SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   City Compilations (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=87)
-   -   AUSTIN | Projects & Construction III (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=199012)

Urbannizer Jan 24, 2018 10:48 PM

Possibly our first look at the Brackenridge Campus Redevelopment.

https://www.bogza.com/work/texas-central/

https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4743/2...05f4dec2_h.jpg

https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4656/2...23632a56_o.jpg

Dariusb Jan 25, 2018 7:23 AM

How tall will that be?

wwmiv Jan 25, 2018 7:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dariusb (Post 8060009)
How tall will that be?

There seem to be 9 highrises in total in these two renderings:

4 on the northern half (from west to east: 60, ~54, ~21, & ~30 floors), 4 on the southern (from west to east: 30, 49, 40, and 46 floors), and the round one in the middle closest to I-35 (~34 floors). If built as such, this will be the most prominent node in our skyline, even without considering multiple neighboring highrise proposals in the development pipeline:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=201251
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...=228193&page=5

IluvATX Jan 25, 2018 6:42 PM

Build these now Amazon (or Merck). :slob::slob:

JoninATX Jan 25, 2018 9:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IluvATX (Post 8059139)
It'd be cool to compile each district into photos/list to compare construction activity and architectural differences.:cool:

That would ba really cool idea. Like comparing 2nd St District to Rainey St and so forth.

JManc Jan 25, 2018 9:43 PM

That second rendering viewed from 35? Can't get my bearings straight..

KevinFromTexas Jan 25, 2018 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JManc (Post 8061092)
That second rendering viewed from 35? Can't get my bearings straight..

The 2nd image is looking north over Waterloo Park between Red River Street and I-35. I-35 is to the right.

The first image is looking east toward I-35.

JManc Jan 26, 2018 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas (Post 8061247)
The 2nd image is looking north over Waterloo Park between Red River Street and I-35. I-35 is to the right.

The first image is looking east toward I-35.

Yup... got it now. The big pinkish Sheraton would be 'behind' the viewer in second shot.

KevinFromTexas Jan 26, 2018 10:31 PM

^Yep. Apparently, though, this is a proposal from Brandywine, which did not win the bid. Wexler did, so we'll still have to wait to see what the design will be. Still, if this is what wasn't chosen, then the one that did win must be pretty good. And I would assume the scale would be about the same.

The Independent update:

Crane jump today and working on the 49th floor - 528 feet - 0 inches tall now.

https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net...6c&oe=5B1F54CD
The Independent Austin - https://www.facebook.com/independent...type=3&theater

H2O Jan 27, 2018 2:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IluvATX (Post 8057861)
is this shot considered second street district or warehouse district?

Technically, it is the Seaholm Development District / Seaholm EcoDistrict. https://austintexas.gov/seaholm

clubtokyo Jan 29, 2018 7:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbannizer (Post 8059480)

Looks nice!

clubtokyo Jan 31, 2018 7:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoninATX (Post 8061090)
That would ba really cool idea. Like comparing 2nd St District to Rainey St and so forth.

I support this idea!

IluvATX Jan 31, 2018 8:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clubtokyo (Post 8068416)
I support this idea!

I started a thread regarding the districts on the Austin page.

clubtokyo Feb 14, 2018 3:27 AM

Whole Foods 365 coming to plaza Saltillo development!

https://vgy.me/837HUf.jpg

IluvATX Feb 16, 2018 7:00 PM

What does 365 mean?

clubtokyo Feb 16, 2018 7:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IluvATX (Post 8088380)
What does 365 mean?

Its an affordable whole foods concept. The first one was put in Cedar Park.

You can read more about it here:
http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/blog...e-foods-market

clubtokyo Mar 1, 2018 12:18 AM

Nice visual update of The Independent:
https://preview.ibb.co/bUkt8H/CC0134..._F50_F7_AB.jpg
Credit:jtype
https://instagram.com/p/BfE-DkKl6fb/

GoldenBoot Mar 1, 2018 8:50 PM

^^^awesome pic!!!

GoldenBoot Mar 1, 2018 8:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbannizer (Post 8059480)

DAMNIT!!! Kiss this beauty goodbye. Frigin' Central Health!

The Best Forumer Mar 13, 2018 6:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clubtokyo (Post 8103278)

nice pic ai agree!


has that... bladerunner feel...

KevinFromTexas Mar 14, 2018 9:48 PM

View looking southeast from the 51st floor of the Independent.

https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net...c5&oe=5B3CA570
The Independent Austin - https://www.facebook.com/independent...type=3&theater

Syndic Mar 15, 2018 5:14 AM

Man, that's high up!

clubtokyo Mar 15, 2018 6:10 PM

Nice view!

clubtokyo Mar 16, 2018 3:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas (Post 8120132)
View looking southeast from the 51st floor of the Independent.

https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net...c5&oe=5B3CA570
The Independent Austin - https://www.facebook.com/independent...type=3&theater

These tenants will have incredible views!

