SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Proposals (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=361)
-   -   NEW YORK | Hudson Yards Phase 2 | 1,376 - 1,189 - 1,180 FT | 80/80/74 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=216956)

Sky88 Jun 4, 2020 3:59 PM

And why not like this? :)

http://scontent-mxp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/...3b&oe=5EFF1AC5

NYguy Sep 3, 2020 3:42 PM

https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...03632DC69.jpeg



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...3C5654CC2.jpeg



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...4CC72F68F.jpeg

citybooster Sep 3, 2020 4:05 PM

Hopefully a lot of that for the second stage...some daring designs, something different and more 21st century in inspiration than typical residential towers. The second stage is where they should be able to afford to explore and create a bit.

NYguy Sep 4, 2020 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by citybooster (Post 9031057)
Hopefully a lot of that for the second stage...some daring designs, something different and more 21st century in inspiration than typical residential towers. The second stage is where they should be able to afford to explore and create a bit.

Well, Calatrava looks like he is going to resurrect that 80 South Street design. But there will have to be some traditional in there as well because they have to sell the units.

chris08876 Sep 4, 2020 6:44 PM

I wish we had floor and height data. No way those models are to scale (but if they are, holy S!). Because we've all seen how dominant 30 Hudson is lol.

Imagine 5 super talls in Phase II, would just be bonkers.

10 Hudson Yards is 878 ft to the roof, so that would something to write home to if those indeed are to scale.

NYguy Sep 5, 2020 12:58 PM

I'm expecting at least one, but likely 2 supertall towers in phase 2. Nothing higher than 30 Hudson, but one of the residential towers could be second tallest in Related's scheme.

Crawford Sep 5, 2020 1:26 PM

Yeah, I think Phase 2 will have at least two residential supertalls. And potentially one commercial supertall.

ESysyn Sep 7, 2020 10:58 PM

Is the a new mock up of Phase II, or just fantasy?

RobEss Sep 8, 2020 2:01 PM

I'm hoping we get something closer to Battery Park City - a cohesive neighborhood with human-scaled elements and matching/complimentary styles of architecture.

The all glass towers-in-the-park rehash just isn't doing it for me...:shrug:

chris08876 Sep 8, 2020 2:33 PM

Has to be a mock-up. I doubt some of those towers are exactly as is or in their final form. I really hope they don't botch up Phase II. This is a prime, prime opportunity to add a sizable unit count to the West Side.

chris08876 Sep 8, 2020 2:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobEss (Post 9035150)
I'm hoping we get something closer to Battery Park City - a cohesive neighborhood with human-scaled elements and matching/complimentary styles of architecture.

The all glass towers-in-the-park rehash just isn't doing it for me...:shrug:

IMO, I think its too much park to be honest. Too much park, not enough density. I'd like to see the density increase and the park reduced in size.

Just of those those things where land is so scarce, and they somewhat are going for the tower in the park concept with Phase II. I'm for parks, but I just think this one is a tad bit big.

RobEss Sep 8, 2020 2:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris08876 (Post 9035190)
IMO, I think its too much park to be honest. Too much park, not enough density. I'd like to see the density increase and the park reduced in size.

Just of those those things where land is so scarce, and they somewhat are going for the tower in the park concept with Phase II. I'm for parks, but I just think this one is a tad bit big.

...I have never met someone who thinks there's too much parkland in Southern Manhattan...

Hudson11 Sep 8, 2020 5:08 PM

In addition of the unseen work below the western yard, Related + Oxford probably will want to wait for the uber-luxury market to bounce back before committing to the mostly residential phase 2. Apparently sales at 35 and 15 HY have been abysmal. Like, really bad.

https://www.cityrealty.com/nyc/marke...covid-19/46301

Quote:

35 Hudson Yards, 500 West 33rd Street
total sales: $15,486,250
average price: $5,162,083
units sold: 3
completed: 2020
Quote:

Fifteen Hudson Yards, 15 Hudson Yards
total: $44,652,708
average: $6,378,958
units sold: 7
completed: 2019

NYguy Sep 8, 2020 5:16 PM

^ Yeah, I would expect any sales there to be bad. It's bad across the board in the city as far as that goes.


Quote:

Originally Posted by RobEss (Post 9035150)
I'm hoping we get something closer to Battery Park City - a cohesive neighborhood with human-scaled elements and matching/complimentary styles of architecture.

