SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Austin (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=446)
-   -   Austin | 415 Colorado | 640 Feet | 47 Floors | Complete (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=240713)

The ATX Oct 18, 2019 3:11 PM

Austin | 415 Colorado | 640 Feet | 47 Floors | Complete
 
There was a post(s) about this being a potential tower site a while back - in the update thread probably. But it's official now because a site plan for a "high rise office tower" project named "Tower 5c" was filed this morning. Specific tower info is not yet available.

https://abc.austintexas.gov/web/perm...pertyrsn=91634


Here's the location from Streetview:

https://i.imgur.com/DOYt87X.png

We vs us Oct 18, 2019 3:14 PM

Adios to another lil chunk of the Warehouse District.

Jdawgboy Oct 18, 2019 3:26 PM

Yea, so long what little street activity is left along that side of Colorado. Used to be such a vibrant segment.

Syndic Oct 18, 2019 4:42 PM

Hmm, that is a little sad. I like that little stretch of Colorado. it's cozy. I don't get why they can't focus on developing the big-ass parking lot right next door.

Mopacs Oct 18, 2019 5:09 PM

Does this include the original Alamo Drafthouse building?

zrx299 Oct 18, 2019 6:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Syndic (Post 8721224)
Hmm, that is a little sad. I like that little stretch of Colorado. it's cozy. I don't get why they can't focus on developing the big-ass parking lot right next door.

Seriously.
Do we have to bulldoze every single block downtown and replace it with sterile glass boxes, soul-less lobbies, and $10 inward-facing coffee shops that cater only to the 9-5 crowd?

Not anti-development at all, but a quick glance at an up to date satellite photo shows plenty of surface lots that could/should be developed first.

We vs us Oct 18, 2019 6:28 PM

All those surface lots are being squatted on by Nate Paul.

Not even kidding.

GoldenBoot Oct 18, 2019 6:41 PM

Looks like Rudy Garza's engineering company is working on this building.

KevinFromTexas Oct 18, 2019 6:50 PM

That sucks. I love all the new high rises, but you have to maintain a balance in the neighborhood otherwise you're going to lose the original character of it so that it doesn't exist anymore. There are still significant vacant lots where high rises could go in that neighborhood. It's unlikely that any new lowrise buildings would be built on those lots, so it makes sense to focus on them for highrises instead. Give the neighborhood meaningful infill while maintaining the character that has been helping to support the new growth in the first place.

paul78701 Oct 18, 2019 8:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mopacs (Post 8721264)
Does this include the original Alamo Drafthouse building?

I would guess not. Walmart recently renovated and is occupying that building with their first tech incubator hub.

https://corporate.walmart.com/newsro...n-austin-texas
https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...-tech-hub.html

Jdawgboy Oct 18, 2019 10:18 PM

It would be one thing if they actually incorporated music/club venue space into the project but they won't. So piece by piece what was once a vibrant district with a ton of pedestrian activity is now only a shadow of it's former self.

Syndic Oct 19, 2019 2:23 AM

I'm a Yimby but I'm telling y'all, we need to make some demands of these developers. We need to assert some control over what they're building in place of these beloved establishments.

Jdawgboy Oct 19, 2019 4:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Syndic (Post 8721907)
I'm a Yimby but I'm telling y'all, we need to make some demands of these developers. We need to assert some control over what they're building in place of these beloved establishments.

Agreed:cheers:

paul78701 Oct 19, 2019 2:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Syndic (Post 8721907)
I'm a Yimby but I'm telling y'all, we need to make some demands of these developers. We need to assert some control over what they're building in place of these beloved establishments.

I understand where you're coming from in general, but in this case, Searsucker has been closed for a while. I like Lonesome Dove and Chinatown, but I don't know of anyone who thinks of them as beloved. Also, they do have other locations.

They do need to replace the loss of the restaurant/retail spots on the ground floor of their new building though. It would be irresponsible not to IMHO.

At least this building will likely make the ugly backside of 405 Colorado less visible.

StoOgE Oct 19, 2019 8:30 PM

Yeah, this block has been a graveyard for new bars for decades other than Chinatown. I agree we need to demand restraint and bars in all of these buildings.

George_Blume Oct 20, 2019 12:30 AM

I think you’re going to be excited.

The ATX Oct 20, 2019 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George_Blume (Post 8722568)
I think you’re going to be excited.

Which properties other than 415 Colorado are involved? Can you say who the developer is? Gensler is apparently the architect. :)

chinchaaa Oct 20, 2019 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by George_Blume (Post 8722568)
I think you’re going to be excited.

Give us a hint, George!

George_Blume Oct 20, 2019 12:50 AM

I’m sure someone will find the elevations soon.

The ATX Oct 20, 2019 12:53 AM

^^^ That probably means they will be posted for AULCC as soon as next week.

Also, in two to four weeks we'll have some specific tower info like the floor count, use(s), developer, etc. after the formal site plan goes into review.

