Richmonopoly
Dec 8, 2003, 5:22 PM
"Line of Fire"
Is Richmond-based drama good for city's image?
http://images.richmond.com/images/storyimage/12-05-03linefire_story.jpg
Robb Crocker
Richmond.com
Friday December 5, 2003
ABC's new FBI drama "Line of Fire," which is based on organized crime in and around the city of Richmond, debuted Tuesday night. Within the show, scenes filmed on the James River, at the Canal Club and at various other downtown locations were showcased in the crime drama. With an already sub par reputation, does Richmond want the nation to view it as a city that is a hub for organized crime?
A recent ranking of cities in the United States by Morgan Quitno Press ranked Richmond as the 14th most dangerous. With the violent crime and murder rates high this year, that assessment can be considered a fair ranking.
But having covered the police beat over the past 10 months, I have yet to observe or hear about a rash of organized crime; that doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but it is not indicative to what goes on in Richmond.
We have similar problems that most urban cities have, which are social issues. When I think of organized crime I think of New York, Chicago, Las Vegas and Los Angeles, not Richmond. Having grown up in the suburbs of D.C., I would even consider it believable that the D.C. area could be a hub for organized crime (something we like to call Congress), but Richmond?
When I talk to my family in D.C., New Jersey and Mass., they all have an impression of Richmond as being a city riddled with violent crime and gun-blazing maniacs shooting and killing anyone who gets in their way. When I interviewed Charles Moose, who was the Montgomery County police chief in charge of the sniper investigations last year, he said that Montgomery County doesn't see the level of violence that Richmond does. My father, who lives outside D.C., works in the city and has his car broken into on a regular basis, was worried about my safety when I moved here for college five years ago.
What these people don't understand is that Richmond is a city like any other. Social issues like teen pregnancy, drugs, unemployment and lacking school systems are a common problem throughout the U.S. Unfortunately, surveys like the aforementioned Morgan Quitno Press survey and media attention on the murder rate have given Richmond a black eye and put the city under the microscope. What does a television show about organized crime do to clean up that image?
The argument for the show being good for the image of the city is that the series will explore how crime can be fought successfully in an urban setting. Basically sending a positive message through a negative situation. That could just as easily have been done with a hospital show. I'd even be more content to see a new version of the "Golden Girls" based out of Richmond.
Anything would be better than a show that displays more of society's evils. Aren't there enough "NYPD Blue," "Law and Order," "Dragnet: Los Angeles," and "CSI" type shows on television?
It was great to watch and see parts of Richmond on a television show, just like it was exciting to see parts of "Hannibal" filmed in the Fan and Downtown (but in "Hannibal," Richmond was supposed to be D.C.). And I have to admit, the show was good.
Don't get me wrong. Hollywood's exposure of Richmond is great for the city, region and state. But with an already tainted reputation, is it exposure or exploitation?
Is Richmond-based drama good for city's image?
http://images.richmond.com/images/storyimage/12-05-03linefire_story.jpg
Robb Crocker
Richmond.com
Friday December 5, 2003
ABC's new FBI drama "Line of Fire," which is based on organized crime in and around the city of Richmond, debuted Tuesday night. Within the show, scenes filmed on the James River, at the Canal Club and at various other downtown locations were showcased in the crime drama. With an already sub par reputation, does Richmond want the nation to view it as a city that is a hub for organized crime?
A recent ranking of cities in the United States by Morgan Quitno Press ranked Richmond as the 14th most dangerous. With the violent crime and murder rates high this year, that assessment can be considered a fair ranking.
But having covered the police beat over the past 10 months, I have yet to observe or hear about a rash of organized crime; that doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but it is not indicative to what goes on in Richmond.
We have similar problems that most urban cities have, which are social issues. When I think of organized crime I think of New York, Chicago, Las Vegas and Los Angeles, not Richmond. Having grown up in the suburbs of D.C., I would even consider it believable that the D.C. area could be a hub for organized crime (something we like to call Congress), but Richmond?
When I talk to my family in D.C., New Jersey and Mass., they all have an impression of Richmond as being a city riddled with violent crime and gun-blazing maniacs shooting and killing anyone who gets in their way. When I interviewed Charles Moose, who was the Montgomery County police chief in charge of the sniper investigations last year, he said that Montgomery County doesn't see the level of violence that Richmond does. My father, who lives outside D.C., works in the city and has his car broken into on a regular basis, was worried about my safety when I moved here for college five years ago.
What these people don't understand is that Richmond is a city like any other. Social issues like teen pregnancy, drugs, unemployment and lacking school systems are a common problem throughout the U.S. Unfortunately, surveys like the aforementioned Morgan Quitno Press survey and media attention on the murder rate have given Richmond a black eye and put the city under the microscope. What does a television show about organized crime do to clean up that image?
The argument for the show being good for the image of the city is that the series will explore how crime can be fought successfully in an urban setting. Basically sending a positive message through a negative situation. That could just as easily have been done with a hospital show. I'd even be more content to see a new version of the "Golden Girls" based out of Richmond.
Anything would be better than a show that displays more of society's evils. Aren't there enough "NYPD Blue," "Law and Order," "Dragnet: Los Angeles," and "CSI" type shows on television?
It was great to watch and see parts of Richmond on a television show, just like it was exciting to see parts of "Hannibal" filmed in the Fan and Downtown (but in "Hannibal," Richmond was supposed to be D.C.). And I have to admit, the show was good.
Don't get me wrong. Hollywood's exposure of Richmond is great for the city, region and state. But with an already tainted reputation, is it exposure or exploitation?