SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Proposals (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=361)
-   -   SAN FRANCISCO | 530 Howard Street | 844 FT | 72 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123461)

BTinSF Jan 12, 2007 9:15 AM

SAN FRANCISCO | 530 Howard Street | 844 FT | 72 FLOORS
 
I believe the following Business Times article makes it reasonable to start a thread for this as a "proposal":

Quote:

Developers dust off plans to build SoMa office tower
San Francisco Business Times - January 5, 2007
by J.K. Dineen and Ryan Tate
A stealth contender among the next crop of downtown San Francisco office buildings, 524 Howard St. seemed to have fallen off the map.

But perhaps not for long, according to developer Higgins Development Partners, which owns the parcel along with financial partner Pritzker Realty.

A 23-story building designed by HellerManus, 524 Howard St. was approved in 2000 and put on ice after the tech boom soured. On a mid-block site between First and Second streets, the project will include 202,000 square feet of office space. Swinerton is the contractor.

With rents rising rapidly in the south financial district, it's time to dust off the plans, said Nader Shah, senior VP of Higgins Development Partners.

"We believe the market has come back and we'll be taking a hard look at it in the first half of 2007," he said.

Higgins, based in Chicago, developed the 820,000-square-foot Yahoo headquarters in Sunnyvale and the Hyatt Center, a 47-story tower in Chicago.

The building at 524 Howard St. would be its first project in San Francisco.

Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranci...ml?t=printable
Here are renderings from the architect's (Heller-Manus) site:

http://63.240.68.122/FirmFiles/25/im...St%20copy1.jpg

http://63.240.68.122/FirmFiles/25/im...d%20Aerial.jpg

http://63.240.68.122/FirmFiles/25/im...wardLobby1.jpg

viewguysf Jan 5, 2008 10:38 PM

:deadthread:

BTinSF Jan 6, 2008 1:50 AM

^^^It's as dead or undead as the spec office market. Time will tell.

viewguysf May 31, 2009 9:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BTinSF (Post 3262745)
^^^It's as dead or undead as the spec office market. Time will tell.

A year and a half after my last posting here, time has now told us.

AndrewK Jun 1, 2009 9:19 AM

no way this is getting built any time soon with all the open office space in the city, though it would have been a nice addition to the area (and it's silhouette is still shown in the the transbay video).

tommaso Oct 15, 2009 11:21 PM

Updates...
 
What's the plan for this site now? And where are the official renders?

timbad Nov 11, 2012 9:39 PM

update
 
just to bring this thread a bit more up-to-date, here was socketsite from 2011, when Planning was considering approving the existing parking lot on the site for 2 more years, and from this past June, a blurb mentioning that the site has been acquired by an affiliate of Crescent Heights. no word on plans, tho.

timbad Jun 10, 2013 3:17 AM

"coming soon"?
 
was a bit surprised to see this on the site when I walked by yesterday:

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3723/9...d4423bbd_b.jpg

maybe one of our super-sleuths can come up with the renderings to post here

viewguysf Jun 10, 2013 4:05 AM

Nice! As usual, this is a huge improvement over the original Heller Manus proposal--open the link in timbad's 11/11/12 post to see it.

minesweeper Jun 10, 2013 5:43 AM

Wow, nice find! It looks like this new proposal takes full advantage of the new 450' height limit added by the Transbay Plan. Just eyeballing that rendering, it looks like it's 40+ stories.

The Transbay Plan suggested that the building on this parcel could have a direct connection to the Transit Center, but none is depicted here.

The rear design reminds me of a skinny residential tower in Manhattan, although that one is on a much skinner lot.

OneRinconHill Jun 10, 2013 6:42 AM

That is a really cool building.

fimiak Jun 10, 2013 9:15 AM

Great find timbad, another one to block my view of the Bay Bridge. J/k, but its almost ridiculous how fast these buildings are coming out of the woodwork. Imagine this area in 5-10 years...an entirely new extension of downtown for SF.

JWS Jun 11, 2013 9:11 PM

Oh man, that rendering is awesome! In an era of dozens of exciting new projects, this may have jumped to the top of my radar, simply because the narrow footprint will become more prevalent down the line once the bigger lots are all snapped up. Would love to see this get built and see how it looks in the skyline.

Any more info on this? Based on the balcony inclusion and design, it looks like this iteration will be focused primarily on condos?

peanut gallery Jun 12, 2013 11:18 PM

Nice find, timbad. Kind of reminds me of a better designed and taller Blu.

1977 Jun 13, 2013 2:35 AM

Yes, great find. I love how slender this one looks from the south/north.

minesweeper Jun 25, 2013 2:10 AM

The Planning Commission is set to approve a continuation of the "temporary" parking lot at the hearing on July 11:

Quote:

2013.0211C: 524 HOWARD STREET – north side between First and Second Streets; Lot 013 in Assessor’s Block 3721 - Request for Conditional Use Authorization, pursuant to Planning Code Sections 156 and 303, to allow the continued operation of an existing temporary surface parking lot within the C-3-O (SD) District, the Transbay C-3 Special Use District, the Transit Center C-3-O(SD) Commercial Special Use District, and the 450-S Height and Bulk District.