KevinFromTexas Mar 16, 2018 7:23 AM

Yeah, I mean those roofs are over 400 feet above the street, and this thing will tower almost 300 feet higher than they do.

I remember leaning over the edge on the main roof of the Austonian looking down on 100 Congress - which is about 300 feet below. It was a strange feeling seeing it that far down, even a bit disorienting seeing such a strange view of it. 100 Congress was Austin's 4th tallest from 1987 to 2002. That building now is our 28th tallest.

The ATX Mar 26, 2018 4:44 AM

Here are two of the better videos I've seen of this morning's Block 71 implosion. The first one is from a drone, and the second one was taken from in front of the Congress Ave. Aloft.

Video Link


Video Link

photoLith Mar 26, 2018 5:46 PM

Good riddance, that building was ugly as sin. What are they putting in its place?

KevinFromTexas Mar 26, 2018 5:56 PM

EDIT: Site plan now indicates the Block 71 office tower will be slightly reduced from 555 feet to 542 feet. The number of floors and design remain the same. The FAA had reviewed this project and had some concern about the height. Seriously, FAA, 13 feet? Put your wheels up. haha

ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/ATD_AULCC/...0blk_PLANS.pdf

https://i.imgur.com/pPFF6bZ.png

https://i.imgur.com/y3WDCuj.png

The Best Forumer Mar 26, 2018 5:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by photoLith (Post 8133266)
Good riddance, that building was ugly as sin. What are they putting in its place?

Houston news this morning mentioned something about another tall one for you guys!

AviationGuy Mar 27, 2018 3:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Best Forumer (Post 8133283)
Houston news this morning mentioned something about another tall one for you guys!

That's amazing. At the rate Austin's skyline is growing, it could become Texas' premier skyline. To me, it's already the best looking in the state, and one of the best in the country when you look at it from various angles.

wwmiv Mar 27, 2018 4:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AviationGuy (Post 8134038)
That's amazing. At the rate Austin's skyline is growing, it could become Texas' premier skyline. To me, it's already the best looking in the state, and one of the best in the country when you look at it from various angles.

Dallas has ~130 built highrises taller than 35 meters (115 feet) in the skyrise belt from Downtown thru Uptown and Turtle Creek situated in a nearly continuous urban built environment.

Austin and Houston, in comparison, each have ~120 built highrises taller than 35 meters (the minimum cut-off on this forum's database in their urban skyline belts from Downtown (in Austin, thru West Campus). That's no slouch in comparison, if we're only considering total number of highrises.

San Antonio has ~60 and Fort Worth ~40. Of course, this doesn't consider highrises elsewhere in these cities.

Each downtown really excels at a different form of urbanity. Houston excels at height, Dallas at architecture/lighting, Austin at density, San Antonio at preserved urban fabric, and Fort Worth for keeping its historic charm.

If Austin wants to have THE signature skyline of Texas, it needs the height and architecture as well as the density. Four or five well-designed buildings over 800'+ and a supertall with a distinctive crown would be the key to "signature" status, in my eyes.

The Best Forumer Mar 27, 2018 6:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwmiv (Post 8134099)
Dallas has ~130 built highrises taller than 35 meters (115 feet) in the skyrise belt from Downtown thru Uptown and Turtle Creek situated in a nearly continuous urban built environment.

Austin and Houston, in comparison, each have ~120 built highrises taller than 35 meters (the minimum cut-off on this forum's database in their urban skyline belts from Downtown (in Austin, thru West Campus). That's no slouch in comparison, if we're only considering total number of highrises.

San Antonio has ~60 and Fort Worth ~40. Of course, this doesn't consider highrises elsewhere in these cities.

Each downtown really excels at a different form of urbanity. Houston excels at height, Dallas at architecture/lighting, Austin at density, San Antonio at preserved urban fabric, and Fort Worth for keeping its historic charm.

If Austin wants to have THE signature skyline of Texas, it needs the height and architecture as well as the density. Four or five well-designed buildings over 800'+ and a supertall with a distinctive crown would be the key to "signature" status, in my eyes.

I wasn't aware Dallas has more then Houston.

AviationGuy Mar 27, 2018 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwmiv (Post 8134099)
Dallas has ~130 built highrises taller than 35 meters (115 feet) in the skyrise belt from Downtown thru Uptown and Turtle Creek situated in a nearly continuous urban built environment.

Austin and Houston, in comparison, each have ~120 built highrises taller than 35 meters (the minimum cut-off on this forum's database in their urban skyline belts from Downtown (in Austin, thru West Campus). That's no slouch in comparison, if we're only considering total number of highrises.

