SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Business & the Economy (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=169)
-   -   The Metro Vancouver Real Estate Thread (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=193748)

LeftCoaster Sep 8, 2011 6:11 PM

The Metro Vancouver Real Estate Thread
 
I cant for the life of me understand how this thread doesn't already exist. Anyway if someone could sticky this it would be nice to have a centralized location to discuss commercial, residential and industiral real estate trends in the metro.

Here's somehting to kick it off:
Quote:

Metro Vancouver building permits leap more than 42 percent from May to June

DAN CASSIDY, THE VANCOUVER SUN SEPTEMBER 8, 2011 8:05 AM


The value of building permits isssued in Metro Vancouver jumped by more than 42 per cent from May to June, almost entirely due to multi-family residential permits, Statistics Canada reported this morning.

The value of permits rose from $370 million to more than $529 million, the federal data-gathering agency said.

The June total represents an increase of more than seven per cent from June of 2010.

Meanwhile the value of permits issued in the Abbotsford census metropolitan area dropped by more than 82 per cent from the May total.

Nonetheless, Abbotsford's June numbers are a 91-per-cent increase over the same month last year.

The value of permits issued in the Victoria region rose by almost 17 per cent.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/business...#ixzz1XNxl1vXn

red-paladin Oct 27, 2011 7:26 PM

Quote:

Suburban Vancouver office market driven by rapid transit: report

Jones Lang LaSalle notes that offices near SkyTrain and Canada Line have lower vacancies, higher rents

By BRIAN MORTON, Vancouver SunOctober 18, 2011



In Richmond, the commercial vacancy rate near the Canada Line is well below half that in the rest of the municipality.
Photograph by: Ric Ernst, Vancouver Sun

METRO VANCOUVER - Proximity to rapid transit is increasingly a key factor in where new offices locate in the suburbs and Vancouver’s outlying areas, according to a report by commercial real estate services firm Jones Lang LaSalle.

“The closer, the better,” the company’s executive vice-president Ray Ahrens said in an interview after Monday’s release of the Rapid Transit Office Index. “The office buildings close to SkyTrain stations are enjoying much lower vacancies. While [it makes sense that] they [are] better occupied, we didn’t know the extent of this until we did the study.”

Ahrens said that transit is becoming increasingly popular in Metro Vancouver and “our [report] shows clear evidence that office developments located within walking distance of rapid transit have a significant advantage with less vacancy and higher rents.” More people are now commuting from downtown Vancouver to the suburbs for work, he noted.

According to the report, which addressed both suburban municipalities and the city of Vancouver’s outlying area, the direct vacancy rate for buildings within 0.5 kilometres of a rapid transit station is 4.8 per cent compared to 12.3 per cent for the rest of the market, while the average asking rents are approximately eight per cent higher.

The report noted that with a vacancy rate about one-third of areas not served by rapid transit, developers are increasingly looking to build more transit-oriented suburban office complexes.

“As downtown and Broadway corridor availability decreases and rents increase, our landlord and tenant clients are becoming more interested in transit-oriented suburban locations,” added Ahrens.

The report cited new office developments taking advantage of the trend, including in New Westminster, where three buildings are scheduled to be ready for occupancy in 2013.

The buildings, which include the new TransLink headquarters, will more than double the area’s existing ‘A’ class inventory and be adjacent to the New Westminster and Sapperton SkyTrain stations.

“We expect to see continued interest in these [suburban] developments, particularly from employers with back-office operations that do not need to be located downtown,” Ahrens said.

The report noted that a preference for rapid-transit-oriented office space is more muted in the downtown core and Broadway corridor.

“Although these markets are serviced by rapid transit, they also benefit from their central location and convenient access to other modes of public transportation such as frequent bus service and the SeaBus. Rapid-transit access, therefore, is not deemed to be a determining factor for tenants in these two regions.”

The report cited several benefits of having rapid transit near an office in the suburbs, including the ability for employees to save money on travel costs, and the ability to live in a more affordable suburban neighbourhood.

The report looked at several suburban municipalities, including Surrey, Burnaby, New Westminster and Richmond......

