PDA

View Full Version : Finance industry continues to boost New York


NYonward
Dec 16, 2006, 3:46 PM
Wall Street Journal
Dec. 15, 2006

The Home Front: They'll Take Manhattan -- Still;
Finance Sector Buoys New York As Housing Slips Elsewhere; Big Board CEO's Big Buy

THE STATE OF THE housing market in much of the country may be gloomy but in Manhattan, real-estate brokers are still celebrating -- and record Wall Street year-end bonuses are only part of the reason.

In many major metro areas, from Miami to San Diego, the number of homes listed for sale has soared over the past year or two as sales have plunged. Median home prices in the U.S. fell 3.5% in October compared with a year ago, the largest year-over-year drop on record, according to the National Association of Realtors. A new report from UBS AG predicts a continued decline and warns that the slump could "seriously impact the overall economy" in 2007.

Yet despite the national outlook, Manhattan has shown resilience, fueled by lower-than-average unemployment rates, a surging financial sector and a swelling population of millionaires (and billionaires) immune to the impact of a slowdown.

Manhattan's international credentials are unique in the U.S., says Andreas Hoeferp, chief global economist at UBS Wealth Management Research. A power center that attracts major players in fashion, art, media and finance, the island has more in common with other world capitals like London, Hong Kong or Paris. "Like other financial capitals, the real-estate market here is cushioned by a global demand for housing that's unmatched in the U.S.," Mr. Hoeferp says. Still, there could be clouds gathering, some analysts warn, including a glut of new condominiums and possible price declines.

Overall, the number of homes sold in Manhattan was up about 1% in November versus a year ago (compared to an 11.5% drop in sales nationwide in October), and prices continue to appreciate. Median home prices in the borough rose 17.5% during the same period and 26.8% since November 2004, according to Gregory Heym, chief economist for Realtor Brown Harris Stevens. Manhattan's strength is even more pronounced at the high end, where growing demand for trophy properties is propping up the luxury market. The number of $3 million-plus homes sold was up 6.5% year-on-year in November, according to Mr. Heym.

Among the big-ticket sales: the $27.5 million paid by New York Stock Exchange Chief Executive John Thain for a two-bedroom duplex apartment at 740 Park Ave., one of the city's most storied addresses. Formerly home to Rockefellers, Vanderbilts and Chryslers, the building's current residents include cosmetics executive Ronald Lauder and Blackstone Group chief Stephen A. Schwarzman.

In addition, 38 single-family townhouses priced at $10 million and over sold during the same period, up from 22 last year, says Kirk Henckels, an executive vice president of Stribling Private Brokerage. Those sales include the $53 million that investment banker J. Christopher Flowers paid in October for the century-old, five-story Harkness Mansion on East 75th Street, just off Fifth Avenue. The price for the 20-plus-room limestone mansion, which includes a ballroom, 11 fireplaces and a center atrium, is thought to be the highest paid for a Manhattan residence.

The health of the New York real-estate sector is the result of lower unemployment rates than the national average, higher job growth rates and a Dow Jones Industrial Average in record territory. The financial industry, long a bellwether for New York's real-estate economy, is soaring. Through the first nine months of 2006, combined earnings at seven top global securities firms based in New York surged to $39 billion, according to David Trone, a banking analyst at Fox-Pitt, Kelton. Meanwhile, new federal data show the average weekly pay for finance jobs in Manhattan was about $8,300 in the first quarter of 2006, up more than $3,000 per week in three years. A projected $36 billion in bonuses will be doled out this year by the top five investment banks in New York, according to Options Group, an executive search firm, up from a record $21.5 billion in 2005 and nearly a fourfold increase from $8.6 billion in 2002.

"There's an incredible amount of money out there right now," says Jacky Teplitzky, an executive vice president at Prudential Douglas Elliman. "It's not clear if that funnels into real estate, but it certainly can't hurt."

