SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=223)
-   -   Development Rumours (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=139843)

kph06 Mar 22, 2024 3:00 PM

This is an interesting concept.

The developer who did the old NFB building and Tramway recently passed away. Their next project was an addition above the Halifax Club and neighboring building.

These are from the property listing advertising the potential for the site and must have been the concept for the addition.

https://cwatlantic.com/wp-content/up...ts_Renders.jpg
https://cwatlantic.com/wp-content/up...olour-edit.png
Source: Halifax Club Suites (Cushman & Wakefield Atlantic)

kph06 Mar 22, 2024 4:15 PM

Another interesting future project:

Strawberry Hill Future Growth Node

new2halifax Apr 1, 2024 5:10 PM

Apologies not sure where to ask this: Is there a thread for Spring Garden West? (did a quick search but couldn't find it). Wondering what's the status of that project...

Keith P. Apr 1, 2024 7:14 PM

You mean THIS?

new2halifax Apr 2, 2024 3:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith P. (Post 10176000)
You mean THIS?

Yes! Thank you Keith.

Musquodoboit County Apr 4, 2024 3:31 PM

Not sure where to post this:
'A significant overreach': Canada housing plan draws provincial pushback https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/a-si...back-1.6833275

Why are provinces opposed to fourplex' and four levels basically the federal government is saying here's money but you need to develop more densely. And the provinces are against this? Why ?

Patrick Matthews Apr 4, 2024 4:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Musquodoboit County (Post 10178007)
Not sure where to post this:
'A significant overreach': Canada housing plan draws provincial pushback https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/a-si...back-1.6833275

Why are provinces opposed to fourplex' and four levels basically the federal government is saying here's money but you need to develop more densely. And the provinces are against this? Why ?

There were initially, and remain some good reasons not to have 4x density on every lot?

Jstaleness Apr 4, 2024 8:20 PM

I get it from both sides. I'm not a fan of row on row of 4 Plex, Town House, Row House whatever we want to call them all over the place as well. It's better than single dwelling, but not that much over all. I love them in areas where there are mid to high rise developments in the same area as that normally works well.

Musquodoboit County Apr 5, 2024 10:49 AM

From what I understand...
The province can have billions and I mean billions of dollars for this.
And it's not going to tear down anyone's house or demolish whole neighborhoods. It simply says that the province is to allow development to be fourplex' etc.mayne I'm not understanding this. How can we say we're not interested in billions of federal money to the province for pro-development, pro housing, pro density?
I think we can afford to be pro density in Nova Scotia for decades to come. Nova Scotia is mostly un-developed. We have huge vast areas where we don't even have roads through our wilderness areas. Nova Scotia is not in an over crowded situation at all.

Keith P. Apr 5, 2024 11:18 AM

It seems to make more sense to remove or at least increase the arbitrary height limit that keeps new developments to a 7 to 8 storey max than to destroy existing single-family home neighborhood (the bane of the student urban planners everywhere and especially at HRM) by putting multi-unit houses everywhere in such neighborhoods.

Dmajackson Apr 7, 2024 4:07 PM

Scanning the permits this week and four lots jump out as future development sites that we don't have any details on.

15 Primrose Street, Dartmouth - demolition permit with no mention of future use. Lot is ~21'000 sq ft in corridor zone.

1766 Robie Street, Halifax - Vacant lot at Cedar Street with permits in place for excavation for a future multi-unit building. ~10'000 sq ft in corridor zoning.

1816 Robie Street, Halifax - Same as above but on a 13'400 sq ft lot at Cherry Street.

2542 Robie Street, Halifax - demolition permit with mention of future apartment building. Lot is 6'500 sq ft and adjacent to another recently demolished lot (at Willow). The vacant lots total 20'000 sq ft in corridor zoning.

All of these lots fall under the H.A.F. rezoning goal to allow more height in corridor zoning that is along future Rapid Transit Lines. There has been a noticeable drop in large building permits in the Regional Centre. I think once the changes get approved in May/June there is going to be a massive pile of major building permits submitted in the following weeks. It looks to me whoever owns these lots are just getting ahead of the construction rush by doing everything they can without an actual building permit.

Also not a rumour but there is a $23M building permit submitted for a new 4-storey U-Haul storage facility at 30 Atlantic Street, Dartmouth.

