Quote:
Originally Posted by Cro Burnham
(Post 7454076)
On an anecdotal level, Boston simply does not have anywhere close to the scale of run down slums that cover a very large portion of Philly. Our ring of slums is pretty mind blowing in its extent. Other than those among us who have been lobotomized, we can all see this fairly plainly. But here are some facts:
Philly city poverty rate is about 26%, metro about 13%.
Boston's city rate about 22%, metro rate about 10%.
Philly median per capita income is about $23K in the City, $33K in the metro.
Boston's about $36K in the City, $40K in the metro.
Pretty stark difference. The facts clearly bear out that Boston is a much richer city. I'm not making a value statement here. I don't think Boston is better because it is richer, but it is much richer.
Not only is there a greater proportion of impoverished people in Philly, but though I am no demographer, I think the census data suggests that the impoverished of Philly are more deeply impoverished.
Again, no shock here. Why fight the facts? Accept the truth and it will set you free.
|
I don't mean to take this further down the rabbit hole, but if we're going to cite economic data, we need to consider the context.
An extremely important caveat to the "official" poverty numbers reported by the Census is that they do
not take into account cost-of-living differences. And, in a similar vein, per capita income values in Boston are simply measured on a very different scale from that of Philadelphia--it's not an apples-to-apples comparison.
To address regional disparities in purchasing power, the Census has developed a Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) that is still relatively new and not necessarily imperfect, but definitely gets much closer to measuring true poverty. Unfortunately, I don't think they've released granular enough data to measure SPM for metro areas/cities, but at least the state level, Massachusetts, supposedly one of the wealthiest states in the US, has a higher SPM than Pennsylvania
(13.8% versus 12.7%):
https://www.census.gov/content/dam/C...mo/p60-251.pdf
It stands to reason that, as both metro areas would likely be around those state averages, poverty in the Boston and Philly areas is in fact very comparable.
However, I think you're really getting at is "deep poverty," which the Philly area certainly
does have more of than Boston, which manifests itself in the form of noticeably more chronic unemployment, crime and blight (or "slums") than anything in the Boston area.
But intractable as deep poverty is for Philly, it's definitely not insurmountable, and arguably it will lessen as future generations are brought more and more into the mainstream economy as the city reaches its deindustrial recovery.
It's not about a lack of resources, but using them more wisely. And with the amount of vision and young leadership currently in the city/region that far surpasses anything that the city had for the past half-century, Philly's regeneration into a much more stable and prosperous city can and will happen in due time.