HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1101  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2018, 10:36 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,574
10 more floors and it should pass up Sky55 in height. After that, OMPW is next!
     
     
  #1102  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2018, 11:31 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,423
02/09/18





__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #1103  
Old Posted Feb 19, 2018, 4:39 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Feb 17











__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #1104  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2018, 12:12 AM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,574
Great shots!

Now that its gaining some height after the setback from the base/podium its starting to look almost airy and elegant, especially looking at it from its north facade on Roosevelt. Some of the renderings on the first page (especially the very first one) made it seem that OGP would turn out fat and clunky, especially when visually comparing it with OMP and OMPW. It doesn't seem that will be the case however, which is a relief.
     
     
  #1105  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2018, 12:22 AM
donnie's Avatar
donnie donnie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 596
What a view, is this overlooking the 78?
     
     
  #1106  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2018, 6:10 AM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,574
^ Appears so. Looks like the shot was take from 18th St viaduct just southeast of the Ping Tom Park field house.
     
     
  #1107  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2018, 10:45 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
^ Appears so. Looks like the shot was take from 18th St viaduct just southeast of the Ping Tom Park field house.
Just west of the bridge
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #1108  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2018, 11:37 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,574
^ My bad, I meant southwest of the field house.
     
     
  #1109  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2018, 6:02 PM
AMWChicago's Avatar
AMWChicago AMWChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 202
Has there been any word on the second tower for this site? Will it begin once this one finishes similar to Wolf Point? Or will it need additional approval from the city and/or additional time for funding?
     
     
  #1110  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2018, 7:06 PM
wchicity wchicity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Chicago & Los Angeles
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMWChicago View Post
Has there been any word on the second tower for this site? Will it begin once this one finishes similar to Wolf Point? Or will it need additional approval from the city and/or additional time for funding?
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure the second tower won't start construction at least until the first is finished. I think it also depends on how leasing goes in the first tower.
     
     
  #1111  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2018, 11:30 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by wchicity View Post
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure the second tower won't start construction at least until the first is finished. I think it also depends on how leasing goes in the first tower.
This is my understanding as well.

I would think that OGP and Essex would suck up a lot of the rental demand in the immediate area once they come online and start leasing, so it wouldn't be an immediate start for the 2nd tower.

Another factor is that the economy might start to slow down or cycle to recession in the next 12 to 24 months as well, so its fairly likely 2GP might not break ground this real estate cycle.
     
     
  #1112  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 12:01 AM
Fvn Fvn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 694
The Paragon (1326 S Michigan), too. All these developments in the area will also slow down Riverline, however I feel like those developers saw that coming which is why they started with a smaller building.

Also I wonder if there is a chance that phase2 could be a completely different design...or if the developer would even sell the lot (I feel like that wont be the case though in the event of a economic downturn you never know)
     
     
  #1113  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 12:13 AM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fvn View Post
The Paragon (1326 S Michigan), too. All these developments in the area will also slow down Riverline, however I feel like those developers saw that coming which is why they started with a smaller building.

Also I wonder if there is a chance that phase2 could be a completely different design...or if the developer would even sell the lot (I feel like that wont be the case though in the event of a economic downturn you never know)
OGP and 2GP are all a part of the Central Station development, so I don't think the lot will be sold. The developers have been playing the long game on this (although I think the original owners sold in 2015?) and have been putting out new buildings one at a time at a steady pace, ala LSE. I doubt the plot will be sold, but a redesign wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility. Magellan has deviated from its initial designs several times at LSE, and all for the better IMHO.
     
     
  #1114  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 1:46 AM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,387
Crescent Heights bought these two sites from the Central Station folks. The Grant (OMPW) had already been sold to Related Midwest during the recession. So Fogelson/Forrest City owns nothing fronting on Grant Park.

Yes, the future second tower will be a different design.
     
     
  #1115  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 2:08 AM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Yes, the future second tower will be a different design.
Do you know the reason for the change of plans?
     
     
  #1116  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 2:10 AM
KWillChicago's Avatar
KWillChicago KWillChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,115
I hope not. Twins would have squared off that corner nicely. I hope they dont go back to a curved building, that corner should have a sharp edge to it.
     
     
  #1117  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 5:50 AM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Monterey CA
Posts: 4,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Crescent Heights bought these two sites from the Central Station folks. The Grant (OMPW) had already been sold to Related Midwest during the recession. So Fogelson/Forrest City owns nothing fronting on Grant Park.

Yes, the future second tower will be a different design.
Personally. I'm okay with that. I like the current, under-construction tower, but would love a different and complimentary design (or not) for the adjacent highrise.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
     
     
  #1118  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 8:03 AM
donnie's Avatar
donnie donnie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 596
I don't mind a different design either as longer as its height is not compromised!
     
     
  #1119  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 8:31 AM
KWillChicago's Avatar
KWillChicago KWillChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,115
I still really hope they use the original design of Grant Park 3 somewhere else in chicago, along with the spiral crown of OMPW.

Scroll down to Oct. 20 2008
http://www.sloopin.com/2008/10/?m=1

Sorry, couldn't find another image of that drawing off of google.
     
     
  #1120  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 9:04 AM
Rocket49 Rocket49 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post

Yes, the future second tower will be a different design.
That's a pity.

I really like the twin tower aspect of the original design.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:55 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.