PDA

View Full Version : NEW YORK | Sky House | 588 FT / 179 M | 54 FLOORS


Pages : 1 2 [3] 4

colemonkee
Mar 26, 2007, 2:34 PM
Did I read that sign right? Did FX Fowle design this?

Lost Island
Mar 26, 2007, 3:43 PM
I like the building, but it seems strange to have a blank windowless section like that on an apartment house.

JACKinBeantown
Mar 26, 2007, 5:16 PM
Yeah, it makes sense on one side because there would be elevators there. But there's a blank wall on both sides.

-GR2NY-
Mar 26, 2007, 6:34 PM
Funny how on their site when u go to "views", the view to the east is angled north to show mostly midtown. I guess they're not too proud of the tribeca (sp?) view? :shrug:

antinimby
Mar 26, 2007, 11:04 PM
You can't say that. They're not going to show every angle.

If they had shown Tribeca, then you would've said they were reluctant to show Midtown.

CarlosV
Mar 26, 2007, 11:41 PM
Towering amongst its neighbors.....

March 26, 2007

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/CIMG1576.jpg

hoosier
Mar 27, 2007, 12:29 AM
It is looking good.

I can't wait for this and Saya to be completed.

NYguy
Mar 27, 2007, 6:43 PM
Did I read that sign right? Did FX Fowle design this?


Correct...

Flatiron District, Manhattan

Currently under construction, Sky House is a 54-story luxury condominium located at 11 East 29th Street in Manhattan’s Flatiron District. This dynamic building designed by Fox & Fowle Architects features 138 one, two and three bedroom homes.

http://www.clarett.com/images/skyhouseblock.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/76201049/large.jpg

JACKinBeantown
Mar 29, 2007, 8:33 PM
March 29, 2007

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-7.jpg

hoosier
Mar 29, 2007, 10:33 PM
WOW jack, that thing has really sprouted like a beanstalk!!:haha:

antinimby
Mar 29, 2007, 10:54 PM
How much more to go?

JACKinBeantown
Mar 30, 2007, 12:43 AM
15-18 floors.

NYguy
Mar 30, 2007, 12:42 PM
March 29, 2007

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-7.jpg

This is what I mean when I speak of the density of a true city at its core. It's when you're
lucky if you can see the sky from the ground, or the ground from the sky. And yet it still
grows. Amazing.

It's interesting that in that photo I see at least 5 other towers that we watched grow
from the ground up with construction threads.

antinimby
Mar 30, 2007, 6:59 PM
^ And none of them are really that pretty.

NYguy
Mar 31, 2007, 12:00 AM
^ And none of them are really that pretty.


It's not a "pretty" town. Just massive and very busy.

Hoodrat
Mar 31, 2007, 2:54 AM
It's not a "pretty" town. Just massive and very busy.

for real:tup:

Citizen
Mar 31, 2007, 7:20 PM
Capital of the world. :yes:

JACKinBeantown
Apr 2, 2007, 7:36 PM
It's not a "pretty" town. Just massive and very busy.

Actually, lots of those old 10-15 story buildings are very pretty... inside and out. You just can't tell when you're looking at all the 50+ story buildings. And of course, sticking out of the top of my photo is the Empire State Building, and just off to the right is Chrysler. Two very handsome structures.

JACKinBeantown
Apr 2, 2007, 7:40 PM
Here's what I mean...

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/ESB.jpg

And of course, my next door neightbor...

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/41MadisonAveMcGoldrick.jpg

NYguy
Apr 3, 2007, 12:09 PM
Here's what I mean...

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/ESB.jpg

And of course, my next door neightbor...

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/41MadisonAveMcGoldrick.jpg

I see nothing "pretty" about either of those. Really, don't go looking for pretty in New York. Besides, who wants it?

JACKinBeantown
Apr 3, 2007, 12:28 PM
Um... OK. That's certainly an opinion I disagree with. I guess Beaux Arts grandeur, accentuated fenestration, classic gargoyles and and amazing gold pyramidal crown just don't compare with blue glass and a 300-foot pole stuck on top for added "height." But maybe that's what opinions are for... so we can each have one to call our own.

And I'd like to amend your statement... "Don't go looking for pretty in New York... if you don't want to find it. You'll be sorely disappointed at every turn."

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/NYLife.jpg

And now, back to Skyhouse...

CarlosV
Apr 3, 2007, 3:46 PM
^ I love this Cass Gilbert skyscraper....one of my favorite NYC "Gothic" towers.... :)

colemonkee
Apr 3, 2007, 4:25 PM
^ That's the New York Life tower, right? I think I stayed right around the corner from that my first time in New York, at the Gershwin Hotel. Cool spot with a great rooftop party area.

