Quote:
Originally Posted by TarHeelJ
Well, why not have ample parking when there is plenty of open space and no rail transit?
|
Economically it's tough to make anything other than a surface lot work in a small city, because land is usually cheaper than the construction cost for a garage. That's what I was referring to by "that's a tough part in smaller cities." That's why our small cities usually aren't very urban unless they started out that way, or they control growth, maybe aided by everything bunching along a beach or something.
However, in this case they could build a garage for added cost to avoid having surface parking. A park would be nice. Or replace half the lot with a hotel, and at least double-deck the rest.
Tourist attractions rarely want to make themselves hard to visit. But maybe a skybridge over the freeway (in addition to the underpass apparently shown) and a free shuttle bus could make it easier for tourists to get there, and reduce parking demand.
Unfortunately, the only way that sort of thing seems likely is if they get ambitous about building more stuff (like a hotel or a HOF expansion) and can only fit it in by stacking things. They won't do it for quality of life alone. That's why I like more expensive cities where land-efficiency is an economic imperative for most things.