SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Austin (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=446)
-   -   Austin's Next Wave of High-Rises (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=227566)

The ATX Mar 26, 2017 6:24 AM

Austin's Next Wave of High-Rises
 
EDIT: The project list was updated as of 06/2018. The ones highlighted in green are underway, and the one highlighted in yellow is completed.

The discussion in a couple threads got me wondering what the next high rises (300'+) would be most likely to start. The list of 27 projects below shows how big our pipeline is for 300+ footers. All of the projects on the list have been mentioned in the Austin sub-forum at some point in time.

The last project to get underway - 70 Rainey - barely got started due to financing. Since then there haven't been any announcements about projects (the 300+ footers) breaking ground with financing in place. Even though Austin continues to boom, financing nationwide seems to be harder to get.

Of all the projects on the list, the only one I'm confident about is the 32-story Marriott. White Lodging has an excellent track record, and they can finance in house like they did with the Aloft.

What are everyone's thoughts on the next big ones to break ground?

https://i.imgur.com/BvbDGKS.png
https://i.imgur.com/x3c9Qev.png

AustinGoesVertical Mar 26, 2017 4:58 PM

This is a very impressive pipeline. If even 25-50% of this comes to fruition, the skyline will change dramatically. I feel good about the Marriot actually happening. Next is 3rd and Colorado because Riverside Resources put their money where their mouth was for 5th and West. The Avenue and 48 East look to be the next in line.

For more speculative projects, I'm bullish on the UT Block actually happening because looks like a lot of legwork has been done on the design end and we'be seen square footage numbers and I think unit numbers, etc. come out.

405 Colorado is a ? because the design is being overhauled. My hope is they keep some of the original components - the abstract shape, line lighting, and glass elevators, but reduce the podium.

5th and Brazos will continue to amaze me. Magellan is reputable in Chicago and the person I talk to over there keeps mentioning this as something that is definitely happening. I don't know why we haven't seen any movement.

99 Trinity is DEAD for me while Waller Park Place feels too much like a vision. The lack of high quality renderings or a website, pre-leasing, lack of hotel operator, etc. makes me think that is more like 5 years out.

Jdawgboy Mar 26, 2017 5:03 PM

It's a sure bet that there are projects that we have no idea about as evidence by The_Genral's tantilizing post on the Independent thread. Of course without official verification or press releases it's simply juicy gossip, however with strong backing given the people he heard it from, there is likely something to it.

Also lets not beat around the bush, we have a couple of posters on here that know some things but for reasons that they cannot divulge what they know, they occasionally throw in little hints here and there and leave us speculating by what they meant.

All in all it will ultimately come down to who has the financing to back up their project and the timeline as to which projects will be built going forward.

The ATX Oct 28, 2017 11:30 PM

Bump.

I started this thread back in March, and I just now updated the 300'+ project list in the OP. The project pipeline has gotten even larger since then, but we still haven't seen a significant number of large projects break ground since the summer of 2016.

The Marriott did end up being the first 300'+ project to break ground - if the demo is considered to be breaking ground. But beyond the Marriott, which one is next?

Austin is still booming, but financing appears harder get. Since the last post, a few of the big projects have gotten site plans approved:

The Avenue
Hotel Mirabeau
48 East

But there is still no solid info about their groundbreaking. I think financing is becoming a problem.

Jdawgboy Oct 29, 2017 1:06 AM

I have a feeling that we are entering a freeze period where little in the way of financing is going to take place. Midrise projects will move forward but we may be coming to the end of this building cycle for larger projects. The one building I'm pulling for is 608 Guadalupe but in general, I think it will be another year before we see the next wave really pick up. That of course will depend heavily on the state of the world economy.

The ATX Oct 29, 2017 1:25 AM

I don't have a good feeling about the three with approved site plans that I listed in my previous post starting any time soon. But Block 71 - and fortunately - 600 Guadalupe seem to have some momentum.

IIRC at last word, these three had December start dates:

Hotel Mirabeau
48 East
3rd & Colorado

But I don't have any confidence that they will break ground on schedule.

JoninATX Oct 29, 2017 3:31 AM

In other words Austin will be taking a breather. :)

brando Oct 29, 2017 7:21 PM

What project is taking up the last lot from the water plant? The one at the southwest corner of the creek across from the library?