And I agree with Jack, there's plenty of "pretty" in NY. You don't even really have to look that hard.

antinimby
Apr 4, 2007, 6:33 AM
The older Beaux Arts and Art Deco buildings are very attractive but the modern ones are all pretty much forgettable.

NYguy
Apr 4, 2007, 12:42 PM
Um... OK. That's certainly an opinion I disagree with.

And I'd like to amend your statement... "Don't go looking for pretty in New York... if you don't want to find it. You'll be sorely disappointed at every turn."


A little amendment to your own...

"Don't go looking for pretty in New York... if you don't want to find it. You'll be sorely disappointed at every turn. For it is the city of 'bigness', towers that simply rise into the sky, where the architects are often criticized, but never idle. A city that is simply astonishing by its numbers. 'Pretty' is not what this town does best. Never has, never will. You want that, go to Peoria."

pret·ty (prt) KEY
ADJECTIVE:

Pleasing or attractive in a graceful or delicate way

Nothing you've shown meets that description. Sure, there may be some delicate details to the building, but overall it's a raw behemoth, not the best choice for your argument.

JACKinBeantown
Apr 4, 2007, 2:54 PM
I haven't been to Peoria yet. Please show me the pretty examples in Peoria you're talking about. :)

I do agree that many of the new building going up in NYC are lacking in creativity and the finer details that make so many of the old buildings so special. Too many single-pole "spires" on 42nd street, too many all glass facades that make it hard to delineate individual floors thus making the buildings lose their sense of scale and proportion. I'm looking forward to the new Gehry building downtown, and BofA is above average. There's also a really cool new building going up on 11th Avenue downtown with all kinds of uneven windows. That's going to be really cool. The Times Tower blows hard. It's mostly the old skyscrapers in this city that are so cool... ESB, Chrysler, Woolworth, 40 Wall Street, etc.

My favorite element of Skyhouse (an average building) is the many windows. It gives it clear floor delineation and therefore a good sense of scale. It's also skinny, and that makes it appear taller than it actually is. Otherwise, though, it's a pretty plain building. Nonetheless, I'm enjoying watching it rise.

CarlosV
Apr 10, 2007, 8:16 PM
April 10, 2007

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/CIMG1653.jpg

NYguy
Apr 10, 2007, 8:24 PM
Not the best side, but it's still ok. Maybe someday something will block that side of the tower.

CarlosV
Apr 10, 2007, 8:31 PM
Funny thing is...i think once completed it will just "dissappear" and no one will look at it twice....

Antares41
Apr 10, 2007, 8:37 PM
^ Agreed! it width-to-height and reasonable nice brick facade is it best feature. Although from a distance it along with the Epic and soon to be constructed 400 Fifth Ave will ring the ESB with 600 ft towers that should go a long way in eliminating its isolation in lower Midtown.

antinimby
Apr 10, 2007, 11:45 PM
Not the best side, but it's still ok.True. The east-facing side is even worst. The blankwall is even larger.

NYguy
Apr 11, 2007, 12:41 PM
from a distance it along with the Epic and soon to be constructed 400 Fifth Ave will ring the ESB with 600 ft towers that should go a long way in eliminating its isolation in lower Midtown.

The large towers planned along the 33rd street corridor will go further in that regard.

JACKinBeantown
Apr 20, 2007, 7:13 PM
April 20, 2007

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-8.jpg

NYguy
Apr 21, 2007, 1:07 PM
The vastness of Manhattan is breathtaking...

JACKinBeantown
May 16, 2007, 6:09 PM
May 16, 2007

Storm approaching... weird light. It's hard to tell in this photo, but they've reached the first setback (two levels ago). It's hidden behind the orange mesh sheeting. So six floors to go.

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-9.jpg

BayRidgeFever
May 16, 2007, 7:29 PM
I was just going to ask for an update too....haha. It's looking good, and makes a nice presence from the BQE surprisingly. I wish it had a nice hat to complement the tower across the street, but the better brickwork makes up for it I suppose.

NYguy
May 16, 2007, 11:25 PM
http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-9.jpg


Thin is in...:tup:

antinimby
May 17, 2007, 2:35 AM
Depends on which angle. Thin would not describe the view from the east or west.

How many more floors to go by the way?

Fabb
May 17, 2007, 10:42 AM
^Read the lines that go with the pretty picture. ;)

May 16, 2007

It's hard to tell in this photo, but they've reached the first setback (two levels ago). It's hidden behind the orange mesh sheeting. So six floors to go.

