SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Austin (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=446)
-   -   Austin | Conrad Residences (307 E. 2nd St.) | 755 Feet | 62 Floors | Never Built (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=245523)

ahealy May 6, 2022 9:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drummer (Post 9618721)
They are, compared to the CC. The plateau of 400' that we used to complain about isn't an issue anymore.

Too soon....way too soon. Those were dark days :yuck:

Also, thanks for the heads up J78704. The re-design is growing on me, just wish there was a crown.

Crowns...goddamn crowns....that is one of the phrases my doll says when you pull his string "I just wish you'd add a nice illuminated crown. Hideee-ho ha ha ha!"

JollyvilleJ-Rad May 6, 2022 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vexal (Post 9618930)
For a building this large I would have expected they'd be able to fit more than 125 units. Shouldn't a full city block be able to house at least 500 - 1000 people each?

Quote:

Originally Posted by We vs us (Post 9618938)
It's less than half a block, actually.

It's also atop 330 hotel rooms in the lower portion of the building, according to Towers.net

The ATX May 6, 2022 11:25 PM

I like the redesign even though it lost a couple floors. I prefer vertical lines to horizontal. Even though I don't care for flat tops, that Gumby crown was silly.

ILUVSAT May 7, 2022 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 9619015)
I like the redesign even though it lost a couple floors. I prefer vertical lines to horizontal. Even though I don't care for flat tops, that Gumby crown was silly.

How do you know it lost floors? A marketing brochure?

I'm still betting it's 775' and 65 floors when you include the parapet and mechanical levels. There are mechanical levels somewhere near halfway up and at the apex. I think it's 63 "occupied" levels...

Yes. They could have altered what had already been approved and released. But, wouldn't they have to submit a site plan addendum?

The ATX May 7, 2022 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILUVSAT (Post 9619057)
How do you know it lost floors? A marketing brochure?

I'm still betting it's 775' and 65 floors when you include the parapet and mechanical levels. There are mechanical levels somewhere near halfway up and at the apex. I think it's 63 "occupied" levels...

Yes. They could have altered what had already been approved and released. But, wouldn't they have to submit a site plan addendum?

Don't worry. We didn't change the thread title yet. :)

ILUVSAT May 7, 2022 1:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The ATX (Post 9619066)
Don't worry. We didn't change the thread title yet. :)

Thank the Good Lord above! :)

KevinFromTexas May 7, 2022 8:15 PM

Modern architecture, man.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/DopeyElast...ut-max-1mb.gif

JACKinBeantown May 7, 2022 8:50 PM

https://austin.towers.net/wp-content...CA06AF0C6.jpeg

It looks kinda like macrame.
https://target.scene7.com/is/image/T...=488&fmt=pjpeg
https://target.scene7.com/is/image/T...=488&fmt=pjpeg

ahealy May 7, 2022 8:54 PM

It's increasingly growing on me. I just really hope the vertical lines are that off yellow color. I love blue and gold/yellow mixed.

JACKinBeantown May 7, 2022 9:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ahealy (Post 9619510)
It's increasingly growing on me. I just really hope the vertical lines are that off yellow color. I love blue and gold/yellow mixed.

I think it's sunset magic light in the rendering. It's the same color as the Hilton, which is a very light beige... almost white. Here's hoping though. :tup:

AusTex May 7, 2022 11:19 PM

I am still not thinking it is a blue glass. Very reflective YES; of the blue sky, but not blue. We will see. :shrug:

H2O May 8, 2022 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AusTex (Post 9619568)
I am still not thinking it is a blue glass. Very reflective YES; of the blue sky, but not blue. We will see. :shrug:

That is what all glass is regardless of the tint. Unless it is a dark tone like red/purple, gold or black.

N90 May 8, 2022 7:07 PM

The redesign ruined it. They got rid of the crown and changed the glass color from teal to some version of blue.

I was really happy about this one but now I don’t care, just another shit box.

The ATX May 9, 2022 10:31 PM

The latest elevations were released. The highest occupied floor is 62 and it is 755'.

Elevations: https://studio.bluebeam.com/share/9nmm7b#

https://i.imgur.com/s0gM4il.png
https://i.imgur.com/CDEvIVd.png

zrx299 May 11, 2022 3:20 PM

Another "trendy" staggered lines tower that will forever trigger folks with OCD :laugh:

We're only missing the leaning exposed support beams on the amenity deck to complete the look.
Did they not get the memo? /s

futures May 11, 2022 5:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zrx299 (Post 9622180)
Another "trendy" staggered lines tower that will forever trigger folks with OCD :laugh:

We're only missing the leaning exposed support beams on the amenity deck to complete the look.
Did they not get the memo? /s

There actually IS a leaning support beam on the second deck. You can see the outside beam leans out since the top section is slightly wider than the middle section. So we've got a BINGO here!

bobbywest87 May 11, 2022 6:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by futures (Post 9622344)
There actually IS a leaning support beam on the second deck. You can see the outside beam leans out since the top section is slightly wider than the middle section. So we've got a BINGO here!

Oh GOD I can't UNSEE it.

https://i.imgur.com/KX2MUxU.jpg

Sigaven May 12, 2022 2:54 PM

you can see it in the elevations too. ugh.

AusTex May 12, 2022 4:50 PM

I know from previous threads there people that like this buildings type of "hanging and exposed" balconies, however, at 700' above the ground I do not think I would feel safe on one of them. They really do allow for expansive views especially if one is at the end of the building. But I am fairly sure I would have some trouble getting used to such a small space with only the back wall being solid, especially with the wind. Three solid walls would be just fine at 700', but not these balconies.

JACKinBeantown May 12, 2022 7:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbywest87 (Post 9622431)
Oh GOD I can't UNSEE it.

https://i.imgur.com/KX2MUxU.jpg

Now it just needs some trees, wind turbines, an overhanging glass-bottomed viewing platform, exposed ductwork, neon lights, and a 400-foot spire.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.