SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Canada (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   What would happen if the Oregon Country/Columbia District was given to Canada (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=243661)

YUNEMUS Aug 25, 2020 4:37 PM

What would happen if the Oregon Country/Columbia District was given to Canada
 
What would happen if the (Oregon Country / Columbia District) was given to Canada by Oregon Treaty?

What would happen if highlighted disputed area of Oregon Country / Columbia District was given to Canada ?

How it would affect Seattle and Vancouver (BC)?



https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...goncountry.png

Denscity Aug 25, 2020 5:23 PM

That would be cool. I could drive from Castlegar along the Columbia River all the way to BC's former capitol Vancouver Washington. With a stop at The Gorge for an outdoor concert lol.

MolsonExport Aug 25, 2020 5:26 PM

I know what would happen. The Oregon Country/Columbia District would belong to Canada.

Sewciu85 Aug 25, 2020 7:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MolsonExport (Post 9021774)
I know what would happen. The Oregon Country/Columbia District would belong to Canada.

Lmao!
This question needs to be asked during the next leadership debate!

WhipperSnapper Aug 25, 2020 7:31 PM

Nuclear War would have ended civilization in the 1960s so thank whoever you thank this was never given to the Brits.

Architype Aug 26, 2020 1:19 AM

What would happen is BC would be the most populous or second most populous province in Canada, shifting the power balance west. :cool:

harls Aug 26, 2020 3:47 AM

Disputed area made me think of this..

Video Link

YUNEMUS Aug 28, 2020 6:25 AM

At least Boeing and Microsoft would have been Canadian companies:cheers::)


.

VANRIDERFAN Aug 28, 2020 7:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YUNEMUS (Post 9025058)
At least Boeing and Microsoft would have been Canadian companies:cheers::)


.

Maybe.

SignalHillHiker Aug 28, 2020 11:32 AM

Probably not much. Canada is exceptionally bad at this sort of nation building. If we’d gotten Alaska, I’m sure Anchorage today would be no bigger than Prince Rupert. And the same for this territory, unless Vancouver consequently developed farther south. But Canada definitely would never accomplish two large cities on the west coast.

VANRIDERFAN Aug 28, 2020 2:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker (Post 9025101)
Probably not much. Canada is exceptionally bad at this sort of nation building. If we’d gotten Alaska, I’m sure Anchorage today would be no bigger than Prince Rupert. And the same for this territory, unless Vancouver consequently developed farther south. But Canada definitely would never accomplish two large cities on the west coast.

If Canada was in control of the PNW (including Alaska) there is no guarantee that the likes of Boeing or Microsoft would establish themselves in Canada. We have a poor record of growing great establishment of the likes of those giants.

Look at our sports and entertainment. Until the NHL was wholly taken over by Americans it was going to remain a niche sport confined to New England and the Great Lakes region. It wasn't until the American Bettman pushed the NHL to expand into non traditional markets. Would that have happened if the head office remained in Toronto or Montreal? I highly doubt it.

Our entertainment industry (English) is a laughable and anyone with an ounce of talents seems to head to the states as soon as they can.

Same with our Universities both in research and sports. Every Canadian kid in sports seems to have dreams of getting a NCAA scholarship or an Ivy League Law degree. Our schools are content to not do the work to make it attractive for the best student and student athletes to stay in Canada.

On the professional sports side we laugh at the leagues that remain in Canada (CFL, CPL, CEBL) and only seem to care or feel validated if Toronto is playing New York vice playing Edmonton.

Hell we can't even muster the courage to renovate our Prime Minister's Official Residence!

Canada is a cheap, small minded provincial country. We could be so much more
but our inferiority complex holds us back.

MonctonRad Aug 28, 2020 2:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN (Post 9025202)
Canada is a cheap, small minded provincial country. We could be so much more
but our inferiority complex holds us back.

It's as much a problem with "tall poppy syndrome" as it is with a chronic inferiority complex.

Canadians tend to be incredibly envious of other peoples success, and will do everything in their power to drag them down........

Innsertnamehere Aug 28, 2020 2:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YUNEMUS (Post 9025058)
At least Boeing and Microsoft would have been Canadian companies:cheers::)


.

They just would be located somewhere else. Maybe California. Those companies wouldn't develop in Canada. Boeing is a a machine in the US Military industrial complex, and Microsoft was reliant on US venture capital. Neither would happen north of the border.


