SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Austin (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=446)
-   -   AUSTIN | Tech 3443/Zen Garden/Austin Viie/EightFold | Mixed Use Development (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=231930)

Riverranchdrone May 1, 2019 9:49 PM

They are putting glass on the one building they did build. and it looks like they are adding on to it also which is weird.

Mopacs May 2, 2019 2:31 AM

https://youtu.be/NViLMZC6fAc

Video Link

Echostatic May 2, 2019 3:13 AM

Youtube throwing me a "Video Unavailable" error

The ATX May 2, 2019 5:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freerover (Post 8558788)
Some changes for Eightfold

-Limit the 400 ft maximum to 10 acres fronting 183 for 3 buildings.
-A height limit of 280 ft for 2 more buildings on an 8 acre site also fronting 183.
-Modify the rest of the land to 120 feet except for two existing 185 ft buildings
-Modify the parking requirement to a %50 reduction

New facts in the rezone:
-The 5 new buildings would be about 3 million sq feet.
-About 5,700 parking spaces in the under building parking structures

What is the source for this info?

freerover May 2, 2019 7:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 8559433)
What is the source for this info?

Sprouse Shrader Smith Lawfirm.

The ATX May 2, 2019 8:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freerover (Post 8559459)
Sprouse Shrader Smith Lawfirm.

So what you posted is what the Eightfold developers want to be able to do after a zoning change request? I'm guessing the ZC is still a work in progress.

freerover May 2, 2019 8:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 8559467)
So what you posted is what the Eightfold developers want to be able to do after a zoning change request? I'm guessing the ZC is still a work in progress.

Yep but they seem ready to proceed to a zoning hearing with these new height requests. Hopefully in the next 6 weeks.

lzppjb May 2, 2019 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mopacs (Post 8559310)


Video Link

freerover Aug 19, 2019 8:42 PM

Eightfold is scheduled for the Planning Commission on August 27th but it will be postponed at that time by the Applicant. City Staff is not sure what date they will be requesting, but they think it will be late September or October.

Riverranchdrone Aug 19, 2019 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freerover (Post 8662928)
Eightfold is scheduled for the Planning Commission on August 27th but it will be postponed at that time by the Applicant. City Staff is not sure what date they will be requesting, but they think it will be late September or October.

Excuse my ignorance but what would they be needing to go to the planning commision for? the next building on the site?

The ATX Aug 19, 2019 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riverranchdrone (Post 8663056)
Excuse my ignorance but what would they be needing to go to the planning commision for? the next building on the site?

A zoning change for taller buildings. It would then go to City Council if the Planning Commission approves it.

freerover Oct 3, 2019 5:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freerover (Post 8558788)
Some changes for Eightfold

-Limit the 400 ft maximum to 10 acres fronting 183 for 3 buildings.
-A height limit of 280 ft for 2 more buildings on an 8 acre site also fronting 183.
-Modify the rest of the land to 120 feet except for two existing 185 ft buildings
-Modify the parking requirement to a %50 reduction

New facts in the rezone:
-The 5 new buildings would be about 3 million sq feet.
-About 5,700 parking spaces in the under building parking structures

Looks like City Staff wants to cap all buildings at Eightfold at 120'. Eightfold is going to the planning commission asking for 400' cap right next to 183 like mentioned above and 280' cap for the rest of the property except for Building B.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the Applicant’s request of LI-PDA-NP zoning, with conditions.
The Applicant requests the following:
1. The property is permitted to utilize a 50% parking and loading area reduction. 2. Building B shall be no greater than 160’ of height.
3. All other buildings east of Semiconductor Drive shall be no greater than 120’ of
height.
4. For the portion of the property that is bounded by Ed Bluestein Boulevard,
Technicenter Drive, Semiconductor Drive and Central Avenue, buildings shall not
exceed 400’ of height.
5. For the remaining portion of the property that is west of Semiconductor Drive,
buildings shall not exceed 280’ of height.
Staff supports conditions 1, 2, and 3 but does not support 4 or 5. With the exception of Building B, Staff recommends that all other buildings on the property shall not exceed 120’ of height.

