![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
San Antonio... a city that has much less people living in its downtown has the Rivercenter Mall with all the typical suburban shopping mall type stores. People go downtown to shop there. Instead of an enclosed mall though I'd like to see retailers locate at street-level. That or some open air shopping arcades/pedestrian streets. Downtown still really feels like a restaurant/bar dominated place. The shopping that is available is mostly specialty stores and boutiques that the majority of the population don't do the bulk of their shopping at. Whole Foods is great but I'm really looking forward to the more affordable Trader Joe's coming to the Seaholm. I'm a big supporter of all of the local shopping options available downtown right now but I personally think that the introduction of national retailers would only be a boon for everyone. It would draw more a more diverse group of people downtown. It would be amazing to see the pedestrian traffic SOCO gets on the weekends in the downtown area http://rotterdamholland.ca/images/shoppingrotterdam.jpg http://www.socketsite.com/San%20Fran...y%20Target.jpg http://farm1.staticflickr.com/119/30...6b36dc6e_o.jpg |
We always mention a downtown market that would be open 7 days a week. That would liven up the place. It's just a matter of figuring out where to put it. Browsing Google Maps, and remembering a question I had about how to utilize these 2 lots, made me think a market on 4th Street between Congress and Colorado could work. It's the large surface parking lot next to Frank.
They could dig down and give just 1 or 2 levels of parking/docks, then have a combination of indoor and outdoor areas, with the indoors going up a couple of floors. I think it'd be cooler in the SW part of downtown with all the residents closeby, but what lot would be used? Convert Sand Beach Park by Gables? |
Quote:
Honestly, I can't shop on 2nd street or congress for almost anything... and those are supposed to be the main retail destinations. They're not. Over the years we've seen shops come and go almost over night on 2nd because they are NOT realistic stores for people who live downtown. I think downtown ATX needs to take note from Portland, OR http://downtownportland.org/ |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I think it will be a great idea if we can put a public market where the future Federal court house will be, between Republic Park and the Amli. Also who owns that hideous parking garage by the 360? It needs a good makeover or build sometime else in it's place.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
^^Sorry about the rant |
Quote:
Of course, they'll probably just stick it east of 35. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The lot south of Colorado Tower wouldn't be a small public market. It would just be long and narrow (and hopefully crowded), which is the way a public market should be. For example, Seattle's: http://i.imgur.com/5LNmuDd.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe I'm a bit spoiled after being in San Francisco, having active both day and night neighborhoods. That part of downtown can remind me a bit of the same crowd you'd find in Hayes Valley in SF, with a mix of hip and shiekh retail stores and restaurants. Something to that effect is ideal to me. It's still a laid back atmosphere but very active. |
Quote:
https://www.austintexas.gov/devrevie...erRSN=11056288 Quote:
|
I'm really glad they are finally filling in those lots on Colorado between 4th and 5th. Now all that's left is to get a highrise built on that parking lot on the northwest corner of Congress and 4th.:yes:
|
Quote:
We had two threads watching it, but like I said, this project was from 2007, and we haven't heard a thing about it in at least 5 years. http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=131432 http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=131080 |
Okay Ahealy, I know your not supposed to say anything about the ECC project but it's really getting to me not knowing anything. Can you at least hint one of two things?
Could you either hint if we should be excited about its height or is it pretty much compatible to what we have seen? If not that could you hint of a possible time frame that we can expect an official announcement? :shuffle: Thanks:worship: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sweet sassy mollassy!
Soooooooo awesome
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
That's a damn nice Starbucks. Cannot wait to see it in person!
|
I don't go to bars and I don't go shopping for clothes. I will reluctantly shop for clothes once or twice a year. Museums would bring me downtown, but not on a consistent basis. I'd check them out once, and maybe when they have an interesting exhibit, but it's not like it will bring me back day after day.
