![]() |
Quote:
https://i.imgur.com/GEdNs4Th.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/JnX9YP8h.jpeg |
River Street Residences & Cambria Hotel
https://i.imgur.com/7Pms8Nlh.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/7Pms8Nlh.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/czGGlCeh.jpg 80 Rainey https://i.imgur.com/p1h0tz6h.jpeg Vesper https://i.imgur.com/SMxSDjVh.jpeg |
Austin set to become #2 in buildings over 500ft, surpassing Dallas.
Quote:
|
Quote:
9 = T/O or Complete 10 = Site Prep or U/C 11 = Proposed, Site Plan Under Review, or Approved Plus, there are these projects which should be over 500' (not included in the numbers above): -3rd & Congress -ATX Tower East -ATX Tower West -99 Red River -309 E. 3rd If all built - that's 35. |
Based on the numbers I get, if all get built, Austin would be rivaling Houston with towers at 400'+.
|
Skyscrapers over 500+ feet
Miami: 66 (60 built | +6 u/c) Houston: 37 (35 built | +2 u/c) Los Angeles: 31 (27 built | +4 u/c) San Francisco 25 (25 built | 0 u/c) Boston: 23 (20 built | +3 u/c) Seattle: 21 (20 built | 0 u/c) Dallas: 20 (20 built | 0 u/c) Atlanta: 19 (19 built | 0 u/c) Austin: 18 (9 built | +9 u/c) Las Vegas: 15 (15 built | 0 u/c) Philly: 15 (13 built | +2 u/c) Pittsburgh: 11 (11 built | 0 u/c) Minneapolis: 10 (9 built | +1 u/c) Detroit: 9 (8 built | +1 u/c) Charlotte: 8 (7 built | +1 u/c) Denver: 8 (8 built | 0 u/c) Baltimore: 4 (4 built | 0 u/c) Portland: 3 (3 built | 0 u/c) St. Louis: 3 (3 built | 0 u/c) San Diego: 1 (1 built | 0 u/c) I used the SSP database |
By the end of this decade in 2029 Austin will either be between Houston and LA or between Miami and Houston on this list. And all of Austin’s 500 footers will be in downtown or directly adjacent neighborhoods.
|
Quote:
SSP's Database is obviously off a bit... |
What’s off about it?
|
Missing cities on your list.
|
Quote:
Austin's great, but not quite to the level of those other two cities (yet?). |
No it’s not. I got every city ahead of Austin except NYC and Chicago because they have over 100 each and take too long to count, sort, and double check. I’m not doing that, I don’t have time for that.
The list successfully accomplished the goal of getting Austin and the cities directly ahead of it. That was the point of the list. I did add some cities behind Austin to the list but I didn’t wanna break my back compiling a full list of cities for it, so if anywhere is left off it is definitely behind Austin. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This Downtown Demolition Application Could Tell a Tower-Shaped Story
Quote:
|
Quote:
NYC: 311 (+Jersey City 17) = 328 Chicago: 127 And including Canada: Toronto: 112 Calgary: 19 Montreal: 15 Vancouver: 9 |
Great momentum. The nice thing is that what's going on in Austin is dynamic so more proposals are bound to occur as this boom continues. To see the potential to quickly eclipse Dallas and even Houston (in theory) shows the magnitude of what is going on. 10 years ago, I don't think we would of predicted that, at least on this level. But hey, knock-on-wood, may the boom continue and accelerate! :cheers:
The fact also with super talls, with one rising and others looking like they may happen, shows a strength in the market, which will no doubt trickle and continue to trickle to your 100-200m categories. |
11th and Trinity: Residential, Office & Retail
https://weaverbuildings.com/property/pending/ https://weaverbuildings.com/wp-conte...S-1-scaled.jpg https://weaverbuildings.com/wp-conte...S-1-scaled.jpg |
I like it.
|
Over 500+ feet
Miami: 66 (60 built | +6 u/c) Houston: 38 (35 built | +3 u/c) Los Angeles: 31 (27 built | +4 u/c) San Francisco 25 (25 built | 0 u/c) Boston: 23 (20 built | +3 u/c) Seattle: 21 (20 built | 0 u/c) Dallas: 20 (20 built | 0 u/c) Atlanta: 19 (19 built | 0 u/c) Austin: 18 (9 built | +9 u/c) Las Vegas: 15 (15 built | 0 u/c) Philly: 15 (13 built | +2 u/c) Pittsburgh: 11 (11 built | 0 u/c) Minneapolis: 10 (9 built | +1 u/c) Detroit: 9 (8 built | +1 u/c) Charlotte: 8 (7 built | +1 u/c) Denver: 8 (8 built | 0 u/c) Baltimore: 4 (4 built | 0 u/c) Portland: 3 (3 built | 0 u/c) St. Louis: 3 (3 built | 0 u/c) San Diego: 1 (1 built | 0 u/c) Over 400+ feet Miami: 99 (92 built | +7 u/c) Houston: 71 (64 built | +7 u/c) San Francisco: 57 (57 built | 0 u/c) Los Angeles: 54 (49 built | +5 u/c) Seattle: 53 (48 built | +5 u/c) Atlanta: 43 (43 built | 0 u/c) Las Vegas: 41 (41 built | 0 u/c) Boston: 39 (35 built | +4 u/c) Dallas: 34 (34 built | 0 u/c) Philly: 32 (30 built | +2 u/c) Austin: 31 (21 built | +10 u/c) Honolulu: 28 (27 built | +1 u/c) Minneapolis: 21 (20 built | +1 u/c) San Diego: 20 (20 built | 0 u/c) Denver: 18 (18 built | 0 u/c) Detroit: 15 (14 built | +1 u/c) Portland: 6 (5 built | +1 u/c) Over 300+ feet Houston: 148 (141 built | +7 u/c) Miami: 144 (136 built | +8 u/c) San Francisco: 123 (123 built | 0 u/c) Honolulu: 104 (103 built | +1 u/c) Los Angeles: 103 (97 built | + 6 u/c) Atlanta: 96 (96 built | 0 u/c) Seattle: 85 (76 built | +9 u/c) Boston: 80 (76 built | +4 u/c) Philly: 80 (77 built | +3 u/c) Dallas: 76 (76 built | 0 u/c) Austin: 62 (48 built | +14 u/c) Las Vegas: 57 (57 built | 0 u/c) Detroit: 38 (37 built | +1 u/c) Minneapolis: 38 (37 built | +1 u/c) The under construction numbers are probably a little off for some of these cities. So keep that in mind because the SSP database is not up to date for u/c buildings for every city. I noticed that the first 4 of the 5 under construction for Houston have finished construction and the 511 foot Methodist centennial tower under construction hasn’t been added on SSP’s u/c database nor have any of the other recent buildings that just began construction. I’d imagine it’s like this for a number of the other cities too. I also seriously doubt SF has 0 300+ footers under construction. But granted that the buildings already built list is accurate. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 8:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.