PDA

View Full Version : Brussels: Even With Change, an Affordable Capital


Jularc
Feb 21, 2007, 5:43 AM
Even With Change, an Affordable Capital


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/02/20/realestate/greathomes/21gh-brussels_span.jpg
Gregg Svingen of Seattle, Wash., and his girlfriend, Sophie Jacobs, rent a chic corner flat in this building in
Brussels' city center. They plan to buy in Brussels soon.

By GARETH HARDING
February 21, 2007

BRUSSELS — Apartments here don’t get much more central than Gregg Svingen’s one-bedroom place just off Boulevard Emile Jacqmain, a busy thoroughfare that snakes through the Belgian capital.

Directly in front of his building is Rue Neuve, the city’s main shopping street. On the left is the shimmering glass home of the National Theater; on the right, central Brussels’s oldest hotel and biggest movie complex. And the Grand Place, considered to be one of the most beautiful squares in the world, is a five-minute stroll away, as are most of the city’s finest bars and restaurants.

“It’s amazing to live downtown,” said Mr. Svingen, a 34-year-old American from Seattle, who works as a consultant for a lobbying firm called the Centre. “Before Brussels, I never thought it would be possible to live slap-bang in the center.”

Until the mid-1990s, few urban professionals would have been tempted to live in the neighborhood, which was better known for sex shops than hip restaurants. But the area is rapidly changing, altered mainly by young Flemish professionals and expatriates like Mr. Svingen — although he recently decided to take advantage of the growing property market and buy a place in the city suburbs. “Downtown is definitely changing for the better,” he said, surveying the sidewalk-widening work going on below his balcony. “But I don’t know how long the prices will remain democratic.”

The cost of renting and buying property has risen in the eight years that Mr. Svingen has lived in Brussels, where both NATO and the 27-member European Union have their headquarters. But despite the increases, Brussels remains one of the cheapest places to buy or to rent among all the European Union capitals.

“The politicians in Belgium think it’s horribly expensive here, but only because they don’t compare it to anywhere else,” said Iain Cook, chief executive of the local branch of ERA Real Estate, which has offices in 40 countries.

The average rent for a one-bedroom apartment of 60 square meters, or almost 650 square feet, in an upscale district of Brussels is $1,280 a month. That is half the average price in Paris and less than a third the cost of renting in London and New York, according to Mercer Human Resources Consulting, which helps clients around the world find housing for expatriate employees.

Tenants like Mr. Svingen, who signed a nine-year lease in 2003, are also protected by Belgian laws that make it difficult for rent increases to exceed the rate of inflation.

He pays 723 euros, or $950, a month for his 88-square-meter, or 947-square-foot apartment. The amount includes services charges but no utilities; he also pays an additional 60 euros, or $79, a month to rent a garage on his street.

It certainly is possible to find cheaper apartments in Brussels, but not with the same kind of parquet flooring, stucco moldings, high ceilings, wraparound balconies and French windows that flood the apartment with natural light.

“The great thing about Brussels is you can rent without feeling guilty about throwing your money away,” said Mr. Svingen, who lived in England and France before settling in Belgium. “In London and Paris they scrimp on the space but certainly not on the price.”

Despite the cheap rent and the buzz of living downtown, Mr. Svingen and his Dutch partner, Sophie Jacobs, are about to buy an apartment in Ixelles, a trendy suburb favored by expats. “I’m buying because the property market in Belgium is growing at a healthy rate,” he said, but is not as expensive as London, Dublin or New York.

In fact, house prices in Brussels over the last two years have grown at a faster rate than in any of those three cities. In 2006, the value of town houses rose by 13 percent, and apartments by almost 10 percent, according to the Belgium Economics Ministry. This followed a 17.1 percent jump in house prices in 2005, the largest increase in the 12-nation Eurozone.

But residential property in the Belgian capital is still cheap compared with other major European cities, partly because the purchase tax is just 17 percent. According to the ERA Europe Market Survey 2006, the average price of a dwelling of 100 square meters, or slightly more than 1,075 square feet, was 217,462 euros in Brussels, 297,462 euros in Paris, 360,427 euros in London and 368,000 euros in Dublin. (In dollars, the figures would be approximately $286,000 in Brussels, $391,000 in Paris, $474,000 in London and $484,000 in Dublin.)

