SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Canada (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   Canada's Tallest U/C #11 - #30 (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=145470)

caltrane74 Feb 5, 2008 3:55 PM

Canada's Tallest U/C #11 - #30
 
--- QUICK LIST ---

(diagram)





11. Two Gilmore Place / Burnaby BC / 202.2 / 64 floors
12. Canada House 2 ./ Toronto ON/ 202.2 // 59 floors
13. Maestria Condominiums / Montreal QC/ 202 m 61 Floors
14. M City M2 - / Mississauga ON/ 61 Floors / / 201 meters
15. Victoria Sur Le Parc / Montreal / 200 meters / 56 floors
16. National Bank / Montreal / 200 meters 46 floors
17. M City – M1 - / Mississauga ON / 197.8 / 60 floors /

18. Wellesley on the Park / Toronto ON / 194.1 / 60 floors
19. 22|21 Yonge / Toronto ON / 192.5 meters / 58 Floors

20. CG Tower / Vaughan ON / 189.3 meters / 61 floors
21. 19 Duncan Street/ Toronto ON / 186.5 meters / 58 Floors
22. Rosedale on Bloor / Toronto ON 185.9 / 55 floors

23. One Yorkville / Toronto ON / 183.2 / 58 floors
24. Water's Edge at Cove / Toronto ON/ 182.4 / 56 floors
25. Brentwood Three / Burnaby BC / 182 meters / 55 floors
26. Pier West 1 / New Westminster BC / 180 meters / 53 floors
27. Transit City Condos / Vaughan ON / 178.8 // 55 floors
28. The Butterfly / Vancouver BC / 178.6 // 56 floors
29. Vita on the Lake / Toronto ON / 177.1 meters/ 53 floors
30. Highline / Burnaby BC / 177 meters / 53 floors






- topped out -
- excavating -




--- RENDERS & PHOTO UPDATES ---



11. Massey Tower (Toronto): 208.3m / 683ft

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7204/6...93a4ca13_b.jpg

https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4848/3...44a3e17f_c.jpg
By: drum118 on Flickr (November 11, 2018)



12. Residences of 488 University Avenue (Toronto): 207m / 679ft

http://www.corearchitects.com/blog/w...A-559x1024.jpg
http://www.corearchitects.com/blog/4...ersity-avenue/

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1934/4...059e7f1e_c.jpg
By: drum118 on Flickr (September 22, 2018)



13. Canada House 2 (Toronto): 202.2m / 663ft

https://www.realtorforce.ca/sites/de...4c4ae5f05a.jpg
http://realtorforce.ca/en/wechat/blog/view/1441035
Note: On the left.

https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4838/3...000165ef_c.jpg
By: Josh Kenn Photographics on Flickr (November 29, 2018)



14. M City - Tower 1 (Mississauga): ~~~m / ~~~ft

https://images.thestar.com/content/d...crop.0x650.jpg
https://www.thestar.com/business/201...est-tower.html

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1951/3...e09db9a8_c.jpg
By: drum118 on Flickr (September 4, 2018)



14. M City - Tower 2 (Mississauga): ~~~m / ~~~ft

https://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/ODAwWDUyM...as-gx/$_59.JPG
https://www.kijiji.ca/v-condo-for-sa...00k/1341515143

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1951/3...e09db9a8_c.jpg
By: drum118 on Flickr (September 4, 2018)



16. Victoria Sur Le Parc (Montreal): 200m / 656ft

https://www.westislandblog.com/wp-co...3.08.43-PM.jpg
https://www.westislandblog.com/victo...at-3-08-43-pm/

[IMG][/IMG]
By: on ()



16. National Bank (Montreal): 200m / 656ft

http://www.portailconstructo.com/sit...-nationale.jpg
http://www.portailconstructo.com/act...nque_nationale

[IMG][/IMG]
By: on ()



18. Wellesley on the Park (Toronto): 194.1m / 637ft

http://www.11wellesley-onthepark.ca/...88/2187381.jpg
http://www.11wellesley-onthepark.ca/

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1974/3...92b445b0_c.jpg
By: drum118 on Flickr (September 28, 2018)



19. 22|21 Yonge (Toronto): 192.5m / 632ft

http://www.pinnaclealliancerealty.co...u11448/1_1.jpg
http://www.pinnaclealliancerealty.com/node/791665

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1907/4...4f0c42f1_c.jpg
By: drum118 at Flickr (September 3, 2018)



20. JW Marriott Edmonton & Legend Residences (Edmonton): 191m / 627ft

http://storage.edmontonsun.com/v1/dy...y=80&size=650x
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2016/01/3...stry-down-time