[email protected]
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
http://www.vancouversun.com/business...744/story.html

Quote:

House values skyrocket in Vancouver's Cambie corridor
CBC News
Posted: Oct 27, 2011 10:51 AM PT
Last Updated: Oct 27, 2011 10:55 AM PT

Ten home on Cambie Street near 41st Avenue recently sold for $3.4 Million, nearly three times their assessed value. Ten home on Cambie Street near 41st Avenue recently sold for $3.4 Million, nearly three times their assessed value. ((Steve Lus/CBC))

Six months after Vancouver City Council approved a plan to transform the Cambie Street corridor, homes in the area have nearly tripled in value and some residents fear development will ruin the neighbourhood.

Last May the council passed a plan to bring 15,000 more people into the Cambie Street corridor through mid-rise development.

Then last month a block of 10 homes along Cambie Street near 41st Avenue sold for $3.4 million a piece – nearly three times their previously assessed value — and neighbours say they're growing tired of being pressured to sell by developers and real estate agents.
5100 Cambie Street
Cambie Street

Janice Douglas says she expects a six-storey building will soon be overlooking her single family home.

"We've got people looking in our back yard, looking in our bedroom, and we will never see the trees again — nor will we have any more sunshine," Douglas told CBC News.

Many residents don't want to move and feel ignored by the city as developers move in, looking to tear down the single family homes, she says.

"People come here for the beauty. Well the beauty is rapidly disappearing," said Douglas.
Canada Line driving changes

City planner Brent Toderian says he appreciates the concerns and the city is trying to cool down land speculation in the neighbourhood.

Toderian says the city has been meeting with developers and realtors to discuss land transactions after getting wind of some very high deals negotiated in the months after the Cambie corridor plan was approved.

He says the final prices didn't appear to have factored in community amenity contributions the city negotiates with developers in order to pay for infrastructure and services associated with increased density......
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis...eculation.html

SpongeG Feb 1, 2012 6:10 AM

Excess condos weigh heavily on local market

By ERICA BULMAN, 24 HOURS

B.C.’s once booming housing market is the nation’s new weak spot, with prices and sales dropping in previously red-hot Vancouver, according to a Bank of Montreal report released Monday.

Though Canada will likely avoid a crash, the condo market in pricey Vancouver is worrisome because capacity is significantly overbuilt, the report said, citing the new Olympic Village condos, currently about 60% sold.

Over the past decade Vancouver home prices have skyrocketed 159%, more than 50% higher than the national average. And the city’s price-to-income ratio has doubled.

This explains why the city is ranked second priciest, after Hong Kong, among 325 urban centres according to Demographia, which annually issues an international housing affordability survey that compares housing prices to incomes, the bank report said.

...

http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/News/local.../19315971.html

SpongeG Apr 4, 2012 6:23 AM

this has been floating around facebook and tumblr etc. it comapreas what 2.1 will buy in other places - basically mansions

Absurd Vancouver Property of the Week

http://thethirtiesgrind.com/2012/04/...of-the-week-2/

http://thethirtiesgrind.files.wordpr...48_1.jpg?w=538
Listing price: $2.1 Million

SpongeG May 17, 2012 7:27 AM

BC real Estate cooling down

video here

twoNeurons May 17, 2012 3:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpongeG (Post 5703828)
BC real Estate cooling down

video here

Is it just me, or does that video sound like it's trying to soften the blow? It's reporting the decrease, but quickly moves on to how places like Regina's house prices increased. I don't think Regina saw the insane increase over the past 10 years... so it seems a little specious.

Vestry May 17, 2012 4:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twoNeurons (Post 5704057)
Is it just me, or does that video sound like it's trying to soften the blow? It's reporting the decrease, but quickly moves on to how places like Regina's house prices increased. I don't think Regina saw the insane increase over the past 10 years... so it seems a little specious.

The difference is that the housing increases in the prairies have been accompanied by substantial median income increases.

logan5 Jul 30, 2012 1:17 PM

Here's some more positive news to follow up the story from last September - see post #1

Quote:

B.C issues highest number of building permits since 2007
Permits reached $4.4 billion up to May this year

By Gordon Hoekstra, Vancouver Sun July 6, 2012


British Columbia municipalities issued building permits in the first five months of 2012 at levels not seen since before the global recession.

Up to May of this year, permits reached $4.4 billion in B.C., a level not seen since the same period in 2007 when permits were more than $5 billion, according to Statistics Canada figures.

Building permits — which indicate an intent to build, not actual construction — sunk to $2.4 billion in the first five months of 2009.