The all glass towers-in-the-park rehash just isn't doing it for me...:shrug:


Battery Park City is what I compare the second phase to, in terms of it being largely residential, with some office. There will be no lowrise scale, unless you count the towers on lowrise bases. As you know, there will be a school located here as well. But there is a density that is required for Related, because of the open space mandate. They can't just build a lowrise neighborhood. The central portion of the yards wasn't supposed to have any buildings at all (where it looks like the Calatrava towers are), but they got around that.


But I believe this is pretty much what you are going to see, these displays are permanent. And you can pretty much pick out the Gehry and Calatrava towers. Of course, actual renderings won't look as scrambled.



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...03632DC69.jpeg



https://media.architecturaldigest.co...344-185584.jpg
https://www.architecturaldigest.com/...ds-nyc-opening

citybooster Sep 8, 2020 5:33 PM

If they are trying for condos in the 3-10 million range, good luck...but isn't the residential supposed to be rental? So this proposed lineup(more or less) will be what we see in the skyline here from the Jersey City side? These are really nice... how many in all, likely...8 would be written in stone?

mrnyc Sep 9, 2020 11:52 PM

^ i dk if its written in stone, but its been that from early on with no known wavering.

and it kinda has to be what it is or similar for them to make their money back and the profit. that’s why i think once they finally get the ok from the transit authorities it will start immediately. that’s been the holdup all along.

NYguy Sep 10, 2020 12:45 AM

^ Yeah, the work on the platform would start whether or not the towers themselves would start.


Quote:

Originally Posted by citybooster (Post 9035402)
If they are trying for condos in the 3-10 million range, good luck...but isn't the residential supposed to be rental? So this proposed lineup(more or less) will be what we see in the skyline here from the Jersey City side? These are really nice... how many in all, likely...8 would be written in stone?

The site plan, and number of towers is set. The residential won't be rental, as this is where Related expects to get its money from the complex.


Quote:

https://therealdeal.com/2019/12/27/r...-hudson-yards/

Related no longer giving timetable for finishing Hudson Yards
Second phase — with offices, homes and a school — was due in 2024


TRD New York
December 27, 2019


The news, buried at the end of a New York Times piece Thursday, follows a report in August by the New York Post that Related had not obtained approval from the Long Island Rail Road for the design of the development’s second phase. But the company did not say at the time that it would miss its announced 2024 completion date.

Design approvals aside, there is another reason not to rush luxury apartments onto the market: A plethora of units remain unsold at the first phase of Hudson Yards and other West Side buildings. “The issue is that the consumer feels the market is going to decline further,” Pierre E. Debbas, a managing partner at Romer Debbas, a real-estate law firm that has represented condo buyers in Hudson Yards, told the Times.

The second phase, dubbed the Western Yard, would span 6,220,000 square feet, and incorporate several residential towers, an office complex and a grade school, according to Related’s website.

Related and its partner Oxford Properties Group submitted plans in the summer of 2018 for a platform to be built over the rail yard. Without approval, the Western Yard development cannot proceed.

“We’re in the planning stages of Phase 2 and are currently focused on the Gateway tunnel, platform and the commercial building planned in the northeast corner,” a spokesperson for Related told The Real Deal. The company had no comment on when the phase would be done.

chris08876 Sep 10, 2020 12:59 AM

Did they ever give a figure of how many units will rise or projected within the 6.2 mil square feet?

I hope its in the range of 4000-4500. This is a prime opportunity for a ton of market-rate units.

mrnyc Sep 10, 2020 1:46 AM

^ good question. are the number of apts in these buildings known? no doubt it is if not publically. it would be interesting to see that breakdown.

NYguy Sep 10, 2020 8:28 PM

If the breakdown was ever given I don’t recall. But there’s this overall...


https://www.hudsonyardsnewyork.com/d...r/western-yard

Quote:

Phase 2 of development at Hudson Yards is the Western Yard, occupying the area from 11th to 12th Avenues between West 30th and West 33rd Streets. Upon completion, the Western Yard will include approximately 6,220,000 square feet, incorporating several residential towers, an office complex and a school serving K-8th grade students.

OFFICE: 2,000,000 SF
RESIDENTIAL: 4,000,000 SF
RETAIL: 100,000 SF
SCHOOL: 120,000 SF


chris08876 Sep 10, 2020 11:23 PM

If we assume on average 750-1100 sqft per unit, where looking at a minimum of 3000-3200 units. Just minimum. Just for concept, spread over 4 mil-sqft.

