HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 3:15 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Manitoba twins Trans-Canada Highway before Saskatchewan!

The Manitoba government is one step closer to satisfying your need for speed.

Engineers have given the go-ahead for traffic to begin flowing at 2 p.m. today along the newly twinned portion of the Trans-Canada Highway all the way to the Saskatchewan border. The new section had been under construction for at least the last two years. It was one of the last barriers before the speed limit on the Trans-Canada almost right across the province is hiked to 110 kilometres per hour from the current 100 km/h, says Infrastructure Minister Ron Lemieux.

“That is something we’re going to do,” Lemieux said.

He said all he’s waiting for is a recommendation from the Highway Traffic Board on how to implement the speed increase, including dealing with intersections.

Twinning the highway to the Saskatchewan border was a 2003 NDP election promise. The project cost $32.8 million and the province footed 80 per cent of the bill. Ottawa picked up the rest.

The newly twinned stretch is 34 kilometres long and means the Trans-Canada is now four lanes wide and divided almost right across the province.

NHL Classic DVD
A 16-kilometre stretch from Falcon Lake to the Ontario border is the only remaining portion that is a single-lane, undivided highway.

Lemieux said a divided four-lane highway is safer but he said drivers still need to exercise caution and not be lulled into thinking the road is so safe they can drive at excessive speeds.

“This isn’t the Indianapolis 500,” he said. “Accidents are not caused just by roads not being four lanes.”

The province has been criticized for not opening up portions of the newly twinned highway as they were completed. More than 11 kilometres of the twinned section has been done for more than a year and a half but hasn’t been opened.

Lemieux said engineers recommended against opening it in stages for safety reasons, which drew opposition scoffs.

Infrastructure critic Larry Maguire said leaving people to drive on the single-lane undivided highway for longer than necessary was unsafe. Two people were killed in crashes on that 11 kilometres in the last year.

Both crashes occurred when cars were passing on the undivided highway and hit oncoming traffic head-on.

Maguire said he is happy the road is finally opening, but said it took far too long.
He said the province should immediately look at twinning the remainder of the Trans-Canada all the way to the Ontario border.

Lemieux said his department is looking at how much it would cost to twin that section.

“It is going to be very pricey,” Lemieux said, noting it would require blasting through rocks and dealing with the numerous lakes in the area, many of which almost lap up against the existing highway.

He said there have been no decisions on whether Manitoba will twin the highway right to the Ontario border, but added he would like to see it twinned eventually, if possible.

The Highway Traffic Board is also looking at whether the speed limit should be raised to 110 km/h on Highway 75 and the south Perimeter Highway.

The speed limit on the Trans-Canada through much of Alberta has been 110 km/h for more than two decades.

Saskatchewan boosted the speed limited on all four-lane highways in that province, including the Trans-Canada, in 2003. In 2004, Saskatchewan reported no change in safety statistics.

There are 25 kilometres of the Trans-Canada in Saskatchewan not yet twinned. Construction on that section, between Moosomin and Wapella, is underway but will not be completed this year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 4:04 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,174
any pics
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 5:04 AM
ReginaGuy's Avatar
ReginaGuy ReginaGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,581
good news, but the title is a bit deceiving. Like the article said, there are still 16 km of un-twinned highway left in Manitoba. Saskatchewan has 25 left, but construction is already underway

will Manitoba's remaining 16 km be twinned in the near future? Saskatchewan can still finish first!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 11:11 AM
Dalreg's Avatar
Dalreg Dalreg is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReginaGuy View Post
good news, but the title is a bit deceiving. Like the article said, there are still 16 km of un-twinned highway left in Manitoba. Saskatchewan has 25 left, but construction is already underway

will Manitoba's remaining 16 km be twinned in the near future? Saskatchewan can still finish first!
Pretty sure Saskatchewan will finish first in the race. But if they need the bragging rights let them have it. We here in Saskatchewan know the TRUTH!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2007, 11:33 PM
Mrj's Avatar
Mrj Mrj is offline
iron ring
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalreg View Post
Pretty sure Saskatchewan will finish first in the race. But if they need the bragging rights let them have it. We here in Saskatchewan know the TRUTH!
I think we have to give credit where it's due. When I drove Calgary to Winnipeg 10 years ago there were hundreds of kilometres in Saskatchewan on highway 1 that were 2 lane. Now there will be zero very shortly. Manitoba has only twinned about 50km west of Virden in that time. Sask has simply done a phenominal job of building that road. Now of course to be fair Manitoba had already twinned to the borders save for the 2 short stretches west of Virden and east of Falcon lake, but the MB gov't has generally been dragging its heels on these sorts of upgrades...

