Quote:
The blocked views don't seem to matter either. If you're in the courtyard east of the building formerly labelled "Morse's Teas", you can't see up and down the waterfront, but that doesn't seem to stop people from exploring. There are people walking around that area because it has things worth visiting (unique buildings, shops, and museums), not because of its sight lines. I think the broken up space and the contrast between open and enclosed space makes the waterfront much more interesting than it would be as a large open area. The more I think about the Queen's Marque proposal the more I see it as a huge step forward. I think it'll really tie together the central part of the waterfront and downtown. Downtown Halifax used to be very shabby and hit-or-miss; some stretches were nice but others were full of parking lots. Soon however it'll be more or less evenly built up, with few surface lots and a much greater density of things worth seeing on foot. |
I agree, I don't see anything here that will stop pedestrian flow. There are already some awkward blockages all along the waterfront, which doesn't deter people walking; and certainly the big parking lot / vacant lots don't either further up the boardwalk. This will add a really interesting dimension to the waterfront.
I actually really like the graduated pier as a new kind of public gathering space near the water, beyond the typical benches on traditional piers. I also love the idea, suggested by others above, of putting a big arch right in the middle of that central massing along Water street. That would break it up, and also bring a historic aspect to the design. And the fingers jutting out -- they're different, but again, really add something we don't have. Imagine a cafe up top there with stunning views of the waterfront? I love that, and beyond the Halifax Market roof, there's nothing similar along the waterfront for the public (the old Harbour side had something like that where you could buy a coffee and sit in that shared space, but now that's been closed off by the Hart and Thistle and now Gahan Pub). |
Quote:
|
I've been concerned about those bottlenecks as well, but the DRC agenda has been updated online and their presentation for tonights meeting is now up.
http://www.halifax.ca/boardscom/drc/...reet-8.2.1.pdf You can see if you look closely that the two passages under the building are directly in line with each other and are also 45 feet wide, much wider than any of the other significant bottlenecks along the boardwalk at the moment so I don't think this will be much of an issue. While at first I really liked the idea of putting in a large arch as the main entrance off of lower water, it would be a very awkward design as those types of formal entrances to a space should be located at the foot of a street, and not facing a big blank wall on a tight street, which is what would happen here. https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7058/...607a75d1_h.jpgqueen4 by Jonovision23, on Flickr https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7055/...fddd5680_h.jpgqueen2 by Jonovision23, on Flickr https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7238/...8b5a68b9_h.jpgqueen3 by Jonovision23, on Flickr https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7334/...56378e4a_h.jpgqueen by Jonovision23, on Flickr |
If you think about it, in many ways the overall form is similar to Bishop's Landing.
I don't think I realized when looking at the original pics that this thing is actually about 9-10 stories tall. That'll be sure to cause a ruckus. |
Quote:
Bishop's Landing was a pretty big win for the waterfront despite its shortcomings so I think this one will be too. Quote:
|
The Queen's marque proposal earned rave reviews at Design Review Committee last night. An approval vote is months away but members gave full marks to the concept. Quoted by ANS, committee member and architect Anna Sampson said, "It is a pleasure to look at the renderings of a building and understand what you were trying to do with the architecture. That was a beautiful moment."
|
That sounds like celebrity-architect-swooning from one architect to another. I find it odd that the general reaction I have heard is not very positive yet the DRC loves it.
|
Quote:
my initial reaction was its good - i like it, but meh the more i look at it - the more i like it |
Quote:
|
Regardless of my feeling on Queen's Marque (I like some things, don't like others, am very unimpressed with the centre block portion) Halifax's DRC is kinda...easy to impress.
|
It's not what I was expecting and I have some definite reservations, but it is also impressive in many ways, and it's growing on me as well.
This is not really the right attitude, but when I see views like the one in this video, my reaction is to think: I don't even care, just start building over those massive parking lots ASAP... https://www.facebook.com/flitelab/vi...7966685902781/ |
Quote:
...and get rid of the creepy floating humans in the 'public art' area (though I know that will not be as rendered)! :haha: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think overall it's a beautiful proposal, but there are some things that could be changed. But it's an easy net-improvement to what is in the waterfront now, especially if they retain some space for existing kiosks in the plaza or just on the other side. |
I'm also liking this proposal more and more, especially the public-facing elements. This really creates a nice public space for people to sit, hang, lounge near the water.
|
(Repost from the Canada section.)