I do like some of the food options, and I'd have to say that's the main attraction to downtown for me. But even then, many of the places are out of my price range. Other than that, I just like walking around and seeing the old buildings and the new highrises side by side. I love the Capitol and its history. I like the city's reflection off the river. I guess I'm more of a ambiance kind of guy than an activity guy. I think there are tons of people like me (minus caring about highrises) not only around this city, but all over Texas. Figure out how to attract us to downtown, and there would be a lot more activity down there. |
Quote:
boxy |
60 stories? 821 feet?
One or two towers? |
I'm thinking they could get that high if they only did 1 tower. That would be amazing.
|
OMG! I've always wanted Austin to have one of that kind of design!
|
:)
|
When you say think of 56 Leonard, do you mean its height or its style?
|
Quote:
|
Dang, and here I got excited for an 800-footer. ;)
|
Quote:
Do you know who is designing the ECC campus? I'd be very excited if it were Herzog & De Meuron!!! Man, wouldn't it be great if someone finally went "tall" in Austin (i.e., 800' to 1000')?!? Constructive Ventures is developing this site, correct? If so, I wouldn't be surprised if they used Rafii Architects again (CVI developed Spring). And, if this is the case, it would be a completely new design concept for them. None of their current (or "in-development") projects are similar to 56 Leonard. |
"...iconic..."
"...56 Leonard..." Ugh, I don't like where this is headed. People swing and miss more than hit when they try to design "iconic" buildings and then cities end up with very prominent white elephants. I'm also not a fan of 56 Leonard. I like cities to have visual harmony, not a bunch of individual "look at me!" buildings that don't look good together. |
Most of our buildings are nice and stately. I want one or two interesting buildings to bring in some contrast.
|
We really need a couple of towers to break the 700 to 900 foot range. As has been mentioned in the Austin section, our skyline is getting pretty flat. Developers really need to start getting some nice 700 to 800 foot towers in development like now!!!:superwhip
|
Any word on fairmont? I noticed a fence around the site but wasn't sure how long that'd been there
|
Haven't seen this posted. Does anyone know about this?
http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/...ps243fc64c.jpg Edit: or this Aspen Lake http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/...ps7c535190.jpg Looks like maybe they are planning something big... http://i1072.photobucket.com/albums/...ps81098019.jpg |
The only one we haven't seen is the second image (Aspen Lake). The first is a proposed office building downtown and the last are conceptual massings for the new court block under a public-private partnership development.
|
Quote:
|
That 2nd one is from 2007 or so, I believe it has changed plans. Instead of building 3 tall towers, they are going to built another 6 story building close to the other one that was built back during pre recession.
|
The Fairmont just bought the Mark Hopkins in San Francisco, one of the most famous hotels, anywhere, and the favorite of Tony Bennett's and Peggy Lee's. For anybody who thinks that the Fairmont is having financing problems in Austin should take note and realize that such a silly idea that the Fairmont does not have more than enough ways to finance ANYTHING they want to build is "nothing but a fart in the wind".
It will be breaking ground as soon as they want it to, and as soon as Austin will let them! HISTORIC SAN FRANCISCO LUXURY HOTEL ON THE CREST OF NOB HILL As splendid as when it opened in 1926, Mark Hopkins is one of the city’s finest historic San Francisco luxury hotels. It’s ideally located at the crossing of three cable car lines, just minutes from Union Square. Each suite is furnished in a unique, stately style. Breathtaking views of San Francisco combine with fine dining and a signature 100 Martini menu at Top of the Mark restaurant. Described when it opened as ‘architecturally perfect’, this San Francisco luxury hotel remains so today. |
love it !
Quote:
|
I can't read the rest of the Article so what does it say about seaholm and entertainment? http://www.mystatesman.com/news/busi...atesman_launch
|
Quote:
Also, not sure if y'all noticed but the glass has begun to go up on the base of the J.W. Marriott. |
austin is awesome, as evidenced by all the austinites hating on new comers for love of the good old days!
development means give and take , things are awesome here is austin, lots of need for improvement and some stuff is sad to see go... but there are many instances of cool stuff happening too .... good scene and music are still thriving I find it interesting how people are afraid of the outsiders ruining the good old days, reminds me of madmen.... I will say we need another Leslie and kinky Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 6:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.