Empire Apr 8, 2024 9:54 AM

Height phobia pundits have been advocating infill density for years. I personally think it’s a misguided plan. We don’t do renos. well in HRM so I envision structures in the Quinpool area of quality construction and architectural merit having an offensive square box added to the roof and on the back, decked out in vinyl (if it hasn’t already happened). None of the streets in this area can accommodate the extra cars that will have no parking space.

Increase height on opportunity sites in the Kempt Rd. area and provide funding to restore quality homes. Maybe it would be advantageous to do a land swap with Windsor / Willow park and free up an extraordinary tract of prime, high density land.

This is what I sadly envision infill renos looking like:
https://www.google.com/maps/@44.6514...8192?entry=ttu

https://www.google.com/maps/@44.6526...8192?entry=ttu

https://www.google.com/maps/@44.6535...8192?entry=ttu

Colin May Apr 9, 2024 4:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith P. (Post 10178598)
It seems to make more sense to remove or at least increase the arbitrary height limit that keeps new developments to a 7 to 8 storey max than to destroy existing single-family home neighborhood (the bane of the student urban planners everywhere and especially at HRM) by putting multi-unit houses everywhere in such neighborhoods.

I often wonder if participants have children under the age of 18

Dmajackson Apr 14, 2024 3:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatscat (Post 10119087)
That 6-story Gottingen build is on an impressively tight lot. Assuming they will be tearing down some of the adjacent properties.

https://i.imgur.com/tuVbpb2.png

There is now a demolition permit submitted for 2328 GOTTINGEN STREET, currently home to Farm Assist and JJ Mart.

This is likely tied to the proposed 6-storey building shown above.

Dmajackson Apr 18, 2024 4:39 AM

I missed this on my first read of the suburban proposals list for HAF. Apparently St Thomas More Church on Caledonia Road (at Main Street), Dartmouth is requesting 25 storeys. Combine that with the 33 storeys across the street and the approved 14 storeys at Kuhn Road and this area has a lot of development potential.

Saul Goode Apr 18, 2024 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dmajackson (Post 10187346)
Apparently St Thomas More Church on Caledonia Road (at Main Street), Dartmouth is requesting 25 storeys. Combine that with the 33 storeys across the street and the approved 14 storeys at Kuhn Road and this area has a lot of development potential.

AllNS is reporting that W.M. Fares Group has actually submitted a five-building proposal for the St. Thomas More site, ranging from 19 to 27 storeys. That intersection could soon look very, very different.

IanWatson Apr 18, 2024 11:28 AM

Hopefully the city has the foresight to carve out some land there for a light rail station. That corner could be the poster child for TOD development in HRM.

OldDartmouthMark Apr 18, 2024 9:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Goode (Post 10187398)
AllNS is reporting that W.M. Fares Group has actually submitted a five-building proposal for the St. Thomas More site, ranging from 19 to 27 storeys. That intersection could soon look very, very different.

Wow!

Caledonia Apr 19, 2024 7:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dmajackson (Post 10187346)
I missed this on my first read of the suburban proposals list for HAF. Apparently St Thomas More Church on Caledonia Road (at Main Street), Dartmouth is requesting 25 storeys. Combine that with the 33 storeys across the street and the approved 14 storeys at Kuhn Road and this area has a lot of development potential.

The 14 story’s has been approved? That’s great! I know the strip along Kahn road is still not serviced by city sewer (surprisingly) so that’s a big bonus for any property owner along that small strip

Mr. Hunt Apr 23, 2024 2:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith P. (Post 9739202)
I attended a business (as HRP press releases would say) at the Dartmouth Shopping Center today. In chatting with a staff member I learned that they were unable to renew their lease and need to relocate early in 2023. The reason as they understood it was that with the possible exception of Shoppers and No Frills, the rest of the facility is scheduled for demolition and redevelopment as residential units of some sort (they were not sure exactly what). This is the first I have heard of this.

Bit of an update...so the plaza has slowly been emptying out. According to ReTales the Salvation Army store will be gone in about a month, leaving Domino's and Subway to find new homes. The plaza, except for the end stores (No Frills, Shoppers, Dollarama) will be knocked down and a new residential building will be constructed. Apparently the residential entrance will face Green Rd and there will be retail facing Wyse.


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.