![]() |
Quote:
:) |
Quote:
............................ :koko: |
[QUOTE=Syndic;5700054]Well that children's museum looks positively bland.
I don't know about y'all, but Mueller has been a big disappointment to me, starting with the big box stores they put in there. Then, all the unnecessary parks. There's very little mixed-use. It's all basically suburbs with moderately more density. It's not like you can just walk to a corner store there and buy a gallon of milk. I'd prefer a bunch of little stores to one big H-E-B store. And the plans just keep changing. I totally agree with you here. I love Austin and I'm glad to see they are getting some attention to their skyline, but I visited recently on a trip home to FW to see my family and I don't like what they are doing DT. I know I'm going to get slammed on here, but I am just commenting on my impressions about my recent visit. I was initially excited about because it had been a while since I have visited Austin and I have not been since all the new skyscraper growth. I like a lot of the buildings and the effect on the skyline, but I was actually disappointed with what I saw at ground level where one can truly measure the vibrancy of it's central core. All the new buildings seem too far apart and the areas surrounding them felt lackluster and sterile. There are too many parking lots and all they do to an urban environment is create a void between each development. It's like going to an art exhibit where each of the works of art is shown in a different venue. Just when I was starting to get excited I was interrupted by 2 or 3 parking lots. It didn't feel urban, but instead felt like a residential/office park near DT. I really hope they start to focus more on infill in between to create more of a neighborhood feel. More small corner stores and independent grocers and drugstores to discourage people from having to drive for their goods & services. Less car centric, although that can be difficult in TX cities, but Austin has the where-with-all and the intelligent people to pull it off. |
it's going to take some time to plug up all the holes and fill in the gaps that are surface parking lots. my impression is that all the issues and problems that you have with DT Austin, are the very concerns the city is trying to address as they continue their development and density plans.
|
Quote:
Look up on all the designs posted, particularly Seaholm and Greenwater Treatment. 2nd St District and Seaholm will just be what you see now but continued and expanded. It's on its way and growing very rapidly. But there are other sorts of issues like the Capital View Corridor and financing that delays many projects from breaking ground. Things don't just happen. There's politics and money involved. I don't see how anybody would want it to go faster, because given the circumstances it already is. It's impossible for it to go any faster. |
Quote:
It feels like they are moving in the right direction, but I know it will take time. |
Quote:
But as for downtown I have to wonder where you went downtown to not be able to find anywhere with out blocks of vibrancy without parking lots? Second street has one parking lot. Granted it is a huge one that takes up a whole block, but that entire block is being built into a huge 1000 room hotel this summer. But still that is one parking lot for a total of 7 block long. Congress is the main street in Austin and it has the one parking lot I mentioned above and then tiny parts of two others (no more than 70 or 80 feet). And it is 10 blocks long. 6th Street has no parking lots until you get on the west side of downtown. That is 10 blocks with zero parking lots. 5th Street also has like 10 or 12 blocks with no parking lots. Edit: correction with only one tiny (80x80 foot) parking lot. That is like 80 feet out of over near 4,000 feet of street. Brazos has like 11 blocks with only the one big one I mentioned above, and the tiny one I mentioned on 5th. With the exception of 2nd (due to the convention center) all those streets I just mentioned there that is over a full kilometer each (over 3,200 feet), and after this summer that big parking lot I mentioned for Congress, 2nd and Brazos is no longer going to be there. In most cities I would totally agree that big surface parking lots are bad. But not in the case of Austin as it is right now. Austin has tons of vibrant areas downtown. It is an extremely lucky city to have such a vibrant downtown. How you missed those parts I am not sure, but they are there. HOWEVER, one of the problems Austin has is the skyline is highly restricted due to such things and view corridors. Views of the Capitol building are protected to many parts all around Austin outside downtown. So tall buildings can't be build in many areas of DT. That does two things. One it lowers the value of what those lots that have those restrictions as development potential is limited. But most importantly it makes the lots that don't have those restrictions MUCH more important. There are two lots like that in DT. One Travis County owns and is building a new courthouse. The other one is the over 1,000 room hotel on the lot I mentioned in the previous paragraph (on Congress, 2nd and Brazos.) Given that Austin has so much great vibrancy as it is downtown I do not think that the smaller areas that don't have the restrictions and have large development potential should just have infill thrown in for the sake of infill. I think they should sit until the full developmental potential can be filled with a kick ass project. Just trowing some half-assed infill in there is not needed. At least not in Austin, because our downtown is not hurting for vibrancy in the least. |
Yea rriojas71, it was the Mueller redevelopment site not Downtown that we are complaining about but since you put in how you feel about downtown Austin, let me put how I feel.
