Originally Posted by yuriandrade (Post 9388570)

Awesome. It will look like some futuristic Los Angeles movie. Take a night shot, with a nice filter and you have Blade Runner.

Originally Posted by Quixote (Post 9388549)

Everything (or just about) on the table (under construction, approved, proposed):

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...3b016bdf_b.jpg
SSP/DoctorBoffin

3X-large:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...56f38eb_3k.jpg


That's the view from the 110 at MLK Blvd., so the foreground isn't DTLA. The cluster of brown high-rises to the far right are a project along Mesquit (between 6th and 7th) in the Arts District. The taller set of skyscrapers to its left are part of a project proposed for 6th/Alameda.

Like I said, a lot of room for a lot more than 200K.

Originally Posted by yuriandrade (Post 9388572)

[SIZE="3"]Downtown Cincinnati

As it's immediately north of Downtown, I decided to bring Over-the-Rhine. It still posts population losses and now might be a sign of gentrification, I don't know.

And maybe the most remarkable thing here is the city of Cincinnati itself, posting growth for the first time since 1940-1950.

Originally Posted by Labtec (Post 9389472)

Hopefully, those are built out, LA's skyline is very underwhelming for the 2nd largest city in the US. Also, whenever I visit there's nothing really to do besides around the LA Live area.

Originally Posted by dc_denizen (Post 9389688)

I'd rather they add towers and midrise along the major arterials.

Originally Posted by JDRCRASH (Post 9389800)

Thats happening, too, especially around Koreatown.

Just wait till Westlake/MacArthur is cornered on all sides with development. It will pop like CRAZY.

Originally Posted by LA21st (Post 9388616)

Once the purple line is completed to West LA, you will see a explosion of highrises in LA like never before. It's gonna be crazy, just that one line alone.
I dont think outsiders are really aware of the change that will happen.

Originally Posted by Wigs (Post 9391941)

yuriandrade, can you do Buffalo and Rochester NY?

Originally Posted by yuriandrade (Post 9391942)

I did it. Ditto for Albany and Syracuse. They're in line to be posted.

Originally Posted by Derek (Post 9384199)

I think you’re misunderstanding. The Goose Hollow and Pearl neighborhoods are part of Portland’s “downtown” core, despite having a distinct name.

Originally Posted by dc_denizen (Post 9389688)

I'd rather they add towers and midrise along the major arterials.

Originally Posted by yuriandrade (Post 9379091)

Downtown Dallas-Fort Worth

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...1a0a93fc_z.jpg


------------------------------ 2020 ------ 2010 ------ 2000 ------ 1990 ------ Growth ------ Density

Downtown Dallas -------------- 36,456 ----- 19,975 ------ 9,510 ------ 7,520 ---- 82.5% --- 110.0% --- 26.5% ------ 10.8 km² --- 3,365.6 inh./km²

CBD Dallas ---------------------- 6,514 ------ 3,712 ------ 1,920 ------ 2,841 ---- 75.5% ---- 93.3% -- -32.4% ------- 2.0 km² --- 3,310.0 inh./km²

Downtown Fort Worth -------- 11,977 ------ 6,435 ------ 6,739 ------ 6,443 ---- 86.1% ---- -4.5% ---- 4.6% ------ 11.8 km² --- 1,018.3 inh./km²

CBD Fort Worth ---------------- 6,345 ------ 3,210 -------- 857 -------- 489 ---- 97.7% --- 274.6% --- 75.3% ------- 2.0 km² --- 3,214.3 inh./km²

Dallas MSA ---------------- 7,637,387 -- 6,366,542 -- 5,156,217 -- 3,984,437 ---- 20.0% ---- 23.5% --- 29.4% -- 22,469 km²


What was a shame here for Dallas was the shape of their census tracts, not making possible to take the whole freeway loop area, which would be the best definition for their Downtown. So I came up with one strict (3 tracts), covering only half of the loop and a broader one, comprising 10 census tracts and including Uptown and Victoria Park north of loop and Cedars south. And to make Fort Worth comparable to Dallas, I also brought two definitions, one with 1 tract and the other comprising 3.

But back to the numbers, Downtown Dallas growing super fast and already reached a good density giving we're talking about a large area (almost 11 km²).

Downtown Fort Worth, on the other hand started its process only in the 2010's but they're already moving on the right direction.

And regarding the MSA, as Houston, it doesn't seem to slow. By the 2030 Census, the CSA will be quite close to the 10 million mark.

Originally Posted by yuriandrade (Post 9381146)

Downtown Washington

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...1f18f865_z.jpg


-------------------------------- 2020 ------ 2010 ------ 2000 ------ 1990 ------ Growth ------ Density

Downtown --------------------- 30,279 ----- 27,025 ----- 18,704 ----- 17,457 ---- 12.0% ---- 44.5% ---- 7.1% ------ 11.0 km² --- 2,743.7 inh./km²

Georgetown -------------------- 13,603 ----- 14,231 ----- 12,991 ----- 12,181 ---- -4.4% ----- 9.5% ---- 6.6% ------- 3.2 km² --- 4,268.3 inh./km²

Washington DC --------------- 689,545 ---- 601,723 ---- 572,059 ---- 606,900 ---- 14.6% ----- 5.2% --- -5.7% ----- 158.3 km² --- 4,355.9 inh./km²

Arlington-Alexandria-F.C. ---- 412,768 ---- 359,925 ---- 328,113 ---- 291,697 ---- 14.7% ----- 9.7% --- 12.5% ----- 111.3 km² --- 3,708.3 inh./km²

Washington Metro Area ----- 6,105,431 -- 5,388,326 -- 4,635,194 -- 3,997,373 ---- 13.3% ---- 16.2% --- 16.0% -- 12,403 km²


Washington Downtown is very different from everything. Firstly, the Mall and Potomac Park takes half of it (1 census tract). The other 10 census tracts comprise Foggy Bottom and everything between the Massachusetts Avenue and the Mall. As this region is full of big government offices, embassies, hotels, it's hard to make any assumption about its residential population trends.

As bonus, I brought Georgetown, formed by 4 census tracts.