![]() |
Stunning. Other than 175 Park Avenue, this is my favorite proposal out there now. Really hope Wynn gets this, because if the resort in Vegas is any indication, they don't do anything but ultra high end.
|
It shouldn't be a Casino ... and Gehry shouldn't be allowed to even visit NY let alone design buildings for the city.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...ase2Large2.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Promising renderings, BUT, I do not trust Related Companies... In HY Phase 1 Related totally did a bait-and-switch on the tower designs.... In the competition for developing HY they fronted with having a proposal with several towers that had different textures and designs (and not just glass facades), but they ended up building a mass of glass constructs that by in large comes off grossly untextured and monolithic. If they are going to do Phase 2 they have to be beholden contractually to not expand the glass blob they erected in Phase 1. |
Quote:
30 Hudson could not be the main focal point of the Hudson Yards.. way too blah and short. The one thing I'd like to see is the Wynn Tower another 200 feet taller! I know.. I know.. I'm getting supertall greedy!! LOL! |
Looks great.
|
Quote:
Not a bait-and-switch at all. You may not remember what the original planned towers looked like, but what we actually got is far superior, trust me. Of course, these designs will be refined more, that’s to be expected. We watched that play out in the last phase, really in most proposals. Related had already had a few alterarions to the designated site plans. |
My one beef is that they look a little shorter than expected. At that angle you'd expect a near 1,400 footer to tower over 30HY.
While they may not be signature towers height wise, they are tall and gorgeous. |
There have been a lot of changes over time. But this is the rendering of the site plan that Related won with. (They actually are the runner up, but that’s another story).
https://a4.pbase.com/o3/06/102706/1/...del1121074.JPG But after some changes were approved, they were moving forward with this version… https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...iWGZ.ren19.jpg A change of heart (and design) got us here… https://a4.pbase.com/o1/06/102706/1/...aIS5ij.r22.jpg A design refined further still…. https://a4.pbase.com/o1/06/102706/1/...GsLTpn.r12.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o1/06/102706/1/...csV5AH.r31.jpg Some early designs which featured phase 2… https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...rendering2.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...V8NA8V.r2b.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...OEbF1f.r5b.jpg Closest we ever got to seeing any actual designs is a feature at the Edge… https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...p.IMG_4916.jpg |
|
Who knows who they have now, but these were some of the names mentioned involved with phase 2…
https://www.architecturaldigest.com/...a-hudson-yards Frank Gehry, Santiago Calatrava, Robert A.M. Stern, and Heatherwick Studio Reported to Work on Phase Two of Hudson Yards By Tim Nelson February 22, 2018 Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.architecturalrecord.com/...ards-discussed For Kohn Pedersen Fox, Arquitectonica, Robert A.M. Stern, and West 8, which collaborated on the proposal from the Related Companies and Goldman Sachs, the project is all about variety. “What we’re really talking about is trying to make a neighborhood for people to live and work in,” Stern said. “A New York neighborhood which is diverse in its functions, diverse in its architecture, diverse in its typologies, and one that can grow incrementally and change over time as the project goes forward, even after completion.” Hoping to reflect existing Manhattan city blocks more than a singular, super-sized development, the proposal calls for buildings of varying heights, styles, and materials, from bricks and mortar to glass. "Variety".... not quite. |
well, as expected this is most certainly the diva of the casino proposals.
aside from the obvious of getting the yards built out, what i like best is that the casino entrance is so dam classy you can't even tell its a casino. :cool: |
I don't think the Related design is at fault. But I think the three added boxy towers, although they have been very successful, detract from the overall site. I don't mind the Spiral but the 50 Hudson and 15 Hudson with the Spiral seem to create a boring wall similar to the downtown office boxes that they built along the waterfront in the 60s/70s.
|
Quote:
I think from their point of view, and from mine as well actually, there is a variety. From 35, to 50, to 30, I would say it's a variety. Is there too much blue glass? With the added towers around it, yes. I don't like the massing of 50, but that's another issue. Quote:
Quote:
https://newsroom.wf.com/English/news...-/default.aspx https://s25.q4cdn.com/967830246/file..._Full_1_CX.jpg https://s25.q4cdn.com/967830246/file...level_1_CX.jpg https://s25.q4cdn.com/967830246/file...se-up_1_CX.jpg |
Manhattan CB4 had it's initial presentation from Related, and it went about as well as you would expect. But it doesn't matter, City Planning will approve the change in site plan. It's the state process that will be the heavyweight fight, and multiple meetings will be had with the community boards again.