NYguy
May 17, 2007, 12:12 PM
Depends on which angle. Thin would not describe the view from the east or west.

It's still a thin building, regardless of the view. But it's best viewed from the thin angle.

Antares41
May 17, 2007, 12:18 PM
What fascinates me is just how many bldgs in the picture above did not exist prior to 2000. I counted six, not including 325 Fifth which is hidden behind the Sky House.

ZZ-II
May 17, 2007, 12:22 PM
wow, never seen that tower. great addition for NY

NYguy
May 17, 2007, 12:28 PM
What fascinates me is just how many bldgs in the picture above did not exist prior to 2000. I counted six, not including 325 Fifth which is hidden behind the Sky House.

I counted six also. And we've watched them all rise...:yes:

Make that 7: Bear Stearns, CIBC, 425 5th, TS Tower, Westin TS, that other hotel on 42nd, and that residential on the left.

Antares41
May 17, 2007, 12:35 PM
I counted six also. And we've watched them all rise...:yes:

Make that 7: Bear Stearns, CIBC, 425 5th, TS Tower, Westin TS, that other hotel on 42nd, and that residential on the left.

I think the small reddish bldg. in front of 425 5th is relatively new, but its soo small its easy to overlook.

NYguy
May 17, 2007, 12:38 PM
I think the small reddish bldg. in front of 425 5th is relatively new, but its soo small its easy to overlook.

Yeah, there are a lot of smaller residential towers that we don't even pay attention to. I know I don't, there's just too many. But look at that photo, and compare it (as so many do) with Dubai. Even with all the Dubai construction, and different architecture there, this photo tells shows you what a real city looks like. What Manhattan is is much more impressive to me than some built overnight sensation.

Antares41
May 17, 2007, 12:54 PM
I think history will look back at the period from 2000 to 2015 and designate it as a decade and a half of unprecedented growth of NYC. The re-birth of the WTC complex and the Hudson yard construction will be the grand finale!

And more skyscrapers for me to draw :banana:

NYguy
May 17, 2007, 1:06 PM
I think history will look back at the period from 2000 to 2015 and designate it as a decade and a half of unprecedented growth of NYC. The re-birth of the WTC complex and the Hudson yard construction will be the grand finale!

That's true. 2001, and 9/11 saw the darkest of days for the city and its skyscrapers. Initially, it was thought to be the end of it all. History will show that it actally led to a spark of building unlike the city has ever seen. Some of our greatest, iconic towers will be constructed in this next decade. Also, a tall building boom around the country unlike any the country has ever seen.

nygirl1
May 17, 2007, 4:34 PM
That's true. 2001, and 9/11 saw the darkest of days for the city and its skyscrapers. Initially, it was thought to be the end of it all. History will show that it actally led to a spark of building unlike the city has ever seen. Some of our greatest, iconic towers will be constructed in this next decade. Also, a tall building boom around the country unlike any the country has ever seen.


Yeah look at: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, Miami, and Philadelphia. Even Dallas, Denver, Nashville, and Baltimore is getting something. Hopefully we can see something in Boston and Houston looks promising. I'd say things are just getting started again over here. It's good to have those ups and downs and not just toss in everything at once because you know there's going to be an up when your down.

Derek2k32
May 19, 2007, 11:01 PM
What fascinates me is just how many bldgs in the picture above did not exist prior to 2000. I counted six, not including 325 Fifth which is hidden behind the Sky House.
Also The Belvedere, the tower in front of Sky House was completed in 99.

NYguy
May 21, 2007, 12:52 PM
Also The Belvedere, the tower in front of Sky House was completed in 99.

Yeah, that one seemed to come out of nowhere.

Scruffy
May 30, 2007, 4:14 AM
5/25

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05202.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05279.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05281.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05282.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05286.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05289.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05290.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05291.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05292.jpg

Scruffy
May 30, 2007, 4:16 AM
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05297.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05298.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05299.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05300.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05301.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05302.jpg

Scruffy
May 30, 2007, 4:21 AM
Its a nice looking tower. Great looking on the narrow side. But there is a total chink in its armor and its the east facade.
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05304.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05321.jpg

http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05328.jpg

RandySavage
May 30, 2007, 3:09 PM
Thanks for the pics. That's an enormous chink. Does you know if they are to brick over the concrete east facade or just leave it like that?

Antares41
May 30, 2007, 3:57 PM
Either brick or paint it! I doubt it will be left in that condition.

