I actually think Ballpark Village will be one of the more iconic designs over the past several years to rise. So many of the new residential highrises subscribe to the "glass and balcony" look without much effort placed in the aesthetic look of the building.
|
|
^ Nice, Chapelo.
|
Belmont park is adding a new rest/bar and rooftop bar.
and zip lines! finally zip lines! https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/...93766701_n.jpg http://media.sdreader.com/img/photos...ebf11d604414e5 http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2...-belmont-park/ |
Thanks for the photo Chapelo. Chargers are proposing a Downtown Stadium Spanos/NFL 400 million City sells Sports Arena and Qualcomm sites. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10...tive-la-market
|
Quote:
Why on earth does every single thing have to go to the voters? |
Quote:
Who's to say AEG or someone else doesn't buy the Sports Arena site and build a better venue. Let the free market figure this one out. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
It really should be placed where the Murph is today. It's been said before, but there is already the infrastructure and the roads to support the stadium there. I'm not sure why downtown keeps coming up, traffic is already bad going downtown, and placing a stadium there is just going to make things worse.
Not to mention not being able to tailgate, plus all the other events the parking lot is used for, like the Big Three Swap Meet this weekend, the RaceLegal events, etc. Those sort of revenue generating events would be able to continue. |
Because a downtown stadium would look BEAUTIFUL and the views would be PHENOMINAL.
It has to go to the voters to have legitimacy. The area where the bus yard and tailgate park is would be perfect. |
I thought the redevelopment money attached to that parcel was gone.
My guess is the property around EV will help developers but more so at sports arena and Q site. Cha Ching . just make sure the taxpayers fork over the majority percentage plus infrastructure costs. |
Quote:
|
By booming, do you mean dozens of storefronts that have been vacant for 5+ years?
|
Quote:
The free market is playing out right now and if it didn't need to come to a vote the deal would be all but done. It would be easily the largest project ever downtown, which I think we can all appreciate. The positive economic impact would also be gigantic.I haven't seen any other developer try and take a stab at the site and they won't because they know better than to get in the way of the biggest fish in the pond. I was against Petco when it was introduced and I have to admit that my worst fears were never realized. I think with the right architects and engineers, the East Village site could be monumentally awesome. |
New clairemont shopping center. but NIMBY's stopped the in-n-out. lmfao
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ikcrk7tJgg...+capture_2.jpg http://blog.clairemont.com/2014/02/b...tores.html?m=1 |
Broadstone project at 5th & Thorn
As of February 23, 2014 looking southeast from 4th & Thorn.
http://www.custompuzzlecraft.com/San...n_20140223.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the stadium would be a "dead zone," I'm curious what you call the space it would occupy right now. |
I just received an email back from Lankford and associates concerning Lane Field. They plan to break ground in early April.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7372/1...75f7e9f4a2.jpg |
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.