Anyway, at about the 1 hour 20 min mark, they get into it. The audio is difficult, especially with people screaming over each other. No new renderings, but a bit more information. Some screenshots below so you don't have to listen to the noise... 1. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards1.png 2. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards2.png 3. Looks like "One Hudson" for the residential building and "40 Hudson" for the office building. These numbers are all over the place. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards3.png 4. Comparison with the previously approved site plan. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards4.png 5. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards5.png 6. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards6.png 7. You can see here the slope of 33rd Street toward the river. The rails are at street level on the western end. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards7.png 8. And here's what was described in the draft, bringing 33rd up to grade along it's length, but keeping the original grade at the western end for access. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards8.png 9. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards9.png |
Quote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/8699/1...1057948d_b.jpgTower 42, London by Iain McLauchlan, on Flickr |
Quote:
Nice. Hopefully we get more looks at the office tower soon. Looks like it will have a “fluted” appearance, at least on the lower levels. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards5.png https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...S5.Large3b.jpg |
If Related and its partner “Wynn” the license, this project could start rising as soon as the deck is done. Presumably, they’ll be able to finance the casino/hotel and the residential tower fairly easily.
Even if it takes a while to get an office tenant, the office tower seems to occupy a small portion of the site. Does anyone recall how long it took to build the deck over the east side of the yard? |
Quote:
The deck and the towers were under construction simultaneously. But only the casino will be supported by the deck. Some past info on the deck... https://www.hudsonyardsnewyork.com/s...20Platform.pdf https://www.hudsonyardsnewyork.com/a...g-hudson-yards Quote:
Waaay back in the old days... https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...291469b_wm.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...215172b_wm.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...271552b_wm.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...onySociia2.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...111524b_wm.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...111530b_wm.JPG A look at early Coach tower construction... https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...CswoDif.c3.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...xsfKkPb.c2.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...281465b_wm.JPG Early 15 Hudson foundation... https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...241440b_wm.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...291449b_wm.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...c11281542b.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...c11281543b.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...c01091666b.JPG https://a4.pbase.com/o9/06/102706/1/...c12061620b.JPG |
Thanks.
If Related and its partner prevail, it will be a huge “Wynn” for the city. This has the potential to be a Monaco-caliber casino that will attract international high-rollers who would not be as inclined to visit a casino in Times Square. |
Quote:
That's true as well. The Wynn casino is expected to have 250 extended stay units. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...iQ.Large3c.jpg Meanwhile, the residential and office buildings will be built on the southern end of the site, not located on the platform. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...QWp.Rails1.png https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...qsG.Rails7.png https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...DPw.Rails5.png https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...g3g.Rails6.png |
The last act of the lightning in a bottle that has been Hudson Yards. The trend of building over active rail lines, taking an inactive rail line and repurposing it for use as a park, and taking advantage of untapped air rights remains. That is the lasting legacy of Hudson Yards, the High Line, and the renaissance of the west side more fully.
What will the next big development strategy be in New York? There are mid-century mid-rise developments all over the five boroughs that are now undersized to what the modern day requirements are, lacking in density on the first few to five floors. They are also out of alignment with the street grid and somewhat isolated from the surrounding city. Maybe taking those towers in the park and replacing them with more parks in the tower could work to preserve some green space, while providing additional density and dynamism down at street level. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I actually think that Sunnyside is a perfect spot for when we poach the Giants/Jets back from the Meadowlands so that area can be returned to swamp as God intended.
