NEW YORK | New York by Gehry | 870 FT / 265 M | 76 FLOORS | T/O - Page 12

STERNyc · #**221** Posted **May 21, 2005, 1:34 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fabb

Quote:

Originally Posted by STERNyc

What's your source, as far as I know that's technically impossible since they haven't filed an offering plan yet and units can't be offered or sold.

Which project are we talking about ? Gehry's or Calatrava's ?
I'm confused.

As far as Im aware neither project have yet to offer an offering plan which must be filed with the NY DA before units can go on sale. Although it was rumoured 80 South Street could begin offering units as soon as April, I've heard no news of that happening.

Daquan13 · #**222** Posted **May 21, 2005, 1:40 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by STERNyc

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fabb

Quote:

Originally Posted by STERNyc

What's your source, as far as I know that's technically impossible since they haven't filed an offering plan yet and units can't be offered or sold.

Which project are we talking about ? Gehry's or Calatrava's ?
I'm confused.

As far as Im aware neither project have yet to offer an offering plan which must be filed with the NY DA before units can go on sale. Although it was rumoured 80 South Street could begin offering units as soon as April, I've heard no news of that happening.

Sorry STERNyc,

I took your other post the wrong way. I appolligize for that mistake. I was wrong.

STERNyc · #**223** Posted **May 21, 2005, 1:58 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daquan13

Sorry STERNyc,

I took your other post the wrong way. I appolligize for that mistake. I was wrong.

Its alright.

STERNyc · #**224** Posted **May 28, 2005, 2:21 AM**

Gulcrapek posted a preliminary rendering of Beekman Place at Wired New York:

Can't tell much from the rendering, only thing you can see for sure is that it will be big!

Stephenapolis · #**225** Posted **May 28, 2005, 3:16 AM**

Thanks for sharing. It does look like it will be big. Too bad we can't make out the tower better.

JMGarcia · #**226** Posted **May 28, 2005, 5:22 AM**

^Its Gehry. Its not supposed to have a shape, or details, or edges, or....

Fabb · #**227** Posted **May 28, 2005, 9:09 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by STERNyc

Gulcrapek posted a preliminary rendering of Beekman Place at Wired New York:

Can't tell much from the rendering, only thing you can see for sure is that it will be big!

The massing of this tower looks just fine. What a presence !

igzaklee · #**228** Posted **May 28, 2005, 9:39 AM**

:glow:

FerrariEnzo · #**229** Posted **May 28, 2005, 3:04 PM**

That is one VERY large tower. It looks like a glass and aluminum undulation of a wave, very cool!

Stu · #**230** Posted **May 28, 2005, 5:02 PM**

I guess it's over 1000 ft. It looks it in the rendering.

bayrider · #**231** Posted **May 28, 2005, 7:21 PM**

can't really say much from the picture except that its big. Whats the point of releasing a picture this small anyways? no one can make anything out of it

buildup · #**232** Posted **May 30, 2005, 7:15 PM**

Looks like a really big tower. When a rendering with more detail comes out I'll celebrate more.

STR · #**233** Posted **Jun 4, 2005, 11:06 PM**

I enhanced the above photo to take out some of the noise and enhance its quality. While I couldn't do much due to the horrible quality of the pic, I think I made the slight hourglass appearence of the building a little more apparent.

Gulcrapek · #**234** Posted **Jun 5, 2005, 12:36 AM**

Good job.

Daquan13 · #**235** Posted **Jun 5, 2005, 1:25 AM**

Kind of blurry.

STR · #**236** Posted **Jun 5, 2005, 1:33 AM**

^No kidding.

Well I ran it through GIMP again and I think I might have over-sharpened it, but here's attempt #2. I'll leave #1 up so y'all can pick your preference.

Daquan13 · #**237** Posted **Jun 5, 2005, 2:03 AM**

A tad better, but still blurry.

Islander · #**238** Posted **Jun 5, 2005, 2:08 AM**

I still can't tell ANYTHING from that photo aside from massing. I don't even know what the heck that dark line running down the middle is.

STR · #**239** Posted **Jun 5, 2005, 2:12 AM**

^That would probably be a corner.

STERNyc · #**240** Posted **Jun 5, 2005, 2:48 AM**

Yeah, its a corner. Who knows if its going to look like this, but from the looks of it, the more slender sides are rounded and the longer two sides set back 2/3's of the height, the rounded corners frame the setback, the entire height.