A good sign is when a school is present. That's a crap ton of units if they need a school for it. I think we'll see closer to 3700 units (just my inclination)

4 mil-sqft is massive. I mean if this is your standard size unit found in newer developments, I wouldn't expect many 10k sqft units or penthouses, but a bulk being 750-1100/1200 sqft. Studios, 550-600 sqft.

Crawford Sep 11, 2020 12:01 AM

So Barclays Bank is supposedly moving its North American HQ to Hudson Yards. They're looking at proposed towers.

I wonder if the planned office tower in Related's Phase II is under consideration.

NYguy Sep 11, 2020 2:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crawford (Post 9038284)
So Barclays Bank is supposedly moving its North American HQ to Hudson Yards. They're looking at proposed towers.

I wonder if the planned office tower in Related's Phase II is under consideration.


Could be, but that seems much further off than something like 3 Hudson, or even 2 Manhattan West. It could even be 50 Hudson or the Spiral, though for that much space you would think they would want to anchor the lower floors. That would reason to think it would be a tower without a major signed tenant yet. Hard to say these days. But it's welcome news for the city, that and Chase saying it's time to start returning the forces.

chris08876 Sep 20, 2020 5:01 AM

https://ds4.cityrealty.com/img/be266...kyscrapers.jpg

https://ds2.cityrealty.com/img/db624...n-yards-01.jpg
Credit: City Realty

mrnyc Sep 20, 2020 2:21 PM

while i do not think we will get any renders for awhile i am looking forward to them. no doubt they will be quite handsome. the green and the people living there will really liven up the area from the cold and dystopian feel it has now. unfortunately, i don’t think anything is going to be resolved with the transit authorities to start the decking anytime soon.

NYguy Oct 19, 2020 1:45 AM

Coordination underway to protect the right-of-way for future tunnel construction.



Video Link

chris08876 Oct 19, 2020 2:10 AM

Hopefully the EIS final draft/submission timeline remains the same. Would be nice to get everything wrapped up for phase II by 2026, but IDK if thats optimistic.

Hopefully capping the yards doesn't take two years. Would be nice if its just one year.

I have a feeling, realistically, 2028. If I had to bet.

NYguy Oct 19, 2020 2:12 AM

There was a delay, but things seem to be moving in place.




https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...3GQZgfN.d1.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...HqzhDbs.d2.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...9Yr5mh3.d3.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...ZoTpnCj.d4.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...80dNhYb.d5.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...1YgR16j.d6.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...MJWeP0k.d7.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...HL48XCd.d8.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...zi3hjbG.d9.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...ylKpoP.d10.JPG

NYguy Nov 14, 2020 3:05 AM

More fantasy rendering....


Image by gammavisualstudio

https://scontent-lga3-1.cdninstagram...37&oe=5FDA589E
https://scontent-lga3-1.cdninstagram...71&oe=5FD84C99

NYC2ATX Nov 15, 2020 6:17 AM

That's honestly an awesome design, I would be fine with this :P

While I am not wishing for this to be delayed for an extended time, it would be interesting if it were ... and when built with an updated redesign in, say 2035, how the two schemes would differ, architecturally, technologically, and otherwise, because of the time that had elapsed in between them. I am reminded of the first phase of Rockefeller Center with 30 Rock and its surrounds, vs. the latter XYZ buildings on 6th Avenue (1211, 1221, 1251 Avenue of the Americas). What a difference a few decades makes. :rolleyes:

Dylan Dude Nov 15, 2020 8:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYC2ATX (Post 9106796)
That's honestly an awesome design, I would be fine with this :P

While I am not wishing for this to be delayed for an extended time, it would be interesting if it were ... and when built with an updated redesign in, say 2035, how the two schemes would differ, architecturally, technologically, and otherwise, because of the time that had elapsed in between them. I am reminded of the first phase of Rockefeller Center with 30 Rock and its surrounds, vs. the latter XYZ buildings on 6th Avenue (1211, 1221, 1251 Avenue of the Americas). What a difference a few decades makes. :rolleyes:

you got a lot of patience man lol

chris08876 Mar 21, 2021 3:16 AM

Pics by me. Taken today.


https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...a5e91cc4_h.jpg
Hudson Yards Phase II - 03-20-2021 - 1 by Christopher Estevez, on Flickr

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...c14f7cdc_h.jpg
Hudson Yards Phase II - 03-20-2021 - 2 by Christopher Estevez, on Flickr

mschall50 Mar 21, 2021 3:41 AM

Wow. Where were these taken? As far as I know there is no new information on these towers except for the renderings released after wall-gate. I wonder if these designs are purely conceptual or closer to final.

chris08876 Mar 21, 2021 4:25 AM

Inside the hallway to the Edge (observation deck) elevator. They light up and have little people and noises coming out of those Phase II exhibits.