The ATX Oct 29, 2017 7:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brando (Post 7969135)
What project is taking up the last lot from the water plant? The one at the southwest corner of the creek across from the library?

That's Block 185.

We vs us Oct 30, 2017 3:11 PM

The lack-of-financing theory is interesting. Any clue as to why that might be? Austin still seems like one of the better bets nationally. All things being equal, if I'm a big lender, I'd be pretty bullish on Austin projects.

EDIT: also, would landing a high profile project (like HQ2, say) make funding easier for everyone in the city? Interested in how funding generally works beyond individual (developer's) creditworthiness.

austlar1 Oct 30, 2017 6:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by We vs us (Post 7969783)
The lack-of-financing theory is interesting. Any clue as to why that might be? Austin still seems like one of the better bets nationally. All things being equal, if I'm a big lender, I'd be pretty bullish on Austin projects.

EDIT: also, would landing a high profile project (like HQ2, say) make funding easier for everyone in the city? Interested in how funding generally works beyond individual (developer's) creditworthiness.

Projects get built with construction loans or construction funding that is usually repaid quickly upon completion. Developers then have to refinance or dig deep into their own (and investor pockets) to repay construction loan. Perceived project viability plays a big role in funding decisions. Austin has a lot of hotel rooms in the pipeline or recently delivered. Ditto for high end apartments and condos. The demand for huge amounts of new office space seems to be present, but that could quickly change. Some of the projects currently under construction seem to have struggled to obtain funding- ie, Hotel Zaza/Gables and 70 Rainey. I am sure there are real estate or construction industry folks here that can provide a better explanation, but it makes sense to me that lenders might be feeling a little cautious at this point in the current building cycle. The attached link is pretty good primer on the two stage loan process for financing new projects.

https://www.propertymetrics.com/blog...ruction-loans/

We vs us Oct 30, 2017 8:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by austlar1 (Post 7970184)
Projects get built with construction loans or construction funding that is usually repaid quickly upon completion. Developers then have to refinance or dig deep into their own (and investor pockets) to repay construction loan. Perceived project viability plays a big role in funding decisions. Austin has a lot of hotel rooms in the pipeline or recently delivered. Ditto for high end apartments and condos. The demand for huge amounts of new office space seems to be present, but that could quickly change. Some of the projects currently under construction seem to have struggled to obtain funding- ie, Hotel Zaza/Gables and 70 Rainey. I am sure there are real estate or construction industry folks here that can provide a better explanation, but it makes sense to me that lenders might be feeling a little cautious at this point in the current building cycle. The attached link is pretty good primer on the two stage loan process for financing new projects.

https://www.propertymetrics.com/blog...ruction-loans/

Good info. I can see the skittishness -- definitely with hotels, which still need to incorporate some amazing increases in room count in 2017, 2018 and beyond.

That said, I just came across another ABJ article about our hot office market -- which is starting to match major market demand and pricing.

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...d-silicon.html

Quote:

Austin's red-hot commercial real estate market means office tenants are paying rental rates similar to those found in some of the country's priciest cities.

That's according to new research on the cost of office space from CommercialCafe, a real estate research firm.

A tenant spending $5,000 per month for Class A office space can get 1,087 square feet in Austin.

That trails only Boston (where you could afford 1,006 square feet); Washington, D.C. (849 square feet); San Francisco (803 square feet); and New York City (703 square feet).
https://d3cdtxx03omvla.cloudfront.ne...9391926279.png

I'm a little amazed, with that kind of money to be made, that we're not seeing MORE projects with solid money cropping up.

mumu Oct 30, 2017 9:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by We vs us (Post 7970331)
https://d3cdtxx03omvla.cloudfront.ne...9391926279.png

I'm a little amazed, with that kind of money to be made, that we're not seeing MORE projects with solid money cropping up.

Is this just Downtown Austin? That seems so high if it's the whole city. We have large grass fields just 3-4 miles from the Capitol (East/SE). Downtown Austin is sort of running out of space; it's tiny compared to the DTs of other cities.

SkyPie Oct 31, 2017 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mumu (Post 7970406)
Downtown Austin is sort of running out of space; it's tiny compared to the DTs of other cities.

