HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2017, 3:27 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,183
Now if they add an interchange at 28A and also at the 37 T we should have a decent road.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2017, 4:21 PM
canucklehead2 canucklehead2 is offline
Sex Marxist of Notleygrad
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YEG
Posts: 6,847
I believe a study was done on this very thing a few years ago. It just needs funding. Still don't quite know if its to be approved with the bridge or not, although that would make sense...

http://www.transportation.alberta.ca...ontonarea.aspx
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2017, 4:52 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by canucklehead2 View Post
I believe a study was done on this very thing a few years ago. It just needs funding. Still don't quite know if its to be approved with the bridge or not, although that would make sense...

http://www.transportation.alberta.ca...ontonarea.aspx
I remember seeing some geoteck studies being done on the section from 43 to 44. but not much else. Putting proper shoulders on that section would be nice.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2017, 8:18 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
^ I think there were also plans to build a new highway and river crossing between Edmonton and south of Fort Saskatchewan at some point.
http://www.transportation.alberta.ca...ercrossing.htm

Also note public meetings scheduled for next month.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2017, 4:21 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,787
Fort Saskatchewan bridge twinning announcement:
https://www.alberta.ca/release.cfm?x...6C17DD56AD539E
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2017, 7:00 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Good news, but unfortunately in the mean time Ft. Sask continues to add traffic lights and generally impede traffic through the rest of the city.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2017, 4:15 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,787
http://edmontonjournal.com/news/loca...campaign-issue

Quote:
On Terwillegar Drive, drivers stick to the on-off ramps, zipping up and down from traffic light to traffic light.

That’s because on-off ramps are all Edmonton ever built of the mighty Terwillegar freeway – originally designed as a free-flow corridor to open southwest Edmonton and run straight past the airport.

Development went ahead, filling up the tableland between Whitemud Creek and the North Saskatchewan River, stretching farther south faster than anyone imagined. But Terwillegar freeway didn’t follow.

Now 30 years later — with annexation and more growth looming — the community has had enough. One collision on a major road can snarl traffic five kilometres away, and it does, regularly, forcing some residents to leave for appointments an hour early because they have no faith in the roads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2017, 4:33 PM
TimB09 TimB09 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,451
Terwillegar is awful to drive on in the mornings. Something needs to be done about it, sooner rather than later as it'll just become more and more congested.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2017, 5:13 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,820
I still recall open houses in the early 2000s for completion in 07/09 of a proper whitemud extension to AHD. LONG overdue.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2017, 6:15 PM
McBoo McBoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 747
Not sure six lanes are needed if the 40th Ave interchange gets built.

Total CF SB off Whitemud as it stands, but not so bad after 40th.

Put the saved $13 million into Ellerslie Road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2017, 9:48 PM
technomad technomad is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberia
Posts: 858
Good to see some progress on this, but I really have to question their math..

FTA:


So 50 mil gets one interchange, and 6 lane-ing of ~1/3 of the distance from whitemud and henday, means about 150 mil to freeway the whole link. Roughly the same distance to get from henday to city limits. Approx 300 mil all in so far? But....

Quote:
Building basic free-flow interchanges all along Terwillegar Drive would cost an estimated $500 million, said Meliefste, much more for a full build out to the airport.
200 mil is one hell of a contingency budget.. even for Edmonton

But even with that bloated budget, it's still a quarter of the cost of SE LRT which is projected to have similar usage numbers.

Notable difference is the freeway upgrades will actually improve travel times for the SW! Worthwhile project IMO
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2017, 4:02 PM
adam-machiavelli adam-machiavelli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,244
Why not run an LRT branch from Southgate along Whitemud, then south along Terwilegar to Windermere?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2017, 4:07 PM
technomad technomad is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberia
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam-machiavelli View Post
Why not run an LRT branch from Southgate along Whitemud, then south along Terwilegar to Windermere?
because ETS has done such a great job with interlining so far?

really though, isn't the 2nd biggest failing of the at-grade university av crossing that it nixed any chance of running two lines further south?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2017, 7:53 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by technomad View Post
because ETS has done such a great job with interlining so far?

really though, isn't the 2nd biggest failing of the at-grade university av crossing that it nixed any chance of running two lines further south?
Always thought 25ave would be better.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2017, 10:16 PM
adam-machiavelli adam-machiavelli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by technomad View Post
because ETS has done such a great job with interlining so far?

really though, isn't the 2nd biggest failing of the at-grade university av crossing that it nixed any chance of running two lines further south?
This would be a perfect opportunity to find funding to build an underpass for trains to run under University Avenue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2017, 6:21 PM
s211 s211 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam-machiavelli View Post
This would be a perfect opportunity to find funding to build an underpass for trains to run under University Avenue.
Won't happen. There's an Edmonton bylaw against admitting failure, or even acknowledging that Edmonton's track record as it pertains to roads and bridges is no better than rank amateurism.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2017, 1:10 PM
technomad technomad is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alberia
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by adam-machiavelli View Post
This would be a perfect opportunity to find funding to build an underpass for trains to run under University Avenue.


I'm not even sure that would be possible now? not without shutting the line down for a couple of years...

and it would probably cost more than full freeway on terwilligar from whitemud to henday. freeway that can also be used by buses

Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Won't happen. There's an Edmonton bylaw against admitting failure, or even acknowledging that Edmonton's track record as it pertains to roads and bridges is no better than rank amateurism.
pretty much.. the only way I could support the cost of fixing that mess now is if it was borne directly by those responsible for the at-grade decision in the first place

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airboy View Post
Always thought 25ave would be better.
do you mean 23av? I thought it could make a good part of ring line, with 170st, 137av and 50st rounding it out.

doubt that'll ever happen though.. at this point I can see teleportation hitting commercial use before Edmonton figures out transportation networks
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted May 16, 2017, 1:09 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,787
Can't unsee: Western Canadians find Trump's image in Yellowhead highway signs
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis...112884?cmp=rss

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted May 24, 2017, 4:42 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,787
Syncing traffic lights: Tech fixes, enduring challenges
https://taprootedmonton.ca/stories/2...ng-challenges/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted May 24, 2017, 5:21 PM
McBoo McBoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 747
91 Street NB from 23rd to 51st ave? Go the speed limit and you'll come to a halt at every light - and just as it's turning red too.

But speed - hey, makes you wonder if it's designed to tempt ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.