|
Quote:
also, old does not mean historic :runaway: |
So I just saw someone in Facebook claim that the antenna on 1000 Lake Shore Drive was not actually dismantled, but blew off in a storm after years of disuse with parts of it landing on the beach across the drive. Is that total nonsense or true? They said they remember riding a bus on the drive and seeing a chunk of it embedded or stabbed into the sand.
|
^That seems pretty unlikely—but I don't know how to completely disprove such a claim.
Chicago Tribune archives include no mention of any such incident. |
Yeah seems pretty dubious to me and no mention of it elsewhere online. Perhaps there is a seed of truth to it like that a piece of it or some equipment got blown off of it one time. Maybe that happened and this guy is remembering it as "the antenna fell off". Maybe a bit did blow off of it and then the city made them take the whole mast down?
Do you know when they took the mast down? Apparently the reason the penthouse is so huge on this building was to house the transmitter equipment. Would be interesting to explore the penthouse of this building and see what they are doing with that space today. |
WTTW moved its transmitter to the Sears Tower mast in 1974, I think, but that doesn't mean they took down their old antenna immediately. And it might well have been subsequently leased out for two-way radio or similar use. I'm pretty sure I can see it in the 1972 aerials, but probably not in the 1983 aerials.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
At the end of the day though, some of these get torn down because the buildings are in pretty bad shape to begin with which costs more to fix than to just tear it down and building something new. That needs to be taken into account. Buildings are old and when you don't take care of a lot of old buildings, they are going to deteriorate into a mess. I'm not saying all of them are like this but I think that people just assume all these buildings are in amazing shape and are simple to fix. |
Quote:
|
speaking of preservation/lack thereof, theres an article in the Trib about this restored former dairy in LP which of course is getting torn down for some 3 lot concrete mansion. incredibly sad, the photos and history of what the owners did with this place is inspiring
https://www.chicagotribune.com/colum...mbu-story.html https://www.zumper.com/apartments-fo...ark-chicago-il im not against all teardowns, but stuff like this really hurts. and yes, i know that neighborhood has already irrevocably changed. but this mindset (aka paying 6 MIL simply to tear down a well preserved existing property) is some real end of rome shit |
Quote:
It's crazy that shit like this is allowed, but zoning prevents multi-family from being built in the majority of the city. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Honestly guys, the Dairy and those mutilated two flats are not the biggest problem here. Those buildings pale in comparison to the endless parade of excellent prewar stock all over the South and West side that is mercilessly plowed under on a daily basis. When you see greystone 3 flats biting the dust all over Garfield and Lawndale and Englewood, I'm really not concerned about a Chicago common building that is only relevant at all because it had an interesting historical use.
To me the main outrage of stuff like the Dairy is the sheer wastefulness of it. It's a perfectly serviceable building and now all those finishes are going to wind up in the landfill. |
Quote:
I might put together some stats later on south vs. West. Vs. North side/downtown demo. It might surprise some people. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 7:54 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.