I've often wondered where the boundaries of downtown Austin will stretch and expand over the next 20-30 years as available land in downtown proper is developed. West seems very unlikely and so does south due to the Bouldin Creek and Travis Heights neighborhoods boxing it in. Maybe north towards the capital complex and West Campus? East seems like the most likely candidate, but given current constraints on height, I'm not sure how feasible that will be either. Perhaps a push for more density in the northwest section of downtown?

drummer Oct 31, 2017 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyPie (Post 7970619)
I've often wondered where the boundaries of downtown Austin will stretch and expand over the next 20-30 years as available land in downtown proper is developed. West seems very unlikely and so does south due to the Bouldin Creek and Travis Heights neighborhoods boxing it in. Maybe north towards the capital complex and West Campus? East seems like the most likely candidate, but given current constraints on height, I'm not sure how feasible that will be either. Perhaps a push for more density in the northwest section of downtown?

Also along Riverside and south to Oltorf, etc., on the east side of I-35.

lzppjb Oct 31, 2017 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyPie (Post 7970619)
Perhaps a push for more density in the northwest section of downtown?

This is what I think happens.

Jdawgboy Oct 31, 2017 3:39 AM

Well if you look at the South Shore Central vision, DT can most certainly expand south, though not very far. Depending on how the area is developed, we could see a good amount of sq footage. It will come down to timing and market demand.

The ATX Jun 10, 2018 2:24 AM

It's time for a thread bump to see where we are at. I updated the list of 300'+ projects in the OP from from my next tallest projects list update.

Austin's economy and population continue to boom. But financing for large projects is getting much more difficult to obtain nationwide. The Marriott was the only large (300'+) project to break ground in 2017. So far in 2018, Block 71 is the only big project to get started. All of the 300'+ towers U/C are topped out or close to it. The cranes will be gone for a short period of time until late July when the Marriott cranes go up.
Among the taller projects that I previously thought were a good bet to break ground was Hotel Mirabeau. I now think that one might be dead. Currently the best bets appear to be:

300 Colorado (Financing should be a no brainer for a 100% pre-leased project.)
Alexan (Site plan is approved and Trammell Crow Residential is behind it)
405 Colorado (Site plan is approved and Brandywine doesn't seem to have an issue with financing a project like this.)

austlar1 Jun 10, 2018 3:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 8216045)
It's time for a thread bump to see where we are at. I updated the list of 300'+ projects in the OP from from my next tallest projects list update.

Austin's economy and population continue to boom. But financing for large projects is getting much more difficult to obtain nationwide. The Marriott was the only large (300'+) project to break ground in 2017. So far in 2018, Block 71 is the only big project to get started. All of the 300'+ towers U/C are topped out or close to it. The cranes will be gone for a short period of time until late July when the Marriott cranes go up.
Among the taller projects that I previously thought were a good bet to break ground was Hotel Mirabeau. I now think that one might be dead. Currently the best bets appear to be:

300 Colorado (Financing should be a no brainer for a 100% pre-leased project.)
Alexan (Site plan is approved and Trammell Crow Residential is behind it)
405 Colorado (Site plan is approved and Brandywine doesn't seem to have an issue with financing a project like this.)

I agree with your list, but I wonder whether you might add 6th and Guadalupe to it some time soon. The architect who has been posting some about this project seems to have the skinny on the timeline, and he's suggesting something is likely to start to happen later in the year. On the other hand that extended stay hotel does not seem to have gotten the message, so who knows??

The ATX Jun 10, 2018 4:17 AM

I hope 6th & Guadalupe gets started more so than any other project. But it's not financed as far as we know, and I'm not yet sold on Lincoln and Lynd/Kairoi's ability to get stuff built. I put a lot of emphasis on a developer's track record for predicting the success of their projects. White Lodging is #1 in my book when it comes to getting their proposals built. Trammell Crow is right behind them, and Block 185 would be #4 on my list of the next big ones to get started if it was further along in the approval process.

ILUVSAT Jun 10, 2018 4:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 8216111)
...I'm not yet sold on Lincoln and Lynd/Kairoi's ability to get stuff built. I put a lot of emphasis on a developer's track record for predicting the success of their projects...

Seriously? Lincoln just finished 5th & Colorado (with no problem) and Lynd was a partner in The Bowie (along with Endeavor).

When you say "stuff," are you referring only to high-rises? Lynd/Kairoi is quite active and successful in both Austin and San Antonio. Heck, they've quietly developed a massive, 300+ unit apartment complex on 620 near Hudson Bend (among several other big projects).

