HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2020, 3:30 AM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Your city's multiracial population/mixed unions

There isn't really a perfect measure - particularly with the borderline white "Latin American" and "Arab/West Asian" categories.

In 2011, Statistics Canada estimated 8% of all couples in mixed unions. That's 11% of visible minorities, Vancouver is a bit higher with 9.6% and 12%, respectively. Toronto and Van are by far the most nonwhite cities in Canada - and not surprisingly have both the highest percentage of the entire population in mixed unions but a low proportion of visible minority groups in mixed unions.

https://vancouversun.com/news/staff-...ples-in-canada
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2020, 4:15 PM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is offline
Go Beavs! Go Niners!
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 6,209
In Honolulu in 2017 it was at 42%. At the national level it was 17%.


Image and news source: Hawaii News Now

By HNN Staff | May 18, 2017 at 7:42 PM HST - Updated August 12 at 4:50 AM

HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) - Four out of every ten newlyweds in Honolulu are married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, by far the highest percentage of any metropolitan area in the United States, according to new research by the Pew Research Center.

The study, which was based on U.S. Census data covering the four-year span between 2011 and 2015, shines a light on the rapidly increasing national trend of Americans marrying outside their own race.

At the national level, according to Pew, roughly one in every six newlyweds – 17 percent – was involved in an interracial marriage. That number represents a significant increase from the 3 percent figure listed for 1967, when the Supreme Court first ruled that interracial marriages were legal.

Of all the areas considered in the study, Honolulu's 42 percent intermarriage rate is significantly higher than both the national average and the next-highest metropolitan location: the Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise region in Nevada, which measured 11 percentage points lower than Honolulu.

In only one other area – Santa Barbara, California – could Pew find an intermarriage rate of more than 30 percent. The next-highest rates were found in Fayetteville, North Carolina (29 percent), Melbourne, Florida (29 percent), and Albuquerque, New Mexico (28 percent).

The lowest rate of intermarriage in the United States was found in Jackson, Mississippi, where just three percent of weddings involved interracial couples.
Copyright 2017 Hawaii News Now. All rights reserved.


It's incredibly common throughout Hawaii so when you see statistics of people choosing only one (single response) ethnic group, race, tribe or ancestry -- the numbers look deceivingly low compared to other states because it doesn't quite capture the full picture of it's diversity and how people identify themselves. In fact, it has the highest mix rate of every single racial category in the U.S. and it gets even more complex when you also add in what ethnic groups they're mixed with under each racial, tribal or ancestral category and combination thereof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2020, 4:51 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
For Toronto:

Black and White: 70,235

Asian groups and White: 76,430
South Asian and White: 33,900
Chinese and White: 20,245
Filipino and White: 9,680
Japanese and White: 5,795
Southeast Asian and White: 4,090
Korean and White: 2,720


Multiple visible minorities 97,185

Not a perfect measure - this is the proportion of these Visible Minority groups that also declare a European origin. 16% of Blacks and 4% of the Asian groups do so. The highest of all are Japanese (28.1%), they are very small and they're the only VM group that's majority native-born.

Last edited by Docere; Jan 23, 2020 at 1:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2020, 9:52 PM
muppet's Avatar
muppet muppet is offline
if I sang out of tune
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,185
For London 2011, there were 405,000 mixed race people (2.3x NYC). It may be nearing double now (fastest growing ethnic group, and growing by 80% or more every decade).

White and Black Caribbean 119,425
White and Black African 65,479
White and pan Asian 101,500
Other Mixed 118,875

Thus it's about 5% growing to 10% of the population. In terms of unions/ relationships rather than kids it's far higher, for example making up the majority of Black and East Asian relationships, and over a third of South Asian ones.

This year should be a marking point when the UK's largest minority group officially becomes 'mixed race'.

And even then, a BBC study found the real figure may be double the census:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-152...ays-new-report

Last edited by muppet; Jan 25, 2020 at 12:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2020, 10:09 PM
liat91 liat91 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 729
Take it from a mixed person, the overall feeling of being a mixed person does not exist past being the product of a first generation union of a clearly juxtaposed couple.