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1849/4...8c6663c8_c.jpg
By: Jason Woodhead on Flickr (September 3, 2018)



21. Amazing Brentwood One (Burnaby): 186.5m / 612ft

http://gingert.net/images/burnaby-tower-01.jpg
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...95#post6476095

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1977/4...7d5eff65_c.jpg
By: City of Rain on Flickr (October 14, 2018)



21. Amazing Brentwood Two (Burnaby): 186.5m / 612ft

http://d2kcmk0r62r1qk.cloudfront.net...10_low_res.jpg
http://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/the-amaz...10_low_res.jpg

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1937/3...03716ee2_c.jpg
By: City of Rain on Flickr (October 14, 2018)



23. 19 Duncan Street (Toronto): 186.5m / 612ft

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKGew7NXkAI1A2i.jpg
https://twitter.com/alliedreit

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1937/4...578a5bfc_c.jpg
By: Josh Kenn Photographics on Flickr (October 22, 2018)



24. 1 Yorkville (Toronto): 183.2m / 601ft

http://www.pureplaza.com/one-york-tr...n-exterior.jpg
http://www.pureplaza.com/one-york-tr...al/design.html

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1969/4...37d2a39b_c.jpg
By: Jimmy Wu on Flickr (October 30, 2018)



25. Brentwood Three (Burnaby): 182m / 597ft

http://vancitypresales.com/wp-conten...t-1024x819.jpg
http://vancitypresales.com/building/...ing-brentwood/

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1955/4...d3b19f79_c.jpg
By: City of Rain on Flickr (October 14, 2018)



26. Eau du Soleil - Water Tower (Toronto): 180.8m / 593ft

http://www.blogto.com/upload/2013/03...re-CloseUp.jpg
http://www.blogto.com/city/2013/03/a...ore_park_lawn/

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1910/4...0535587c_c.jpg
By: drum118 on Flickr (October 10, 2018)



27. Pier West 1 (New Westminster): 180m / 591ft

[IMG][/IMG]


[IMG][/IMG]
By: on ()



28. Rosedale on Bloor (Toronto): 179m / 587ft

http://www.condominiums.ca/web/Skywatch-condos.jpg
http://www.condominiums.ca/skywatch-condos-toronto

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1918/4...94393de9_c.jpg
By: drum118 on Flickr (September 28, 2018)



29. Vita on the Lake (Toronto): 177.1m / 581ft

http://urbantoronto.ca/sites/default...851-74950.jpeg
http://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/vita-lake

https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1949/4...3f03f6db_c.jpg
By: drum118 on Flickr (October 10, 2018)



30. Transit City 1 (Vaughan): 175.3m / 575ft

https://d2kcmk0r62r1qk.cloudfront.ne..._city_park.jpg
https://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/us/transit-city-condos1

http://urbantoronto.ca/sites/default...7471-95542.jpg
By: Craig White on Urban Toronto (June 20, 2017)



30. Transit City 2 (Vaughan): 175.3m / 575ft

http://transitcitycondo.ca/wp-conten...2054042149.jpg
http://transitcitycondo.ca/

http://urbantoronto.ca/sites/default...7471-95542.jpg
By: Craig White on Urban Toronto (June 20, 2017)


Xelebes Feb 5, 2008 4:15 PM

Stationlands in Edmonton is 125 m (137 m with spires), I've seen them do some prep work or servicing on that lot.

Icon II - no idea how tall this one is. I think it is around 120+ m. Ian?

caltrane74 Feb 5, 2008 4:25 PM

I saw Icon on the Edmonton List , but not Station lands.

Icon came in at 112 Meters.

caltrane74 Feb 5, 2008 4:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xelebes (Post 3332312)
Stationlands in Edmonton is 125 m (137 m with spires), I've seen them do some prep work or servicing on that lot.

Icon II - no idea how tall this one is. I think it is around 120+ m. Ian?

No worries once, it's official (hell even if it's not, you can update the list yourself at anytime )

Just copy and paste
insert
and post!!!

Calgarian Feb 5, 2008 5:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xelebes (Post 3332312)
Stationlands in Edmonton is 125 m (137 m with spires), I've seen them do some prep work or servicing on that lot.

Icon II - no idea how tall this one is. I think it is around 120+ m. Ian?

It would be kinda weird to see Edmonton on this list, you are booming, but you seem to have been left far behind the rest of the country in highrise comstruction.

caltrane74 Feb 5, 2008 5:15 PM

Minto Midtown -160 Meters will be finished in a couple of months.