Construction prep is starting for Queen's Marque in Halifax and they are doing some interesting work to preserve marine habitat while the new structure is built. They're going to install some concrete blocks meant to act as artificial reefs. These will provide extra places for bottom dwelling plants and animals to live. They are adding the blocks because the building will extend into the water permanently, but also because they are going to use cofferdam construction for underground parking that will be below sea level. This means that for a while there will be a dam structure extending out from the waterfront and they will pump out the water so that they can work on dry land that used to be the harbour floor. Blocks: https://scontent-sea1-1.cdninstagram...68426511_n.jpg Here's the development (with residential portion highlighted in this rendering): https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnqjTYhXgAAGemh.jpg:large Source |
Quote:
Apparently climate change and sea level rise combined with a major fall storm is of little concern to Armour Group and WDC. |
Quote:
Maybe it's just me, or maybe it's the fault of the artist who did these conceptions of the development, or maybe it's the design itself, but the look of this thing just has not impressed me from day one. It just seems bland and monolithic. |
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlSpc87Jfr0 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think you can get away with a somewhat stark building like this if the quality of construction and materials is relatively good. That's what the developer is promising, and that's what a lot of existing MacKay Lyons-Sweetapple buildings are like (I have been hoping for a large, urban, non-institutional building from them for Halifax for a while). Hopefully the development lives up to that. Either way the style is not going to be for everybody but if the quality is good it will add some nice contrast. Aside from the design I think it's also filling a big hole in the city. To take one example, it looks like the space around Lower Water Street and the narrow lane beside the museum is going to "work" again once this building goes in. The space between buildings is more what the city would have been like before the waterfront demolitions of the 1950's-70's. http://media1.fdncms.com/thecoast/im...235/queen3.jpg (Looking at this image, the projection also seems different from what you would see in person. It's exaggerating the scale of the building and the open spaces; that is good if you want to make something look impressive and monumental but it's not going to appeal to those who prefer "human-scaled buildings".) |
Is the residential building literally called "The Bland"?
I like the starkness of that rendering. It has a very european look and interface with the area. I agree that if the materials are done well, it would be good. |
Quote:
|
I really do hope the design gets a revamp. I am not a lover of it. I think they can do much better for such a Marquee site......
|
Quote:
|
Will it be built when Cogswell is being torn down ? Seems sensible to wait until Cogswell is closed and Lower Water is free from 60 foot truck trailer combos.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just wondering........... I always hated those trucks in the downtown core. They seemed so incongruous. |
And if I may offer my own personal opinion on the Queen's Marque project:
The massing on Lower water Street doesn't bother me, but I have serious misgivings about the harbor facing portion of the project. It just doesn't seem to blend in well with the ambience of the remainder of the harbor front, and to my mind breaks up the character of the boardwalk way too much. I think they can do better........... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
its a shame the MMA isnt getting more space, but i suppose not really surprising. the Province is having trouble keeping its existing museums operating, let alone expanding one. the sackville project looks good. i think that will only happen if some corp gives a big grant or the feds pony up the $$. |
Quote:
I would rather see a larger number of developments with smaller footprints even if it takes longer for some of the lackluster older buildings like the Maritime Museum to be redeveloped. The waterfront will be fairly consistently well-used if Queen's Marque is built along with the Cunard Block and the smaller more seasonal market buildings and the like end up on the Salter and Waterfront Warehouse lots. |
From today's Queens Marque newsletter:
"As of Monday, October 3rd, 2016 the Queen’s Marque site will be closed to prepare for the district’s development. Some changes will occur due to this exciting progression towards construction. The Queen’s Landing parking lot (1707 Lower Water Street) will close on Monday, October 3rd. The Cable Wharf parking lot (1751 Lower Water Street) will close in early October." |
There is a report going to Regional Council tomorrow regarding Queen's Marquee. WDC is looking to purchase 72m² of land to allow for the proposal. In exchange they will give up 390m² for Lower Water Street's R.O.W.
