SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Downtown & City of Vancouver (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=163)
-   -   1800-1898 Main Street (East 2nd & Main) | 106ft | 11fl (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=237558)

lokyin Jan 30, 2019 6:17 PM

1800-1898 Main Street (East 2nd & Main) | 106ft | 11fl
 
https://images.dailyhive.com/2019012...ary-2019-5.jpg
https://images.dailyhive.com/2019012...ary-2019-2.jpg
https://images.dailyhive.com/2019012...ary-2019-6.jpg
https://images.dailyhive.com/2019012...ary-2019-3.jpg

This is a pretty major intersection traffic-wise...

What will really dictate the success is the ground-level retail that will end up going in here. It feels very standalone right now considering there's nothing major on the other corners atm.

osirisboy Jan 30, 2019 6:23 PM

Why so short?

WarrenC12 Jan 30, 2019 6:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokyin (Post 8455234)
This is a pretty major intersection traffic-wise...

What will really dictate the success is the ground-level retail that will end up going in here. It feels very standalone right now considering there's nothing major on the other corners atm.

Is there any ground level retail going in on the other side of Main, currently under construction? I can't recall. There are still vacant CRUs on Main north of 1st Ave. Plenty of foot traffic though, and the new MEC store should drive a ton more foot and bike traffic, among others.

osirisboy Jan 30, 2019 6:32 PM

This section of main and second has always had retail here. Why would you think now it wouldn't work?

Changing City Jan 30, 2019 8:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by osirisboy (Post 8455261)
This section of main and second has always had retail here. Why would you think now it wouldn't work?

The retail on Main near 2nd was pretty sketchy over the past few years, with the sorts of business surviving on low rent in buildings waiting to be redeveloped. It's unlikely that developers will want to offer low rents - at least not until the units have sat empty for a long while - so it will be different businesses that they hope to attract. MEC moving here may change the area, if the rivals currently up on W Broadway that offer similar gear choose to move near the new MEC store. Then we'll see a lot of empty stores on West Broadway, unless there's another 'theme' that opens up a set of stores. It's not obvious that we're missing anything though - the furniture stores cluster around South Granville, and the Boarding cluster is at W4th and Burrard.

GenWhy? Jan 30, 2019 9:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by osirisboy (Post 8455261)
This section of main and second has always had retail here. Why would you think now it wouldn't work?

Auto shops, offices. Changing slowly.

officedweller Jan 30, 2019 9:14 PM

Looks okay.
The offset panel trend is getting a bit too common these days.

The former Scotiabank at the opposite corner was often robbed.

What would help retail would be taller ceiling heights.
i.e. compare to the retail being built (on ground floor of lowrises) in Burnaby on Hastings in The Heights.
The ceiling heights look like they are 15-20 ft.

GenWhy? Jan 30, 2019 9:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by osirisboy (Post 8455247)
Why so short?

Viewcone 22, or 23 from 6th Ave looking north.

urbanight93 Jan 18, 2023 8:22 PM

Any news on this development?

Sorry to bump.

madog222 Jan 18, 2023 8:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by urbanight93 (Post 9842624)
Any news on this development?

Sorry to bump.

Rezoning application didn't go through.

Quote:

RECOMMENDATION
A. THAT the application ... not be referred to Public Hearing because the applicant has made no offer of a Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) or of any material public benefits in respect to the rezoning application, notwithstanding the increased development rights associated with the proposed application.
https://council.vancouver.ca/20210622/documents/rr4.pdf


Under the Broadway Plan the site now requires 20% of units below market rent for residential but office or hotel use is also permitted. Building height and density is capped at what was proposed here because of the view cone.

urbanight93 Jan 18, 2023 9:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madog222 (Post 9842648)
Rezoning application didn't go through.

https://council.vancouver.ca/20210622/documents/rr4.pdf


Under the Broadway Plan the site now requires 20% of units below market rent for residential but office or hotel use is also permitted. Building height and density is capped at what was proposed here because of the view cone.

Interesting, thanks for the info.

Weird that the applicant didn't propose some sort of CAC.

mcj Jan 18, 2023 9:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madog222 (Post 9842648)
Rezoning application didn't go through.

https://council.vancouver.ca/20210622/documents/rr4.pdf


Under the Broadway Plan the site now requires 20% of units below market rent for residential but office or hotel use is also permitted. Building height and density is capped at what was proposed here because of the view cone.

That view cone has to be the most ridiculous one of the lot. In the middle of a 6 lane stroad intersection with no pedestrian crossing, guess the CoV thinks drivers should be looking at the mountains and not the road.

madog222 Jan 18, 2023 9:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by urbanight93 (Post 9842670)
Interesting, thanks for the info.