“If you are looking for a good return on your investment, property in Brussels is still a good buy,” said Mr. Cook, the ERA real estate agent, who added that house prices are expected to continue to rise by 5 to 10 percent this year in spite of higher interest rates.

It is clear from the way Mr. Svingen greets waiters at a local Flemish restaurant, enthuses about the new Ukrainian supermarket that has just opened around the corner and proudly proclaims that work is a 12-minute door-to-door hop by public transport that cheap housing is not the main reason he decided to live in Brussels.

He acknowledged that there is a downside that includes bureaucracy, the squally weather — surely nothing new for someone raised in Seattle — and indifferent customer service, which, he said, “takes nonchalance to a new level.”

But “between Paris, London and Brussels, I’d choose here anytime,” he said. “We’re very spoiled in this city. “Apartments are cheap and of high quality, the restaurants are great and getting around the city is easy.”


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/02/20/realestate/greathomes/21gh-brussels.2_large.jpg
The view of downtown Brussels from Mr. Svingen's terrace.


Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/realestate/greathomes/21GH-brussels.html?ref=realestate)

SpongeG
Feb 21, 2007, 6:14 AM
thats the main shopping street? it looks so empty of shops...

Xelebes
Feb 21, 2007, 6:18 AM
That can't be the main shopping district - doesn't have any appearance of a market being once there. Looks like an ordinary street.

agrant
Feb 21, 2007, 6:44 AM
thats the main shopping street? it looks so empty of shops...Main shopping street? Where does it say that? Brussels isn't like a little town in the Prairies or something. There are many shopping streets.

SHiRO
Feb 21, 2007, 8:03 AM
Of course that's not the main shopping street. The main shopping street is a pedestrian street.

Grumpy
Feb 21, 2007, 8:07 PM
5 ye

Grumpy
Feb 21, 2007, 8:07 PM
5 ye

Grumpy
Feb 21, 2007, 8:09 PM
5 years ago this street was disgusting...there is a high need of affordable housing in the city centre.
The most important shopping area nearby is 3 blocks away...and 2 blocks north the city is a current wastland

alex1
Feb 22, 2007, 1:04 AM
how does brussels compare to antwerp?

I was in Brussels this past October and couldn't believe how beautiful the grand palace was. Other than that, it shuts down too early and isn't all that unique.

SpongeG
Feb 22, 2007, 1:36 AM
Main shopping street? Where does it say that? Brussels isn't like a little town in the Prairies or something. There are many shopping streets.

it said it in the article:

Directly in front of his building is Rue Neuve, the city’s main shopping street.

SpongeG
Feb 22, 2007, 1:37 AM
i would imagine its more bustling than the pic depicts

but why put it in the article only to run that photo with it?

alex1
Feb 22, 2007, 2:06 AM
because it makes the city look clean and modern.

Jularc
Feb 22, 2007, 3:46 AM
Well they should at least plant some trees on that street.

BnaBreaker
Feb 22, 2007, 4:21 AM
If I could speak French or Flemish and it was practical i'd move to Brussels in a heartbeat. I absolutely love that city.

Kilgore Trout
Mar 16, 2007, 3:17 AM
there have been some good photos of brussels posted here over the years and it looks like a great city. plenty of charming residential architecture with a more hodgepodge feel than most french cities.

it's also quite culturally and ethnically diverse, apparently.

Crawford
Mar 16, 2007, 3:26 PM
Honestly, Brussels is one of the blandest and most boring cities in Europe. Maybe it's cheap because people generally don't want to live there.

The city is filled with giant, blocky Washington DC-style office buildings. There's little variety in the streetscape. The second photo is typical. Some parts remind me of the blandly remade parts of East Berlin around Potsdamer Platz. Actually both Brussels and Berlin are sorta ugly, but Berlin is one of the most interesting cities on earth.

Brussels is filled with grim-faced bureaucrats. This is not a place for peoplewatching.

The one thing I liked was the food, but the food is great everywhere in Belgium.

Antwerp and Brugge are much more interesting.

Urban Zombie
Mar 16, 2007, 4:22 PM
^
The Liechtenstein government totally paid you off to say that. Admit it...

BnaBreaker
Mar 16, 2007, 4:46 PM
Honestly, Brussels is one of the blandest and most boring cities in Europe. Maybe it's cheap because people generally don't want to live there.