Nationally we need to take Sask's cue and chip away at the project by consistently putting money into upgrading the long two-lane stretches of the TCH in Ontario, and the expensive mountain terrain in BC. It's not just traffic count that's important - these are very long stretches of highway, and the sheer length makes them acts as a choke point. A long term project to build a few km of twinned road per year between the Manitoba border and Sudbury would take a while to see results, but once things start to snowball...
__________________
σ/E=ε=δ/L
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 11:56 AM
Greco Roman Greco Roman is offline
Movin' on up
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReginaGuy View Post
good news, but the title is a bit deceiving. Like the article said, there are still 16 km of un-twinned highway left in Manitoba. Saskatchewan has 25 left, but construction is already underway

will Manitoba's remaining 16 km be twinned in the near future? Saskatchewan can still finish first!

Lets not forget that the 16 km remaining highway runs through rock outcrops and along shield lakes. It's not easy to "dig" through that kind of terrain and the cost is more than likely intimidating, which is exactly the reason why Ontario, and even BC and Alberta with similar issues, haven't been able to twin their portions of the TC highway. Saskatchewan has it the easiest, as their portion of the TC highway run through any such terrain.

But either way, it took both Manitoba and Saskatchewan way too long to twin this highway. Embarrassing, if you ask me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 3:01 PM
RAFS RAFS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greco Roman View Post
But either way, it took both Manitoba and Saskatchewan way too long to twin this highway. Embarrassing, if you ask me.
I agree!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 3:19 PM
Mister F Mister F is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,848
I'm jealous of your speed limits! Not even a full freeway and the speed limit is 110. In Ontario the freeway speed limits are stuck at 100 and on almost all the undivided highways it's 80. Of course everyone ignores the speed limits, including the police.

You're lucky you don't have to deal with the Canadian Shield. The 400 extension to Sudbury is going to take another 10 years because of that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 6:33 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greco Roman View Post
Lets not forget that the 16 km remaining highway runs through rock outcrops and along shield lakes. It's not easy to "dig" through that kind of terrain and the cost is more than likely intimidating, which is exactly the reason why Ontario, and even BC and Alberta with similar issues, haven't been able to twin their portions of the TC highway. Saskatchewan has it the easiest, as their portion of the TC highway run through any such terrain.

But either way, it took both Manitoba and Saskatchewan way too long to twin this highway. Embarrassing, if you ask me.
The only portion of the TCH not twinned in Alberta is in Banff National Park, a Federal responsibility. It probabaly would have been done 20 years ago if left up to the province.
I'm glad the portions in Sask & Man. are getting done but I agree with you - it's really embarrassing (not to mention dangerous) that a country like Canada does not have a single route coast to coast that is twinned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 6:46 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
The only portion of the TCH not twinned in Alberta is in Banff National Park, a Federal responsibility. It probabaly would have been done 20 years ago if left up to the province.
I'm glad the portions in Sask & Man. are getting done but I agree with you - it's really embarrassing (not to mention dangerous) that a country like Canada does not have a single route coast to coast that is twinned.
Just a small correction to your statement. There are actually 2 designated TCH's - #1 and #16. #16 is also fully twinned in Alberta excepth through Jasper National Park (also a federal responsibility).
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 8:28 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
The only portion of the TCH not twinned in Alberta is in Banff National Park, a Federal responsibility. It probabaly would have been done 20 years ago if left up to the province.
I'm glad the portions in Sask & Man. are getting done but I agree with you - it's really embarrassing (not to mention dangerous) that a country like Canada does not have a single route coast to coast that is twinned.
It's embarrassing we have freakin' traffic lights on our highways. Harper needs to announce a major national highway initiative where within 10 years you could go from Vancouver to where ever the TCH ends in NL without encountering a traffic light, etc. In other words an actual real freeway. This would create a ton of jobs, improve safety immensely, help lower the cost of products, etc. We should be ashamed that we are the only industrialized nation that does not have a national highway plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 11:43 PM
Mister F Mister F is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
It's embarrassing we have freakin' traffic lights on our highways. Harper needs to announce a major national highway initiative where within 10 years you could go from Vancouver to where ever the TCH ends in NL without encountering a traffic light, etc. In other words an actual real freeway. This would create a ton of jobs, improve safety immensely, help lower the cost of products, etc. We should be ashamed that we are the only industrialized nation that does not have a national highway plan.
Is a freeway really necessary through the Prairies? Except in the cities, traffic volumes are usually in the 4000-5000 AADT range (link), and lower over the north shore of Lake Superior. I can't think of a single Ontario freeway with traffic counts that low. I think four lanes across the country is smart and doable, but it doesn't have to be a full freeway. Something like a British dual carriageway would be plenty.