I think Downtown Austin is transforming wonderfully, to see what we have now compared to what we had 5 years ago is amazing and there is so much vibrant activity now than there was 5 years ago. What we are seeing now is still only the beginning so to be disappointment in our downtown is misplaced IMO. Austin is ahead of the other big Texas cities in many respects to zoning as well as new steps to develop our central core, I urge you to come back in 5 more years and see the difference compared to now and I think you will realize what Im trying to say. Sure Austin is not a dense urban mecca yet, but we are on the right track and as I said earlier we are still only just starting our transformation. |
Quote:
|
|
Welp, that about says it all. I just wanna see "2012: Austinites vote for the first phase of urban rail, re-connecting the city" :) :)
Oh, and they left out GRINDHOUSE! |
Quote:
not to mention that i got to see taylor kitsch almost everyday working at jo's and now he's like a huge movie star. it's insane. and i also worked with elise, one of the crazy twinsitters, in that grindhouse movie. basically, you have more chances of hanging out with a movie star in austin than most other major cities. not necessarily cool... but still pretty cool. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i have two friends here in san francisco who lived there and i kid you not... we never met there in austin but we have mutual friends. we're like, "do you know this person?" "yeah i do! crazy!" austin is probably one of the very very few cities in america that's like that. people just don't understand what is cool about it... and to me, that's what makes it cool right there. and these ads that are promoting austin will never do austin any justice until someone decides to move there for themselves and see what the fuss is about. it's true though... austin isn't for everybody and i can totally respect that. i understand what is so great about san francisco and why one would pick it over austin. the reason is probably more obvious than austin, because austin is one city still kinda "unknown" so to speak and its really hard to describe what's so cool about it. and yeah elise quit like two or three months after i started working there. she really loved my hair! haha |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The VERY WORST is the F1 Austin promo video. I suggest looking that up for a good laugh. |
my friend here in san francisco says that austin has got to be the most nostalgic city ever. for everyone there was a decade better than the other. i hear people say, "you shoulda seen austin in early 2000s" then others the 90s, and some 80s so on and so on. And I thought it was particularly funny that they showed the part of "dazed and confused" how they were complaining how the 70s sucked and the 60s were better. i think linklater nailed it. and its probably gonna be like that for every decade as time goes by.
i also just finished watching this movie and some guy is interviewed there. and he basically tells one of the musicians that for all the decades in austin, musicians have always faced obstacles. and that it's part of the struggle as a musician. and its not something that the city itself is doing to give them a hard time. anyways... its pretty interesting and i thought it was cool looking at austin from a really cool perspective. and i recommend it. http://youtu.be/kgdXRaxENfU |
I get what y'all are saying about people knowing people but I think thats for those of us who are either from Austin or have been here more than 5 years. As the city grows im seeing less of that as tons of people from other areas flock here. What I do see and hear others say is that Austin is a very social city and that in itself creates the vibe that you can go out and meet interesting new people.
|
Novare FINALLY completes the purchase of the Post Office site. So another 40+ story condo tower is in our future?
http://www.statesman.com/business/po...n-2364037.html |
New apartment complex in works in West Campus
By Shonda Novak AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF Published: 7:58 p.m. Friday, May 18, 2012 Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.