Scruffy
May 30, 2007, 4:40 PM
It will look bricked up like the edges of that side look which will be an improvement but still. a 600 foot windowless brick wall isn't as pretty as you think.

VA_Gentleman
May 30, 2007, 7:54 PM
This building is so tall and slender it reminds me of a chimney from a burnt-down house.

Antares41
May 30, 2007, 8:34 PM
It will look bricked up like the edges of that side look which will be an improvement but still. a 600 foot windowless brick wall isn't as pretty as you think.

Hopefully, I look forward to making that judgement! I prefer brick to paint.
Or, perhaps the space will be use for advertisement? Tacky yes! but hey this is NYC, anything goes, especially if it generates dollars!

CarlosV
Jun 14, 2007, 12:32 AM
June 13, 2007


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture034.jpg

JACKinBeantown
Jun 14, 2007, 2:37 PM
June 14, 2007

Topping out.

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-10.jpg

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-11.jpg

VA_Gentleman
Jun 14, 2007, 4:53 PM
Man I love this thing! I hope that blank wall means the developer knows something will be developed on that side of the building. Let's hope.

CarlosV
Jun 14, 2007, 6:13 PM
So Narrow!!!!! It Looks Like It Might Topple Over

JACKinBeantown
Jun 14, 2007, 8:02 PM
I'm guessing it's no more than 45 feet wide... if that.

pico44
Jun 15, 2007, 7:39 AM
it isn't good

Locofresh55
Jun 15, 2007, 8:15 AM
What's the height (unofficiallly or officially) on this building? That Picture infront of ESB makes it look about 700 FT. Maybe it's the angle but it's holding it's own in that area.

CHAPINM1
Jun 15, 2007, 3:54 PM
I'd say it's at least 50 feet wide, however not by much. It reminds me so much of the shape of 30 Rock in terms of one side being a whole lot wider than the other!

speedy1979
Jun 15, 2007, 5:16 PM
June 14, 2007

Topping out.

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-10.jpg

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-11.jpg


I hate buildings with blank concrete walls there's one here in Bklyn called the Forte Condo one side has windows looks half-decent the other side facing manhattan is a blank concrete wall. :yuck::yuck:

JACKinBeantown
Jun 15, 2007, 5:34 PM
I hate run-on sentences. :)

AtlanticaC5
Jun 17, 2007, 1:20 PM
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z70/Scruffy66/DSC05282.jpg


Looks way taller than 588 ft in this pic. I like it :)

CarlosV
Jun 18, 2007, 1:41 AM
June 17, 2007

THIS IS THE VIEW FROM THE EAST SIDE OF MANHATTAN TERRIBLE

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture036.jpg

:yuck:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture037.jpg

skymetalscraper
Jun 18, 2007, 8:54 AM
i hope they'll put another tower there to hide that nasty wall !:yuck:

NYguy
Jun 18, 2007, 1:27 PM
June 14, 2007

Topping out.

http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f117/JACKinNYC/Skyhouse-10.jpg

That's a sweet view for so many reasons...:yes:

JACKinBeantown
Jun 18, 2007, 4:27 PM
I feel very lucky to have it, NYguy.

JACKinBeantown
Jun 20, 2007, 3:16 PM
They're making the power station/room on top one floor taller. I thought they'd topped out. I guess I assumed wrong. No tree yet. I'll post a photo pretty soon. I'll let them finish pouring concrete first.

sbarn
Jun 21, 2007, 4:12 AM
I have to admit that I've got mixed feelings about this one... from certain angles I like it, others I don't at all.

June 20th [an angle I like]:

http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/9122/june20thwalk098kn9.jpg

NYguy
Jun 21, 2007, 12:15 PM
I feel very lucky to have it, NYguy.

Hopefully someone will put up a new tower closer to you to block your view...then we'll see who's the NIMBY....;)

NYguy
Jun 21, 2007, 12:19 PM
I have to admit that I've got mixed feelings about this one... from certain angles I like it, others I don't at all.

June 20th [an angle I like]:

http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/9122/june20thwalk098kn9.jpg

I like that angle as well, though it could use a few more windows...

NYguy
Jun 21, 2007, 12:21 PM
This building sure seems to have gone up very fast. Here's a quote from an article in the NY Sun...


http://www.nysun.com/article/57058

At Condominium Sales Centers, Sophisticated Marketing Sells

By STEPHANIE GARLOW
June 21, 2007

The Sky House — a 55-floor development that will be open for occupancy in early 2008 — will unveil its sale center this week in a hotel next to the building site.