Tatyana Dobryanskaya says she expected to wait until next year before looking for a new apartment. But the 30-year-old fixed income analyst says a bigger-than-expected bonus (she declined to disclose how much) from the investment bank she works for helped to change her plans. She is now in the hunt for something in the $1.5 million-to-$2 million range. "There was really no reason to put this off," she says.

Vincent Piazza, a 36-year old research analyst, has moved even faster. He just signed a contract for a new $1-million-plus loft condo in the Wall Street area. It features 10-foot-high ceilings and marble and limestone bathrooms. Mr. Piazza says his year-end bonus is only part of the reason he's buying now. "I waited a year for prices to come down a bit," he says. "They never did."

Traditionally, the upper end of the New York market tended to hold its own when the city's overall housing market slowed, largely because wealthy buyers were buffered from market gyrations. That was particularly true during the last boom-bust cycle in the late 1980s, economists say. Now, however, even as the national market cools, the entire Manhattan real-estate market is humming, fueled in part by rising income levels and interest from wealthy out-of-town buyers.

Ramesh Vangal, an Indian technology and health-care entrepreneur with homes in Bangalore and Singapore, paid nearly $7 million in October for an apartment on Central Park South. Mr. Vangal says he and his wife and business partner, Katharin, have always loved spending time in Manhattan, but that they bought here for business and financial reasons: "New York has always been an important place to do business, but it's also a good place to invest your money," he says.

Despite the robust New York scene, some real-estate observers see warning signs for Manhattan. More listings are crowding the market and the length of time homes are taking to sell is creeping up. Quarterly data show 7,243 units on the market, compared with 6,926 a year ago. The average time a home spent on the market in the third quarter of 2006 before selling was 92 days, a 28-day increase from a year ago.

And while the number of Manhattan sales rose slightly in November compared with the same period a year ago, some of that lift may be inflated. Condos make up only about one-third of Manhattan's housing stock, but they accounted for roughly 44% of sales last month, according to economist Mr. Heym. And much of that came from new buildings where buyers may have made down-payments months or even years ago. That means many of November's "sales" may have occurred when the overall market was still strong. (New condo sales are only registered when the building is completed and residents move in.)

A building boom in the past few years is likely to create a glut next year as new condos are completed. Between 2001 and 2005, there were 21,142 units completed in Manhattan, compared with 12,812 from 1996 to 2000, according to the Real Estate Board of New York. REBNY estimates that there are more than 20,000 new condominium units either under construction or being planned in Manhattan. "The real-estate market here simply cannot sustain that kind of growth," says Nouriel Roubini, a professor of economics at the Stern School of Business at New York University. "Prices will fall very hard."

And brokers shouldn't put too much stock in ballooning Wall Street bonuses. Appraiser Jonathan Miller has analyzed first-quarter sales data since 2003 (bonuses are typically handed out between December and February) and his numbers show no significant bounce in Manhattan home sales, with one year showing a slight decrease. "There's a significant amount of money on the sidelines" in this economy, says Mr. Miller.

The potential for a real-estate slowdown and the imminent glut of new units has done little to slow some developers. Hotelier Andre Balazs is erecting two new Manhattan condos and recently broke ground on a third -- a 47-story tower in the Wall Street area. Called William Beaver House, the high-rise will include three penthouses, an outdoor Jacuzzi, a hot tub and a 60-foot lap pool with lounge-deck and bar. "I see this as a place for hard-working, hard-playing Wall Streeters," he says.

---

Online Today: Get comparable sales information and view Manhattan housing-market trend charts, with the Find Comparable Sales tool, at WSJ.com/Question

---

Apple Still Shiny

The luxury real-estate market in most of the country may be sagging, but Manhattan's high-end has maintained its luster. Here are a few of the standout sales that took place in New York this year.

PROPERTY: Harkness Mansion, East 75th Street PRICE: $53 million DESCRIPTION: Century-old five-story limestone mansion, with ballroom. COMMENT: This October sale is believed to have set a New York record for the highest purchase price for a private residence.