The city is filled with giant, blocky Washington DC-style office buildings. There's little variety in the streetscape. The second photo is typical. Some parts remind me of the blandly remade parts of East Berlin around Potsdamer Platz. Actually both Brussels and Berlin are sorta ugly, but Berlin is one of the most interesting cities on earth.

Brussels is filled with grim-faced bureaucrats. This is not a place for peoplewatching.

The one thing I liked was the food, but the food is great everywhere in Belgium.

Antwerp and Brugge are much more interesting.

I totally disagree. Based on my experience in Brussels, I feel that the street in the second photo is completely and totally atypical. It might be typical for the new downtown office district, but definitely not for the city as a whole.

SHiRO
Mar 16, 2007, 5:04 PM
As do I and I live a hour away...

AJphx
Mar 16, 2007, 7:19 PM
it said it in the article:
haha.. showed him up!

but possibly thats the Boulevard Emile Jacqmain and the Rue Neuve is the intersecting street?


I'm wondering if its a modern(recent-built) district the guy lives in? That pic makes it look like it with the wide street parking, lack of trees, and the modern buildings with no street retail on the other side.

but honestly, few places succeed in designing good modern neighborhoods... or at least building them to the level of old neighborhoods.

Grumpy
Mar 16, 2007, 7:26 PM
Honestly, Brussels is one of the blandest and most boring cities in Europe. Maybe it's cheap because people generally don't want to live there.

The city is filled with giant, blocky Washington DC-style office buildings. There's little variety in the streetscape. The second photo is typical. Some parts remind me of the blandly remade parts of East Berlin around Potsdamer Platz. Actually both Brussels and Berlin are sorta ugly, but Berlin is one of the most interesting cities on earth.

Brussels is filled with grim-faced bureaucrats. This is not a place for peoplewatching.

The one thing I liked was the food, but the food is great everywhere in Belgium.

Antwerp and Brugge are much more interesting.

I suggest you pay the city a visit ,you'll be surprised.
Brugge more interesting no go to Gent that is interesting :)

SHiRO
Mar 16, 2007, 7:28 PM
As do I and I live a hour away...

Case in point:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=127479

pricemazda
Mar 18, 2007, 12:05 AM
Brussels is a workaday city and has the bordom factor to go with it. If you want a good time, people leave Brussels to go to Antwerp.

But you can live and work in Brussels solely speaking english.

I remember using Flemish street names to people in Brussels and they looked at me like I was speaking Martian, when I said the French name, then they understood.

Brussels overall ain't an exciting or interesting city.

Anyway, the Brussels capital region is meant to one of the most expensive parts of the entire EU!

elsonic
Mar 22, 2007, 3:02 PM
from what I know, in terms of «excitement» or nightlife, Bruxelles could compare to midsize French cities, like Bordeaux, Lille, Rennes or Nantes.

in fact, it reminds me of Boston : average streetlife, alternative scenes and bars/clubs, but a superior ratio of «official» cultural institutions, museums, libraries, etc.

one very bored guy
Mar 22, 2007, 4:28 PM
It's pretty obvious that photo isn't the main shopping street of Brussels, Here are some photos of Rue Neuve, a little more street life and shops that the street they showed, which is probably an offshoot.

http://www.pbase.com/image/54359523/original.jpg

Urban Zombie
Mar 23, 2007, 3:45 AM
^Wow, talk about empty streets--what a ghost town! :D

Nice shot, btw.

Stratosphere 2020
Mar 23, 2007, 9:10 AM
Like many other cities, the streets lack trees.

Harry Cane
Mar 23, 2007, 2:06 PM
That’s a brand new development that’s near the Rue Neuve, not on it. I’ve always found that to be a unusually quiet street in what is otherwise a very busy area, with both Rue Neuve and Rue Anspach nearby.

As for Brussels being boring, while it’s certainly no Paris or London, it’s nevertheless livelier than many, if not most, US cities. And it you don’t like it, it’s located centrally enough to get you to Paris, Amsterdam and Cologne by train in a little over an hour. And London is not much more.

sharkfood
Mar 26, 2007, 10:25 PM
I once read that Belgium has a 23% real estate transfer tax--highest in the world--and that is the reason why prices are so reasonable. If you have to pay over 23% of the price every time you sell, it tends to drive speculators out of the market.