HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2009, 6:14 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Is there any role for gargoyles in modernist architecture?

Call this a silly question, but I'm serious.

That's one of my problems with modernist buildings, they sometimes are very boring in their insistence on simplistic form=function.

But is it conceivable to devise a gargoyle in a modernist building, or is that a betrayal of the whole idea of "modernism"? If it is conceivable, what would a modernist gargoyle look like? Seems like ever since Art Deco (Chrysler Building), gargoyles haven't found their footing. Will they ever make a comeback?
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4W...lUKB1w8ED5bV2Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2009, 12:28 PM
malec's Avatar
malec malec is offline
Rrrraaaahhhhh!!!!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,069
Well, one of the things about modernism is the elimination of ornamentation, therefore the whole gargoyle thing is a contradiction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2009, 7:24 PM
CGII's Avatar
CGII CGII is offline
illwaukee/crooklyn
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: rome
Posts: 8,518
Art Deco was the last vestige of the Beaux Arts movement.
__________________
disregard women. acquire finances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2009, 8:24 PM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,917
Do you mean gargoyles strictly, falling under a particular historical and artistic description? Or do you mean ornamentation in general?

I certainly think there is room in modern designs for some sort of ornamentation, but not Modern designs. Modernism imparts functionalism into designs and eliminates any auxiliary aesthetic elements. Ornamentation with contemporary architecture is starting to utilize visual space as well as physical space for ornamentation; e.g., the proliferation of lighting accents and L.E.D. schemes to add depth to a design.

The gargoyle itself has a history well out of reach of anyone currently living I would think, and, to me, the notion of a creature perched atop a building is entrenched in a kind of bizarre nostalgia/historical fantasy. Successfully reinstantiating such a thing and not having it instantly relegated to kitsch would be quite a challenge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2009, 9:25 PM
dchan's Avatar
dchan dchan is offline
No grabbing my banana!
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 10021
Posts: 2,828
^ Perhaps not in Modernist, strictly speaking. But maybe in the newer forms of architecture that are still being developed, or will be developed in the future.

Besides gargoyles, I'd like to see more statues being used - they seem to add an element that just astounds me every time I look at them. My favorite example is the Grand Central Terminal. If you're ever walking on 42nd Street on the Terminal side of the street, just look up around the middle of the building - you'll see the huge statue of Hermes with Hercules and Minerva on his side. It's incredible.
__________________
I take the high road because it's the only route on my GPS nowadays. #selfsatisfied
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2009, 12:22 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Ornamentation isn't completely gone from design. The Art Institute had an interesting exhibit about this last year called "Figuration in Contemporary Design". It featured examples of architecture and applied art that were gorgeous and modern, yet incorporated depictions of other forms.

This was my favorite, Klein Dytham's Leaf Chapel in Kobuchizawa, Japan.


There was also this super-cool twist on the chainlink fence, by De Makers Van:
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...

Last edited by ardecila; Feb 1, 2009 at 12:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2009, 12:37 AM
volguus zildrohar's Avatar
volguus zildrohar volguus zildrohar is offline
I Couldn't Tell Anyone
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The City Of Philadelphia
Posts: 15,988
There's definitely something to be said for statuary and such ornamentation. I don't think taste and design is the only reason they aren't around anymore - cost has to be a factor.

I'll tell you, though, I miss limestone
__________________
je suis phillytrax sur FLICKR, y'all
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:41 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.