This view blocking is silly to me. Its called progression. When you build bigger something is going to get blocked from so views.
We should look at it a different way. Think of all the new views that this will create of the city. From the Citizens Bank Park on Summer nights it will be grand. Crossing the WW Bridge and so on... Just sayin'. |
Quote:
Any way to frame it to include South broad from this angle and the new SL as well Cool shots and thanks - way outside of my technical capability |
Quote:
Guess we'll need some kind of panoramic shot for that. [We're kinda demanding. :yes:] |
And One Riverside! Remember that thing?
|
Quote:
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8321/8...8f3dcfff_c.jpg |
Quote:
|
I will try to dig through some old files when I get the chance .^
It looks like Comcast basically just bought an 80% stake in the original Comcast Tower at 17th +JFK. Suppose they didn't like paying rent:). http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelp...-stake-in.html |
Quote:
No CITC reflection in the water, psh - slacker ... psych, phenomenal work!! Keep them coming :yes: |
skyline view
just 50 yards or so before you enter the WW bridge headed to NJ is IMO the expansive view of the Phila skyline, since you have to be moving in a car you can't stop and savor the view unless your in summer shore traffic.
apetrella802 |
Quote:
By the way, can't they just add four more feet to the non-spire portion of the building? That'd make it a cool 1,000' tall minus the spire. :tup: |
comcast buys 80% stake
One difference between Comcast Tower I and II is that tower II is a very highly specialized construction not a generic office building. Meaning in the far future it might not be as marketable if it even outlived its usefulness to Comcast. Then again it might be so flexible that it can transform itself into anything.
|
This new tower, as a foil for the Comcast tower, shows how elegant the original one is. The surfaces and different facade treatments give a soaring and refined impression. In contrast this new tower is a bit bulky, slab-sided, and industrial. They tried to mitigate that with the spire, but that gives it a lopsided appearance. As the Philly skyline exists now, CC, and the Liberty Place towers create a picturesque grouping.
The skyscraper group might look better in context with the spire on the opposite side of the building (or even the center of the building, like the old Hancock building in Boston, but that undermines the pure structural logic of the building. I'd love to see photoshops of those alternative spires. I'd bet either one would look better. But whatever happens, I'm sure this tower is a huge asset for Philadelphia. |
Quote:
|
comcast II & symmetry
Of course Comcast II is symmetrical along its East/West axis. Real asymmetry is the CIRA Center and the PSFS building. If you created a mirror image of the PSFS building you would have the equivalent of a left handed building and a right handed building. Just like your right and left hand. They can not be made congruent . Although PSFS is a very asymmetric design it is also balanced. If it appeared both asymmetric and unbalanced it probably would seem disturbing to most people.
Comcast II is asymmetrical along its North/South axis. Asymmetry can create tension as your eyes explore how the form changes with height or width, it adds a sense of implied movement. Compare the Bell Atlantic building in Phila. to the RCA building in NY. They seem to be somewhat similar. One is symmetric along both the N/S and E/W axes the other is asymmetric in both the N/S and E/W axes. One seems more static and the other more dynamic. Both all great designs. |
Quote:
|
Article from cbs local. Really? Hope this doesn't get stalled.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...qkskQ7jdGNq_HQ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What he said: “I think there’s going to be a lot (of neighbor concerns),” Clarke said today. “Some people simply don’t like tall buildings, as witnessed by the longstanding prohibition on buildings taller than Billy Penn’s hat. But I think there are legitimate issues with respects to the construction (time) frame, street closures, bringing in materials, workforce. This is a big building, and at the end of the day it will have some levels of impact in the surrounding community.”
What he meant: Some people just hate tall buildings, even though they live in the middle of a major city. Those arguments are just plain idiotic. But we will certainly discuss the legitimate questions/concerns about the construction process. |
Someone do a diagram....
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.