Unfortunately, beyond that, mixed people begin jockeying on being more of this than that, or even denying a background altogether if they can get away with it.
More mixing, at this stage will only uplift those who aren’t.
__________________
WATCH OUT!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2020, 1:25 AM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Toronto, with European origins, under 15:

Japanese 64.1%
Black 19.5%
Korean 18.5%
Southeast Asian 13%
Filipino 12.3%
Chinese 10.1%
South Asian 5%

The majority of children of all groups are native-born. Koreans see the biggest increase (from 2.4% of the entire group to 18.5%).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2020, 8:38 PM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is offline
Go Beavs! Go Niners!
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 6,209
Here are some of the most common multi-racial, multi-ethnic or tribal combinations in Honolulu according to the 5-year (2014-2017) US Census Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS). Approximately 230,000 people were of Mixed Races (23% of the population) in Honolulu according to the 5-year sample and of course increasing.

In the US there are 6 major Racial categories -- (1) White which includes Arabs, most Central Asians, West Asians and North Africans (e.g., Maghreb), (2) Black or African American (includes Caribbean Black, Sub-Saharan African), (3) Asian, (4) Pacific Islander, (5) Native American/Aboriginal/Amerindian/First Nations and Alaska Native and (6) Some other Race.

In Honolulu you can find people mixed across all 6 of these racial categories -- among the very few metros in the United States that can make that claim. FYI: The data directly below also includes ethnic combinations that are within the same racial category.

1 White; Native Hawaiian 20,477
2 White; Japanese 17,958
3 White; Filipino 14,241
4 White; Chinese; Native Hawaiian 14,160
5 Chinese; Japanese 9,769
6 Filipino; Native Hawaiian 9,568
7 White; Japanese; and/or Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 9,514
8 White; Chinese; Filipino; Native Hawaiian 9,320
9 Chinese; Native Hawaiian 8,313
10 Chinese; and/or Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 8,299
11 Filipino; Japanese 7,938
12 White; Chinese; Filipino; and/or Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 7,936
13 White; Filipino; Native Hawaiian 7,650
14 Chinese; Japanese; Native Hawaiian; and/or other Asian and/or Pacific Islander groups 6,881
15 White; Chinese; and/or Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 6,693
16 White; Chinese; Japanese; Native Hawaiian 6,511
17 Chinese; Filipino 5,912
18 Chinese; Filipino; Native Hawaiian 5,788
19 White; American Indian and Alaska Native 5,698
20 White; Japanese; Native Hawaiian 5,682
21 White; Black or African American 5,568
22 Japanese; Native Hawaiian 5,296
23 Filipino; and/or Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 5,161
24 White; American Indian and Alaska Native; and/or Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups 4,521
25 White; Chinese 4,467
26 White; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 4,310
27 Japanese; Korean 4,190
28 Native Hawaiian; and/or Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 4,140
29 Japanese; and/or Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 3,813
30 White; and/or Black or African American; and/or American Indian and Alaska Native; and/or Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 3,531
31 White; Samoan 2,757
32 White; Korean 2,567
33 White; Some Other Race 2,352
34 White; Chinese; Filipino 2,309
35 White; Filipino; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 2,285
36 White; Chinese; Japanese 2,252
37 White; Black or African American; and/or Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 1,617
38 Filipino; Asian groups 1,570
39 White; Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native 1,553
40 White; American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian groups 1,520
41 Filipino; Some Other Race 1,514
42 White; Other Asian 1,508
43 White; Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 1,367
44 Black or African American; Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups 1,330
45 White; Other Pacific Islander 1,254
46 Chinese; Vietnamese 1,173
47 American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian groups; and/or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander groups; and/or Some Other Race 1,066
48 Black or African American; American Indian and Alaska Native 970
49 American Indian and Alaska Native; Filipino 909
50 Chinese; Korean 893


Here are the 20 largest non-White or Black racial and/or ethnic groups -- mixed with Hispanic or Latino origins.

