Quote:
The answer is ofcourse: More babies, but that's easier said than done. |
Quote:
|
German birth figures for 2007 have been published. In 2007 there were exactly 684,865 births in Germany (source). This is a modest increase of 1.8% compared to 2007 (684,865 births in 2007 compared to 672,724 births in 2006), but it's not reaching the level of 2005 when there were 685,795 births, let alone the 1990s when there were on average 790,000 births every year.
The fertility rate figure for 2007 hasn't been published yet. Here are the number of births in the largest EU countries in 2007 for comparison: Code:
Country Births in 2007 |
For a broader perspective, here is the total number of births in the largest EU countries in the 8 years from 2000 (included) to 2007 (included):
Code:
Country Births (2000-2007) |
The German statistical office has finally published the German fertility rate for 2007 (I don't know why it took them so long). In 2007 the German fertility rate was exactly 1.37. This is a moderate increase compared to 2006 when it was 1.33, but it still falls short of the German fertility rate in 2000 which was 1.38, and in 1990 when it was 1.45. Replacement level fertility is considered to be 2.1.
The biggest increase was in East Germany where the fertility rate jumped from 1.30 in 2006 to 1.37 in 2007, whereas in West Germany the increase was more modest, from 1.34 to 1.38. In comparison, in 2007 the fertility rate in metropolitan France (the European part of France) was 1.96. Quote:
Quote:
|
This graph shows the evolution of the German and metropolitan French fertility rates since 1975, including the latest figures published. The Elterngeld (parents' money) scheme introduced in Germany in 2006 is still a long way from turning the German fertility rate into the French one. This shows that there must more than just government money to explain the high fertility rate in metropolitan France.
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/4177/fertilitmf3.png |
Predicted population development in Europe 2004 - 2030.
Dark blue = more than -18% Dark red = more than + 18% Source: Spiegel Online / Berlin-Institut http://www.spiegel.de/img/0,1020,1277840,00.jpg Average fertility rate: Source: Spiegel Online / Berlin-Institut http://www.spiegel.de/img/0,1020,1277827,00.jpg |
^^Great maps. :tup:
Here is another map, from Eurostat, by country this time. Fertility rates in 2006: http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/1269/fconditfg9.png |
Nice maps guys! :tup:
|
The French statistical office has published provisional birth figures for the first half of 2008. These figures show a surprising increase, with births in Metropolitan France reaching a record high. The provisional birth figures can be seen here:
http://www.indices.insee.fr/bsweb/se...01000000000000 Why surprising? A bit of explanation is needed here. In 2006, the record number of 796,896 births were registed in Metropolitan France (the European part of France). This was the highest number of births in Metropolitan France since 1982. Fertility rate in 2006 was consequently also very high, it reached 1.98 in Metropolitan France, and 2.0 when including the overseas departments. Demographers explained this very high number of births by the fact that women from the end of the French baby boom (68-73) were now having the children that they had delayed so far. They predicted that the number of births would decrease after 2006, because as these last women from the baby boom era were having their delayed children, they were going to be replaced by the less numerous women from the post baby boom (1974 and beyond), thus mechanically reducing the number of births in France (something similar will happen in all the European countries, albeit with different magnitudes). In 2007 the number of births in Metropolitan France was 785,985, i.e. 1.4% less than in 2006, and the fertility rate fell slightly to 1.96, which confirmed predictions from demographers. In 2008, I was expecting further slight decline in the number of births, given the "retirement" of the numerous women from the baby boom era, yet these provisional figures from the French statistical office show exactly the opposite. In the first half of 2008, according to the provisional figures, there were 3.3% more births than in the first half of 2007, but what's more remarkable is there were 2.1% more births than in the first half of the record year 2006. If the trend is the same in the second half of the year, Metropolitan France is on course to register about 810,000 births in 2008, which is a number of births that has not been reached since 1973. This would most certainly mean that Metropolitan France's fertility rate would for the first time since 1974 cross the 2.0 threshhold, the holy grail in demographics. We'll know for sure in the middle of January when the French statistical office will publish birth and fertility figures for the entire year 2008. A minority of demographers suspect that in some Western countries at least, we may have entered another age in fertility trends, with fertility rates recovering firmly to above 2.0. Maybe they are right after all. Only time will tell, one or two year data is not enough to draw any conclusion. |
I'm curious..............the higher birth rates in UK, France are due to higher Muslim population or equally shared across all demographics. Muslims tend to have birth rates far higher than the general population due to less freedom of women and lower rate of workforce participation..
|
The French and the German statistical offices have just published their provisional birth figures up to the month of August. In the 8 months from January to August of this year, the number of births in Metropolitan France (the European part of France) increased by 3.0% compared to the previous year. If this is continued in the 4 last months of the year, it means Metropolitan France is on course to register about 810,000 births this year, the highest number of births in Metropolitan France since 1973 (the last year of the French post-war baby boom), and the fertility rate would most probably go over 2.0, which hasn't happened since 1974 (in 2007 it was at 1.96, in the record year 2006 it was at 1.98).