Preliminary Recommendation: Approval with Conditions.
Maybe we will get an update from the developer on a new timeline for this project?

timbad Jul 9, 2013 4:56 AM

socketsite chimes in, but not much new info

simms3_redux Jul 9, 2013 4:57 AM

timbad, you beat Socketsite to it by an entire month!

minesweeper Jul 11, 2013 5:43 AM

An article in the Business Times reveals that the designer is Glenn Rescalvo of Handel Architects, who also designed NEMA. It also says:

Quote:

If the project is consistent with the Transbay plan, as it appears to be, it would not require a full-blown environmental review, according to planning staff.

timbad Jul 12, 2013 8:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simms3_redux (Post 6191758)
timbad, you beat Socketsite to it by an entire month!

:) and I got no credit from Business Times, what's up with that?! :P

minesweeper Aug 10, 2013 10:37 PM

The previous hearing regarding the parking lot got postponed from July 11 to August 15. Now it's set to be approved at this Thursday's hearing. Here's the planning PDF.

They are asking for the surface parking lot to be approved for an additional two years (the maximum possible).

It also offers some details on what Crescent Heights is planning for the site:

Quote:

The Department is currently reviewing a Preliminary Project Assessment (PPA) application for development of the site. The proposal described in the PPA would construct a new 44-story building, reaching a roof height of 450 feet, containing approximately 285 dwelling units, 1,300 square feet of retail space, and 71 off-street parking spaces.

easy as pie Aug 11, 2013 6:06 PM

in a fantasy world that tower would be built without any parking. thanks for the info

timbad Aug 14, 2013 12:13 AM

socketsite blurbs, not much new info in addition to what minesweeper already posted, except they say it is still 3 years away

peanut gallery Aug 24, 2013 3:44 AM

Just for fun, I took a shot of the space where this will rise:

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5473/9...aff3817f_b.jpg

minesweeper Nov 5, 2014 6:35 AM

No new renderings, but Crescent Heights has the project up on their site now and it says:

Quote:

including a sky-bridge to the future Transbay Rooftop Park
I hope they follow through with that. It'll be great to have another building directly connected to the park.

slock Jan 31, 2016 2:42 AM

Revisions just submitted on 1/20/16. Two concepts: one all residential, the other residential and hotel. Residential/hotel is 535' to structural top, all residential is 525'.

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g1...35.17%20PM.png

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g1...35.37%20PM.png

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g1...35.51%20PM.png

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g1...36.04%20PM.png

https://aca.accela.com/ccsf/Cap/CapD...gencyCode=CCSF

tech12 Jan 31, 2016 7:40 PM

Nice! I'm looking forward to this one.

mt_climber13 Jan 31, 2016 8:58 PM

Didn't know this was going to be so tall, title says 23 floors so I assumed it would be about 250' which is a yawner, 535' is quite impressive, would be as tall as ORH 2. This is one of my favorites and have been patiently waiting for this to get built. It's gonna look awesome from Transbay Terminal Park

tall/awkward Feb 1, 2016 11:55 PM

Intriguing. I still can't help but wonder what will happen if this building is filled with wealthy NIMBYs, and plans for Parcel F are developed to tower over its west side...

a very long weekend Feb 1, 2016 11:57 PM

^ yeah, we should be doing a rain dance for hotel and rental over condo with this one.

minesweeper Feb 2, 2016 6:31 AM

A couple points of interest from the linked document:
  • The lot is zoned for 450' in height but they are asking for an extra 10% height increase in the upper tower per § 263.9. That brings the roof height to 495' and well over 500' with the mechanical screening
  • The all-residential option is 48 stories, while the hotel option has 45 floors
  • Both options have a pedestrian bridge to the transit center
  • In addition to the ground-floor retail frontage on Howard St, there's a retail spot on the same floor as the pedestrian bridge

timbad Apr 23, 2016 5:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timbad (Post 6231748)
socketsite blurbs, not much new info in addition to what minesweeper already posted, except they say it is still 3 years away

<-- that was Aug 2013, so three years would have been pretty soon, but socketsite blurbs again. two more years. sigh.

timbad Apr 23, 2016 4:48 PM

thread title update needed
 
the thread title needs updating - this is to be 48 floors as currently proposed, 495' not including mechanical

buzzbuzzsteph Jul 21, 2016 6:29 PM

https://d2kcmk0r62r1qk.cloudfront.ne...endering_5.jpg

New rendering available for Crescent Heights' project. Proposal is now for 48 stories and 334 units. More details: https://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/us/524-howard

ElDuderino Nov 2, 2016 8:05 PM

Quote:

Skinny Transbay District Tower Closer to Reality
November 2, 2016

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...psiulb160r.jpg

Speaking of skinny project sites, the plans for a 48-story, residential tower rising up to 515 feet in height at 524 Howard Street have been newly rendered, granted an exemption from having to complete a detailed environmental impact report, and are slated to be approved by San Francisco’s Planning Commission tomorrow afternoon.