1 Puerto Rican-Native Hawaiian 2,338
2 Spanish/Hispanic/Latino-Filipino 2,030
3 Spanish/Hispanic/Latino-Native Hawaiian 1,015
4 Spanish/Hispanic/Latino-All combinations of Asian races 995
5 Puerto Rican-Filipino 568
6 Mexican-Native Hawaiian 521
7 Spaniard-Native Hawaiian 461
8 Mexican-Japanese 276
9 Mexican-Korean 202
10 Puerto Rican-Japanese 166
11 Puerto Rican-All combinations of Asian races 137
12 Mexican-Filipino 136
13 Mexican-All combinations of Asian races 136
14 Spanish/Hispanic/Latino-Other Pacific Islander 119
15 Spaniard-All combinations of Asian races 110
16 Spanish/Hispanic/Latino-Guamanian or Chamorro 98
17 Spaniard-Filipino 79
18 Puerto Rican-Other Pacific Islander 76
19 Spanish/Hispanic/Latino-Japanese 72
20 Cuban-Native Hawaiian 62
20 Argentinean-Native Hawaiian 62

Last edited by Urbanguy; Jan 25, 2020 at 12:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 5:01 AM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Black and White racial identity and % of Black population:

New York 147,501 4.1%
Boston 66,042 14.7%
Los Angeles 65,109 6.9%
Washington 62,133 3.8%
Chicago 59,056 3.6%
Philadelphia 58,425 4.4%
Dallas 51,674 4.5%
Seattle 49,677 19.2%
Atlanta 47,336 2.4%
Miami 43,055 3.2%
Minneapolis 39,845 12.3%
Houston 38,313 3.2%
Phoenix 37,672 13.5%
San Francisco 37,082 9.7%
Riverside- 34,855 9.6%
Detroit 34,618 3.5%
Tampa 32,477 8.3%
Columbus 30,123 9%

Last edited by Docere; Jan 25, 2020 at 5:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 6:12 AM
dimondpark's Avatar
dimondpark dimondpark is offline
Pay it Forward
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Piedmont, California
Posts: 7,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanguy View Post
In Honolulu in 2017 it was at 42%. At the national level it was 17%.


Image and news source: Hawaii News Now

By HNN Staff | May 18, 2017 at 7:42 PM HST - Updated August 12 at 4:50 AM

HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) - Four out of every ten newlyweds in Honolulu are married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, by far the highest percentage of any metropolitan area in the United States, according to new research by the Pew Research Center.

The study, which was based on U.S. Census data covering the four-year span between 2011 and 2015, shines a light on the rapidly increasing national trend of Americans marrying outside their own race.

At the national level, according to Pew, roughly one in every six newlyweds – 17 percent – was involved in an interracial marriage. That number represents a significant increase from the 3 percent figure listed for 1967, when the Supreme Court first ruled that interracial marriages were legal.

Of all the areas considered in the study, Honolulu's 42 percent intermarriage rate is significantly higher than both the national average and the next-highest metropolitan location: the Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise region in Nevada, which measured 11 percentage points lower than Honolulu.

In only one other area – Santa Barbara, California – could Pew find an intermarriage rate of more than 30 percent. The next-highest rates were found in Fayetteville, North Carolina (29 percent), Melbourne, Florida (29 percent), and Albuquerque, New Mexico (28 percent).

The lowest rate of intermarriage in the United States was found in Jackson, Mississippi, where just three percent of weddings involved interracial couples.
Copyright 2017 Hawaii News Now. All rights reserved.


It's incredibly common throughout Hawaii so when you see statistics of people choosing only one (single response) ethnic group, race, tribe or ancestry -- the numbers look deceivingly low compared to other states because it doesn't quite capture the full picture of it's diversity and how people identify themselves. In fact, it has the highest mix rate of every single racial category in the U.S. and it gets even more complex when you also add in what ethnic groups they're mixed with under each racial, tribal or ancestral category and combination thereof.
Great article!