San Antonio has ~60 and Fort Worth ~40. Of course, this doesn't consider highrises elsewhere in these cities.

Each downtown really excels at a different form of urbanity. Houston excels at height, Dallas at architecture/lighting, Austin at density, San Antonio at preserved urban fabric, and Fort Worth for keeping its historic charm.

If Austin wants to have THE signature skyline of Texas, it needs the height and architecture as well as the density. Four or five well-designed buildings over 800'+ and a supertall with a distinctive crown would be the key to "signature" status, in my eyes.

All good points, although I was referring solely to downtown and the way it has come together relative to the central downtowns of the other cities. That's not to downplay the others...they're nice as well. And Houston and Dallas have all the outlying skylines that I wish Austin had, but doesn't.

clubtokyo Mar 27, 2018 11:36 PM

I like the Dallas skyline, would love to see Austin get a super tall.

KevinFromTexas Mar 28, 2018 3:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Best Forumer (Post 8134724)
I wasn't aware Dallas has more then Houston.

Well, Houston does have more high rises than Dallas. Most of Dallas' high rises are clustered either in downtown, uptown or along a few of the freeways. I do think Dallas has more high rises clustered in their downtown and uptown, which has really become an extension of the downtown skyline. Houston's downtown is pretty isolated from the other clusters, but the clusters they do have like the Texas Medical Center and Uptown/Galleria are big, tall and dense skylines to themselves. Houston's uptown/galleria area by itself would rank one of the state's biggest skylines, and I think I read once that the medical center has more square footage than Fort Worth's downtown.

Austin may even end up eclipsing Dallas for the number of buildings over 400 feet in the not too distant future, but they still have many more buildings over 500 feet than we do. Most of Austin's gains has been in the 400 foot range.

wwmiv Mar 28, 2018 8:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Best Forumer (Post 8134724)
I wasn't aware Dallas has more then Houston.

As Kevin hints at above, this is because the Downtown+Uptown Dallas skyline (a distinct cluster) has more skyscrapers than downtown Houston's skyline cluster. The city of Houston has more skyscrapers overall, however, because there are many major ancillary nodes that Dallas has yet to match.

KevinFromTexas Mar 28, 2018 10:26 AM

By the way, Austin actually has 188 completed high rises citywide now. We also have 19 more under construction and 5 more doing their site prep. So in less than 2 years, Austin will have more than 200 completed high rises. That's still far fewer than both Houston and Dallas, which I'm sure each has several hundred high rises. Houston might even have more than 600 or more of them.

KevinFromTexas Mar 28, 2018 4:44 PM

https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net...fa&oe=5B41DD21
The Independent Austin - https://www.facebook.com/independent...type=3&theater

KevinFromTexas Apr 2, 2018 6:16 PM

Construction is planned to start within 6 months.

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...st-avenue.html
Quote:

Developer details timeline, switch to condos for sky-scraping downtown tower
48 East Avenue project adds luxury amenities to bustling Rainey Street amid condo boom

By Marissa Luck – Staff Writer, Austin Business Journal
5 hours ago

As one condo high-rise wraps up, another one begins. The developers behind a 33-story condo tower in the Rainey Street Historic District say they plan to break ground on the project by the end of the year.

48 East Avenue was first proposed about four years ago as an apartment tower, but now Pearlstone Partners said it will build 215 for-sale condominiums instead.
https://i.imgur.com/lrDuL8g.png

The Best Forumer Apr 2, 2018 8:07 PM

looks good! :)

KevinFromTexas Apr 3, 2018 5:50 PM

Actually, it looked better before they changed the design, and it was a wee bit taller - 370 feet. I do like the current design ok, it certainly isn't bad, but the older one would have been a bit more unique. This was the old design:

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneStarMike (Post 7634334)
I think this pool rendering might be new:

http://i.imgur.com/p8h0Jk9.jpg


Here are the other ones that might have been on one of the links posted earlier:


http://i.imgur.com/8GiuioN.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/9M4yexT.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/d0nlcVv.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/alstmUL.jpg


http://i.imgur.com/g5L86xu.jpg


Source: STG


KevinFromTexas Apr 6, 2018 10:37 PM

The 58th floor of the Independent has been poured. It's now at 626 feet.

Construction cam *note - select the "skyline" link.
https://www.workzonecam.com/projects...nt/workzonecam

ILUVSAT Apr 7, 2018 8:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas (Post 8135470)
By the way, Austin actually has 188 completed high rises citywide now. We also have 19 more under construction and 5 more doing their site prep. So in less than 2 years, Austin will have more than 200 completed high rises. That's still far fewer than both Houston and Dallas, which I'm sure each has several hundred high rises. Houston might even have more than 600 or more of them.