The ATX Oct 20, 2019 1:01 AM

The backup files for the October Design Commission meeting will most likely be posted online next Friday 10/25. So the the first elevations and/or renderings for several significant projects including this one could be available at that time. AULCC files are typically posted on Thursdays and Fridays. So we could have some good info about several projects at the end of next week.

The ATX Oct 20, 2019 2:02 AM

Not that this means much, but I'll post it anyway. After I saw the site plan, I did a little research to see if I could find out who the developer was.

So far the only property publicly tied to this project is 415 Colorado. That property and the neighboring 409 Colorado building are both owned by Dorot LP. The Dorot LP has an address in the Austonian tower and appears to be owned by a former Florida lawyer. 409 Colorado is the home of the joint Walmart IT/Microsoft cloud computing project. I thought Walmart owned the building, but I guess not. So that property could be part of this project. The Walmart/Microsoft project was formed to migrate Walmart's IT systems to Microsoft's cloud. So they could be close to finishing up with that project and not need the space any longer. The Lonesome Dove and Chinatown property on the corner at 419 Colorado has different ownership. The only other property that could be part of this project is the former Frank's at 407 Colorado which has a different owner than the other 400 block properties.

KevinFromTexas Oct 20, 2019 4:06 AM

I wanna big bad tower that tips its hat to the Frost Bank Tower.

The ATX Oct 20, 2019 9:31 PM

This project started off with one strike against it because it's another project nibbling away at the Warehouse District. But at the very least, this project will largely hide the least attractive side of 405 Colorado. And I know a lot of you are now thinking "Which side would that be?"

Geckos_Rule Oct 21, 2019 2:58 PM

Yeah, this is taking away from the warehouse district, but from the looks of it, it's going to be on a pretty small footprint. At least unless its neighbors are included, but that would mean either Lonesome Dove closing (which we've heard nothing about) or the wal-mart space going away, which is unlikely.

So either way, this looks like a small avenue-type building -- meaning no giant parking podium....

The ATX Oct 23, 2019 8:00 PM

Jan Buchholz checks city permits and Travis County property records too. I think the Tower 5c site will be everything north of The Molar.

https://i2.wp.com/atxrealestatenews....pg?w=504&ssl=1
https://atxrealestatenews.com/2019/1...ned-plus-more/

The ATX Oct 23, 2019 8:11 PM

The site plan application lists the limit of construction as .51 acres or 22215.6 Sq. Ft. Maybe someone can translate that to the probable footprint.

Jdawgboy Oct 23, 2019 8:12 PM

We definitely need to push the city council in requiring music venue space going forward.

H2O Oct 26, 2019 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 8727181)
The site plan application lists the limit of construction as .51 acres or 22215.6 Sq. Ft. Maybe someone can translate that to the probable footprint.

That square footage suggests it is all three remaining buildings on the block. I don't believe any of them host live music though.

zrx299 Oct 26, 2019 2:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H2O (Post 8730018)
That square footage suggests it is all three remaining buildings on the block. I don't believe any of them host live music though.

The block of remaining buildings there is roughly 170' x 170' = 28,900 sqft
using crude Google map's measurement tool

If we're going to be mowing down more existing buildings that have a bit of architectural character to them and are human-scaled, instead of using any of the surface lots to build on, then this better be a goddamn signature tower.
It would be an entirely different conversation if there were no open space left, or no other lots to build on.

Jdawgboy Oct 27, 2019 1:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zrx299 (Post 8730061)
The block of remaining buildings there is roughly 170' x 170' = 28,900 sqft
using crude Google map's measurement tool

If we're going to be mowing down more existing buildings that have a bit of architectural character to them and are human-scaled, instead of using any of the surface lots to build on, then this better be a goddamn signature tower.
It would be an entirely different conversation if there were no open space left, or no other lots to build on.

Agreed.

Yea none of those buildings are club/music venues but they once were. I feel that if they are going to tear up the rest of the warehouses then at least put in some sort of entertainment space ground level.

KevinFromTexas Oct 27, 2019 6:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zrx299 (Post 8730061)
The block of remaining buildings there is roughly 170' x 170' = 28,900 sqft
using crude Google map's measurement tool

If we're going to be mowing down more existing buildings that have a bit of architectural character to them and are human-scaled, instead of using any of the surface lots to build on, then this better be a goddamn signature tower.
It would be an entirely different conversation if there were no open space left, or no other lots to build on.

The Google Earth measurement tool is actually pretty accurate as I've compared it to the numbers that the building site plans have listed. They list the widths and lengths for buildings, and I've been able to measure their locations in Google Earth and the numbers match. As long as you're zooming in nice and close, you can get the numbers nice and close. Also, the old Edwin Waller map of downtown lists the block sizes and lot sizes, so you can measure against those using Google Earth to double check.