Here are the major metros besides Honolulu(42%)

% of newlyweds involved in an interracial marriage:
31% Las Vegas
27% San Diego
26% Sacramento
26% San Francisco
25% Phoenix
25% Riverside
25% Tucson
24% Miami
24% Orlando
24% San Jose
23% Oklahoma City
23% San Antonio
22% Denver
22% Los Angeles
22% Tampa
21% Austin
20% Seattle
20% Virginia Beach
19% Chicago
19% Dallas
19% Houston
19% Portland
19% Washington DC
18% New York
18% Salt Lake City
17% Hartford
16% Buffalo
16% Charlotte
16% Grand Rapids
16% Jacksonville
16% New Orleans
16% Raleigh
15% Baltimore
15% Minneapolis
15% Rochester
14% Atlanta
14% Boston
14% Philadelphia
13% Kansas City
13% Milwaukee
12% Cleveland
12% Richmond
11% Columbus
11% Indianapolis
11% Providence
10% Detroit
10% Memphis
10% Nashville
10% Pittsburgh
9% Cincinnati
9% Louisville
6% Birmingham
__________________

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference."-Robert Frost
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 7:22 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Interesting, what this suggests to me is that 1) the majority of "mixed unions" in the US are NHW-Hispanic and that the "color line" (Black vs. non-Black) is weaker in the West.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 9:03 PM
Capsicum's Avatar
Capsicum Capsicum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 2,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Docere View Post
Toronto, with European origins, under 15:

Japanese 64.1%
Black 19.5%
Korean 18.5%
Southeast Asian 13%
Filipino 12.3%
Chinese 10.1%
South Asian 5%

The majority of children of all groups are native-born. Koreans see the biggest increase (from 2.4% of the entire group to 18.5%).
Why is Black-white a higher share in Canada than Asian-white, but reversed in the US? Is it relative proportion or the history of the color line pre 1960s (just like stateside, there is more black-white intermarriage in areas where the black community is "newer" or post 1960s)?

It's notable that Britain is more like Canada in that Asians intermarry with their own community more than Black Brits (as opposed to Americans).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 9:09 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
A higher percentage of Black Canadians are native-born, and cross-ethnic marriage is very rare among the immigrant generation. In addition, South Asians have religious/cultural reasons not to intermarry with other groups.

I don't think native-born East Asians have any "aversion" to intermarriage/mixed unions - Japanese Canadians have by far the highest rate, and Koreans and Filipinos seem to be catching up pretty quickly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 9:16 PM
Capsicum's Avatar
Capsicum Capsicum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 2,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Docere View Post
A higher percentage of Black Canadians are native-born, and cross-ethnic marriage is very rare among the immigrant generation. In addition, South Asians have religious/cultural reasons not to intermarry with other groups.
But Asian Americans have a similar share of immigrant to native-born as Asian Canadians, though the intermarriage rate of Asian Americans is higher.

It seems like the immigrant/non-immigrant divide is stronger in Canada vs. the color line, but in the US, it is the opposite (the color line is stronger, African Americans have lower intermarriage rates, even if native born, than groups like Asians and Hispanics that have higher foreign born shares).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 9:20 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
The Asian population is more South Asian and Chinese-dominated than it is in the US, and 70% of them are in Toronto and Vancouver while the Asian American population is more dispersed.

Canada generally has data on the individual Asian groups while in the US very disparate groups are usually lumped under the "Asian" umbrella for statistical purposes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 9:25 PM
Capsicum's Avatar
Capsicum Capsicum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 2,489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Docere View Post
The Asian population is more South Asian and Chinese-dominated than it is in the US, and 70% of them are in Toronto and Vancouver while the Asian American population is more dispersed.

Canada generally has data on the individual Asian groups while in the US very disparate groups are usually lumped under the "Asian" umbrella for statistical purposes.
This study argues for the relative size of the racial groups explaining the majority of the intermarriage rate differences -- the larger the group, the higher odds they will marry within their own group. Data is somewhat old though (mid-late 2000s).

