SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Austin (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=446)
-   -   Austin | Block 185/Google Tower #2 | 594 Feet | 35 Floors | Complete (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=216703)

Syndic Apr 22, 2015 8:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Matt (Post 7000051)
Actually, the property is subject to multiple restrictions because it is fronts town lake (like North Shore apt.) and shoal creek (like Proper), so it must follow the 70 degree rule on both West and South sides of the property. Therefore any height would be restricted to a sliver in the NE corner.

This seems to only make it likelier that it will be tall. To maximize the potential for the lot, the tower portion will have to be tall and slender.

GoldenBoot Apr 22, 2015 8:32 PM

I don't believe so. If they have to adhere to the 70-degree rule from the west and south (at the 45' level), then the max height of this tower would be about 250' (including an angular crown to reach max height).

I have, however, not completed any research into any conditional overlays which may encumber the height of any tower on Block 185. So this 70-degree rule may not apply (fully) or a variance may be obtained.

In any case, I don't see a tower taller than 480' on this site. Within Green Water, a "super tall" would have had to been built where 500 West Second is going up. And we know that's going to be a squatty 397' tower.

GoldenBoot Apr 22, 2015 8:40 PM

As an example, the building depicted below was to show developers what a building could look like if they adhered to the "rules" and almost maximizing revenue-generating square footage for the Austin Proper site. This design could have produced a tower near 480' tall.

If the 70-degree rule does apply to Block 185, then you would have to imagine a 70-degree slice through the south façade of this tower...cutting it's height dramatically (as the point in which the two angles would meet reduced the maximum height by roughly 230' or so).

https://igcdn-photos-h-a.akamaihd.ne...59338428_n.jpg

austlar1 Apr 22, 2015 10:05 PM

Back in the 1950s most cities the size of Austin were thrilled to have a couple of 400 footers. I guess that is no longer the case. Thought this was interesting. http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=178409

AustinGoesVertical Apr 22, 2015 10:41 PM

Pure pontificating here, but what is the status with Sand Beach Park, wedged between Cesar Chavez and the part of W 2nd St. that deadends. That is very close to the Seaholm/power plant etc. Would also be in the "Independent Neighborhood." Can that land be privately developed because then in theory this Facebook tower could be going there.

wwmiv Apr 22, 2015 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinGoesVertical (Post 7000519)
Pure pontificating here, but what is the status with Sand Beach Park, wedged between Cesar Chavez and the part of W 2nd St. that deadends. That is very close to the Seaholm/power plant etc. Would also be in the "Independent Neighborhood." Can that land be privately developed because then in theory this Facebook tower could be going there.

That's a publicly owned park and will never be developed.

AustinGoesVertical Apr 22, 2015 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwmiv (Post 7000530)
That's a publicly owned park and will never be developed.

Okay, thanks. Must be block 185 then.

Austin1971 Apr 22, 2015 11:29 PM

Facebook should either buy the future TC courthouse site or the old post office and go big. If they truly want to go tall at the 185 site they certainly have the money and clout to change the variance and build it.

wwmiv Apr 22, 2015 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Austin1971 (Post 7000585)
Facebook should either buy the future TC courthouse site or the old post office and go big. If they truly want to go tall at the 185 site they certainly have the money and clout to change the variance and build it.

I would be opposed to such an action. It would fundamentally alter the visual element along the riverfront.

LoneStarMike Apr 23, 2015 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IluvATX (Post 6997288)
Does anyone know if it's possible this could be commercial. It goes against the master plan, but I'd think demand would determine the end product.

Absolutely it could be commercial. While it was originally supposed to be residential, I just found this on the RECA's Facbook page:

https://scontent-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hp...22261508_o.jpg

Link

TBD=to be determined.

loonytoony Apr 23, 2015 12:28 AM

Block 185
 
Hi all. Long time lurker. I've seen a lot of recent posting about Block 185 potentially being a FB or office tower. Where did that idea come from? Very curious as I've only ever heard of this being a residential component. Apologies for any formatting issues.

The ATX Apr 23, 2015 1:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loonytoony (Post 7000663)
Hi all. Long time lurker. I've seen a lot of recent posting about Block 185 potentially being a FB or office tower. Where did that idea come from? Very curious as I've only ever heard of this being a residential component. Apologies for any formatting issues.

It was based on a comment made by a friend of a friend of an anonymous internet poster.

wwmiv Apr 23, 2015 1:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hill Country (Post 7000705)
It was based on a comment made by a friend of a friend of an anonymous internet poster.

A well sourced one, though.

The ATX Apr 23, 2015 1:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwmiv (Post 7000717)
A well sourced one, though.

And I certainly don't doubt Syndic's sincerity.

wwmiv Apr 23, 2015 1:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hill Country (Post 7000720)
And I certainly don't doubt Syndic's sincerity.

agreed.

loonytoony Apr 23, 2015 1:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hill Country (Post 7000705)
It was based on a comment made by a friend of a friend of an anonymous internet poster.

I see. So pretty much a sure thing then :D

The ATX Apr 23, 2015 2:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loonytoony (Post 7000752)
I see. So pretty much a sure thing then :D

Almost as good as building permit and a rendering!

AusTxDevelopment Apr 23, 2015 2:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneStarMike (Post 7000643)
Absolutely it could be commercial. While it was originally supposed to be residential, I just found this on the RECA's Facbook page:

https://scontent-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hp...22261508_o.jpg

Link

TBD=to be determined.

Here is the original massing plan (from Kevin's post on the Greenwater/Seaholm thread back in 2012: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...&postcount=239 ) It was originally going to very much like Northshore, in both height and shape. However it was going to have fewer units.

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b2...s/Image5-4.jpg

drummer Apr 24, 2015 1:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hill Country (Post 7000785)
Almost as good as building permit and a rendering!

Great, so they're starting construction tomorrow then, right? I like how quickly this is going... :cheers:

AusTxDevelopment Apr 24, 2015 10:33 PM

I don't think Block 185 is where Facebook is going. I posted on the Austin Proper thread that there is a very strong rumor that Cielo Property is redeveloping the Austin Music Hall site into a 250,000 square foot office building (see thread: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...=215343&page=6 ). The massing for this rumored building even shows up in the Proper rendering that's posted on RECA's website, as mentioned and posted in the Proper thread. From the below site plan, Austin Music Hall is north of Proper, and Block 185 is south of Proper. I think the building that Syndic's friend was talking about is Cielo's redevelopment, not Block 185.

http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/f...waterMap-1.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.