The value of building permits in May this year alone, at $1.09 billion, accounted for nearly half of the 2009 five-month total. The value of the May 2012 permits is an increase of 35.8 per cent over the same month in 2011.

The increase in the value of permits in May this year was even greater in residential construction in B.C., hitting $660 million, a 45.6 per cent increase from May 2011.

The increase in total building permits in the Vancouver metro area in May year over year jumped a whopping 112.3 per cent to $781.8 million, according to Statistics Canada.

“It’s a sign of optimism, certainly in the Lower Mainland. People don’t build or invest in construction services unless they are confident in the future,” said Independent Contractors and Businesses Association president Philip Hochstein.

“I think if you look around the world, British Columbia is a bit of an oasis in the [economic] storm ... That’s translated into people interested in construction [here],” he said.

An indication of the construction interest — beyond the permit numbers — is the number of cranes that are going up in the Lower Mainland, added Hochstein.

The independent contractors association estimates the number of cranes will peak at 142 in the Lower Mainland in November 2013, well above the 78 cranes that were counted in 2005-2006 before the financial meltdown...

http://www.vancouversun.com/business...279/story.html

littlewenzi Apr 30, 2015 12:53 AM

Suggest a place for me please
 
I was looking at trapp & Holbrook, but missed out on 2 different units and it is now sold out of the one I want :(

The trapp deal was pretty good, move in next month, $250k, 1 bedroom.

I am having problem finding one that I really like, so wondering if you guys have any suggestions. I do have a few criteria though:

1. Close to skytrain (5-10 mins walking distance to skytrain)
2. Not Surrey or Coquitlam
3. Highrise ( >5 floors)
4. Under 300K

I'd prefer downtown New West, but looks like there is not many development going on there now. I found one (elliot street by censorio), but there isn't any pricing info on it.
It would be even better if it was mixed use (ie. shopping mall underneath :) )
Gotta love living on top of a mall, missed that a lot.

So much help appreciated.

Thanks.

TourOdeon Apr 30, 2015 1:12 AM

Introducing RiverSky by Bosa


((Edited by red-paladin: photos were not sourced, so removed))

red-paladin Apr 30, 2015 7:06 AM

TourOdeon: source links are required.

PaperTiger Apr 30, 2015 4:24 PM

If you want move in ready. Northbank. They have some really good floor plans and the pricing per square foot should be similar to Trapp & Holbrook. The units are a little bit bigger though.

BodomReaper Apr 30, 2015 6:33 PM

Not sure if you're looking for move-in ready? SoLo Distict had some 1 bedrooms for just under $300k but they might be all gone. If you're ok with a presale, check out the Brewery District - there are some very affordable 1 beds there, and most of the commercial components are already occupied. Also see The Park (in Metrotown).

Would also echo Northbank, but its immediate surroundings are very shabby.

Klazu Apr 30, 2015 7:29 PM

I think this thread could be merged with the Real Estate Thread.

TourOdeon Apr 30, 2015 8:03 PM

I am also looking to upgrade my studio condo in downtown to a 2-bedroom as I just got engaged... I cant decide between Lonsdale Quay and Brentwood. Some thigs that are important to me are:
- connectivity to downtown via transit
- proximity to a public elementary school
- proximity to a public park for walking my dog
- safe area

The only thing is that my fiancee works in New Westminster, and driving from North Van to New Westminster might be a nightmare for her. I have no problem taking the seabus to work in Downtown. But I sure do love the view of the water from Lonsdale Quay.

osirisboy Apr 30, 2015 8:46 PM

Possibility of a market correction seems low says cmhc

http://www.vancouversun.com/touch/st...ml?id=11017859

whatnext Apr 30, 2015 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TourOdeon (Post 7010338)
I am also looking to upgrade my studio condo in downtown to a 2-bedroom as I just got engaged... I cant decide between Lonsdale Quay and Brentwood. Some thigs that are important to me are:
- connectivity to downtown via transit
- proximity to a public elementary school
- proximity to a public park for walking my dog
- safe area

The only thing is that my fiancee works in New Westminster, and driving from North Van to New Westminster might be a nightmare for her. I have no problem taking the seabus to work in Downtown. But I sure do love the view of the water from Lonsdale Quay.