"While black–white intermarriage is uncommon in the USA, blacks in Canada are just as likely to marry whites as to marry blacks. Asians, in contrast, are more likely to marry whites in the USA than in Canada. We test the claim that high rates of interracial marriage are indicative of high levels of social integration against Peter Blau's ‘macrostructural’ thesis that relative group size is the key to explaining differences in intermarriage rates across marriage markets. Using micro-data drawn from the American Community Survey and the Canadian census, we demonstrate that the relative size of racial groups accounts for over two-thirds of the USA–Canada difference in black–white unions and largely explains the cross-country difference in Asian–white unions. Under broadly similar social and economic conditions, a large enough difference in relative group size can become the predominant determinant of group differences in the prevalence of interracial unions."

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full...0.2015.1005644

But I could still imagine that other factors explain some of the trend too, especially for previous generations, like foreign vs. native-born, or the historic color line in the US in the African American vs. Black Canadian case, or war brides/adoptees among the older generation in the Asian American vs. Canadian case.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2020, 3:18 AM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
"Distinctions based on color certainly have an impact in Europe and Canada, yet the United States is in a class of its own. Available data on residential segregation and mixed unions indicate that in the United States skin color is a greater divide and barrrier to ingegration for people of African ancestry, including those of immigrant origin, than it is for their counterparts in Europe and Canada...individuals of African ancestry remain highly segregated from whites in the United States, a situation that has no parallel in the other countries in our study. This is not just case for African Americans but for Wes Indians as well, the major black immigrant population. The remarkably high segregation rates reduce day-to-day interactions and informal contacts with whites."

- Richard Alba and Nancy Foner, Strangers No More: Immigration and the Challenges of Integration in North America and Europe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2020, 7:03 PM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is offline
Go Beavs! Go Niners!
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 6,209
Let's add a little more context to this discussion...

Steep Rise In Interracial Marriages Among Newlyweds 50 Years After They Became Legal

May 18, 20172:08 PM ET
Hansi Lo Wang - Square


Close to 50 years after interracial marriages became legal across the U.S., the share of newlyweds married to a spouse of a different race or ethnicity has increased more than five times — from 3 percent in 1967, to 17 percent in 2015, according to a new report by the Pew Research Center.

Asian and Latino newlyweds are more likely to marry outside of their race or ethnicity than black and white newlyweds

More than a quarter of Asian newlyweds (29 percent) and Latino newlyweds (27 percent) are married to a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. Those rates go up even higher for those born in the U.S. — to 46 percent for Asian newlyweds and 39 percent for Hispanic newlyweds.

Despite lagging behind Asian and Hispanic newlyweds, black and white newlyweds experienced the most dramatic growth in the rate of interracial and interethnic marriages. The rate for black newlyweds has more than tripled since 1980 — from 5 percent to 18 percent. For white newlyweds, the rate has almost tripped from 4 percent to 11 percent over the same period.
Interracial and interethnic marriages are more common among college-educated black and Latino newlyweds, but not among white or Asian newlyweds

While educational level is not a major factor for white newlyweds, black and Latino newlyweds with at least a bachelor's degree are more likely to have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity than those with some college experience or less education. That educational gap is starkest among Latino newlyweds. As the authors of the Pew report, Gretchen Livingston and Anna Brown, write: "While almost half (46 percent) of Hispanic newlyweds with a bachelor's degree were intermarried in 2015, this share drops to (16 percent) for those with a high school diploma or less – a pattern driven partially, but not entirely, by the higher share of immigrants among the less educated."

But among Asian newlyweds, those with some college experience (39 percent) are more likely to marry someone of a different race or ethnicity than those with a bachelor's degree or higher (29 percent) or with a high school diploma or less (26 percent). "Asian newlyweds with some college are somewhat less likely to be immigrants, and this may contribute to the higher rates of intermarriage for this group," the Pew report suggests. But it also notes that this trend also holds true for Asian newlyweds who were not born in the U.S.

Source: NPR


Where the Growth Happened

All states experienced an increase in the percentage of interracial and interethnic married-couple households from 2000 to 2012-2016.


Two states, Hawaii and Oklahoma, and the District of Columbia increased by 4.34 percentage points or more.
Nine states, located mostly in the West and the Mid-Atlantic region, increased by 3.34 to 4.33 percentage points.
Seventeen states increased by 2.40 to 3.33 percentage points.
The remaining 22 states increased by less than 2.40 percentage points.


