SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Canada (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   Canadian Airport Thread (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=153826)

Nicko999 Nov 23, 2022 3:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenoflyzone (Post 9795391)

A lot of the lineups in your pics were there pre-pandemic as well. And that little paper is what the border agents use to pull people who got flagged, aside. So it's kind of an important step. But I hear your frustration.

YUL is a tiny airport, with A LOT of international passengers. It will only get worse, I'm afraid, until a new terminal is built.

I don't remember the lineups that long pre pandemic. Considering traffic is 10% less than in 2019, it's not very good.

And yes YUL is tiny airport which why Mirabel was built in the first place. I am still an advocate to build a small passenger terminal there (for ULCC maybe). YUL is just way too limited.

nname Nov 23, 2022 4:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicko999 (Post 9797461)
I don't remember the lineups that long pre pandemic. Considering traffic is 10% less than in 2019, it's not very good.

And yes YUL is tiny airport which why Mirabel was built in the first place. I am still an advocate to build a small passenger terminal there (for ULCC maybe). YUL is just way too limited.

If YUL need to kick out the ULCC, maybe YHU is better option than YMX?

thenoflyzone Nov 23, 2022 7:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicko999 (Post 9797461)
I don't remember the lineups that long pre pandemic.

I do. Quite often the lineup for customs was above the stairs, just as in those pictures.

What is much worse now, or at least was this past summer, was the wait for baggage. The baggage claim area was a shit show, when I last passed through in July.

casper Nov 23, 2022 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenoflyzone (Post 9797548)
I do. Quite often the lineup for customs was above the stairs, just as in those pictures.

What is much worse now, or at least was this past summer, was the wait for baggage. The baggage claim area was a shit show, when I last passed through in July.

In Montréal don't forget the lines for a taxi. Those were consistently long.

Last time I was in Montreal I did Uber. The wait area needs more cubside space.

Lastly on the topic of Montreal is the lack of an independent lounge.

thenoflyzone Nov 23, 2022 1:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casper (Post 9797593)

Lastly on the topic of Montreal is the lack of an independent lounge.

There's 2 already.

National bank lounge and Desjardins, but both are on the international side. There's also the AF/KL lounge, that's operated by Plaza Premium Group. Also in the international jetty. You won't have access to them if you're flying domestic or transborder.

YUL doesn't have room for another lounge. There's already 6. AC wants to build a signature suite, same as YYZ and YVR, but there is no room.

Quote:

Originally Posted by casper (Post 9797593)
In Montréal don't forget the lines for a taxi. Those were consistently long.

Last time I was in Montreal I did Uber. The wait area needs more cubside space.

Yes. The wait area is small, but also, the access road leading to the terminal is obsolete. Not enough lanes, and demand far outweighs capacity. There was supposed to be major rework of the airport access road, tied-in with the new terminal. Work was supposed to start in 2020. All of it got pushed back because of COVID. I don't believe there's a timeline yet, as to when the work will start.

casper Nov 23, 2022 1:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenoflyzone (Post 9797625)
There's 2 already.

National bank lounge and Desjardins, but both are on the international side. There's also the AF/KL lounge, that's operated by Plaza Premium Group. Also in the international jetty. You won't have access to them if you're flying domestic or transborder.

YUL doesn't have room for another lounge. There's already 6. AC wants to build a signature suite, same as YYZ and YVR, but there is no room.
.

Only major airport in Canada without a domestic lounge when flying WestJet or using the AMEX lounge program.

Vancouver, Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Quebec City all have one.

Alexcaban Nov 23, 2022 3:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicko999 (Post 9797461)
I don't remember the lineups that long pre pandemic. Considering traffic is 10% less than in 2019, it's not very good.

And yes YUL is tiny airport which why Mirabel was built in the first place. I am still an advocate to build a small passenger terminal there (for ULCC maybe). YUL is just way too limited.

There’s been long lineups like that, that lead upstairs from the customs hall into the terminal since at least 2017 during the peak summer season. We desperately need a new terminal preferably something like Zurich has to handle just international.

thenoflyzone Nov 23, 2022 7:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casper (Post 9797646)
Only major airport in Canada without a domestic lounge when flying WestJet or using the AMEX lounge program.

Vancouver, Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Quebec City all have one.

That's a very narrow passenger list you're mentioning. Westjet's service to YUL is a joke.

And like I said, there is no room to add a lounge, especially in the tiny domestic jetty. If you want a lounge on a domestic run from YUL, you need to fly AC and use the MLL or nothing else. It's unfortunate, but that's what it is.

edit: A couple of years ago, when there was no sterile transit, domestic passengers could use the 2 independent lounges in the international jetty, as the access to that jetty wasn't blocked. That's obviously not the case now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alexcaban (Post 9797710)
There’s been long lineups like that, that lead upstairs from the customs hall into the terminal since at least 2017 during the peak summer season. We desperately need a new terminal preferably something like Zurich has to handle just international.