The ATX Jun 10, 2018 4:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILUVSAT (Post 8216129)
Seriously? Lincoln just finished 5th & Colorado (with no problem) and Lynd was a partner in The Bowie (along with Endeavor).

When you say "stuff," are you referring only to high-rises? Lynd/Kairoi is quite active and successful in both Austin and San Antonio. Heck, they've quietly developed a massive, 300+ unit apartment complex on 620 near Hudson Bend (among several other big projects).

I'm only referring to 300'+ downtown projects. Lincoln and Endeavor (who worked with Lynd on The Bowie) projects would be high on my list AFTER White Lodging and Trammell Crow. I only listed the projects that I felt were most likely to break ground soon. Instead of getting angry, feel free to list the ones you think have the best chance of starting soon.

Syndic Jun 10, 2018 7:44 AM

With so much construction in general happening in Austin and with the Independent, 3rd + Shoal, Austin Proper, and Fifth + West happening, I totally didn't realize that so few projects had started up until I read this. But you're right!

Alexan seems like a lock. I'm surprised it took so long for development to start in that area since everybody has known for years that Waterloo Park is going to be bad-ass once it's finished. Alexan is going to get the jump on other developers but it's still a late jump.

I think all of your picks are logically sound, The_ATX.

But what about The Avenue? Is that looking more like a 2019 timeline?

The ATX Jun 10, 2018 1:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Syndic (Post 8216168)
But what about The Avenue? Is that looking more like a 2019 timeline?

I think the Avenue and 48 East are having trouble getting financing. The site plans for both of them have been approved for a while, but there is no sign of any groundbreakings. They don't have big national developers behind them either which may be why they are having trouble getting underway.

Jdawgboy Jun 10, 2018 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 8216111)
I hope 6th & Guadalupe gets started more so than any other project. But it's not financed as far as we know, and I'm not yet sold on Lincoln and Lynd/Kairoi's ability to get stuff built. I put a lot of emphasis on a developer's track record for predicting the success of their projects. White Lodging is #1 in my book when it comes to getting their proposals built. Trammell Crow is right behind them, and Block 185 would be #4 on my list of the next big ones to get started if it was further along in the approval process.


311 Bowie got built so I would say that is a good track record. Also even if financing has not been announced, that doesn't necessarily mean they are not close to securing financing. Usually that is kept under wraps until the deal is done and set. I agree that we need to see signs that the Extended Stay is about to close down, so far that hasn't happened yet.

urbancore Aug 23, 2018 12:56 AM

bump

GoldenBoot Aug 23, 2018 3:55 AM

The next wave will be interesting. With the next recession looming, how many will actually come out of the ground?!?

Dale Aug 23, 2018 4:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenBoot (Post 8290481)
The next wave will be interesting. With the next recession looming, how many will actually come out of the ground?!?

Where did you hear that a recession is looming ?

lzppjb Aug 23, 2018 4:11 AM

I won't answer for anyone else, but honestly...recessions are always looming. It's cyclical.

Austinite101 Aug 23, 2018 4:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale (Post 8290489)
Where did you hear that a recession is looming ?

Inflation is picking up, there's some international economic uncertainty, some economic indicators associated with a stale, aged bull market are showing red flags, etc. Recessions are a matter of when, not if. We're due for one soon.

hookem Aug 23, 2018 4:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Austinite101 (Post 8290500)
Inflation is picking up, there's some international economic uncertainty, some economic indicators associated with a stale, aged bull market are showing red flags, etc. Recessions are a matter of when, not if. We're due for one soon.

Indeed. We are in the longest bull market in history. What has happened after all the previous longest bull markets in history?

We vs us Aug 23, 2018 2:01 PM

I think there's the possibility of a recession plus one for construction -- not only the standard cycle finally coming back around, but the effect of tariffs on construction material.

Dale Aug 23, 2018 2:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Austinite101 (Post 8290500)
Inflation is picking up, there's some international economic uncertainty, some economic indicators associated with a stale, aged bull market are showing red flags, etc. Recessions are a matter of when, not if. We're due for one soon.

I'm intrigued by the apocalyptic impulse of Americans who would otherwise not consider themselves religious.

Well, maybe it's not exclusively Americans. Torontonians have been wringing their hands about an impending "bubble" for years. I mean YEARS.

Azul Aug 23, 2018 2:47 PM

I'd be skeptical to layer the cyclical market onto Austin's development. It's a legitimate worry but realize there's several assumptions to be made to tie these things together and predict development tanking.