In Germany, in the 8 months from January to August, the number of births increased by 0.15% compared to the previous year. If this is continued in the 4 last months of the year, it means Germany will have about 686,000 births this year, only marginally more than last year. For an historical perspective: Metropolitan France: Two last years of the French baby boom: 1972: 877,506 births 1973: 857,186 End of French baby boom: 1974: 801,218 Nadir of 1976: 1976: 720,395 Recovery of 1980-1981: 1980: 800,376 1981: 805,483 Nadir of 1994: 1994: 710,993 Year 2000 effect: 2000: 774,782 Record year 2006: 2006: 796,896 Decrease in 2007: 2007: 785,985 This year: 2008: could be 810,000 according to provisional figures from Jan. to Aug. Germany: Two last years of the German baby boom: 1970: 1,047,737 births 1971: 1,013,396 End of German baby boom: 1972: 901,657 Nadir of 1975: 1975: 782,310 Recovery of 1989-1990: 1989: 880,459 1990: 905,675 The past four years: 2004: 705,622 2005: 685,795 2006: 672,724 (record year, the lowest number of German births ever) 2007: 684,862 This year: 2008: could be 686,000 according to provisional figures from Jan. to Aug. |
A great graph showing the French and German age pyramids superimposed over each other.
http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/7...sfceallnw1.png |
Quote:
|
An interesting article published in the New York Times exactly 100 years ago. At the time the situation was quite different from today: France had the lowest fertility in Europe, and French authorities were extremely worried for the future due to the rapidly growing population of the German Empire.
The journalist is quite visionary in the end of the article. He correctly predicts that the low fertility experienced by France earlier than other countries would soon spread to the rest of Europe with the increasing standards of living. http://img368.imageshack.us/img368/8...suicideko7.png |
I think trick for high fertility rate in Europe is support for families with child's inside one country, and not just financial but also in every aspect, from work-times of the institutions for child's which must be compatible with working times of the parents, to the good and cheap medical care for child's.
Anywhere, financially couples with child's will "lose" money on child in every country in Europe today, compering to couples without child, they are not mobile like couples without child, but later parents with child and states profit from those child's. So of course that all European countries must invest a lot more in that, than they currently do now. I mean why should person A and B invest his money, time and energy in his child, and after 20 or more years, that child will earn pension for person C and D without child's? Also a lot more must be better, from medical care, schools and etc in one country. For example medical care in France is one of the best in Europe, if not best. I know that because I saw medical system of the one Scandinavian country, and French medical system. French medical system is much better, hospitals are very good, clean, equipped and etc. Also I have friends in Germany, so in talks we compered French and German medical systems, according to them, French medical system is much better than German. All those things have big impact on fertility rate in one country. |
I found fertility rates for Spanish provinces in the year 2003 so I have added Spain to the map showing France, Germany and the Netherlands. Spain appears to find itself in an even worse predicament than Germany.
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/834...mapwithspa.png |
These maps and data are very interesting. But why are there such differents in fertility rates between regions and countries? What's the cause of these differents figures?
|
The number of German births in 2008 has been revised downwards. According to the German statistical office, there were only 675,000 births in Germany last year, which is less than had been initially announced.
Quote:
In comparison, in 2008 there were 834,000 births in France, i.e. 159,000 more than in Germany, which is the highest surplus of French births vs. German births recorded since the First French Empire (1804-1814). In the 9 years between 2000 (included) and 2008 (included) there were 6,351,500 births in Germany vs. 7,284,500 births in France. |
The five largest countries in the EU have now all published their 2008 birth figures. Here is the number of births in 2008:
- France: 834,000 births - UK: 794,380 - Germany: 675,187 - Italy: 576,659 - Spain: 518,967 In the 9 years from 2000 to 2008, these were the births registered in each country: - France: 7,284,500 births - UK: 6,466,211 - Germany: 6,351,448 - Italy: 4,977,910 - Spain: 4,080,152 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 3:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.