What about the Marine Gateway area? Elementary school a couple blocks away, right on Canada Line and if your fiance decides to take transit the 100 bus goes right to New West. Fairly close to Fraser River Dog Park.

red-paladin May 1, 2015 5:57 AM

I've merged the 'Suggest a place for me please' thread in here as Klazu is right.
I've also removed the photos from TourOdeon's post as they were not sourced.

Pinion May 1, 2015 7:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TourOdeon (Post 7010338)
I am also looking to upgrade my studio condo in downtown to a 2-bedroom as I just got engaged... I cant decide between Lonsdale Quay and Brentwood. Some thigs that are important to me are:
- connectivity to downtown via transit
- proximity to a public elementary school
- proximity to a public park for walking my dog
- safe area

The only thing is that my fiancee works in New Westminster, and driving from North Van to New Westminster might be a nightmare for her. I have no problem taking the seabus to work in Downtown. But I sure do love the view of the water from Lonsdale Quay.

If she works 9-5 the commute is pretty bad over second narrows but not worse than most suburbs. Should get better with the three new interchanges. Lions Gate is the real disaster. When people complain about second narrows it's usually those who work on the north shore and want to go east in the evening - that is a giant mess, ironically due to accidents near Brentwood most of the time.

Lonsdale and Brentwood are different in just about every way so it really depends on what your values are. Schools, parks and safety will all be better on Lonsdale. Commute for her will be worse.

If you don't drive, Brentwood definitely has a leg up due to skytrain access. If you value living in an ethnically diverse neighbourhood instead of a homogenous one then Lonsdale is an easy choice. If you want more of a real town feeling than a cosmopolitan set of pretty glass towers then Lonsdale is also an easy choice.

My wife and I love Lonsdale (she's a Kits convert), hate the bridges. We considered Brentwood but the lack of real neighbourhood feel and cultural diversity were killers. As appealing as living in a brand new tower 40 storeys up sounded, it doesn't really matter in day to day life.

Klazu May 1, 2015 8:02 PM

I cannot figure out how much indoor living space this one suite has. How does one interpret the following MLS data when the suite has an outdoor balcony?

Finished Floor Area Main: 1,110 SqFt
Total Finished Floor Area: 1,110 SqFt
Unfinished Floor Area: 0
Grand Total Floor Area: 1,110 SqFt

My problem is that there is an add for a suite few floors down that looks in pictures identical, but is said to be only 958 SqFt. Could this place we including the outdoor balcony in total or can a MLS listing information be trusted to the letter?

The suite has a very good layout and we think we could fit in despite having to downsize quite a bit. I just cannot be it would be 958 SqFt in the context of other places we have seen in the same SqFt ballpack. I am confused on what to trust. :???:

Sheba May 1, 2015 9:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TourOdeon (Post 7010338)
I am also looking to upgrade my studio condo in downtown to a 2-bedroom as I just got engaged... I cant decide between Lonsdale Quay and Brentwood. Some thigs that are important to me are:
- connectivity to downtown via transit
- proximity to a public elementary school
- proximity to a public park for walking my dog
- safe area

The only thing is that my fiancee works in New Westminster, and driving from North Van to New Westminster might be a nightmare for her. I have no problem taking the seabus to work in Downtown. But I sure do love the view of the water from Lonsdale Quay.

RiverSky might be something to consider. It's in New West so her travel will be minimal. You've got the skytrain on one side for getting downtown, and the Fraser River on the other side (admittedly no views of downtown Van). Pier Park is nearby and there's a couple of elementary schools (admittedly maybe not within a short walking distance). Plus it's been cleaned up a lot compared to ye olde days so it's a fairly safe area.

Sheba May 1, 2015 9:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klazu (Post 7011610)
I cannot figure out how much indoor living space this one suite has. How does one interpret the following MLS data when the suite has an outdoor balcony?

Finished Floor Area Main: 1,110 SqFt
Total Finished Floor Area: 1,110 SqFt
Unfinished Floor Area: 0
Grand Total Floor Area: 1,110 SqFt

My problem is that there is an add for a suite few floors down that looks in pictures identical, but is said to be only 958 SqFt. Could this place we including the outdoor balcony in total or can a MLS listing information be trusted to the letter?

The suite has a very good layout and we think we could fit in despite having to downsize quite a bit. I just cannot be it would be 958 SqFt in the context of other places we have seen in the same SqFt ballpack. I am confused on what to trust. :???:

The size is what the realtor is told it is - you have to double check it. If two places look to be the same layout, you're better off assuming it's the smaller size. Layout can make all the difference in how a place feels, despite what the sq footage might say.