PROPERTY: Duke Semans Mansion, Fifth Avenue PRICE: $40 million DESCRIPTION: Seven-story mansion opposite the Metropolitan Museum of Art. COMMENT: Only one family had ever owned this 1901 home until March, when it was sold to real-estate investor Tamir Sapir.

PROPERTY: Fifth Avenue co-op, at 85th Street PRICE: $30 million DESCRIPTION: Full-floor apartment with library, conservatory and gallery. COMMENT: Industrialist David Koch bought the former apartment of Jacqueline Onassis for $9.5 million in 1995 and spent millions more renovating it before selling in September.

PROPERTY: Time Warner Center condominium, Columbus Circle PRICE: $29.2 million DESCRIPTION: Full-floor, 8,000-plus- square-foot penthouse condo on the 78th floor. COMMENT: TD Ameritrade founder J. Joseph Ricketts bought this condo in March. One month later, another condo in the complex sold for $27.6 million.

PROPERTY: Central Park West co-op, at 72nd Street PRICE: $25 million

DESCRIPTION: Five-bedroom apartment in the Majestic. COMMENT: Bard Graduate Center founder and director Susan Weber Soros bought this apartment in June.

Sales prices are from city transfer records

JEH-NYC
Dec 16, 2006, 11:00 PM
Rock-n-Roll! :)

passdoubt
Dec 17, 2006, 12:48 AM
Finance industry continues to boost ratio of douchebags in Manhattan bars

urbanflyer
Dec 17, 2006, 9:34 AM
Shoulda been an investment banker.

NYonward
Dec 18, 2006, 3:52 PM
Finance industry continues to boost ratio of douchebags in Manhattan bars

The douchebags need bars too. There are plenty of other bars in the city with few of them.

Master Shake
Dec 20, 2006, 5:23 AM
NYC can celebrate these bonuses all it wants, but at the end of the day, its losing out to London in the finance game and will be for the forseeable future.

austin356
Dec 20, 2006, 7:05 AM
NYC can celebrate these bonuses all it wants, but at the end of the day, its losing out to London in the finance game and will be for the forseeable future.



Only because of its and its federal government's own mistakes. Capital will always, in the foreseeable future, gravitate towards the big apple more than any other city, but that doesnt always means it will reach it, due to the myriad of reasons, including but not limited to good intending mistakes on the congressional level.

pricemazda
Dec 20, 2006, 10:06 AM
New York is turning into North Americas finance hub, rather than the global hub it used to be.

fountainhead
Dec 21, 2006, 3:56 PM
New York is turning into North Americas finance hub, rather than the global hub it used to be.


With NYSE Group's more than likely merger with Euronext and Nasdaq's likely hostile take over of the London Stock Exchange I don't think that this is necessarily true. These are very smart moves on behalf of the finance industry in New York to assure its preeminence while facing the possible slide of the US dollar as the world's reserve currency.

pricemazda
Dec 21, 2006, 4:40 PM
Well US markets aren't open to be bought by foreigners.

But anyway who owns the exchange doesn't matter, it doesn't mean NY is going to get a boost.

Your logic is flawed.

fountainhead
Dec 21, 2006, 6:41 PM
Of course it means New York will get a boost. The mergers wouldn't be orchestrated without benefit. The leader(s) of the merged firm(s) will reside in New York. This will only build on the current dynamic of top level management of the financial sector gravitating to Gotham. It doesn't matter where the lower echelons will administer the trading, which is primarily done electronically and remotely anyway. It also gives the New York markets ease of trading globally, building on their strong domestic base. It might even encourage foreign companies to start listing once again on the NYSE as opposed to the LSE. As I alluded to in my other post, New York has major hurdels to overcome, such as London being closer to emerging Asian markets and its highly unregulated atmosphere, plus the devaluation of the USD. These are certainly considerations, but I wouldn't rule New York out yet. It has a way of bouncing back from adverse situations.