I saw somewhere recently that Austin's urban core alone (river to 15th Street) has some 34 towers (over 300' in height) either proposed, working through entitlements, approved or under construction as of right now.

WOW!

The ATX Apr 8, 2018 7:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILUVSAT (Post 8146350)
I saw somewhere recently that Austin's urban core alone (river to 15th Street) has some 34 towers (over 300' in height) either proposed, working through entitlements, approved or under construction as of right now.

WOW!

It's 36 now. Several of them are on shaky ground, but it's still a pretty impressive number considering how many have been completed in recent years.

Dariusb Apr 9, 2018 4:08 AM

The density downtown is impressive as well. I have a question. Since so many towers are being built downtown, is that area in danger of running out of available lots to build on or is there any natural barriers that would get in the way of development?

clubtokyo Apr 9, 2018 7:17 PM

I think there are still plenty of lots with low story buildings that could eventually be demolished for a new development, if the market demand was there.

The Best Forumer Apr 17, 2018 3:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dariusb (Post 8147388)
The density downtown is impressive as well. I have a question. Since so many towers are being built downtown, is that area in danger of running out of available lots to build on or is there any natural barriers that would get in the way of development?

I don't think so... there's still lots of empty lots.

The ATX Apr 17, 2018 9:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Best Forumer (Post 8157672)
I don't think so... there's still lots of empty lots.

There are still a lot of potential sites for high rises that would require minimal Demo. But it's a lot less than one would assume buy looking at an aerial of downtown because the CVCs prohibit high rise development in large sections of downtown.

KevinFromTexas Apr 17, 2018 11:26 PM

Austin's "2nd downtown" in the making, though, at this point I'd call it our 2nd skyline and take a wait and see approach to printing any other labels.

Still, to be talking about the possibility of 360-foot buildings outside of downtown would have been unheard of even a few years ago. Technically Austin has already had some decently tall buildings outside of downtown for decades thanks to the UT Campus and West Campus, but those two neighborhoods make up the same skyline that downtown does. Plus, in 2014 the first 200+ foot tall building came to the south shore just across the river from downtown, but again, that building is part of the downtown skyline, especially since downtown wraps around that area as the river turns.

The Broadmoor and Domain developments will be the first time we've truly had buildings of that height in a skyline defined separately from downtown. 360 feet will be way taller than anything currently outside of downtown. Excluding the UT Campus, West Campus, and the south shore area, the tallest building outside of downtown now is 159 feet. 360 feet tall would have been Austin's 3rd tallest building up until 2004 when the Hilton and Frost Bank Tower were finished that year. 360 feet today would be Austin's 21st tallest.

https://communityimpact.com/austin/c...ncil-approval/
Quote:

High-intensity, mixed-use redevelopment of IBM Broadmoor Campus gets initial Austin City Council approval

By Christopher Neely | 5:06 pm April 16, 2018

A high-intensity, mixed-use redevelopment of the IBM Broadmoor Campus in North Austin is poised for final approval by Austin City Council following an initial thumbs up at the April 12 City Council meeting.

IBM has occupied the roughly 66-acre tract at 11501 Burnet Road since the campus’s development in 1991. Future plans for the campus include a mixed-use development with a new Capital Metro Rail Station, at least 2,000 housing units and building heights of up to 360 feet.

The plan has the full support of the nearby Gracywoods Neighborhood Association, and the zoning change request that would allow the development to double its height earned first-reading approval from Austin City Council on April 12. City Council will conduct a public hearing before the final two readings of the zoning change sometime around May.

clubtokyo Apr 18, 2018 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas (Post 8158416)
Austin's "2nd downtown" in the making, though, at this point I'd call it our 2nd skyline and take a wait and see approach to printing any other labels.

Still, to be talking about the possibility of 360-foot buildings outside of downtown would have been unheard of even a few years ago. Technically Austin has already had some decently tall buildings outside of downtown for decades thanks to the UT Campus and West Campus, but those two neighborhoods make up the same skyline that downtown does. Plus, in 2014 the first 200+ foot tall building came to the south shore just across the river from downtown, but again, that building is part of the downtown skyline, especially since downtown wraps around that area as the river turns.

The Broadmoor and Domain developments will be the first time we've truly had buildings of that height in a skyline defined separately from downtown. 360 feet will be way taller than anything currently outside of downtown. Excluding the UT Campus, West Campus, and the south shore area, the tallest building outside of downtown now is 159 feet. 360 feet tall would have been Austin's 3rd tallest building up until 2004 when the Hilton and Frost Bank Tower were finished that year. 360 feet today would be Austin's 21st tallest.

https://communityimpact.com/austin/c...ncil-approval/

Nice! Look forward to the development.


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.