Novacek Oct 3, 2019 5:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freerover (Post 8706135)
Looks like City Staff wants to cap all buildings at Eightfold at 120'. Eightfold is going to the planning commission asking for 400' cap right next to 183 like mentioned above and 280' cap for the rest of the property except for Building B.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the Applicant’s request of LI-PDA-NP zoning, with conditions.
The Applicant requests the following:
1. The property is permitted to utilize a 50% parking and loading area reduction. 2. Building B shall be no greater than 160’ of height.
3. All other buildings east of Semiconductor Drive shall be no greater than 120’ of
height.
4. For the portion of the property that is bounded by Ed Bluestein Boulevard,
Technicenter Drive, Semiconductor Drive and Central Avenue, buildings shall not
exceed 400’ of height.
5. For the remaining portion of the property that is west of Semiconductor Drive,
buildings shall not exceed 280’ of height.
Staff supports conditions 1, 2, and 3 but does not support 4 or 5. With the exception of Building B, Staff recommends that all other buildings on the property shall not exceed 120’ of height.

Yeah, 400 feet was always going to be a hard sell. Brandywine was able to get Broadmoor up to 360 (not by right, just with a _lot_ of bonuses) by paying for (half) a station next to an operating commuter rail line.

Short of Eightfold tossing in a couple hundred million or more, to get the green line up and running sooner than the next 10-20 years, I don't think it happens.
And then you still have the problem that where they want to put the 400 footers is 3/4 mile away from the green line (at its closest).

The ATX Oct 3, 2019 8:08 PM

^ That info came from this PC backup file for the 10/08 meeting.

http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=328713


This is from the same file. With a zoning change, buildings 1,2 & 3 would be 28-stories/400' and buildings 4 & 5 would be 17-stories/280'

https://i.imgur.com/wyDNxQl.png

enragedcamel Oct 3, 2019 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freerover (Post 8706135)
Looks like City Staff wants to cap all buildings at Eightfold at 120'. Eightfold is going to the planning commission asking for 400' cap right next to 183 like mentioned above and 280' cap for the rest of the property except for Building B.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the Applicant’s request of LI-PDA-NP zoning, with conditions.
The Applicant requests the following:
1. The property is permitted to utilize a 50% parking and loading area reduction. 2. Building B shall be no greater than 160’ of height.
3. All other buildings east of Semiconductor Drive shall be no greater than 120’ of
height.
4. For the portion of the property that is bounded by Ed Bluestein Boulevard,
Technicenter Drive, Semiconductor Drive and Central Avenue, buildings shall not
exceed 400’ of height.
5. For the remaining portion of the property that is west of Semiconductor Drive,
buildings shall not exceed 280’ of height.
Staff supports conditions 1, 2, and 3 but does not support 4 or 5. With the exception of Building B, Staff recommends that all other buildings on the property shall not exceed 120’ of height.

That really sucks. I had high hopes for this project.

freerover Oct 3, 2019 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enragedcamel (Post 8706444)
That really sucks. I had high hopes for this project.

The planning commission could recommend to council to approve the 400' towers over city staff.

enragedcamel Oct 3, 2019 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freerover (Post 8706455)
The planning commission could recommend to council to approve the 400' towers over city staff.

Well, I hope they do. That part of town could really use additional development.

freerover Oct 3, 2019 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enragedcamel (Post 8706462)
Well, I hope they do. That part of town could really use additional development.

I agree. I'm not too far away from this spot. I already contacted district 1 staff about it.

The ATX Oct 9, 2019 3:45 PM

The zoning change request was postponed on consent.

freerover Oct 9, 2019 3:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 8712181)
The zoning change request was postponed on consent.

What was the conversation?


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.