That should free up some space for some other projects in The big 3 or Montreal & Edmonton.

Cross your fingers.

caltrane74 Feb 5, 2008 5:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by egotrippin (Post 154730)

from egotrippin on UT

Murano

Xelebes Feb 5, 2008 5:20 PM

Edit - Delete

caltrane74 Feb 5, 2008 5:24 PM

Hey Maybe we can include everything to #50.

I was just lazy man.

Coldrsx Feb 5, 2008 5:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyc (Post 3332426)
It would be kinda weird to see Edmonton on this list, you are booming, but you seem to have been left far behind the rest of the country in highrise comstruction.

give your city a municipal airport overlay of 150m (zenith, most areas are 130 or less) you ignorant bastard and see what you can do.

AuxTown Feb 5, 2008 5:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coldrsx (Post 3332495)
give your city a municipal airport overlay of 150m (zenith, most areas are 130 or less) you ignorant bastard and see what you can do.

Welcome to our nightmare!

Coldrsx Feb 5, 2008 5:35 PM

^born in ottawa and knowing it well i feel your pain. I absolutely cannot stand when "skyscraper/development aficionados" make comments about cities who have significant restrictions.

Edmonton has quite a lot going on...but height isnt one of them for reasons out of our control.

caltrane74 Feb 5, 2008 5:36 PM

Glad to see we're keepin' it civil.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coldrsx (Post 3332508)

Edmonton has quite a lot going on...but height isnt one of them for reasons out of our control.


Don't worry Stationlands will be on the list as soon as we get confirmation.

and.....

look at Vancouver, with regards to hieght limits, so you never know.

And...

They might just shut that airport down. - It doesn't make sense for a city the size of Edmonton to have 2 airports.
It's ridiculous.

Kevin_foster Feb 5, 2008 5:44 PM

^ That argument has been going on for the past 10-15 years.

The best we can hope for immediately, is the closure of a runway.

Calgarian Feb 5, 2008 6:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coldrsx (Post 3332495)
give your city a municipal airport overlay of 150m (zenith, most areas are 130 or less) you ignorant bastard and see what you can do.

hey chill out dude, I wasn't insulting your city, I was saying it is unusual to see Edmonton on a tallest list.

Coldrsx Feb 5, 2008 6:08 PM

"It would be kinda weird to see Edmonton on this list, you are booming, but you seem to have been left far behind the rest of the country in highrise comstruction."

fuck you no insult

Rico Rommheim Feb 5, 2008 6:09 PM

Can someone explain to the meaning of this list? How is it inclusive? Where is the Bow? It doesn't make sense, many if not all of these buildings aren't even u/c!

LeftCoaster Feb 5, 2008 6:13 PM

Bow is on the 1-10 list....

I dont know about the other cities, but all the Vancouver buildings mentioned are U/C

caltrane74 Feb 5, 2008 6:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rico Rommheim (Post 3332580)
Can someone explain to the meaning of this list? How is it inclusive? Where is the Bow? It doesn't make sense, many if not all of these buildings aren't even u/c!


The reason I made this list was to track the construction progress of tall buildings across Canada that are not on the 1-10 list.

I said inclusive , because of just Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver we get more Canadian cities included and more forumers included.

Even though...in the end it was still mainly Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver.


..anyways...

start posting your pictures of the Montreal building on the list.


btw: all the buildings on the list are U/C

Calgarian Feb 5, 2008 6:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coldrsx (Post 3332577)
"It would be kinda weird to see Edmonton on this list, you are booming, but you seem to have been left far behind the rest of the country in highrise comstruction."

fuck you no insult

Hey, it's not my fault your city decided to build your airport downtown, and as such don't have buildings over 150m. And don't get mad at me because you aren't building tons of highrises like Calgary, Toronto and Vancouver are. You can try to make what I said an insuly all you want, it wasn't intended to be so fuck off.

caltrane74 Feb 5, 2008 6:31 PM

let's be civil.

I didn't create this thread for it to get locked on the first day.

Coldrsx Feb 5, 2008 6:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyc (Post 3332648)
Hey, it's not my fault your city decided to build your airport downtown, and as such don't have buildings over 150m. And don't get mad at me because you aren't building tons of highrises like Calgary, Toronto and Vancouver are. You can try to make what I said an insuly all you want, it wasn't intended to be so fuck off.

FYI Edmonton has more buildings over 12 storeys than calgary...


regardless, all cdn cities are doing much better and im happy to see that.

remind me to buy you a prairie fire we meet for drinks

wild wild west Feb 5, 2008 6:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by caltrane74 (Post 3332448)
Minto Midtown -160 Meters will be finished in a couple of months.