Canada would likely have a much higher population and Vancouver would be a small backwater town. Seattle would likely be Canada's #2 city above Montreal, and a huge portion of the country's growth would be happening in the area due to the favourable climate (Canada without the cold!) and accessibility to the Californian economy.

WhipperSnapper Aug 28, 2020 3:06 PM

I can't get around that everything that happened in the last 200 years would have still happened if the Brits ended up with the territory.


Re: Microsoft
Let's keep in mind Elon Musk has(d) Canadian citizenship and studied at Queens before heading to Pittsburgh(?). His eyes were always on Silicon Valley. Best place to raise capital and plenty of buyers willing to shell out hundreds of millions/billions when you are ready to exit. Much of that just has to do with the scale of the United States. For example, you need national distribution to sell 40 million loufas in Canada. The same can be accomplished regional in most parts of the US.

MolsonExport Aug 28, 2020 4:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YUNEMUS (Post 9025058)
At least Boeing and Microsoft would have been Canadian companies:cheers::)


.

This is so speculative it doesn't really merit discussion.

Dengler Avenue Aug 28, 2020 4:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MolsonExport (Post 9025366)
This is so speculative it doesn't really merit discussion.

You really are grilling with your realism.

MolsonExport Aug 28, 2020 4:35 PM

What would happen if Canada had 500 million people?
What would happen if Baffin Island was tropical?
What would happen if Alberta had no fossil fuel resources?
What would happen if Canada was majority French-speaking?
What would happen if Winnipeg had a port on the ocean?
What would happen if Canada were an Island like Australia is, and 10K kms away from the Excited States?

Dengler Avenue Aug 28, 2020 4:38 PM

Actually, the 2nd one isn’t all that far-fetched at this rate, but it sure will be disastrous.
The 4th one, I think there’s already a thread on it, but bref threads get hidden all the time.

JHikka Aug 28, 2020 8:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YUNEMUS (Post 9025058)
At least Boeing and Microsoft would have been Canadian companies:cheers::)/COLOR]

???

That's not how this works at all.

Architype Aug 28, 2020 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere (Post 9025229)
They just would be located somewhere else. Maybe California. Those companies wouldn't develop in Canada. Boeing is a a machine in the US Military industrial complex, and Microsoft was reliant on US venture capital. Neither would happen north of the border.


Canada would likely have a much higher population and Vancouver would be a small backwater town. Seattle would likely be Canada's #2 city above Montreal, and a huge portion of the country's growth would be happening in the area due to the favourable climate (Canada without the cold!) and accessibility to the Californian economy.

If Michigan was a part of Canada, would Toronto be a small backwater town?? Conversely, what would happen if the Niagara Escarpment was the US border?

Vancouver actually has a special, even geographically unique setting with a great harbour and lots of agriculturally fertile land nearby. It's the most northerly location suitable for a large city on the coast.

YUNEMUS Aug 29, 2020 6:23 AM

The funny thing is that there would be two cities called Vancouver.

Architype Aug 29, 2020 6:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YUNEMUS (Post 9026123)
The funny thing is that there would be two cities called Vancouver.

But there are two cities called Vancouver. If the British had retained it all there would only be one.

YUNEMUS Aug 29, 2020 2:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Architype (Post 9026126)
But there are two cities called Vancouver. If the British had retained it all there would only be one.

Yes one of them is Vancouver BC other one is Vancouver WA.
But with this new scenario, both cities would have been in the same province.
( If the British had obtained highlighted disputed area as indicated on the map.)


.

MolsonExport Aug 29, 2020 2:54 PM

I think if the Oregon Country/Columbia District was given to Canada, we may have needed to fight a war to retain it over the long run. A war that we most certainly would have lost. The USA takes what it wants.

Architype Aug 31, 2020 3:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YUNEMUS (Post 9026257)
Yes one of them is Vancouver BC other one is Vancouver WA.
But with this new scenario, both cities would have been in the same province.
( If the British had obtained highlighted disputed area as indicated on the map.)


.

Then our Vancouver would have had a different name, still a similar city, but with much more population to the south. Different political borders would have resulted in a different population distribution, with more to the south still hugging the border. However, our Vancouver would still be a city because of the geography we have here.


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.