![]() |
Quote:
|
IMO the photo below shows one of the better perspectives. From many of the other angles, this building looks either too bland or a bit awkward/weird. If it looked this good from all angles, I suspect fewer people would be criticizing it.
Quote:
|
Those are really great photos, MayDay.
|
Quote:
This tower categorically has NO aesthetics. Its is a massing exercise that is 1500+ feet tall; the shape is synonymous with building a tower that is 1500 feet tall as cheaply as possible. A testament to how some developers like Extell should absolutely have no bearing on "contributing" to the NYC skyline as they tastelessly besmirch it with visual trash like this that emanates out of it. As far as Smith and Gill goes, they seem to have really needed to money from this atrocious commission; not a shred of architectural dignity is reflected on this, with the exception that is tall; a towering showcase of indifference to aesthetics or embellishment of any kind. I suppose you can split hairs by comparing it with 432 Park, but they are both different variations of the same exercise, built it tall and cheap, even if its ugly. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Glass towers aren't "cheaper" than masonry. You may not like the aesthetics, but developers don't go with glass bc they want to save money. Their glass/masonry decisionmaking is based on their perception of target market preferences, not whether they can get a deal on masonry at Home Depot or something. Geez. And 432 Park and CPT are among the most expensive residential towers ever erected, anywhere on the planet. They're the antithesis of "cheap". Quality glass is incredibly expensive, generally more expensive than masonry, and labor costs are extremely high. |
Quote:
|
^maybe he's a time traveller from the future. At current inflation rates, a Big Mac might cost $3 billion soon
|
https://www.instagram.com/p/CUu9xsDA8J2/
https://www.picuki.com/hosted-by-ins...c_sid%3D83d603 https://www.picuki.com/hosted-by-ins...c_sid%3D83d603 https://www.instagram.com/p/CUtC_txMZab/ Quote:
https://www.picuki.com/hosted-by-ins...c_sid%3D83d603 https://www.instagram.com/p/CUteJB-s35M/ https://www.picuki.com/hosted-by-ins...c_sid%3D83d603 https://www.picuki.com/hosted-by-ins...c_sid%3D83d603 https://www.picuki.com/hosted-by-ins...c_sid%3D83d603 https://www.picuki.com/hosted-by-ins...c_sid%3D83d603 https://www.picuki.com/hosted-by-ins...c_sid%3D83d603 https://www.instagram.com/p/CUq2kRFgZE-/ Quote:
|
That appears to be much too low to be the 129th floor. Or are they numbered even weirder than I thought?
|
^ I totally agree. This so-called "129th floor" looks to be only around 350 meters high, using 432 Park Ave as a reference.
|
The 129th would be somewhere close to the top.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...VLMKt5.g11.JPG |
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 2:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.