That should free up some space for some other projects in The big 3 or Montreal & Edmonton.

Cross your fingers.

Much like the top ten, it's still all about the GTA with a smattering of Calgary and Vancouver...

Rico Rommheim Feb 5, 2008 7:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by caltrane74 (Post 3332630)
The reason I made this list was to track the construction progress of tall buildings across Canada that are not on the 1-10 list.

I said inclusive , because of just Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver we get more Canadian cities included and more forumers included.

Even though...in the end it was still mainly Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver.


.


Ok ok now I get it. Thank you :)

Calgarian Feb 5, 2008 8:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coldrsx (Post 3332680)
FYI Edmonton has more buildings over 12 storeys than calgary...

Because that means a lot doesn't it.

WhipperSnapper Feb 5, 2008 9:25 PM

Quote:

Information complied manually from Skyscraperpage.com
Manually sucks

Did you not try clicking on diagrams, set country to Canada and status to construction?

Quote:

FYI Edmonton has more buildings over 12 storeys than calgary
FYI, Calgary just surpassed Edmonton for completed over 12 storey buildings. (36-7 Calgary for those under construction)

Coldrsx Feb 5, 2008 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyc (Post 3333006)
Because that means a lot doesn't it.



i would rather have more towers than fewer with more height.

francely57 Feb 5, 2008 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by caltrane74 (Post 3332630)
..anyways...

start posting your pictures of the Montreal building on the list.

400 Sherbrooke west, ~120m, 37 floors (Montreal's tallest since 1992)


at 14 floors on January 20, 2008... now it's 15 (around the same level as Bay/Adelaide and RBC?)

http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e2...7/IMG_3555.jpg


crane seen from McGill University (12th bla bla) on December 20, 2007

http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e2...C/IMG_3265.jpg




To me the building is basically the Verve (Toronto) with beige instead of green, and dark grey instead of white.

Calgarian Feb 5, 2008 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coldrsx (Post 3333288)
i would rather have more towers than fewer with more height.

No to drag this on, but I can't help this one. Would you rather have Edmonton's skyline or Calgary's? cause from the sounds of it you prefer Edmonton's (which seems kinda weird to me).

Rico Rommheim Feb 5, 2008 10:55 PM

I find it quite bland, the rendering made it seem like it was going to e quality, this looks like yet another pre-fab concrete mindless skyscraper that we've benn getting these past few years :(

Coldrsx Feb 5, 2008 10:56 PM

^i love the density of calgary's but honestly find Edmonton's much more balanced and given the river valley for more photogenic.

however, the quality and volume of recent projects in calgary does make me green with envy.

AndrewJ3D Feb 5, 2008 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coldrsx (Post 3333330)
^i love the density of calgary's but honestly find Edmonton's much more balanced and given the river valley for more photogenic.

however, the quality and volume of recent projects in calgary does make me green with envy.


Some home town biases on this site are so funny. It's obvious that at some point in the last economic boom in Alberta that Calgary's skyline surpassed Edmonton's in style, height, balance, and scale. Their really is no question about it. And if Edmonton's was so photogenic, why do I have a tough time picturing it without googling it? I mean if I saw a picture of it I'd know what city I'm looking at, but if somebody asked me to make a simple sketch I wouldn't know where to begin. Calgary on the other hand I could get most of it right.

Sorry for perpetuating this argument, when I get home I'll try and ad something a bit more constructive.

Coldrsx Feb 5, 2008 11:05 PM

^not hometown bias...seriously.

AndrewJ3D Feb 5, 2008 11:13 PM

It just seems small town compared to Calgary. And each year the gap gets greater and greater. Actually it reminds me a lot of North Yorks Skyline.

http://www.bigskyline.com/images/Sky..._night_1_z.jpg

Kevin_foster Feb 5, 2008 11:19 PM

Funny, an Edmonton /Calgary Rivalry? Now there's a new one!

It's part of our heritage. No matter what, Edmonton is better than Calgary, in every aspect, simply because I'm from Edmonton. They teach this in schools here.

And visa versa, if I was from Calgary...

But it's an intimate feud. Only those who enjoy S&M would understand. And in this case, calgary is our bitch. :D

These arguments are a part of Canadian history. Your watching a longstanding tradition carry out here folks. Admission should be charged!

