HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2008, 9:00 PM
andrea011 andrea011 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Question My first post, and an informal poll about Photovoltaic!

Hi!
My name's Andrea, I'm an italian student (architecture, of course!) here in this nice forum for the first time.

I'm very interested in photovoltaic architecture so I would like to have your own oipinion about these 2 questions:

1-What are the best buildings describing the "art" of the photovoltaic architecture?

2-If you would like to illustrate the history oh the photovoltaic technology in architecture, what are, in your opinion, the most significative buildings that can describe the evolution of this technology within architecture?

I'm waiting for your opinions!

Greetings from Italy!

andrea
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2008, 9:58 PM
M.K. M.K. is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: §¡კ₪@דч®ɛ€...۩™ -> աաա
Posts: 3,934
oh Andrea, welcome, it is interesting that... though... Let's see what people here says about...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2008, 8:58 PM
andrea011 andrea011 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Hi, MKmillennium! Thanks for the welcome.
It seem that my questions interests nobody...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2008, 9:06 PM
M.K. M.K. is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: §¡კ₪@דч®ɛ€...۩™ -> աաա
Posts: 3,934
Just give us photo examples, then let'S see...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2008, 11:02 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,380
OpTIC Technium, St. Asaph, North Wales

Source

Scheidegger Building, near Bern, Switzerland.

source

University of Melbourne Building Integrated Photovoltaic System

Source


Source

Hong Kong Science Park

Source
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2008, 2:42 AM
tua21506 tua21506 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: philadelphia -umm loft district/chinatown, i don't know what its called
Posts: 217
Cost is prohibitive...

Photovoltaic systems well in the US are sort of cost prohibitive...I have seen a few homes and buildings with the systems...such as a residential project in Philadelphia called rag flats by a architectural firm onion flats...Its seems well in Philadelphia anyway that photovoltaic systems serve a more functional purpose rather than a aesthetic one. Additionally in Philadelphia there are complications with integration into the local power grid. It is in my opinion that photovoltaic systems function best when they act as a generation station, supplying energy into the power grid and getting credited for the power supplied rather than storing the energy in a battery. Batteries as you probably know pose an environmental threat themselves and are very costly both in raw material and price. Many places that are seeking a less expensive alternative are going with solar hot water systems, where they heat water to both heat the home and create hot water for faucets...The people who usually go with photovoltaic systems in Philadelphia anyway are fairly wealthy people who have a eco friendly conscience.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2008, 5:36 PM
aic4ever aic4ever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 381
There are two major hurdles with Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV).

First and foremost, there is cost. Unless the builder of the building in question is governmental or institutional, or a major business that isn't going anywhere for a long time, the cost of including photovoltaics cannot be recouped fast enough to make the economic decision an appropriate one. A developer, for instance, building a multi-unit condominium or mixed use building, is highly unlikely to utilize BIPV because he's looking for an immediate profit on the building by selling it off, and does not care about long-term savings on electrical bills.

Furthermore, as to the long-term gain, Photovoltaics at this point have a useful lifespan of approximately 30 years, at which point they no longer function, and have to be replaced. Depending on correct exposure to the sun, and local ordinances regarding incentives like grants and tax breaks, it is possible to gain a pay-back on your BIPV in as little as ten years, however, it is more likely that the pay-back will not be realized for more like 15-20 years. This leaves only 10-15 years for your system to generate a "profit" which is then necessarily much more of a fund toward replacing itself.

The difficulty contributing to the problem of payback is that solar panels generate electricity only when exposed to sunlight. Storage of the generated electricity is supremely costly and prohibitively inefficient at this point. There is just not a good, safe, economical way to store large amounts of electricity, literally to be distributed for a rainy day.

This is somewhat averted in some municipalities by being able to sell your extra electricity back to the grid when you are overproducing, which will allow you credits toward the times you are drawing power, however the overall life cycle costs of the application are typically break-even at the very best.
__________________
Don't be a left wing zombie!

Free Nowhereman...fat girls need lovin' too
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:59 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.