Klazu May 1, 2015 9:43 PM

I wouldn't care about the actual square footage as long as everything fits in the place, but I am just blown away by how spacious the layout is, be it either of the two. We have seen several places that are 1250 SqFt (and more) that we could just barely fit in, but now we would suddenly fit into something that is potentially only 960 SqFt? :???:

That would be downsizing by almost 700 SqFt and I just cannot understand how on Earth that is possible to work (yet it seems like it could). Based on the sale price the MLS listing suggests, I am thinking 1,110 SqFt is the real figure, as nobody would pay that price for something that is under thousand SqFt. No matter that the place has the view it does have.

Damn, I so want this place... :yes:

Homeowner May 2, 2015 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TourOdeon (Post 7010338)
I am also looking to upgrade my studio condo in downtown to a 2-bedroom as I just got engaged... I cant decide between Lonsdale Quay and Brentwood. Some thigs that are important to me are:
- connectivity to downtown via transit
- proximity to a public elementary school
- proximity to a public park for walking my dog
- safe area

The only thing is that my fiancee works in New Westminster, and driving from North Van to New Westminster might be a nightmare for her. I have no problem taking the seabus to work in Downtown. But I sure do love the view of the water from Lonsdale Quay.

Due to your work locations, Brentwood should be the preferred choice.

st7860 May 3, 2015 2:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TourOdeon (Post 7010338)
I am also looking to upgrade my studio condo in downtown to a 2-bedroom as I just got engaged... I cant decide between Lonsdale Quay and Brentwood. Some thigs that are important to me are:
- connectivity to downtown via transit
- proximity to a public elementary school
- proximity to a public park for walking my dog
- safe area

The only thing is that my fiancee works in New Westminster, and driving from North Van to New Westminster might be a nightmare for her. I have no problem taking the seabus to work in Downtown. But I sure do love the view of the water from Lonsdale Quay.

Have you considered Coal Harbour? There's an elementary school there.

whatnext May 3, 2015 3:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st7860 (Post 7012939)
Have you considered Coal Harbour? There's an elementary school there.

Given the poster's implied budget and the commute to New West, it's hard to imagine a less appropriate choice than the overpriced condos of Coal Harbour. Not to mention many feature horrendous maintenance fees.

logan5 May 3, 2015 4:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TourOdeon (Post 7010338)
I am also looking to upgrade my studio condo in downtown to a 2-bedroom as I just got engaged... I cant decide between Lonsdale Quay and Brentwood. Some thigs that are important to me are:
- connectivity to downtown via transit
- proximity to a public elementary school
- proximity to a public park for walking my dog
- safe area

The only thing is that my fiancee works in New Westminster, and driving from North Van to New Westminster might be a nightmare for her. I have no problem taking the seabus to work in Downtown. But I sure do love the view of the water from Lonsdale Quay.

Brentwood is just horrid. It's a huge drop off in lifestyle in exchange for a more central location. Not worth it imo. Everybody has different priorities, but a neighbourhood that draws you out after work or on the week-ends is far more valuable than a convenient location. Brentwood has no identity, and even with a hundred more clone towers, it will still have no identity.

casper May 3, 2015 3:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by logan5 (Post 7013041)
Brentwood is just horrid. It's a huge drop off in lifestyle in exchange for a more central location. Not worth it imo. Everybody has different priorities, but a neighbourhood that draws you out after work or on the week-ends is far more valuable than a convenient location. Brentwood has no identity, and even with a hundred more clone towers, it will still have no identity.

I think Brentwood has potential. If all the public space gets built out (and it does not get taken over by large corporate chains) it has the potential to become a great neighborhood. Just now it is hard to know how it will turn out.

SpongeG May 25, 2015 8:05 PM

there is a petition going around facebook to ask the government to start a speculation tax so houseflipping is less attractive in Vancouver

Klazu May 25, 2015 9:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpongeG (Post 7038754)
there is a petition going around facebook to ask the government to start a speculation tax so houseflipping is less attractive in Vancouver

Good, as this is sick.

Quote:

West Vancouver is the Flip City of real estate, its prices maddest in the mad Vancouver area — which is yoked with London and Manhattan for the priciest property on the planet.

