ATLANTA | Alliance II
 

Topped out shots from this past April:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...-04-09075b.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...-18-09003b.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...-18-09013b.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...-18-09064b.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...-18-09074b.jpg

Looks like this could be a decent building, but it's hard to tell with those massive watermarks in the way. Ugh.

Sorry about the 'watermarks', i don't like having to put them there either but i've had way too many of my photos copied from this site and used in websites, magazines and brochures without my permission or release. If photos could be protected from reproduction from this and other similar sites i would not have to watermark them.

nice job joe.

any site can protect pics from being copied, i wonder why SSP doesn't.

Can SSP stop screen captures?

All it takes is a quick screen cap and some editing, and you're done. Sure, it is not as high quality as the original, but it is good enough for the pamphlets, brochures, and web use that Joe is talking about. I'm not a professional, so I really don't care to watermark my photos, but if I start seeing that people are stealing them I'm going to be pretty pissed.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2466/...0c5c4cc5_b.jpg

When I post pictures I dont mark them. I dont because I thought that you had to acnowledge the origional poster or your post would be deleted. Isin't that correct?

That is correct, but what we are talking about is the ability to steal images from the internet and claim them as your own. I took a screen cap of Joe's image to show atl2phx why disabling right/command click on SSP would not prevent theft of images. No matter what SSP does, they can't stop people from stealing images posted here, and that is probably why Joe has decided to watermark his photos.

BTW, if you'd like me to delete the image, Joe, just let me know.