Coldrsx Feb 5, 2008 11:20 PM

without turning this into an off-topic...the shear length of the skyline is ridiculous and almost impossible to capture in a decent shot....

http://www.globalairphotos.com/image...dh2001_196.jpg

Calgarian Feb 5, 2008 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndrewJ3D (Post 3333372)
It just seems small town compared to Calgary. And each year the gap gets greater and greater. Actually it reminds me a lot of North Yorks Skyline.
[/IMG]

It's not that Edmonton is small time, it's just that Calgary's skyline is that of a city 5x the size, we are just so big time (not to get cocky, but it is true) we make Edmonton look small, when in fact it has a skyline of a city 2-3x it's size.

eemy Feb 5, 2008 11:36 PM

My God, this thread is flooded with testosterone.

I'm really surprised how close that Montreal tower is being built to its neighbour.

WhipperSnapper Feb 5, 2008 11:38 PM

Quote:

i would rather have more towers than fewer with more height.
again ... since Calgary has more of both

Coldrsx Feb 5, 2008 11:42 PM

^incorrect.

WhipperSnapper Feb 5, 2008 11:56 PM

SSP is as close to accurate as possible ... I made sure of it!

Cities/12+ storeys
Toronto - 1677
Vancouver - 626
Montreal - 500
Calgary - 227
Edmonton - 224

The boom in Calgary over the last several years is killing you!

Rico Rommheim Feb 5, 2008 11:56 PM

Montreal would be at around 600-650. Maybe 700 but that's a stretch.

MonkeyRonin Feb 6, 2008 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goodlookin' (Post 3333493)
SSP is as close to accurate as possible ... I made sure of it!

Toronto - 1677
Edmonton - 224

These still fall short of the 1,718 and 235 listed by Emporis, but the numbers are otherwise higher on SSP (as higher=more accurate in this case).

Kevin_foster Feb 6, 2008 12:16 AM

Sorry to step in here.. but emporis database reports:

Calgary 221 High Rise
Edmonton 235 High Rise

Calgary - 21 U/C
Edmonton - 8 U/C

When all is finished being built - Calgary will apparently have one more tower than Edmonton. See emporis.com for their definition of Tower.

TOBoy Feb 6, 2008 12:27 AM

Emporis is by far the most inaccurate site for skyscrapers. As more and more buildings are added to SSP's lists, it will be the primary source for skyscrapers for most cities.

feepa Feb 6, 2008 12:30 AM

What is the point of this discussion, in it's current form?

Calgary has nice shinny office towers, and Edmonton doesn't have as many.

Calgary has some more height, a big obsession for those in Calgary compensating for something else.

Point? There is none. So everyone (cold, johnnyc) untie the knot in your collective panties.

And yes, that post was an insult, though, not direct, it certain was there, and intentional.

Far far far behind every other city in Canada, but only if looking at Vancouver, Toronto or Calgary? Didn't realize these were the only cities in Canada. Winnipeg, Regina, Saskatoon, Ottawa, montreal, London, Hamilton, etc, pay attention, according to JohnnyC, you don't exist in Canada.

LordMandeep Feb 6, 2008 12:30 AM

it says city hall phase 2 is approved, which is clearly not true..

eemy Feb 6, 2008 1:08 AM

I'm a little confused. SSP lists a highrise as either greater than 12 stories or greater than 35m tall.

Given that definition and consolidated to CMA (roughly):
Toronto - 2140
Vancouver - 980
Montreal - 632
Ottawa - 398
Calgary - 262
Edmonton - 248
Hamilton - 153
Winnipeg - 141
London - 119
Halifax - 79
Kitchener - 63
Quebec City - 59
Windsor - 51
Victoria - 48
Saskatoon - 46
St. Catherines - 41
Regina - 39

WhipperSnapper Feb 6, 2008 1:11 AM

Quote:

Montreal would be at around 600-650. Maybe 700 but that's a stretch.
sorry but Montreal (the city not the metro) is 500 +/- 10 at most


Quote:

Sorry to step in here.. but emporis database reports:

Calgary 221 High Rise
Edmonton 235 High Rise

Calgary - 21 U/C
Edmonton - 8 U/C
You do realize a highrise on Emporis is either 12 storeys or a building with a known height above 35m

I count 226 12+ storey buildings for Edmonton and Calgary is obviously really outdated - tarjan pointe is not under construction

caltrane74 Feb 6, 2008 1:22 AM

We use to have a huge set of Niagara Falls-St.Kitts forumers...what happened?

I would love to see an update of the Hilton Niagara Building....


What happened to our Mississauga Forumers with updates on Absolute world...?

Comon guys''

updates!!!!!!!!!!!!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.