Indeed.

It made the news as well at that time, as the overcrowding at the lineup for customs was getting to ridiculous levels. I wanted to find links from 2017-2019 for my post above, but didn't have time to check.

Bourkky Nov 23, 2022 9:17 PM

Some renovations going on where Avenue des Canadiens restaurant use to be. Someone told me it’s going to be a new lounge. To be verified.

thenoflyzone Nov 23, 2022 9:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bourkky (Post 9798123)
Some renovations going on where Avenue des Canadiens restaurant use to be. Someone told me it’s going to be a new lounge. To be verified.

They just built that extension a few years ago. Surprising they would remove a restaurant to build a lounge, but that’s the only way it’s going to happen I guess.

If the restaurant closed up shop due to COVID, and another company was ready to jump in and acquire the space, then it makes sense I guess.

nname Nov 24, 2022 1:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenoflyzone (Post 9798020)
It made the news as well at that time, as the overcrowding at the lineup for customs was getting to ridiculous levels. I wanted to find links from 2017-2019 for my post above, but didn't have time to check.

And that fact that AC is moving capacity from YYZ to YUL, and TS is moving also moving capacity from the west to YUL, it'll only get worse....

thenoflyzone Nov 24, 2022 1:53 AM

^ yeah.

And speaking of TS, looks like they’re beefing up their TATL flights next summer, at the expense of domestic runs.

YUL-YYZ/YQB/YYC/YVR are all being reduced
YYZ-YVR is cut, whereas YYZ-YYC remains cancelled as well.

https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/221121-tsns23

So yeah, by the looks of it, next summer will be as busy, if not more, than S19, at least on the international scene.

Quote:

Air Transat in last week’s schedule update filed service changes for Northern summer 2023 season. The following adjustment mostly focuses on service between June and September 2023.

Montreal – Athens 23JUN23 – 04SEP23 Increase from 3 to 4 weekly, A330-200
Montreal – Barcelona 12JUN23 – 21SEP23 Increase from 3 to 4 weekly, A321neo LR/A330-200
Montreal – Basel/Mulhouse Service revised to 05JUN23 – 02OCT23 instead of 03MAY23 – 25OCT23. Increase from 1 to 2 weekly, A321neo LR
Montreal – Bordeaux 18JUN23 – 27SEP23 Increase from 4 to 5 weekly, A321neo LR
Montreal – Calgary Peak season reduces from 8 to 7 weekly, A321
Montreal – Cancun eff 01MAY23 Increase from 4 to 7 weekly, A321/321neo
Montreal – Cayo Coco eff 01MAY23 Increase from 2 to 3 weekly, A321/321neo
Montreal – Holguin 25JUN23 – 05SEP23 Increase from 1 to 2 weekly, A321/321neo
Montreal – Lyon 22JUN23 – 14SEP23 Increase from 4 to 5 weekly, A321neo LR/A330-200
Montreal – Madrid 28JUN23 – 12SEP23 Increase from 3 to 4 weekly, A321neo LR
Montreal – Marseille 18JUN23 – 19SEP23 Increase from 5 to 6 weekly, A321neo LR/A330-200
Montreal – Nantes 27JUN23 – 26SEP23 Increase from 3 to 4 weekly, A321neo LR/A330-200
Montreal – Nice 08JUN23 – 30SEP23 Increase from 2 to 3 weekly, A321neo LR
Montreal – Orlando 21JUN23 – 30AUG23 Increase from 2 to 3 weekly, A321/321neo
Montreal – Port-au-Prince eff 11JUN23 1 weekly service maintained with A330-200, instead of 2 weekly A321/330
Montreal – Porto 06JUN23 – 30SEP23 Increase from 2 to 3 weekly, A321neo LR
Montreal – Puerto Vallarta eff 04JUN23 Service extends into summer season, 2 weekly A321/321neo
Montreal – Punta Cana eff 01MAY23 Increase from 5 to 7 weekly, A321/A330-200
Montreal – Quebec City Peak season reduces from 5 to 4 weekly, A321/321neo
Montreal – Rome 22JUN23 – 26SEP23 Increase from 4 to 7 weekly (5 from 05SEP23), A330-200
Montreal – San Francisco 30MAY23 – 05OCT23 Increase from 2 to 3 weekly, A321
Montreal – Santa Clara eff 01JUN23 Reduce from 2 to 1 weekly, A321neo
Montreal – Toronto Peak season reduces from 14 to 10 weekly, A321neo/A330-200
Montreal – Toulouse 25JUN23 – 25SEP23 Increase from 4 to 5 weekly, A321neo LR/A330-200
Montreal – Vancouver Peak season reduces from 10 to 7 weekly, A321
Montreal – Varadero 01JUN23 – 07SEP23 Increase from 2 to 3 weekly, A321/321neo
Toronto – Amsterdam 4th weekly service operates from 26JUN23 instead of 29MAY23 (3 weekly A321neo LR / 1 weekly A330-200)
Toronto – Athens Seasonal service begins on 28MAY23 instead of 07MAY23. 3rd weekly flight scheduled from 23JUN23 instead of 09JUN23 (3 weekly A330-200)
Toronto – Barcelona Seasonal service begins on 18MAY23 instead of 02MAY23. Increase from 2 to 3 weekly 10JUN23 – 09SEP23, A330-200
Toronto – Calgary Service remains cancelled in NS23
Toronto – Cancun eff 04JUN23 Increase from 5 to 7 weekly, A321/330-200
Toronto – Cayo Coco 07JUN23 – 06SEP23 1 weekly service maintained, instead of 2 weekly. A321
Toronto – Dublin 11JUN23 – 10SEP23 Increase from 5 to 6 weekly, A321neo LR
Toronto – Glasgow Frequency variation from 4 weekly to following:
04MAY23 – 03JUN23 Reduce to 3 weekly, A321neo LR instead of A321neo LR/330-200
04JUN23 – 04SEP23 Increase to 5 weekly, 7 from 21JUN23. A321neo LR/A330-200
05SEP23 – 18SEP23 Increase to 5 weekly, A321neo LR/A330-200

