couldn't tell you any details about the designs, other than the obvious that made them stand out - they were indentical towers of enormous size and height. They were the first supertall buildings built in the city (and really the world) since the Empire State, about 4 decades earlier. So they were going to be noticed, and people came to love them because they were dominating, identifiable marks on the skyline and the city. Central Park Tower, while taller than everything around it, is not so much taller that it blows everything away. And it comes at a time when there is a small army of supertall towers taking over the skyline. It would have helped a lot if this tower had something that set it apart, because a skyline is mostly made up of silhouettes. And the ones that stand out the most are the ones that taper, or had some other distinguishable feature other than a flat roof. And there is no observation deck to draw attention to it.

New York's skyline is world famous, and it became that way because of the dramatic peaks that were built there. (NY was NY before it had a skyline, but the skyline and the city has gone hand in hand for a century and more.) Central Park Tower should have been more than it is, and in fact it was at one time. Too bad. It'll join the army of supertalls taking over the skyline, and it'll be fine. There are other mistakes, such as how this tower meets the street and it's base (there is no connection). But that's another story.

NYguy Sep 8, 2020 4:24 PM

That being said, the building is nearing completion, and it is very tall.



SEPTEMBER 7, 2020


1.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...36_InPixio.jpg


2.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...37_InPixio.jpg


3.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...38_InPixio.jpg


4.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...39_InPixio.jpg


5.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...40_InPixio.jpg


6.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...41_InPixio.jpg


7.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...42_InPixio.jpg


8.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...15_InPixio.jpg


9.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...17_InPixio.jpg


10.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...18_InPixio.jpg


11.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...19_InPixio.jpg


12.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...21_InPixio.jpg


13.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...72_InPixio.jpg


14.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...01_InPixio.jpg


15.

https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...28_InPixio.jpg

pianowizard Sep 8, 2020 5:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy (Post 9035319)
The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center...were the first supertall buildings built in the city (and really the world) since the Empire State

Chicago's John Hancock Center was built from 1965 to 1969. Construction of 1WTC started in 1968, and 2WTC in 1969.

jd3189 Sep 8, 2020 6:47 PM

That height is intense. And I thought 432 Park Avenue was a beast.:cheers:

NYguy Sep 8, 2020 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pianowizard (Post 9035422)
Chicago's John Hancock Center was built from 1965 to 1969. Construction of 1WTC started in 1968, and 2WTC in 1969.

I aware of that, basically the same era. The Empire State was from decades earlier (another era), and was the tallest building in the world. Not to knock the Hancock, but it wasn't on the Manhattan skyline.


Three towers waiting for their lighting debut...

https://www.instagram.com/p/CE3ArTojGtR/


https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...12&oe=5F7FC7FD




https://www.instagram.com/p/CE44xJYAsJZ/

https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...d4&oe=5F81C69A



https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...04&oe=5F808789



https://www.instagram.com/p/CEiKExqBgM0/

https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...a6&oe=5F80D9EB

NYguy Sep 10, 2020 1:15 AM

Older pics, but the view is insane...


https://www.instagram.com/p/CE7hCuUATLN/

https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...e6&oe=5F8157CE



https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...c2&oe=5F835A7F



https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...4c&oe=5F82B8A5



https://scontent-ort2-1.cdninstagram...38&oe=5F843417

NYguy Sep 11, 2020 3:34 AM

JMS2

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...97ac4e6f_k.jpg



https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...f0cf485_3k.jpg



https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...e7232cc_4k.jpg

chris08876 Sep 13, 2020 2:47 PM

Pic by me. Taken yesterday.


https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...85bc0dc1_k.jpg
Eagle Rock 09-12-2020 - 6 by Christopher Estevez, on Flickr

NYguy Sep 13, 2020 3:47 PM

https://www.instagram.com/p/CFDnmt1jo1m/

https://scontent-yyz1-1.cdninstagram...d4&oe=5F87B9DA



https://scontent-lga3-1.cdninstagram...7e&oe=5F88619C


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.