The biggest one is assuming that the regional economy will mirror that of the nation/world as a whole which is likely not going to be the case after seeing our growth during the 2008 Recession. For the time being our industries are still thriving and likely still will when the next cyclical recession hits, though I wouldn't expect as well as 2008, honestly.

Another assumption would be that these investors would pull out funding during a recession, which could happen but would be unlikely as Austin and Texas as a whole is still a net-positive investment on their end. In addition smaller projects with tighter budgets and weaker investors are typically the ones that get hit the hardest. This leaves construction, engineering, and architect firms to lose some of their "filler jobs" and thus they usually take on these larger projects at a slight discount because they can't afford to lose all work. It gives these larger developments more incentive to get these projects rolling.


tl; dr - Austin is weird, nuanced, and there's a lot of gears moving with cyclical recessions

Geckos_Rule Aug 23, 2018 6:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azul (Post 8290888)
I'd be skeptical to layer the cyclical market onto Austin's development. It's a legitimate worry but realize there's several assumptions to be made to tie these things together and predict development tanking.

The biggest one is assuming that the regional economy will mirror that of the nation/world as a whole which is likely not going to be the case after seeing our growth during the 2008 Recession. For the time being our industries are still thriving and likely still will when the next cyclical recession hits, though I wouldn't expect as well as 2008, honestly.

Another assumption would be that these investors would pull out funding during a recession, which could happen but would be unlikely as Austin and Texas as a whole is still a net-positive investment on their end. In addition smaller projects with tighter budgets and weaker investors are typically the ones that get hit the hardest. This leaves construction, engineering, and architect firms to lose some of their "filler jobs" and thus they usually take on these larger projects at a slight discount because they can't afford to lose all work. It gives these larger developments more incentive to get these projects rolling.


tl; dr - Austin is weird, nuanced, and there's a lot of gears moving with cyclical recessions

Still, there were several towers during that time that didn't get built due to the recession. For example, the Hotel Van Zandt was originally planned to be built concurrently with the Shore Condos around 2007, but they stopped it until 5-ish years later.

StoOgE Aug 23, 2018 8:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geckos_Rule (Post 8291261)
Still, there were several towers during that time that didn't get built due to the recession. For example, the Hotel Van Zandt was originally planned to be built concurrently with the Shore Condos around 2007, but they stopped it until 5-ish years later.

Yeah, but I will say that the financial collapse at that time froze financing at a very high level and specifically funding for large scale projects came to a screeching halt nationally. I was still working in finance back then, and it was a real wacky moment.

Assuming whatever recession we enter in the next 4-5 years looks like is a more normal correction and not something that catastrophic there will be capital available for projects in off-cycle sectors or regions.

The last recession (hopefully) isn't a useful predictor of normal downturns. Though, all out trade wars and protectionism is a fun thing was haven't really seen at scale since pre-WWII. So, hopefully we get away from this stupidity and get back to free trade.

N90 Aug 25, 2018 5:21 PM

Here is the next wave. I wont include any under construction, so just the proposals or the ones in site demo. I'll post the ones that have renderings, site plans and massings, or at least conceptual designs.

6 X Guadalupe 848 feet
https://i.imgur.com/8dS57pd.png
https://i.imgur.com/8dS57pd.png

The Republic 709 feet
https://i.imgur.com/wJVEO1g.png
https://i.imgur.com/wJVEO1g.png

Block 185 593 feet
https://i.imgur.com/L8vQZJs.png
https://i.imgur.com/L8vQZJs.png

Block 71 542 feet
https://i.imgur.com/y3WDCuj.png
https://i.imgur.com/y3WDCuj.png

305 W. 5th 480 feet?
http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/...psdezk7dat.jpg
http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/...psdezk7dat.jpg

300 Colorado 446 feet
https://i.imgur.com/P79SoqE.png
https://i.imgur.com/P79SoqE.png

711 Trinity 436 feet
http://i.imgur.com/mEaVn0d.png
http://i.imgur.com/mEaVn0d.png

Velocity Tower 400-450 feet?
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8...b4a7c~mv2.webp
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8...b4a7c~mv2.webp

48 East 358 feet
http://i.imgur.com/9kdzUxF.png
http://i.imgur.com/9kdzUxF.png

Hotel Mirabeau 357 feet
https://i.imgur.com/WChqaNC.png
https://i.imgur.com/WChqaNC.png

