National boundaries aren't arbitrary. Most Americans can't even enter Canada.
|
Quote:
A national border isn't exactly an arbitrary line. There might be common transnational cultural, historic, and geographic traits in the region; but a border still has very real implications - which is why Toronto exists as the "first city" of Canada and not the 1st/2nd city of the Great Lakes. |
Quote:
Prior to the current guy who's now a lifetime president or something, like the dude even altered their constitution to make sure he would remain in office to his death (that could inspire Donald Trump in a wrong way, lol), there was some kind of Shanghai team to manage their communist party. But they're gone now. The current lifetime president and his own friends may be more of Beijing individuals. So Shanghai may go slower in the coming years. That's hearsay over here. Everybody's closely watching China anyway. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And Buffalo might as well be Boise if you're downstate. It's probably still very important west of Albany, but the main connotation downstate is SUNY Buffalo. |
Quote:
Buffalo-Niagara airport is also much larger than Rochester with more destinations and significantly more passengers (5 million vs. 2.4 million). Also, since Buffalo has been on a bit of a roll lately with the huge growth of the Buffalo Niagara Medical campus (new children's hospital, new UB Med school etc.), startup companies, banking (M&T) still growing, tons of redevelopment occurring in the downtown core, it has now outpaced the Rochester Metro in GDP or Gross Metropolitan Product. Rochester has strong institutions, but Buffalo is the 2nd city of NY State. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=nsq7 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Toronto is more important to the typical Buffalonian than NYC. It's seen as cheaper, cleaner, much closer and almost as cosmopolitan and exciting as NYC.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We do feel like honorary Detroiters, being so close and tied to Detroit, but we are not Detroiters. |
Quote:
I don't think this is actually debatable. Again, the population and economies of Buffalo, Rochester and Albany are all about the same. Downstate, the biggest local reference is SUNY Buffalo. Of course there are historical differences, and Buffalo is a legacy cultural heavyweight (its art museum is better than those in much bigger cities like LA, Dallas and Toronto, it has world class parks and cultural venues, far more extensive urban fabric and big city amenities and FL Wright), but you can't really argue population or economy anymore. All three have around 1 million folks and around the same economic output. Albany's economy has grown faster over the last few decades, closing the gap. Albany has a somewhat better economy, with more tech, govt. and ed. Buffalo is the legacy big city with the bigger bones, and Rochester has the science-corporate legacy, somewhat diminished, but still decent. |
Quote:
|
As an outsider (outside NY state and outside the country), Buffalo would clearly be the second city in New York State by a wide margin. I'd guess that would also be the answer from everyone I know here.
|
I would consider Buffalo the second city of NYS for cultural relevance alone.
|
Quote:
But I think the biggest reason is legacy. Same reason Americans think Montreal is as important as Toronto, or Rio as important as SP, same reason people think the UK is still a global power. |
buffalo is new york state's second city because of sports.
believe it or not, around 80%* of the geographic awareness of the average america is due to sports. (*) i totally made that up, so don't bother refuting it. but it's probably true. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.