|
Quote:
|
Lol. I think New Jersey will eventually have to allow at least one casino in northern NJ after the NY casinos open. If one does, it should be right in the meadowlands. Put it at American Dream.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Actually, NYGuy, I am more shocked that considering you expertise and after seeing 175 Park Ave, 520 Fifth Avenue, 9 Dekalb, 111 W 57th St you seem to think that modern construction only revolves around slapping glass facades onto every square inch of a tower (as was pretty much done in HY). I know you think, but it doesn't seem like you thought the knee-jerk response through (or what my original point was). |
Quote:
You're boring me. I'm BORED to death of this conversation. So we'll agree that you can't see what I can see, and remain disgruntled. I don't give a shit either way. We're already discussing the new renderings that just came out yesterday, and I will devote this time to them. |
There's a new website that came out, not much new information given beyond what's in the press release. But there is one image from a different angle which gives you a view of the office tower.
Also there are higher resolution images of the complex (LARGE pics below) from Wynn New York City https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...ML.Large6b.jpg That office tower is looking more and more like Gehry... https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...XQ.Large6c.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...nzC.Large6.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...3n.Large7b.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...v9.Large8b.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...CM.Large9b.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...c1.Large9c.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...c.Large10b.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...D.Large10c.jpg |
The wavy base of the office tower looks great. I wonder if this tower has setbacks. What we’ve seen of the top doesn’t seem very thick.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...S5.Large3b.jpg Then again, it’s hard to tell. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...hase2Large.jpg |
Where are all the trash cans outside the casino for people to puke in after losing their life savings letting it ride?
|
Quote:
come on lucky 7 … dam … SNAKE EYES! :hell::haha: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/17/ea/3f/1...yes-snakes.jpg |
Quote:
I hope the state allows a direct connection to the High Line. I know it was said there would be a future connection of the High Line to Hudson River Park somewhere near the Javits. But a direct connection from this side of the complex from the High Line would be great. Maybe they could also somehow rework the street level connection to the High Line as well. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards9.png https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...rkHighLine.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...dsonYards8.png |
Quote:
The last time I puked in public (2011:???:) I had the decency to use a trash can, so I guess it's just a personal preference. If it hadn't been there it would have been all over a train platform. |
The office tower does have setbacks. This project is incredible.
https://www.wynnnewyorkcity.com/ https://images.ctfassets.net/d6smc2e...&h=640&fm=webp |
Looks about 1,200' for the two taller ones and 900' for the smaller.
|
Well, first a permit would have to be granted to erect the platform and only then could the actual construction begin.
|
The office tower looks like a Foster. I think I’ve seen a Foster office tower that consists of tube-like structures like this tower will have.
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...XQ.Large6c.jpg |
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...5038ff2e_b.jpgHudson Yards Phase 2 massing by Philly SkyGuy, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...152175f9_b.jpgHudson Yards Phase 2 massing by Philly SkyGuy, on Flickr https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...4ac0b1d7_b.jpgHudson Yards Phase 2 massing by Philly SkyGuy, on Flickr https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...f66cee97_b.jpgHudson Yards Phase 2 massing by Philly SkyGuy, on Flickr https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...6d02ed8a_b.jpgHudson Yards Phase 2 massing by Philly SkyGuy, on Flickr |
Quote:
https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...7aXD0l.d14.jpg Quote:
Looks more Beekman to me. It's the first thing I thought of when I saw it. It could be Foster, Foster designed 50 for Related. So I could see it being Foster as well, though it doesn't look like any of Foster's New York work. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1....Large6cut.jpg https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IPgD3VyWk...by%2Bgehry.jpg https://uglymodernbuildings.blogspot...ce-street.html |
Focusing more on just the casino, and everything that entails, this is really the only location in Midtown where you could build this type of resort.
It would breath so much new life into the railyards, drawing even more people from all over. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...I3.Large6d.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...sonYards3b.png https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...sonYards5b.png I would add a simple water feature at both ends on 11th Avenue, along the retail. If you look closely, you can also see how the loading access on 11th Ave is hidden. https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...c.Large10b.jpg https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...D.Large10c.jpg |
Quote:
There’s a Foster office building somewhere overseas with more pronounced blue glass tubes on the exterior than the UN condo has. https://thumbs.cityrealty.com/assets...6fb3d776c085e2 |
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 8:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.