Image Source: US Census


Image Source: US Census


What's behind the rise of interracial marriage in the US?

Attitudes, migration patterns, availability of partners and education are all factors of interracial and interethnic marriages

For a start, there’s huge geographic variation in where intermarriage happens; it’s more common in metropolitan areas than rural places (18% compared to 11%) according to a Pew analysis of the Census Bureau’s figures. But those are just averages – US metropolitan areas vary significantly from Honolulu, Hawaii, where 42% of weddings are interracial to Jackson, Mississippi where the figure is just 3%.

Overall, the most common type of intermarriage is between a partner who is white and one who is Hispanic of any race – those relationships accounted for 38% of all intermarriages in 2010. White-Asian couples accounted for another 14% of intermarriages, and white-black couples made up 8%. You can find detailed maps of intermarriage patterns at a county level in this Census Bureau poster.

There are gender patterns in this data too. In 2008, 22% of black male newlyweds chose partners of another race, compared to just 9% of black female newlyweds. The gender pattern is the opposite among Asians. While 40% of Asian females married outside their race in 2008, just 20% of Asian male newlyweds did the same. For whites and Hispanics though, Pew found no gender differences.

These numbers aren’t simply a matter of love. They’re the consequence of economic, political and cultural factors. To list just a few:

Attitudes (plain racism): While 72% of black respondents said it would be fine with them if a family member chose to marry someone of another racial or ethnic group, 61% of whites and 63% of Hispanics said the same. More specifically though, Americans aren’t comfortable with specific kinds of intermarriage. A Pew survey found that acceptance of out-marriage to whites (81%) was higher than is acceptance of out-marriage to Asians (75%), Hispanics (73%) or blacks (66%).

Migration patterns: The Census Bureau provided the following examples: “the removal of many American Indian tribes from their original lands to reservation lands; historically higher proportions of Hispanics living in the Southwest; historically higher proportions of Asians living in the West” all of which shape where intermarriages happen and between whom.

Availability of partners: Systematic incarceration of young black men, together with higher death rates contribute to the fact that black women are much less likely to get married than women of any other race or ethnicity in the US. This, together with higher black unemployment rates mean that black individuals make up a relatively small share of all marriages, including intermarriages.

Education: People with a higher educational attainment are more likely to intermarry. This affects geographic patterns too – areas with higher educational attainment are more likely to have more interracial couples living there.

Source: The Guardian
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2020, 7:45 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,148
I was just talking to my girlfriend the other day how insane it is that interracial marriages were illegal not that long ago(historically speaking).

Yet, I hear almost weekly that "race relations are worse than ever" or that "not much has changed since the Civil Rights era."

Bullshit. Accept progress(don't be blind to it) while also recognizing recent discrimination. Those two things can work together folks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2020, 1:50 AM
liat91 liat91 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 729
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtown,man View Post
I was just talking to my girlfriend the other day how insane it is that interracial marriages were illegal not that long ago(historically speaking).

Yet, I hear almost weekly that "race relations are worse than ever" or that "not much has changed since the Civil Rights era."

Bullshit. Accept progress(don't be blind to it) while also recognizing recent discrimination. Those two things can work together folks.
Your right in most ways and that’s what matters I guess. I’m concerned about what any society can do in the evolution of becoming increasingly mixed. Racism exists on 5 levels. The individual, family, community, nation and world. The source code being perceived value. All it takes is time to bake the results in.

Take the country of Panama, which is clearly a black/white/native mixed nation. This is a nation where it seems being black wouldn’t/shouldn’t be an issue. This example however, would indicate the troubling reality that is modern day Panama. Refer to the story about the guy with dred-locks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost....epression/amp/

Racism at the individual and global levels are the most damaging imo, though all the levels bleed into each other.
__________________
WATCH OUT!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2020, 8:42 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Share of mixed unions:

NHW / Hispanic 42%
White/Asian 15%
White/Multiracial 12%
White/Black 11%
Hispanic / Black 5%

https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017...intermarriage/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:05 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.