I'm convinced that the fella who designed the show or hallway prior to entering the elevator did a lot of acid and DMT. Its quite a trippy experience. I approve!!! :D

Nobody with a sober mind would put that many lights of all rainbow colors within 1200 sq-ft.

NYguy Jun 5, 2021 1:51 AM

Just renewing the parking permit....



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...SizeRender.jpg



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...SizeRender.jpg



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...SizeRender.jpg



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...H.IMG_0892.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...P.IMG_0893.JPG

NYguy Feb 16, 2022 5:27 AM

https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...vRsuJO1.d1.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...mXGQrJw.d2.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...9Vz0G75.d3.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...txFh6bJ.d4.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...pjIy5Ms.d5.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...D7W4ylU.d6.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...vfrYD0E.d7.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...UtFk5rP.d8.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...c3jGpKT.d9.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...OlDJ1F.d10.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...SVmDGc.d11.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...eZivSP.d12.JPG



https://a4.pbase.com/o12/06/102706/1...BsA6h7.d13.JPG

Raysiri Feb 16, 2022 12:45 PM

Are they finally gonna build it?

202_Cyclist Feb 16, 2022 1:05 PM

This is a bit random but I saw if you use your Visa credit card, there are all sorts of deals and discounts with the restaurants and other stores at Hudson Yards, including Jose Andres' restaurant and discounts for the Edge observation deck.

DCReid Feb 16, 2022 4:05 PM

This may sound like wishful thinking, but has there been any proposal to deck over the convention center with a platform and build?

Busy Bee Feb 16, 2022 5:07 PM

Thats probably still decades away. And when it does happen it wont be decked over as much as it will be torn down and either built into the ground floors of a new mega-development or relocated with Sunnyside Yard being the most obvious and likely location.

DCReid Feb 16, 2022 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Busy Bee (Post 9538734)
Thats probably still decades away. And when it does happen it wont be decked over as much as it will be torn down and either built into the ground floors of a new mega-development or relocated with Sunnyside Yard being the most obvious and likely location.

That's makes sense but unfortunately, it's not part of the plan now.
https://sunnysideyard.nyc/

Busy Bee Feb 16, 2022 10:26 PM

^That "plan" is mostly meaningless as they are doing virtually nothing to advance it.

TREPYE Feb 18, 2022 3:32 PM

The second phase MUST be better than the first phase which was not only abjectly UNDERWHELMING, but misrepresented their primary selling point during bid selection from other developers. Related promised variety in the textures and building materials of the façade, but yet it looks like a giant pile of glass.

Just one glass redundancy after another. Also, unsurprisingly, too much rectilinearity.

Oh, the vessel in concept is interesting, the shiny copper hide is tacky and way too shiny.

Mulan Feb 27, 2022 12:13 PM

Per Mackensen

https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/busin...2_375x500.jpeg

Mulan Mar 9, 2022 10:02 AM

Per Mackensen

https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/busin...2_690x434.jpeg
Quote:

The Twin Towers of the Mackensen Tower complex with a projected height of 1900 feet.
https://forum.newyorkyimby.com/t/whe...raper/16859/63

NYguy Sep 16, 2022 1:11 PM

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/15/n...attan.amp.html

Related Companies and Wynn to Bid for New Casino in Midtown Manhattan
The companies want to put the casino on the western half of Hudson Yards, which remains undeveloped.



By Dana Rubinstein, Nicole Hong and Matthew Haag
Sept. 15, 2022


Quote:

The bid by Related Companies, the developer of Hudson Yards, and Wynn Resorts represents the first publicly announced bid for one of three new casino licenses open to city developers.

The casino would be situated next to the Javits Center on the still-undeveloped western portion of the Hudson Yards, the second half of the largest mixed-use private real estate development in American history.
Quote:

The only casino-like option currently in the five boroughs is the Resorts World facility at the Aqueduct Racetrack in Queens, which has video slot machines but no table games. Last year, Resorts World had the most gambling revenue of any casino property outside Nevada.

It will likely be several months before the casino sites are announced. The state’s gambling commission has until October to create a board that will manage the application process, which is supposed to begin within 90 days of its formation.