nito
Dec 21, 2006, 8:04 PM
Of course it means New York will get a boost. The mergers wouldn't be orchestrated without benefit. The leader(s) of the merged firm(s) will reside in New York. This will only build on the current dynamic of top level management of the financial sector gravitating to Gotham. It doesn't matter where the lower echelons will administer the trading, which is primarily done electronically and remotely anyway. It also gives the New York markets ease of trading globally, building on their strong domestic base. It might even encourage foreign companies to start listing once again on the NYSE as opposed to the LSE. As I alluded to in my other post, New York has major hurdels to overcome, such as London being closer to emerging Asian markets and its highly unregulated atmosphere, plus the devaluation of the USD. These are certainly considerations, but I wouldn't rule New York out yet. It has a way of bouncing back from adverse situations.Actually the only beneficiaries will be LSE shareholders, as Nasdaq is buying the company, not the companies listed, the talent or the flow of international capital in London.

New York won't gain anything from this deal, because the crap Sox environment will remain, while it will be non-existent in London.

pricemazda
Dec 21, 2006, 11:09 PM
I was going to say New York the city won't benefit, possibly NASDAQ will, but there are rumours that Nasdaq will joint list in London, and possibly move its HQ.

Just rumours though.

austin356
Dec 31, 2006, 6:51 AM
I was going to say New York the city won't benefit, possibly NASDAQ will, but there are rumours that Nasdaq will joint list in London, and possibly move its HQ.

Just rumours though.


I might buy the relisting of Nasdaq shares in London, but a Global HQ shift in their case would make little sense as it stands now, but who knows, one would think that Chevron would be better off in Texas, but California it is, so I guess corporate decisions dont always have to make sense publicly.

Yea, this well not significantly help NYC. It may help the US companies though.

US companies will now be able to list in Brussels and be traded in NYC electronically, with much lower cost, and much higher volume than before the merger.


Also, Nasdaq has now gained around a 1/3rd stake up in the LSE. If they get a few big holders to sell out, its theirs. Look out for some private transactions that exceed the current market value of LSE shares.




It may be time to start a international dialog between China/HK/SP/Japan/US/EU/Switzerland about some type of international standards for listed companies. The Financial markets are already globalized and now are just becoming one market completely integrated together. So I think it is time to at least begin some rhetoric on what nations want to see happen, because if we start now it will take at least a decade to reach some sort of consensus on principals, let alone policy.

austin356
Dec 31, 2006, 7:07 AM
New York is turning into North Americas finance hub, rather than the global hub it used to be.



The whole hub concept is faltering. The world is flattening and wealth is spreading out. The book The World Is Flat by liberal NY Times columnists Thomas Friedman explains it well. And NYC is taking part in such to just as large of an extent or larger extented than the most involved nations in Europe (England and Ireland).


London and HK might be gaining listings, but with globalization those loses are mitigated in relation to what those loses would have been a decade ago. Not to say they are insignificant, just less significant than would have been.

Jeff_in_Dayton
Dec 31, 2006, 2:23 PM
If one looks at the Midwestern cities that are doing "well"...Omaha, Des Moines, Indianapolis, and Columbus, all of these have a strong FIRE sector, though its not the stock market brokerages, but more on the insurance and regional banking side.

passdoubt
Dec 31, 2006, 8:28 PM
Not to get too far off topic, but
The book The World Is Flat by liberal NY Times columnists Thomas Friedman explains it well.
It's disingenuous to start calling Thomas Friedman a liberal. Friedman is a pretty textbook neoliberal, which bears fairly little in common with the 20th century American political sense of the term "liberal." For instance, the National Journal ranks American politicians (http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/house/lib.htm?o1=lib_economic&o2=desc#vr) by their voting records on a conservative-to-liberal scale. Friedman would be one of the "most conservative" sorted by economic policy.