Incidentally, roundabouts instead of traffic signals at rural intersections work wonders to keep traffic moving.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2007, 5:56 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
It's embarrassing we have freakin' traffic lights on our highways. Harper needs to announce a major national highway initiative where within 10 years you could go from Vancouver to where ever the TCH ends in NL without encountering a traffic light, etc. In other words an actual real freeway. This would create a ton of jobs, improve safety immensely, help lower the cost of products, etc. We should be ashamed that we are the only industrialized nation that does not have a national highway plan.

Let's look at some facts first and then decide if we should let the government off the hook. The Federal Gas Tax brings in about $5.5 billion/yr. of which very little goes to building or maintaining highways. My goal to turn the TCH into a freeway in 10 years would have about $60 billion (factoring in increased miles driven) in financing from this tax alone not to mention what should be put in from general revenues, vehicle registration fees, and whatever taxes they charge truckers. Also, don't forget how much could have and should have been over the last several decades.

It's obvious we could have coast to coast freeways in this country and it would not involve increasing taxes one bit. Sure some left-wing social program that more than likely has next to no support would go unfunded but big deal. A decent national highway system would benefit every citizen despite what people like Layton and Suzuki might say. The party that finally wakes up to this idea will have a guaranteed vote getter in every region of the country. We need to get going on this now for all of the reasons I mentioned before.
Completely agree with you - I like what you're preachin'
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2007, 1:13 AM
Nutterbug Nutterbug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
It's embarrassing we have freakin' traffic lights on our highways. Harper needs to announce a major national highway initiative where within 10 years you could go from Vancouver to where ever the TCH ends in NL without encountering a traffic light, etc. In other words an actual real freeway. This would create a ton of jobs, improve safety immensely, help lower the cost of products, etc. We should be ashamed that we are the only industrialized nation that does not have a national highway plan.
They should then rename it Interprovincial 100.

The northern Yellowhead TCH route should become Interprovincial 104 or 106.
Manitoba Hwy 75 from Winnipeg to the US border should become Interprovincial 29.
The QEII and Hwy 4 in Alberta should become Interprovincial 15.
Hwy 99 in BC south of Vancouver should become Interprovincial 5.
The 401 in Ontario can become Interprovincial 94.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 5:08 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,890
no its runing threw a national park.......... and aww that streach is in need of a twining along with the masive strech threw onterio....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 11:25 AM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
no its runing threw a national park.......... and aww that streach is in need of a twining along with the masive strech threw onterio....
PROVINCIAL park 1ajs, not National. Whiteshell is provincial and all the more reason that highway stretch should be twinned, thousands travel every weekend to their cottages there and in Kenora. I can see it costing mega-mega-millions though due to the rock cliffs and water. It would need at least 2 bridges.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 4:39 PM
spiritedenergy's Avatar
spiritedenergy spiritedenergy is offline
A long time gone
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Great Spirit Land
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags_in_the_peg View Post
PROVINCIAL park 1ajs, not National. Whiteshell is provincial and all the more reason that highway stretch should be twinned, thousands travel every weekend to their cottages there and in Kenora. I can see it costing mega-mega-millions though due to the rock cliffs and water. It would need at least 2 bridges.
oh God hopefully they don't do it, Whiteshell wilderness is already dilapidated by those horrible cottages.
__________________
"Perdedar-i mikuned der kasr-i kayser ankebut
bu növbet mizenet der bertarimi Afrasyab."

-------------
"The spider spins his web in the Palace of the Caesars,
An owl hoots in the towers of Afrasiyab."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 6:05 AM
Echoes's Avatar
Echoes Echoes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 4,249
In related news..
As of Wednesday the stretch of the Yellowhead Hwy. between Saskatoon and the Alberta border is now completely twinned and open to traffic. Now it's smooth sailing to the Edmonton IKEA and West Ed. Mall. Oh yippee!
__________________
SASKATOON PHOTO TOURS
2013: [Part I] [Part II] | [2014] | [2016] | [2022-23]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 6:45 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Country View Post
In related news..
As of Wednesday the stretch of the Yellowhead Hwy. between Saskatoon and the Alberta border is now completely twinned and open to traffic. Now it's smooth sailing to the Edmonton IKEA and West Ed. Mall. Oh yippee!
That is pretty impressive. I drove that stretch in July and it looked nowhere near being completed. I didn't think they would get it done this year.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2007, 3:10 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 13,984
Beating Saskatchewan at this is hardly an accomplishment.

But, I will say kudos to both governements for finally, actually, maybe, coming close to reaching this feat.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:06 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.