Steven Cohen, the owner of the New York Mets, has also been in talks with Hard Rock to develop a casino near Citi Field, the team’s stadium, according to someone familiar with the discussions.
Quote:

In order for the Related-Wynn proposal to proceed, it would have to win approval from a yet-to-be-formed, six-person community advisory committee. Mayor Eric Adams will have a representative on the committee, as will the governor, the local City Council member, the borough president, the local Assembly member and the local state senator.

….. While Manhattan has long been considered one of the last, best untapped gambling markets in the country, any casino bidder will likely have to overcome significant resistance.

“Related and Wynn have a steep hill to climb to convince local residents that a casino in Hudson Yards is in their best interests,” said Brad Hoylman, the state senator whose district includes Hudson Yards.

Other casino and real estate companies are eyeing sites throughout the city. Thor Equities, a real estate firm, has expressed interest in building a casino on Coney Island in Brooklyn. Earlier this year, Marc Holliday, the chief executive of SL Green Realty, a major office developer, said in an earnings call that Times Square would be the best location for a casino.







https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-hudson-yards

Related Pursues Giant Casino Complex at Manhattan's Hudson Yards
Developer teams up with Wynn Resorts for a proposal to build an entertainment and gaming resort in the Western Yards part of New York.



ByNatalie Wong
September 15, 2022


Quote:

The firm, founded by billionaire Stephen Ross, is partnering with Wynn Resorts Ltd. to pursue a casino license on the Western Yards, according to a statement Thursday. The plan is to build an entertainment and gaming resort along New York’s Hudson River.

While Related has previously expressed interest in the possibility of being involved in a casino development, the partnership with Wynn marks an official step in its pursuit of a license. The proposal would situate a casino in the Western Yards, located next to the Javits Center, the massive convention center that recently went through a $1.5 billion expansion.

“The Western Yards provides the ideal site for a resort that will reinvigorate our tourism economy and provide billions in tax revenues for the city and state,” Jeff Blau, Related’s chief executive officer, said in the statement. He described Related's partnering with Wynn as a “perfect pair.”
Quote:

The Western Yard is the second phase of Related and Oxford Properties’ Hudson Yards project, occupying the area from 11th to 12th avenues between West 30th and West 33rd streets. Related had initially planned to build residential buildings, offices and a school at the site.

“Siting a casino in Manhattan will help cement our place as the world's pre-eminent tourism destination,” said Jessica Walker, Manhattan Chamber of Commerce’s CEO. “Manhattan’s transportation infrastructure, cultural attractions and convention facilities at Javits present an unparalleled opportunity to maximize gaming revenue for the city and state.”

Sky88 Sep 16, 2022 3:17 PM

Well the Hudson Yards would be the best place for a casino. In addition to the casino there would also be room for a new MSG. The whole area from the Empire Station District to the new PA Bus Terminal could benefit from this new project. Not only that but projects like 360 10th Avenue and Affirmation Tower could also benefit. :)

mrnyc Sep 16, 2022 5:22 PM

yeah if they throw a new msg in the western hudson yards mix i would be all in.

if they want a giant casino, then what else could they add if not a new msg? residential as previously planned? i wouldn’t want to live next to monaco casino if it were even possible, much less an american mega casino.

DCReid Sep 16, 2022 6:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrnyc (Post 9733098)
yeah if they throw a new msg in the western hudson yards mix i would be all in.

if they want a giant casino, then what else could they add if not a new msg? residential as previously planned? i wouldn’t want to live next to monaco casino if it were even possible, much less an american mega casino.

At one time, wasn't Hudson Yards was supposed to have a new Jets stadium? I think it was for a planned NYC Olympic bid that was never made.

NYguy Sep 16, 2022 6:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCReid (Post 9733160)
At one time, wasn't Hudson Yards was supposed to have a new Jets stadium? I think it was for a planned NYC Olympic bid that was never made.

Yes, the original zoning included a stadium on the western half. The JETS decided it was too costly, considering the Giants offer to share costs on a new stadium in the Meadowlands.

Related has said it previously approached MSG about a potential move there, something that would be more of a longshot than a casino. Related always said the western railyards (mostly condo) is what made the entire development worthwhile. Not shocking they would jump at the chance for a casino. But the western rails also is where the new school would go, and I don’t see anyone approving a casino there.

But the westside is one of 2 locations in the city (the other being Coney Island), where a casino makes the most sense. I think it should be on the block south of the Javits. That sit is large enough. But its one of 2 sites Hochul is eyeing for affordable housing.


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.