405 Colorado 356 feet
http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/...psrbbor0rt.jpg
http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/...psrbbor0rt.jpg

5th & Brazos 355 feet
https://i.imgur.com/I2t8hgN.png
https://i.imgur.com/I2t8hgN.png

91 Red River 354 feet
https://i.imgur.com/NVJiKkL.png
https://i.imgur.com/NVJiKkL.png

One Austin 353 feet
https://i.imgur.com/6YNQry7.png
https://i.imgur.com/6YNQry7.png

Alexan Capitol 350 feet
https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1827/4...e1cbccd4_h.jpg
https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1827/4...e1cbccd4_h.jpg

The Avenue Hotel 346 feet
https://nelsenpartners.com/wp-conten...-Level_8th.jpg
https://nelsenpartners.com/wp-conten...-Level_8th.jpg

56 East 250 feet?
http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/...psdmyk3zmj.jpg
http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/...psdmyk3zmj.jpg

17th Street 220 feet
https://i.imgur.com/4WXP51W.png
https://i.imgur.com/4WXP51W.png

425 Riverside 216 feet
https://i.imgur.com/qveGAxC.png
https://i.imgur.com/qveGAxC.png

The Standard 191 feet
https://media.licdn.com/media-proxy/...bhU4hGUB5sE-Pg
https://media.licdn.com/media-proxy/...bhU4hGUB5sE-Pg

Two Two Zero Four 180 feet?
https://static.spacecrafted.com/aae1...XEEL39JLpCdD4p
https://static.spacecrafted.com/aae1...XEEL39JLpCdD4p

The Huston 170 feet
https://i.imgur.com/Y9lpLFE.png
https://i.imgur.com/Y9lpLFE.png

82 Rainey 160 feet?
https://i.imgur.com/fSbsgWk.png
https://i.imgur.com/fSbsgWk.png

Cambria Hotel 140 feet?
http://i.imgur.com/h2g6nID.png
http://i.imgur.com/h2g6nID.png

916 Congress 133 feet
http://i.imgur.com/vvNY9Wx.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/vvNY9Wx.jpg

Travis Co. Courthouse 130 feet?
https://mms.businesswire.com/media/2...jpg?download=1
https://mms.businesswire.com/media/2...jpg?download=1

1108 Nueces 65 feet
https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4624/2...a0cd111f_h.jpg
https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4624/2...a0cd111f_h.jpg

Canopy by Hilton 60 feet?
https://austin.towers.net/wp-content...7528866529.png
https://austin.towers.net/wp-content...7528866529.png

NYC2ATX Aug 25, 2018 5:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StoOgE (Post 8291436)
Yeah, but I will say that the financial collapse at that time froze financing at a very high level and specifically funding for large scale projects came to a screeching halt nationally. I was still working in finance back then, and it was a real wacky moment.

Assuming whatever recession we enter in the next 4-5 years looks like is a more normal correction and not something that catastrophic there will be capital available for projects in off-cycle sectors or regions.

The last recession (hopefully) isn't a useful predictor of normal downturns. Though, all out trade wars and protectionism is a fun thing was haven't really seen at scale since pre-WWII. So, hopefully we get away from this stupidity and get back to free trade.

I have a pretty simple reason for fearing a recession's effects less in Austin in particular, and that's because so much of the boom in the city is tech-driven.

The last time tech was the cause of a recession (the dot-com bubble), so much more of the money going through Silicon Valley was speculative and the entire industry itself was in its infancy. There had not yet been much proof of profitability. Even since the Great Recession, the tech industry has matured so much and seems to run on its own set of principles that preclude some of the more volatile aspects of the economy.

We haven't yet seen how the tech industry would respond to a contraction of activity now that literally everyone has a smartphone, and Amazon and other online retailers are monumental money-printing machines. None of these companies are going anywhere this time, and Austin has firmly established itself as both a tech and tourism hub in the decade since 2008. Even if a recession causes the average American to keep the purse-strings tighter, phones, tablets, and the Alexas and Siris of the world aren't going anywhere.