Last Saturday’s Sun — anyone who doesn’t read at least one Vancouver daily is badly under-informed — listed 23 West Van flipped property prices that would knock your proverbial socks off. Example: 910 Braeside St., sold April 7 for $2,098,000, listed six days later for half a million higher.

The champ: A bare lot at 1424 Sandhurst Place, sold a year ago for $3.7 million, listed last month for $6.18 million. (In April a typical detached West Van home sold for $2.23 million.)
- See more at: http://www.nsnews.com/opinion/column....BgX5s7wu.dpuf

TourOdeon May 25, 2015 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheba (Post 7011728)
RiverSky might be something to consider. It's in New West so her travel will be minimal. You've got the skytrain on one side for getting downtown, and the Fraser River on the other side (admittedly no views of downtown Van). Pier Park is nearby and there's a couple of elementary schools (admittedly maybe not within a short walking distance). Plus it's been cleaned up a lot compared to ye olde days so it's a fairly safe area.

New West is not a very safe place, you know. My ideal neighborhood is where I can walk my kid to his/her elementary school without feeling worried all day.

P.S. I have recently checked out Solo District, Aviara (definitely no) and Motif. Need to spare time this weekend to check out what's good in Lonsdale Quay, any recommendation on which buildings to consider?

whatnext May 26, 2015 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TourOdeon (Post 7038962)
New West is not a very safe place, you know. My ideal neighborhood is where I can walk my kid to his/her elementary school without feeling worried all day.

P.S. I have recently checked out Solo District, Aviara (definitely no) and Motif. Need to spare time this weekend to check out what's good in Lonsdale Quay, any recommendation on which buildings to consider?

If its not too intrusive, can you give us an idea of your budget?

Pinion May 26, 2015 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TourOdeon (Post 7038962)
New West is not a very safe place, you know. My ideal neighborhood is where I can walk my kid to his/her elementary school without feeling worried all day.

P.S. I have recently checked out Solo District, Aviara (definitely no) and Motif. Need to spare time this weekend to check out what's good in Lonsdale Quay, any recommendation on which buildings to consider?

For Lower Lonsdale, if you want new, Wallace and McDowell, The Anchor. If you don't mind something a bit older, in the area surrounded by Chesterfield/Lonsdale/Esplanade/2nd is the prime spot.

Consider Central Lonsdale too. I moved to the area so my wife could feel safe in the dark myself. It's more family-oriented up there - LoLo is more a young yuppie scene.

Spork May 26, 2015 2:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TourOdeon (Post 7038962)
New West is not a very safe place, you know. My ideal neighborhood is where I can walk my kid to his/her elementary school without feeling worried all day.

It's very safe. Much, much better than 10, even 5 years ago. I lived there for 2 years between 2009 and 2011. The place is primed for prices to keep climbing.

TourOdeon May 26, 2015 4:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spork (Post 7039073)
It's very safe. Much, much better than 10, even 5 years ago. I lived there for 2 years between 2009 and 2011. The place is primed for prices to keep climbing.

Tell me about it... Like I said, my fiancée works in New West, so I know the area quite well too. I cant say that its high crime, but definitely a lot of low-income people are residing in the area. Its also too close from Surrey and the patullo bridge. When taking the Expo line from New West, you will bump into a lot of weird people. The retirees also look really poor compared to retirees residing in North Vancouver.

whatnext Jun 29, 2015 3:33 PM

Having been looking at condos lately, I can't imagine how people live in the glass towers without air conditioning. One unit I saw at 11 am was already up to 29! Unbearable. I can see why more new housing is being built with A/C.

Klazu Dec 3, 2015 11:15 PM

Seems that Squamish is also doing well and I guess many plan on commuting to Vancouver? On my way to Whistler on Sunday I took note of lots of development being prepared at the northern end of town.

Quote:

Vancitybyzz: 65-unit Squamish condo development sells out in 90 minutes

The Lower Mainland’s real estate craze seems to have extended to Squamish, a mountain town in the midst of a major transformation.

Earlier this month, in a span of just 90 minutes, a 65-unit, four-storey-tall wood frame development with prices ranging from $167,900 to $449,900 per unit was completely sold out – and even then, there were still plenty of people still waiting in line for a chance to purchase a home.

According to Mario Gomes and Michael Henson, the developers for the ParkHouse project at the corner of Eaglewind Boulevard and Bailey Street in downtown Squamish, the reaction and crowds at the start of sales at the sales centre completely caught them off guard.