http://www.halifax.ca/council/agenda...004ca14110.pdf EDIT: It should be noted that while the extra right-of-way will be helpful for Lower Water Street the main pinch point is located south of this area at the Johnston Building so this proposal in itself won't fix the street. |
EDIT: It should be noted that while the extra right-of-way will be helpful for Lower Water Street the main pinch point is located south of this area at the Johnston Building so this proposal in itself won't fix the street.[/QUOTE]
the Johnson building is west - Corner of Barrington and Prince. this doesn't actually change the width of the street all that much. the streetline as defined runs through the Robertson store at the MMA, and encompass property that isnt owned by the city. the strip they want to buy is likely an old sewer outlet into the harbour, long since disused and infilled. |
Construction fencing was up when I drove by tonight.
|
Kind of incredible how successful Armour Group has been these past few years. RBC Waterside really set the precedent for modern/historical blended buildings in the downtown core, and their technology campus investments in Bedford (multiple new interconnected buildings, one going up right now and more on the way) really show their commitment to the success of Halifax. I hope this one goes as well as others!
|
Context
https://c7.staticflickr.com/6/5731/2...61a86b47_b.jpgHalifax Harbourfront by Denise Lynn R, on Flickr |
Design Review Committee Report - Queen's Marque
It is recommended that the Design Review Committee: 1. Approve the qualitative elements of the substantive site plan approval application for the mixeduse development on lands located at 1721-1735 Lower Water Street, Halifax, as contained in Attachment A, with the conditions that: a) the southern portion of the Lower Water Street streetwall be articulated with an upper storey streetwall stepback; b) all flat rooftops, which are generally inaccessible to the building’s occupants, be landscaped with roof tolerant vegetation; and c) the sandstone bar be clad with Wallace sandstone; 2. Approve twelve of the thirteen identified variances to the Land Use By-law requirements, as contained in Attachment D; the only exception being the variance request for maximum streetwall height along the southern portion of the Lower Water Street frontage; 3. Accept the findings of the quantitative Wind Impact Assessment, as contained in Attachment E; and 4. Recommend that the Development Officer accept the provision of publicly accessible amenity or open space, the provision of public art, and the provision of exemplary sustainable building practices as the post-bonus height public benefit for the development. |
Wallace Sandstone, learn something new everyday:
http://www.virtualmuseum.ca/sgc-cms/...sh&ex=00000541 |
Quote:
|
This was also approved tonight by the DRC. The vote was apparently unanimous with no conditions even though staff had recommended against some of the requested variances, including the street wall setback along Lower Water.
http://www.metronews.ca/news/halifax...-approved.html |
Quote:
I think this is one of a minority of the proposals in Halifax that you can say has some unique local flavour in a positive way. Many of the others are nice but generic looking and could have come from a number of Canadian cities. You wouldn't get a solid looking building like this on the West Coast, you wouldn't get a waterfront building like this in non-waterfront cities (or the finger wharf type footprint almost anywhere), and smaller cities in Atlantic Canada rarely get developments on this scale. |
Quote:
It would just make the whole thing a bit more open and transparent. |
Work is well underway on site as well as further along the waterfront where all of the kiosks are to be set up for next season.
https://c6.staticflickr.com/6/5540/3...19188071_k.jpg20161202_145804_HDR by Jonovision23, on Flickr https://c7.staticflickr.com/6/5823/3...a38daf14_k.jpg20161202_145723_HDR by Jonovision23, on Flickr https://c1.staticflickr.com/6/5620/3...9632b07c_k.jpg20161202_145137 by Jonovision23, on Flickr https://c4.staticflickr.com/6/5461/3...1fd4edb4_k.jpg20161202_145244_HDR by Jonovision23, on Flickr |
Moving right along!
https://scontent-sea1-1.cdninstagram...03610368_n.jpg brintonphotography on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brintonphotography/?hl=en Quote:
|
All the kiosks have been moved to the far side of the Salter block and will eventually be put into a newly built area behind the Smiling Goat beer garden.
https://c3.staticflickr.com/1/748/31...ee7431fa_k.jpg20161207_131347_HDR by Jonovision23, on Flickr |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 4:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.