Quote:
|
Quote:
As always, 1 picture is worth a thousand words. |
Quote:
Most developments are much easier for gauging progress. |
Quote:
I know that, but we do need photos to confirm things. Regardless, there's been activity on site for a while now, whatever section of the forum this thread was in at any given time had no bearing on that, and still doesn't. Of course, there are people who may not have known, but they probably wouldn't click on the thread anyway. |
Quote:
http://i.imgur.com/LBk3067.png http://i.imgur.com/obuLSq3.png http://i.imgur.com/8oAEwVU.png Man, that dollar is certainly looking weak! :koko: |
Quote:
In any case, I doubt the relative strength of the dollar has anything to do with the relative strength of the Manhattan condo market. |
Quote:
So maybe this baby will "accidently" grow 2 feet!:) |
Maybe a daredevil will climb it and weld an old pogo stick to the top of the spire. Has to happen sooner or later.
|
Quote:
|
If they do add a few feet to the spire, will there be some sort of penalty? Also, if they want to add a few more floors, would they have to go through the whole approval process again or would it be a shorter process?
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So this building could theoretically be over 2000 feet without much trouble with permitting? Do you guys see this as a possibility at all, or are we looking at a tower about the current height?
Quote:
|
Quote:
I bet the 1775' figure will stay the same and the roof will end up in the 1500' range since apparently there was an increase. |
Quote:
But we already have building permits, so why would we assume anything beyond the building permits? I believe 1490-1500 to roof and 1775 to tip. That's almost certainly the outcome, because that's what the filings indicate. |
I don't know about that....I mean, don't you think that they might just say that it's going to be a foot shorter than one wtc so nobody starts complaining, and when it is under construction, they make taller? I guess you don't think that is too likely, but that's my thinking.
Quote:
|
Don't expect a height change.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Roof height is far more important anyway, especially in NY where there are abundant pinnacles. |
Even so, the agreement still allows for a 1,775' 11" roof height with a 500' antenna. Besides economics, there's hardly a cap on height in NYC...
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.