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...psqxlsxbij.jpg

As designed by Handel Architects for Crescent Heights, the proposed Transbay District tower would include 334 condos over stacked parking for 167 cars and 3,900 square feet of retail space, of which 1,150 square feet would front Howard Street on the ground floor.

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...pscyspkvdj.jpg

The remaining retail space would be located on the seventh floor, connected to the future Transbay Park via a pedestrian bridge over Natoma Street as envisioned, as would be the proposed tower to rise up to 806 feet in height at 546 Howard Street upon Transbay Parcel F.

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...pseqp1n1kn.jpg

First approved for development over 25 years ago, Crescent Heights has been touting “Coming Soon” with respect to their plans for the 524 Howard Street tower since 2013 and recently secured approval the existing parking lot on the site to operate for up to another two years.

Keep in mind that Crescent Heights is also seeking approval for a possible variant to project as proposed, which would yield 72 condos over a 273-room hotel and parking for 54 cars on the 524 Howard Street site, depending upon how the market and timing plays out.

And with respect to the foundation upon which the tower would be built, the project team is currently proposing the use of “pre-drilled and press-in piles, drilled and cast-in-place piers, or rectangular-profile load bearing elements” rather than impact-driven piles down to the bedrock below.
http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2...o-reality.html

mt_climber13 Nov 2, 2016 8:39 PM

:soon:

SLO Nov 2, 2016 8:50 PM

I like the thin structure and cant wait to see the park in person!

homebucket Nov 3, 2016 2:03 AM

Looks great! Love the connection btwn the Transbay Park and retail on the 7th floor.

Are there any plans to raze 530 and 540 Howard for another tower? Would be cool to have a canyon wall rise up on that side of the park, since it's not possible on the other side thanks to the squat Foundry Square.

tall/awkward Nov 3, 2016 10:58 PM

There are other nice renderings at the bottom of this:

http://commissions.sfplanning.org/cp...XGPRSHDVAR.pdf

timbad Mar 30, 2018 9:14 PM

duplicate

timbad Mar 30, 2018 9:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timbad (Post 7418071)
<-- that was Aug 2013, so three years would have been pretty soon, but socketsite blurbs again. two more years. sigh.

<-- that was Apr 2016, so two years would have been pretty soon, but socketsite blurbs again. two more years. sigh.

slock May 15, 2019 9:14 PM

It's not 100% clear from the article, but it looks like this project as designed and approved won't be happening.

The Registry (subscription) had an item about this that stated the project was just purchased from Crescent Heights and was being combined with the adjacent building.

It's separate from the 540 Howard design we've seen, but here's a quote: "The buyers, who are the owners of the neighboring 530 Howard building, intend to combine the two parcels for greater efficiency and advance an appropriate design for one of the final significant developments in the neighborhood."

https://news.theregistrysf.com/524-h...stor-for-78mm/

mt_climber13 May 15, 2019 10:51 PM

Damn :( was so excited for this. Another squat box instead.

Pedestrian Jun 30, 2019 12:52 AM

Quote:

Planning says an approved 48-story project at 524 Howard that would have included 334 dwelling units will likely not move forward as its approvals sunset this November.
https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranc...and-macys.html

timbad Oct 31, 2019 7:50 AM

socketsite blurbs again

Quote:

... Crescent Heights ... has quietly sold the parcel ...

And with that in mind, ... American West Parking is now seeking authorization to continue to operate the “temporary” Transbay District parking lot for (at least) another two years.
woohoooooo!

timbad Sep 5, 2020 9:05 AM

socketsite

Quote:

San Francisco’s Planning Commission is expected to approve the fifth extension, which would allow the “temporary” parking lot to continue to operate through September of 2022, this week.

At the same time, the entitlements for the 495-foot-tall tower have now technically expired as well.

homebucket Aug 5, 2022 6:25 PM

Any updates on this one?

homebucket Aug 29, 2022 5:25 PM

Looks like this one remains in limbo.

Quote:

Approved Tower Pushed Back, Parking Lot Extension Sought
August 26, 2022

... with the entitlements for the 495-foot-tall tower having technically expired, an application to secure a sixth two-year extension for the “temporary” parking lot, which would run through the third quarter of 2024, has been filed with Planning. At the same time, building permits for the tower have yet to be requested. We’ll continue to keep you posted and plugged-in.
https://socketsite.com/archives/2022...on-sought.html

homebucket Aug 29, 2022 5:27 PM

A reminder of what could've been.

https://socketsite.com/wp-content/up...endering-1.jpg

https://socketsite.com/archives/2022...on-sought.html

Iceman12 Aug 29, 2022 5:54 PM

Such a shame. At what point do we create a use it or lose it policy?

Separately, anyone have a clue what's going on with Parcel F (next door)? I biked by this weekend and it's still a pile of rubble. Hines is out getting approvals for several other parcels, but this continues to stay untouched.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.