Toronto – Holguin eff 05MAY23 Increase from 1 to 2 weekly, A321neo LR
Toronto – Lamezia Terme Service reduced to 14JUN23 – 27SEP23, 1 weekly A330-200 (Previous: 07JUN23 – 25OCT23)
Toronto – Lisbon Planned increase from 4 to 5 weekly from 07JUN23, instead of 28JUN23. A321neo LR/A330-200
Toronto – Manchester Frequency variation from 4 weekly to following. A321neo LR replaces A330-200 in NS23
02MAY23 – 23MAY23 3 weekly
07JUN23 – 25JUN23 5 weekly
26JUN23 – 17SEP23 6 weekly

Toronto – Montego Bay eff 01JUN23 1 weekly service extends into summer season, A321/321neo
Toronto – Orlando 3rd weekly in NS23 begins from 21JUN23, instead of 07JUN23. A321/321neo
Toronto – Paris CDG eff 12JUN23 Increase from 4 to 6 weekly (7 27JUN23 – 05SEP23), A321neo LR/A330-200
Toronto – Porto 05JUN23 – 18SEP23 Increase from 3 to 4 weekly, A330-200
Toronto – Puerto Plata eff 02MAY23 Increase from 1 to 2 weekly, A321
Toronto – Puerto Vallarta eff 01MAY23 Service extends into summer season, 2 weekly A321
Toronto – Punta Cana eff 01MAY23 Increase from 5 to 7 weekly, A321/A330-200
Toronto – Rome 23JUN23 – 23SEP23 Increase from 5 to 7 weekly (6 from 10SEP23), A330-200
Toronto – Samana eff 01MAY23 Service extends into summer season, 2 weekly A321
Toronto – Santa Clara eff 11JUN23 Reduce from 2 to 1 weekly, A321
Toronto – Vancouver Service cancelled in NS23
Toronto – Venice Service reduced to 09JUN23 – 22SEP23, 1 weekly A330-200 (Previous: 01MAY23 – 23OCT23)
Toronto – Zagreb 22JUN23 – 21SEP23 Increase from 2 to 3 weekly, A330-200

nname Nov 24, 2022 1:58 AM

From the current AC schedule, S23 will have more international departure out of YUL compared to S19... at the expense of YYZ, of course. So S23 at YUL will be busy at least in the international/transborder front.

Note that there are some over count for the S23 number, as some flights are currently zeroed out but not removed, pending suspension or transfer to Rouge. I manually remove some from the number (if schedule duplicated between mainline/express/rouge), but there will be the ones I miss such as those YYC suspensions.

Code:

        YYZ        YVR        YUL        YYC
TOTAL:
S19        2731        1301        1282        664
S23        2224        1120        1200        600

DOMESTIC:
S19        1363        888        761        572
S23        1024        744        594        516

TRANSBORDER:
S19        999        300        370          70
S23        895        297        429          70

INTERNATIONAL:
S19        394        113        165          22
S23        313          81        184          14


thenoflyzone Nov 24, 2022 2:09 AM

^ nice work.

