|
|
|
I'm dying to see them remove some of the blue shrinkwrap or whatever it is and see if the glass color aligns with the renders.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I really want to see the facade because I think it will be a shiny, crisp facade.
https://therealdeal.com/2018/03/21/w...al-park-tower/ Wanted: Sales director at Central Park Tower Jason Karadus is re-joining Brown Harris Stevens By E.B. Solomont March 21, 2018 Quote:
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bgl8xtyD...ken-by=zuckiji https://scontent-sea1-1.cdninstagram...NDk5Ng%3D%3D.2 |
|
|
looks like its hit 900'
|
So still another 600+ feet to grow? This will totally dominate everything around it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
^
I still can't believe all the change that's happened in the past 5 years from that view. It's absolutely incredible. |
^ The view of the skyline is so much better with peaks and contrasting heights, a concept the NIMBYs do not get with their nonsense need to have everything be the same heights/fitting in/contextual.
|
Quote:
|
On a side note, a few posts up, check out 220 CPS. Blends in so well with the much older structures in the foreground (along CP South).
220 CPS and 111 W 57th will be ones for the architecture books. I could just picture a nice book at some college called "fundamentals of architecture" with a pic of Steinway on the front cover and being used in some architecture class for freshmen. Sadly, the class on the exam had an average of a 20... and only 1 passed. He went on to design the 1st mega tall for NYC. After great success, and going on to designing Chicago's 1st mega tall, he was struck by a bus (that was taking NIMBYs to a community meeting) and died. But he is not to be forgotten, as the "fundamentals of architecture", with the Steinway pic, inspired him to transform two skylines. (credits screen) |
Getting close to be the dominant tower over Central Park.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BhABV1MF...en-by=dcblake1 https://scontent-sea1-1.cdninstagram...MTA2Mg%3D%3D.2 |
|
|
Quote:
|
220CPS looks great.
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Current height 904ft, 650ft more to go.
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/818/4...51c92a81_o.jpg 225 W 57th St (Central Park Tower by NyConstructionPhoto, on Flickr https://farm1.staticflickr.com/799/4...197be11f_o.jpg 225 W 57th St (Central Park Tower by NyConstructionPhoto, on Flickr All 3 supertalls u/c are visible from New Jersey now. https://farm1.staticflickr.com/883/4...9c1c5ed4_o.jpg New York City by NyConstructionPhoto, on Flickr |
I can almost feel it passing both 220 and One57...interesting how One57 is looking smaller and smaller.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BhFsbl0n...by=orangedoors https://scontent-iad3-1.cdninstagram...86897664_n.jpg |
I do wish they would be just a tad above a little bit more expeditious with the façade........
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
the greatest city in the world!!!! |
I'd imagine as investment properties, some of the owners of units in One57 will seek to buy some next door. One57 started it all folks! The godfather of the 57th Street revolution.
|
From 4/1
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/896/4...caee72e1_h.jpgIMG_1886 by David Z, on Flickr https://farm1.staticflickr.com/891/3...5195958a_h.jpgIMG_1912 by David Z, on Flickr |
Quote:
|
https://www.instagram.com/p/BhHqICAn...en-by=nycfairy
Quote:
|
This has about another 600 feet to go, no?
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Almost heads above the others (minus 432). https://www.instagram.com/p/BhMP3uth...by=nickybivona https://scontent-iad3-1.cdninstagram...92721664_n.jpg |
great photo¡¡¡ thank you¡¡¡
:) |
It's strange how the facade (with the thick metal panels between floors) emphasizes the horizontal rather than the vertical. Most skyscraper facades want to express verticality. I guess when you have the actual height it's not as important.
|
Not a big fan of the blue windows.
|
Quote:
|
|
Only in NY...
A 900’ Tower with 656’ left to go!! It’s the Capital of the World! |
Quote:
For reference... 656' , minus 1', is equivalent to a "One Wall Street" rising. http://nyc-architecture.com/LM/srivals8.gif Credit: nycarchitecture We tend to forget the impact that 656' has given the surroundings, but in many cities, that is a new tallest. If you place 656' out in a field, you'd be like damn... its big. Now, the only in NY thing could also be said for the fact that 800' towers go unnoticed. That itself is scary, yet a testament to the boom and the magnitude of its skyscraper collection, spanning 3 centuries! Whats exiting is we are on our way to being the global city with the most super talls. Where not there yet, but catching up. If all goes well, the #1 spot is in reach. 2# is not acceptable! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 7:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.