![]() |
I remember some data where Chicago is the top 1 or 2 landing places for grads from so many Universities from the Midwest including probably most of these schools from Steely's list..
Agreed Steely that UIC is on an incredible rise to prominence. Kinda surprised Bradley University in Peoria isn't on the list. Similar to U of Dayton and Drake. Maybe the need a better media/PR dept. Minor side bar: Notre dame does offer an Executive MBA in the Santa Fe Building on Michigan Ave. |
Quote:
i've now edited the original list to include all midwest universities ranked in the top 200. |
Quote:
|
another cool feather in UIC's cap from this year's rankings:
Quote:
that's a pretty awesome distinction for actually making a difference! you gotta wonder how many thousands upon thousand of people UIC has lifted up from lower/working class status over the decades. |
My alma mater has come a long way! Great to see its rise recognized. Even back in my day, the school was on a pretty evident upswing, academically. I started in 2002 in the College of Business, and the minimum ACT score to get in was 16. When I graduated in 2006, the minimum had risen significantly, to 22. While I don't think schools care much about college entrance exam scores anymore, the raising of educational standards was very much in motion back then and very evidently has continued in the 16 years I have graduated (damn, I feel old!).
|
Quote:
|
Surprised Loyola wasn't up there. I've seen that University of Chicago is a top 10 school WORLDWIDE. very impressive
|
Quote:
|
It will be great to see UIC continue to expand their campus with new buildings, both on the east and west campus.
|
It's kind of bittersweet that this is the only building going up that is over 800 feet tall. Is it the end of this very long cycle? If so, then I hope the next cycle will be a great one with multiple buildings over 800 feet. Hopefully a supertall too.
|
Pretty sweet drone video from the Cubs! It's not at all your typical drone video. So cool!
|
Quote:
How common is it as far as cycles go for proposals to carry over? I'm starting to think this is Chicago's last skyscraper for a while and doubting that any of the others will start anytime soon. But I'm also wondering if they can stay on the back burner and get built 5-10 years from now. |
still waiting for 600 w randolph
|
Really want 400 LSD to start. That massive hole right in front of the city is embarassing.
Other cities continue to pump out skyscrapers and supertalls, why can't Chicago, the home of the skyscraper? |
^ because these things work in cycles.
and chicago is starting to come out of one of its biggest big-tower cycles ever. unless, of course, one of those big towers currently on the drawing boards gets financed. https://i.postimg.cc/ZRQbJTfV/GRAPH-07-28-2022.png |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Residential skyscrapers could still happen, but you would think with the strong job market here in Chicago and perhaps the city being a little bit more affordable than NYC and LA would attract more people to move here. That would spur more residential high-rises to be built which seem to be concentrated in Fulton Market at the moment. |
This is a weird cycle because i dont perceive the hard stop of the cycle crashing in 2009. What if the pandemic was the pause between cycle and now we are actually in a new cycle?
|
...
|
Quote:
I see your point though, I get frustrated when some random 3rd world city can build a 400+ meter tower but anywhere outside of NYC seems to struggle in the US with decently tall buildings (with a few exceptions). Quote:
Chicago seems to be coming out of a cycle, that's why I asked if projects ever carry over or if developers ever hold onto a site for ~10 years. I would think they wouldn't but who knows... Maybe in better times we'll finally see Tribune / Parcel I / 400LSD / 78 site see the light of day. Or maybe, crazy enough, we'll see new very tall proposals. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.