Weird that the applicant didn't propose some sort of CAC.

I guess they thought doing rental over strata was the community benefit.

WarrenC12 Jan 18, 2023 9:14 PM

That meeting was 18 months ago. Nothing since?

Changing City Jan 18, 2023 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madog222 (Post 9842673)
I guess they thought doing rental over strata was the community benefit.

Not really. The rezoning that Council decided not to hear was the second. "In February 2017, the same applicant team submitted a similar rezoning application, except that the previous project included 13 moderate income rental (MIR) units as the CAC offer. The 2017 and 2020 applications contained similar land use, height, density, and form of development.

The 2017 application was approved, in principle, following the Public Hearing on July 31, 2018. Subsequently, the owner chose not to bring forward the Housing Agreement to Council for approval and the CD-1 By-law was not enacted. The site remains under its original IC-2 zoning.
"

So there was already a done deal that had a CAC offered, and then Cressey decided not to run with it. While construction costs have risen, so have rents, so it's hard to see any justification for not having some sort of benefit for extra density.

urbanight93 Jan 19, 2023 3:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Changing City (Post 9842847)
Not really. The rezoning that Council decided not to hear was the second. "In February 2017, the same applicant team submitted a similar rezoning application, except that the previous project included 13 moderate income rental (MIR) units as the CAC offer. The 2017 and 2020 applications contained similar land use, height, density, and form of development.

The 2017 application was approved, in principle, following the Public Hearing on July 31, 2018. Subsequently, the owner chose not to bring forward the Housing Agreement to Council for approval and the CD-1 By-law was not enacted. The site remains under its original IC-2 zoning.
"

So there was already a done deal that had a CAC offered, and then Cressey decided not to run with it. While construction costs have risen, so have rents, so it's hard to see any justification for not having some sort of benefit for extra density.

Thanks for that Changing City. I was trying to reconcile the fact that there were two applications for this site, with one being approved and the other one not.

Good to know the City won't accept a bait & switch

Vin Jan 19, 2023 9:04 PM

This site with its proximity to everything would already have a skyscraper standing on it if this were Burnaby or any other suburban city.

Vancouver problem.

WarrenC12 Jan 19, 2023 9:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vin (Post 9843709)
This site with its proximity to everything would already have a skyscraper standing on it if this were Burnaby or any other suburban city.

Vancouver problem.

Main and 2nd? A skyscaper? :rolleyes:

Vin Jan 19, 2023 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarrenC12 (Post 9843732)
Main and 2nd? A skyscaper? :rolleyes:

2nd and Quebec just a block away:
https://www.google.com/maps/@49.2692...7i16384!8i8192

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

WarrenC12 Jan 19, 2023 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vin (Post 9843804)
2nd and Quebec just a block away:
https://www.google.com/maps/@49.2692...7i16384!8i8192

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

That's a skyscraper?

So, is this a Vancouver problem or not? You're really all over the place... par for the course I guess.

LeftCoaster Jan 19, 2023 10:34 PM

Of course it is, it's got a mall at the bottom and everything!

GenWhy? Jan 19, 2023 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vin (Post 9843709)
This site with its proximity to everything would already have a skyscraper standing on it if this were Burnaby or any other suburban city.

Vancouver problem.

I think at about 500m from SkyTrain you'd get the same in any jurisdiction outside Vancouver.

Changing City Jan 20, 2023 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenWhy? (Post 9843901)
I think at about 500m from SkyTrain you'd get the same in any jurisdiction outside Vancouver.

And in terms of density, many in Burnaby are lower. Some are the same. Some are higher, (as they are on sites in Vancouver). For example, Slate, on Lougheed. Exactly the same density as the W2nd project. 5.0 FSR (but with 46 storeys).

https://rafiiarchitects.com/wp-conte...-2021-sm-1.jpg

[rafii architects]

madog222 Jan 20, 2023 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vin (Post 9843804)
2nd and Quebec just a block away:
https://www.google.com/maps/@49.2692...7i16384!8i8192

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

The density of of that site can't be much higher than this, maybe 6fsr at the most, I tried searching the SEFC thread not couldn't find anything.

Changing City Jan 20, 2023 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madog222 (Post 9843977)
The density of of that site can't be much higher than this, maybe 6fsr at the most, I tried searching the SEFC thread not couldn't find anything.

5.3. Almost the same.

madog222 Jan 20, 2023 1:08 AM

^Thanks, almost the same BuT vAnCoUvEr SuX cAuSe ItS nOt A tOwEr!!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.