Also, it has already been stated that if anything will tip the US into a recession, it won't be a real estate bubble this time, but either the bubble of student and credit card debt, the current trade war or continued volatility in the federal government that will do it. These big new projects coming online have shown that they are going ahead with tenants and numbers that prove their viability, and honestly, the Texas economy itself is such a steamroller that it would take more than a normal cyclical correction to destabilize everything locally. I'm not so worried at the moment.


Also N90, thank you for the new rundown, I'm weeping tears of joy at these towers. YAAS :cheers:

hookem Aug 25, 2018 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYC2ATX (Post 8293678)
I have a pretty simple reason for fearing a recession's effects less in Austin in particular, and that's because so much of the boom in the city is tech-driven.

I like your thinking, and hope you are right. But here are my reasons for concern about a potential recession having an effect here in Austin regardless of the tech boom -

1) Interest rates rising will affect property values everywhere
2) The high current valuations and the new $10K SALT deduction limit may have an impact on property values
3) There is a small but increasing investment portion of the Austin housing market; high end second homes, investment properties, etc that are not employment driven. They are, in part, counting on the high appreciation. Once that slows or even reverses a little bit, there could be a snowball effect with many properties coming on the market. Especially those that have already seen big appreciation in the last few years -- investors will want to cash in on those gains rather than risk them evaporating.

Although not directly related to Austin in particular, we are in a period where everything is on the high end of historic valuation -- Stocks, Real Estate, Bonds. And interest rates are still on the low end. It just doesn't seem sustainable without at least a moderate correction.

wwmiv Aug 26, 2018 10:44 AM

Wouldn’t that only affect condo development? There have been very few condos delivered downtown in the last decade; most of the new towers are office, hotel, and apartment.

lzppjb Aug 27, 2018 5:10 AM

Austin is also somewhat insulated because of the large base of jobs in City, County, State, and Federal government, as well as UT.

drummer Aug 27, 2018 7:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lzppjb (Post 8294854)
Austin is also somewhat insulated because of the large base of jobs in City, County, State, and Federal government, as well as UT.

Add to that US Army Futures Command and other business growth that comes with that landing in Austin (though I guess that's Federal).

Geckos_Rule Aug 27, 2018 4:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwmiv (Post 8294130)
Wouldn’t that only affect condo development? There have been very few condos delivered downtown in the last decade; most of the new towers are office, hotel, and apartment.

In the last decade? We've had a fair amount. Since the Austonian, we got Seaholm, W Residences, 4 season residences, 70 rainey, the independant, and 5th and west, and Austin proper. Not to mention the few that are in the pipeline and are very likely to begin construction within a year from now (i.e. 6 x guad). Not to mention even more apartment buildings.

urbancore Aug 27, 2018 4:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geckos_Rule (Post 8295140)
In the last decade? We've had a fair amount. Since the Austonian, we got Seaholm, W Residences, 4 season residences, 70 rainey, the independant, and 5th and west, and Austin proper. Not to mention the few that are in the pipeline and are very likely to begin construction within a year from now (i.e. 6 x guad). Not to mention even more apartment buildings.

Fair amount of projects yes, but not that many units per project considering big Austin is. I seem to recall the number Austin can reasonably absorb is 300 new urban core units per year. Apartment buildings are typically easier to get funding for....if the economy dips, people ease up on purchasing, but they will still rent.

wwmiv Aug 27, 2018 8:13 PM

Almost all of those buildings are mixed use, not all condos, hence why funding was easier.

urbancore Dec 3, 2018 9:35 PM

bump....
what are the next 6 we think will realistically break ground by summer 2019?

Geckos_Rule Dec 3, 2018 9:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dcbrickley (Post 8397886)
bump....
what are the next 6 we think will realistically break ground by summer 2019?

93 Red River, 425 Riverside, The Huston, 5th and Brazos, and 300 Colorado. Also, it's not a highrise, but I'd imagine the associated 9-floor mixed-use development being built in conjunction with 70 Rainey will start sometime soon.

Others that are possible are 6th & Guad, Block 185, Alexan, 5th & Lavaca, and 405 Colorado.

We vs us Dec 3, 2018 10:43 PM

5th and Brazos is already UC.

Echostatic Dec 3, 2018 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by We vs us (Post 8397980)
5th and Brazos is already UC.

300 Colorado practically is, too.

We vs us Dec 6, 2018 4:21 AM

Looking back through the threads, the Travis (two towers, right across from the Van Zandt) seem like it's ready for demo. That's going to be a pretty amazing project when it finally gets revving.


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.