"We just wanted to be as close to our site as possible," said the director of sales for Clarrett Group, David E. Perry.

The sale center has a scale model of the building as well as floor plans to show potential buyers. There is no full model but customers can also walk next door to see a finished apartment in the building.

Perry said that in the past the Clarrett Group had set up sales centers farther away from the actual building site. "We had to do all the razzmatazz, and all the smoke and mirrors, and now we don't have to do that." he said.

CarlosV
Jun 25, 2007, 5:30 AM
june 25, 2007



http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture013copy.jpg

JACKinBeantown
Jun 25, 2007, 5:13 PM
Hopefully someone will put up a new tower closer to you to block your view...then we'll see who's the NIMBY....;)

I'm confused. I am a little bit of a NIMBY. :cheers:

NYguy
Jun 25, 2007, 11:03 PM
I'm confused. I am a little bit of a NIMBY. :cheers:

Just jealous of your view....:tup:

JACKinBeantown
Jun 26, 2007, 3:05 PM
As I said, I feel lucky. Thanks.

CarlosV
Aug 16, 2007, 8:32 PM
August 16, 2007


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture120-1.jpg


;)


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture121.jpg


:rolleyes:


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture122.jpg


:P

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture129-1.jpg



one block over......


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture128.jpg



http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture124.jpg




http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture127.jpg



http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture126.jpg

GVNY
Aug 16, 2007, 8:36 PM
I hate it. I am not at all impressed with this building.

Nice photos though!

CarlosV
Aug 16, 2007, 8:41 PM
its kind of a mid block filler...but on a sunny day it looks better.....today is gray and rainy here in Gotham...

NYguy
Aug 18, 2007, 1:07 AM
August 16, 2007


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v109/nyctowers/2007/Picture120-1.jpg

It's towering for its size...

Antares41
Aug 18, 2007, 8:37 PM
I also find its size towering, especially for that area of midtown. A good addition to the skyline. Is that eastern face still showing a bare concrete wall? What are they going to do with that?

NYguy
Aug 20, 2007, 12:39 PM
I also find its size towering, especially for that area of midtown. A good addition to the skyline. Is that eastern face still showing a bare concrete wall? What are they going to do with that?

Haven't checked it in a while, but probably so...

VA_Gentleman
Nov 29, 2007, 11:08 PM
I was always interested by the size of this building. Does anyone have any updates on it or is it pretty much completed?

NYguy
Nov 30, 2007, 2:29 AM
I was always interested by the size of this building. Does anyone have any updates on it or is it pretty much completed?

It's been topped off for a while. They're probably just putting the finishing touches on it.

Zerton
Nov 30, 2007, 5:51 AM
this building is hideous. Looks like project housing or something stretched vertically.

NYguy
Apr 14, 2008, 5:16 PM
APRIL 12, 2008

Looking down from the Empire State...

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/95616495/large.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/95616523/large.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/95617883/large.jpg

nygirl1
Apr 14, 2008, 9:40 PM
kinda ugly but it is filler.

Zerton
Apr 14, 2008, 11:22 PM
I just wanted to comment on how ugly this is. Even moreso after seeing it in person. It is so boring, uninspired, and no good building has blank walls like that.

CGII
Apr 15, 2008, 1:10 AM
Hmmm...I was just going to come on and say how much I liked it, especially considering the atrocity of the renderings. Mark my words, it'll age beautifully with all that brick.

quobobo
Apr 15, 2008, 1:51 AM
Hmmm...I was just going to come on and say how much I liked it, especially considering the atrocity of the renderings. Mark my words, it'll age beautifully with all that brick.

Seconded. I love how the height/width ratio borders on absurd, it makes it look quite interesting - otherwise I wouldn't like it nearly as much.

antinimby
Apr 15, 2008, 5:40 AM
Being thin helps. Imagine how much worse it would be if it was fatter.

NYguy
Apr 15, 2008, 12:58 PM
Hmmm...I was just going to come on and say how much I liked it, especially considering the atrocity of the renderings. Mark my words, it'll age beautifully with all that brick.


This is one of those buildings that changes depending on the view. It's nice in some, not so nice in others. It's an ok tower, pretty much filler. Very thin, but what else were they going to do with that site. In the photos you can see one, lone parking lot, no doubt the site of a future slender residential.

Busy Bee
Apr 15, 2008, 2:01 PM
Wasn't the blank wall said to be intentional because they expected a neighboring tower to be be built there covering it up?

Derek2k32
Apr 15, 2008, 3:27 PM
The city has rules that prevents most types of windows on lot lines.