“We knew we were going to have a good day, but we never expected to be sold out in a day in only 90 minutes,” Gomes told Vancity Buzz. “We had some appointments booked between 12 p.m. to 2 p.m., and people that didn’t have an appointment began to show up.”

“By 1:30 p.m. we were already sold out, so people that were standing outside waiting didn’t even have a chance to come in.”
In contrast, detached house prices in Squamish reached a benchmark of $620,400 this year, a 13.5 per cent increase over 2015. As well, apartments have reached $293,000, up 12.6 per cent over the same period during the previous year.

For the town of 17,000 people, this is merely the beginning of a new era of economic development. A century ago, sawmills and port activities were the driver’s the Squamish’s economic activity, but over the next 20 years a major residential development coupled with population growth will become the new driver of the town’s economic activity.

In 2014, the District of Squamish approved a proposal to redevelop 59 acres of former industrial land on the waterfront right next to downtown. The new community, dubbed Squamish Oceanfront by developers, will include 1,1000 residential units for 5,000 people. Amenities include park space, a marina, cultural spaces, and educational spaces for a post-secondary institution.

More developments will likely be proposed for Squamish in the coming years.

I also didn't know that Squamish has such a plan for their Downtown. Long way to go, but would be fantastic.
I have some troubles putting this masterplan on map, though. Where exactly would this be at?

http://www.vancitybuzz.com/wp-conten...oceanfront.jpg
vancitybuzz.com

wrenegade Dec 7, 2015 11:17 PM

The beach/park area in the bottom left hand corner of that wildly optimistic rendering is directly east of Squamish Terminals. It is the south end of Galbraith Avenue/Loggers lane and the area is also known as Nexen beach.

Currently the site is completely vacant.

cornholio Dec 8, 2015 2:47 AM

Good for Squamish. For me though it has the same problem as North Vancouver. It rains way too much in Squamish. I think lots of people forget to look at weather patterns as they vary allot in our region from place to place. For example Squamish gets 3 times the rain as say Tsawwassen and way les sunshine hours. For me personally sunshine hours are key given the fact we live on the 49th parallel. Weather is literally the first thing I look at, and as a result there is no way I would ever live in Squamish or the north shore.

Vin Jan 22, 2016 8:15 PM

Moved from "General Vancouver Updates"


Absolutely!



Quote:

Originally Posted by Rico (Post 7308657)
I agree, it is actually amazing to me how many intelligent posters here do not believe the laws of supply and demand apply to Vancouver. That said it is quite possible (likely even) the amount of extra supply we are constructing is not enough to prevent prices from rising....but obviously the new supply is at least reducing the amount prices rise.

But because of their construction, high-rise condo prices are rising way slower than SFHs, making it a relatively more affordable alternative. Without them, the majority of us would be driven to the burbs.

JamesOwnz Jun 5, 2016 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by logan5 (Post 7013041)
Brentwood is just horrid. It's a huge drop off in lifestyle in exchange for a more central location. Not worth it imo. Everybody has different priorities, but a neighbourhood that draws you out after work or on the week-ends is far more valuable than a convenient location. Brentwood has no identity, and even with a hundred more clone towers, it will still have no identity.

Are we including the heights into brentwood? Or when we say Brentwood are we just counting the mall and the new condos?

If we include the heights that area is almost perfect to raise a family in..if he was in a condo by the mall well he can't exactly walk his child to school everyday but is a 5 min drive to about 4 different elementary schools.

No, it is not a great area for the 20s/early 30s person who wants to go out and party every weekend (but even then.. only a 15 min skytrain to granville)

Smooth Jun 7, 2016 8:26 PM

As some of you may know, Bob Rennie recently addressed the Urban Development Institute regarding housing affordability. The speech was very informative and was supported by well researched data.

If any of you are interested in the affordability issues affecting the City of Vancouver and the Lower Mainland then I highly recommend watching the speech.

Video Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szsMBFgf21k

wrenegade Jun 7, 2016 8:59 PM

Thanks for posting that. I was unable to attend due to work this year but have added the video to my watch later list!

Sheba Jun 26, 2016 5:49 AM

Christy Clark reveals 6 key principles to affordable housing
Quote:

Premier Christy Clark says her government will lay out a plan to address housing affordability in the province over the coming days and weeks.

