Agreed on all counts.

It's not needed, until you're stuck behind a Canadream going 20 under the limit.

Yeah, for the time being, I can't really see any major changes happening to Route 97 south of Penticton, or US-97 in Washington.

I did, however, read about the proposed Interstate 11. This highway could someday stretch from the Mexico border through Arizona, Nevada (small stretch of it already exists in Las Vegas area), and then through the Inland Northwest to reach the Canadian border. It is known as the 'Intermountain West Corridor' and its part of the CANAMEX corridor plans. Not exactly sure where it would lead on the approach to the Canadian border but will likely pass through the Spokane area. That means it would reach the border somewhere between Grand Forks and Creston. I wonder what would connect to it on the Canadian side? Could it be an extension of the Okanagan Connector through to the Kootenays?

^I hope they opt for a more easterly connection in Canada. :D
As per my post in the Albera Highway Construction thread:

Rather than Howse Pass, I would like to see an improved route from Calgary to Spokane, WA (and thus Seattle) as an economic trade stimulator. Routing through Cranbrook and connecting with US 95 in Idaho down to I-90.
Selfishly if they could route it so it cut the time it takes to drive from Calgary to the Radium/Windermere/Fairmont area that would be appreciated.

I’ve read about the proposed “Interstate 11” - sounds like a very long ways off (if it ever happens at all).

Interstate 11, especially north of Spokane, would be a bit of a pipe dream; however, Idaho is slowly improving US 95 north of Coeur d'Alene and Alberta has long-term plans to twin the Crowsnest Hwy to the BC border. Even if it wasn't to interstate standards, a potential Calgary-Spokane Corridor could follow US/BC 95 and BC/AB 3 between I-90 and Fort Macleod. I think the Yahk-Alberta section of the Crowsnest could probably be expanded to four lanes fairly easy compared to other sections of the Crowsnest or Trans-Canada - the question is whether BC would be interested improving sections of highway that benefit a small proportion of its population.

"The question is whether BC would be interested in improving sections of highway that benefit a small proportion of its population."

I think the answer is a flat out no. C'mon, it's B.C. Since when do we dare to upset tree huggers in the lower mainland? (Admittedly I used to be one too.) Just watch: When the stimulus package comes out, it will contain little to nothing about highways.

Digression: As for Coeur d'Alene, IDOT will need to find ways to make I-90 to U.S. 95 north free-flowing. Afterward, grade-separating U.S. 95 on the current alignment shouldn't be extremely difficult.

Good to hear they are improving US95 north of I-90.
I agree - a four lane connection between Calgary & Spokane would be adequate - doesn’t require full interstate standards. Seems at least somewhat of a realistic possibility. Alberta would likely have to share the cost of the portion through BC for the reason you mention.
:cheers:

How should it go then? AB-3, B.C.-3, B.C.-395, then U.S. 395, or AB-3, B.C.-3, B.C.-95, U.S. 95, U.S. 2, then U.S. 395?

Probably not BC/US 395 all the way to the border. From Spokane it goes further west and doesn't really benefit the Canadian population. Also, Kootenay Pass, located between Creston and Salmo, is higher than Rogers Pass and one the highest highway mountain passes opened year-round, so any north-south traffic would want to avoid that. As an aside, I wonder if US 395 could be rerouted at Kettle Falls, WA to follow WA 25 north? It becomes BC 22 and goes through Trail and Castlegar, seemingly better connecting to populated areas in BC better than dead-ending at Hwy 3, 4 km after crossing the Canada/US border. I've never drove WA 25 so I don't know what the road is like.

Back to Spokane-Coeur d'Alene, the North Spokane Corridor is a freeway under construction that will head from I-90 north out of Spokane and will singed as US 395, so US 2 could be an option; I don't know if it's viable to twin US 2 (haven't taken it), especially between Newport and Sandpoint. US 95 in Coeur d'Alene is a bit congested, but it also has a pretty wide ROW and is limited access, so at minimum IDOT could widen it to 6+ lanes (probably should anyway) or even squeeze in an urban freeway - if BC had a road like that they probably would but standards are a little different down south.

Yes through Castlegar!

Logically north of Spokane it should angle through Sandpoint and enter Canada at Kingsgate / Eastport on Hwy 95.

That’s what I was thinking.

https://www.google.ca/maps/@49.14573...8i6656!5m1!1e4

Wth, if you keep going west, the lane painting is wrong!

TCH Twinning Near Chase Greenlighted
 

https://canada.constructconnect.com/...se-moves-ahead

Woot, woot! Has anyone else seen this yet? :D

Wait just a minute!

That’s a major downgrade.

The interchange was the preferred option.

Now it is two protected T intersections?

What the fuck!

Send letter now!

Oops my habit of not reading the entire article is biting me hard.

I literally just looked at their website the other week, and this was the selected design for phase one:

Here is phase one which will begin construction this year I believe:

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...d1848942_o.jpgChase5 by Ian, on Flickr

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...b800e7c0_o.jpgChase1 by Ian, on Flickr

This was after all the consultations and had been the chosen design for years!

What the fuck is with this sudden out of left field downgrade!!!???

Just checked the website, it has literally just been changed.

Project officially downgraded from a single interchange to 2 at grade protected T intersections.

Only contact info is this:

Maike Schimpf
Project Manager
Telephone: 250 828-4976

Someone call this guy and get answers as to what the fuck happened.

NDP cheap-out just as with B.C.-19