|
Looks like both 1550 N Bosworth AND 1521 W North are biting the dust. Something about a 4 story car dealership at that site at 1521?
|
Quote:
north broadway feels like a lost cause sometimes |
Quote:
Speaking of which, has anyone heard any news on when construction might begin? |
Quote:
Very good point. Probably the right way to look at this (saw Mr Downtown also picked up on my concern as well, and it definitely has happened), that with time, as density and walkability increase in select areas, it sure is easy enough to just switch the 'front' entrance back..... |
wasn't the elysian (waldorf) site either a gas station or 7-11?
|
Quote:
What, you don't think this will be an instant classic public gathering space in Chicago? I can't wait first day open to grab lunch and head over and pick out a prime spot sit on the steps and relax over a leisurely lunch break.... (on a serious note thanks for the photo updates, aaron!) |
wow...$7500 fine for this. really sticking it to them
http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20141...orkers-cottage good to know that if you want to violate your permit you can just do whatever the hell you want anyway and just chalk the rest up to the cost of doing business |
Quote:
|
Quote:
7500 is a joke and does nothing to dissuade or discourage this behavior from happening in the future |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
he does seem to have a habit of ignoring permits and zoning (that blue sculpture and non-regulation stone wall around his property come to mind)
anyway, it was a charming little house in an increasingly bland area. its unfortunate everyone feels the need to outdo themselves and cant appreciate some of the finer grained things that make the city interesting |
Quote:
It had no protection. the only thing Novak is guilty of, is not getting a demo permit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But even as a NIMBY, I firmly believe that As Of Right means exactly that. An absolute right to do what you wish with the development rights you pay for when you purchase with the property. Sad as this case may be, $7500 is a pretty steep fine for otherwise legal work done without a permit. This is a crime that happens all over the city every day, and if it was the the owner of a two flat who enclosed his porch without a permit, a $7500 fine would seem astronomical. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
...if you choose to ignore his history of bullshit -- such as the giant sculpture illegally overhanging the public right-of-way and the illegal stone wall (as other have noted above). Furthermore, he's no stranger to the city's permitting process and how things are done. Simply put, he knew better yet he thought the rules do not apply... again. The neighborhood has been watching this potential project for a year (see link: http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20131...ld-be-expanded). Novak knew it would face public scrutiny (especially in a neighborhood where most people incorrectly assume historic = protected). Yet he still went ahead half-cocked. The arrogance! At the end of the day all he's done is given the local NIMBYs more ammunition to use in their crusade against good projects in the future. |
Quote:
I really like seeing these awkward parcels along the highway fill in with sleek new architecture. I exited the Tri-State at the new Balmoral exit on Saturday past a block-long LED wall... pretty cool stuff, wish we had more of it. There's the El Centro building too which is in the same spirit. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.