In a new address on YouTube, Clark lists six principles the government will consider, including supporting first-time homebuyers and protecting consumers from greedy sales practices.

She says a determined effort must be made by all levels of government because high housing costs are impacting families.

"To make sure that we preserve the dream of owning a home and keeping it in the reach of the middle class," said Clark in the video.

On Sunday, Jean-Yves Duclos, minister of Families, Children and Social Development, and Rich Coleman, the province's housing minister are set to announce funding for the issue at a media event on Hastings Street in Vancouver at 2:30 p.m. PT.

Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson said he wants the province to co-operate in collecting an empty homes tax; Robertson hopes to create more rental housing instead of letting investment properties sit dormant while his city's living costs soar.
YouTube link (see if you can watch it without rolling your eyes)

ssiguy Jun 26, 2016 6:17 AM

Note to self.............stick spoon down throat.

jlousa Jun 26, 2016 7:15 AM

Never a problem that a government couldn't make worse. Besides the shark has already been jumped. The latest push upwards on land prices we've seen is going to be the last for quite a while even before any intervention. And feel free to quote me on that. Not recommending people cash out but if that is how you've been making a living then start looking for a job.;)

supercanuck Jun 28, 2016 8:19 PM

Does anyone know why there is no development around the 2 Expo Vancouver stations, Nanaimo and 29th Avenue? To me it would make sense to add density around transit but those 2 areas have remained untouched. Thanks for any insights. :)

officedweller Jun 28, 2016 8:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by supercanuck (Post 7488693)
Does anyone know why there is no development around the 2 Expo Vancouver stations, Nanaimo and 29th Avenue? To me it would make sense to add density around transit but those 2 areas have remained untouched. Thanks for any insights. :)

See post here:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...&postcount=547

Sheba Jun 29, 2016 12:07 AM

British Columbia real estate panel urges tougher fines, oversight

Quote:

British Columbia's real estate agents and brokerages should be fined dramatically more than they currently are for misconduct and face more stringent regulatory oversight, an advisory board recommended on Tuesday.

The final report by the provincially appointed Independent Advisory Group follows a four-month review of the sector, which has come under scrutiny after media reports of predatory practices by some agents and brokers in red hot markets.

Housing prices have skyrocketed in British Columbia, jumping 30 percent in Greater Vancouver over the last year, prompting concerns that speculators and foreign investors are driving the market rather than local housing needs, and posing regulatory challenges.

"The regulatory regime for real estate was designed for people who buy and sell homes, not people who are buying and selling investments," advisory group chair Carolyn Rogers told reporters. "That is a different market, it requires different regulatory rules, approaches and power."

That shift drove the group to urge numerous changes to strengthen the Real Estate Council of British Columbia's oversight of the industry, including ensuring that the Council is the only body responsible for investigating misconduct.

There was previously some confusion as to whether regional real estate boards, which are industry groups, or the provincially appointed Council was the de facto regulator.

But the most striking of 28 recommendations was that maximum penalties levied by for misconduct by individual licensees be boosted C$250,000 ($191,703) from a current C$10,000, and to C$500,000 from C$20,000 for brokerages. It also recommended raising maximum administrative penalties to C$50,000 from C$1,000.

"Large commissions and low penalties for licensee misconduct combine to create the perception that regulatory penalties are simply a transaction costs for otherwise profitable behavior," the advisor group said in its report. "This significantly undermines the effectiveness and credibility of the regulator."

The report also recommended that agents no longer be able to represent both buyer and seller in a transaction, and that they be prohibited from having a financial interest in a transaction, beyond getting a commission.

Seven of the recommendations, including changes to monetary penalties, are subject to approval by the British Columbia government. The remainder will be implemented by the Real Estate Council, which has accepted the recommendations.

The advisory group said it does not expect the stricter rules to have a material impact on scorching real estate markets in the province or housing affordability, noting the focus was on rebuilding consumer trust.

cornholio Jun 29, 2016 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheba (Post 7488984)

Not enough and frankly meaningless. The real estate board has lost all relevance in this province. At some point it will be completely reworked from the ground up. Its not a matter of if but a matter of when. Those that still hold any sort of value in the real estate board or anything coming from it should re analyze their views. The real estate board is morally bankrupt, it has completely failed at the one thing it was tasked to do and there is no saving it.

The sooner people shun it as they should the faster we can fix the industry.


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.