![]() |
http://therealdeal.com/issues_articl...-yards-hustle/
The Hudson Yards hustle With Related furiously locking in tenants, a look at who’s signed and how much space in the megaproject is left November 01, 2015 By Rich Bockmann Quote:
|
two million sq ft? i'm gonna cry
|
Quote:
If anything, there is not enough. Even with all of the construction in the residential and office sectors, there's not enough according to most analysts. More Class-A space is needed. |
Quote:
As far as the 2nd phase goes, that is where Related expects to make money, on the residential portion of the railyard development. They will likely kick off the 50 Hudson Yards tower first (it's now scheduled for 2017 construction) as both 10 and 30 Hudson are practically full now. But that's also good news for Manhattan West, 3 Hudson, and Tishman's tower. In a sense, the second phase is more or less Battery Park City. http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/154697700/large.jpg |
Quote:
|
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/163106136/original.jpg
url]http://www.hudsonyardsnewyork.com/the-story[/url] http://content.related.com/HYImages/...-Plan-Site.jpg |
That rendering is bananas. Can't wait to see the area when it's finished.
|
|
It's hard to tell from that rendering whether the southern-most buildings are within the Hudson Yards block or not. If not, it's worth noting that the entire two blocks south of 30th Street are also vacant and will likely be tall as well.
|
Boy am I glad we got the design that is going up now.
|
Quote:
What, you didn't like Extell's three-headed monster? Lol http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/89337658/large.jpg |
http://nypost.com/2016/06/06/douglas...-park-ave-lot/
By Steve Cuozzo June 6, 2016 Quote:
|
Wow. Those pics bring me back. When were these proposals released? It must have been eight -nine years ago, right?
I remember thinking the Brookfield proposal was very nice but the Extell proposal was drop dead gorgeous and brilliant. Good to see that the younger me was right on the money. Geeesh, it's just so beautiful and cool. Now we know Extell would have neutered the design completely but at least we have those pictures. |
Quote:
Now we'll just sit back and wait for this next phase to see who Related selects to design these towers. |
Looking back on it now I actually prefer the Vornado/Durst proposal. It has the one thing that Hudson Yards is sorely missing: a signature tower.
I'm sure that the centerpiece that Related has planned with Thomas Heatherwick will provide this element on the street level, but I'm still hoping for something to clearly break through the plateau on the skyline and give a focal point to the cluster. The Spiral had the development rights to do it, but it looks like Tishman is going with a more conservative approach. I'm not aware of any other assemblage that can make it work, but here's to hoping. |
Quote:
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/154469026/original.jpg |
|
Vanity addresses (addresses that overlay existing addresses) are often used in New York. Here's an interesting look at Related's plan for vanity addresses for its Hudson Yards development, which will include many towers...
http://m1.i.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/...YaXwKZC.v1.JPG http://m2.i.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/...NG6E1gB.v2.JPG http://m4.i.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/...mZBqe4Q.v3.JPG http://m5.i.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/...UrInhJl.v4.JPG http://m7.i.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/...YrHxDcl.v5.JPG The layout of the entire plan, with building entrances: http://m8.i.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/...iNKD9mf.v6.JPG |
This Hudson Yards explosion will eventually consume the remaining open yards...
Steven J. Messina https://c1.staticflickr.com/4/3762/3...c8ba4456_k.jpg https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2880/3...121613f2_k.jpg https://c1.staticflickr.com/4/3936/3...b77b5e42_k.jpg |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 2:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.