Always appreciate seeing those numbers.

Nicko999 Nov 24, 2022 4:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nname (Post 9797506)
If YUL need to kick out the ULCC, maybe YHU is better option than YMX?

YHU is limited just like YUL. YMX is a better option.

thenoflyzone Nov 24, 2022 7:45 AM

Both YMX and YHU face challenges in accepting scheduled commercial airlines, and therefore passengers, for different reasons.

Aside from the obvious, which is that neither airport has a terminal building that can accomodate a ULCC:

YMX's operator, ADM, has no intentions of building one.

YHU's operator, DASH-L, actually wanted to build a passenger terminal for ULCC ops back in 2018. It announced a partnership with Canada Jetlines to do just that, but then Jetlines did what it does best, stall, plus the pandemic happened. Also, YHU doesn't have designated airport status, meaning no CATSA. That will need to be addressed before any commerical service starts.

Here is the list of airports that have designated status for the CATSA Act.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/...html#h-1344680

So YMX has no plans for ULCC accomodation, but has the status to do so if it wishes, and YHU wants to, but doesn't have the status.

So neither airport is in any position, in the short to medium term, to receive a ULCC.

https://www.thestar.com/business/201...20early%202020.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicko999 (Post 9798402)
YHU is limited just like YUL. YMX is a better option.

You don't need much room for a small ULCC terminal with 2-3 parking positions for 737/A320 sized aircraft in front. You don't even need jet bridges. (Ryanair does just fine without them at most of the airports it serves in Europe.) YHU definately has room and runway to handle that. YHU's problem is noise. The NIMBY's around YHU complain about C172s coming and going. Imagine 737s or A320s coming and going on a regular basis. YMX doesn't have that problem.

Nicko999 Nov 25, 2022 2:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thenoflyzone (Post 9798459)
Both YMX and YHU face challenges in accepting scheduled commercial airlines, and therefore passengers, for different reasons.

Aside from the obvious, which is that neither airport has a terminal building that can accomodate a ULCC:

YMX's operator, ADM, has no intentions of building one.

YHU's operator, DASH-L, actually wanted to build a passenger terminal for ULCC ops back in 2018. It announced a partnership with Canada Jetlines to do just that, but then Jetlines did what it does best, stall, plus the pandemic happened. Also, YHU doesn't have designated airport status, meaning no CATSA. That will need to be addressed before any commerical service starts.

Here is the list of airports that have designated status for the CATSA Act.

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/...html#h-1344680

So YMX has no plans for ULCC accomodation, but has the status to do so if it wishes, and YHU wants to, but doesn't have the status.

So neither airport is in any position, in the short to medium term, to receive a ULCC.

https://www.thestar.com/business/201...20early%202020.



You don't need much room for a small ULCC terminal with 2-3 parking positions for 737/A320 sized aircraft in front. You don't even need jet bridges. (Ryanair does just fine without them at most of the airports it serves in Europe.) YHU definately has room and runway to handle that. YHU's problem is noise. The NIMBY's around YHU complain about C172s coming and going. Imagine 737s or A320s coming and going on a regular basis. YMX doesn't have that problem.

It's a serious lack of vision by ADM. YUL capacity is maybe at 25M max. After you reach that mark, you will stop your growth because there is simply not enough space at Dorval.

I agree with you that NIMBY's will never let YHU develop more than what it currently is. Hence the option of building a small terminal at YMX being only one and the best one. If not for ADM's stupidity that is.

casper Nov 25, 2022 6:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicko999 (Post 9799082)
It's a serious lack of vision by ADM. YUL capacity is maybe at 25M max. After you reach that mark, you will stop your growth because there is simply not enough space at Dorval.

I agree with you that NIMBY's will never let YHU develop more than what it currently is. Hence the option of building a small terminal at YMX being only one and the best one. If not for ADM's stupidity that is.

Did they not just finish removing a perfectly good terminal building at YMX?

Alexcaban Nov 25, 2022 2:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casper (Post 9799149)
Did they not just finish removing a perfectly good terminal building at YMX?

I wouldn’t call it perfectly good, building was abandoned for years and had a big asbestos problem.

JakeLRS Nov 25, 2022 3:20 PM

A flair 737-800 aircraft ran off the runway upon landing in Kitchener from Vancouver.

134 passengers all safe.

In CP24 fashion, they have a breaking news header on their website about it. Not really the publicity flair needs.

In a more economic view tho, 134 passengers on YVR-YKF during shoulder season while running 5x weekly is pretty impressive.


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.