We vs us Oct 27, 2019 1:00 PM

It's interesting that the Wal Mart Innovation Lab or whatever it is seems to be included in this footprint. When it was announced a couple of years back, it was supposed to be a relatively big thing, and I didn't get a sense that it was supposed to be temporary, or have a sunset date.

I wonder if they'll be a tenant in the new building.

The ATX Nov 24, 2019 12:47 AM

I didn't see it mentioned yet, but this tower is a Ryan Companies project as well as the 321 W. 6th St. project. We should have more info including height by Wednesday or as soon as Monday - unless the Thanksgiving Holiday slows the flow of info.

The ATX Nov 25, 2019 7:50 PM

The formal site plan posted online was disappointingly short of tower specifics. But it will be 470K - to 490K Sq. Ft. of office space over 17 levels of parking with a 10K Sq. Ft. restaurant. It didn't say how many office levels there would be or if any of the parking levels were underground. This could be around 40-stories I'm guessing.

https://abc.austintexas.gov/attachme...g1Y9820g%3D%3D

The ATX Nov 25, 2019 8:13 PM

A Development Assessment for Demo was posted online today.

https://abc.austintexas.gov/web/perm...pertyrsn=91634

We vs us Nov 25, 2019 8:37 PM

Moving fast.

The ATX Nov 25, 2019 9:08 PM

It's confirmed that the project will take out the the rest of the 400 block.

https://i.imgur.com/MDkI6T8.png

The ATX Nov 26, 2019 10:52 PM

We should get some renderings Monday if not sooner. This on the HLC agenda for the 12/02 meeting. Notice that it says "partial demolition of warehouse buildings". They must be planning on using the facades in the new building.

https://i.imgur.com/SK2i3gt.png

MichaelB Nov 26, 2019 11:27 PM

See towers article now!

The ATX Nov 26, 2019 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelB (Post 8760008)
See towers article now!

https://austin.towers.net/meet-tower...-and-colorado/

This is one of the sketches on George Blume's Instagram.

https://austin.towers.net/wp-content...4809267714.jpg
https://austin.towers.net/wp-content...4805420904.jpg
https://austin.towers.net/wp-content...ion_detail.jpg

the Genral Nov 26, 2019 11:54 PM

It looks like this might have rounded corner(s). If that's the case, this pleases me. I kind of wish it was a 700 footer though. Something in height between the Independant and 6X. I really like the top of the building, not sure if you would call it a crown, at least not in a conventional way, the openings exposing some interior is pretty cool. I wonder if any of that would be visable from below or from a distance. This is very close to what I've been waiting for, except 10 floors shorter. I just showed the renderings to my chihuahua and she just turned away and buried herself under the blanket. What do dogs know anyway:shrug:

clubtokyo Nov 27, 2019 12:00 AM

I like the design, especially the round part. The top also looks amazing.

The ATX Nov 27, 2019 12:12 AM

We now have 15 towers in development that are over 500'. That doesn't even include some planned projects that should be well over that height like Block 190, Railyard Condos site x 2, and 321 W. 6th.

zrx299 Nov 27, 2019 12:42 AM

At least they are making an attempt to incorporate 409 Colorado's facade. It'd be nice if the building itself was incorporated into it, instead of just some lame half-ass attempt at bolt-on wall decor.

We vs us Nov 27, 2019 12:45 AM

That’s a cylinder, or my name isn’t we vs us. Immediately 65% more interesting than most of the other stuff we’ve been seeing.

Jdawgboy Nov 27, 2019 1:17 AM

That is a cool design and definitely rounded rather than squared but I too wish this was taller than it is proposed, especially considering it will be cady corner to 6X Guad. still another 600+ footer is nothing to sneeze at. At least it isn't another 595 or just under 700 sort of situation since those irritate me more. It's like why not just at 10 or 15 feet more to push it to the next level sort of thing..

The ATX Nov 27, 2019 1:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jdawgboy (Post 8760107)
That is a cool design and definitely rounded rather than squared but I too wish this was taller than it is proposed, especially considering it will be cady corner to 6X Guad. still another 600+ footer is nothing to sneeze at. At least it isn't another 595 or just under 700 sort of situation since those irritate me more. It's like why not just at 10 or 15 feet more to push it to the next level sort of thing..

FYI... 321 W. 6th is the project that will be caddy corner to 6XG.

Jdawgboy Nov 27, 2019 2:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 8760115)
FYI... 321 W. 6th is the project that will be caddy corner to 6XG.

ooooooooohhhh. This is the one at 5th and Colorado. My bad, I get so confused with these names plus theres so much going on it's hard to keep them in order. Actually I think the height works for that location. I just hope they incorporate entertainment venues at ground level such as music venues.

paul78701 Nov 27, 2019 3:20 AM

The old Frank building is not a part of this and is going to keep standing. It will be similar to the Roosevelt Room after Hanover Republic is built.


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.