HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted May 26, 2008, 8:01 PM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 3,218
Six-lane Disraeli bridge sought
By: Bartley Kives

Updated: May 26 at 12:28 PM CDT

City council’s public works committee has formally asked Premier Gary Doer to come up with the cash for a six-lane, two-span Disraeli Bridge rehabilitation, which could cost twice as much as the four-lane, single-span repair job currently slated for next year.

In what amounts to a slap in the face to Mayor Sam Katz and most members of his cabinet, the public works committee voted 3-1 to petition Doer for the cash, which could be as much as $350 million.

Elwood Coun. Lillian Thomas, North Kildonan Coun. Jeff Browaty and Mynarski Coun. Harry Lazarenko voted in favour of the largely symbolic move, which is bound to be turned aside when it comes before council’s executive policy committee next week.

Public works chairman Bill Clement voted against it, noting the six-lane replacement bridge is not in Winnipeg’s capital budget and claiming other projects would have to be cancelled if the scope of the Disraeli repairs was to be widened.

The province also appears to have little interest in the Disraeli project, despite a public-relations campaign being waged by NDP backbencher Jim Maloway.

Doer has said he will not consider cash for a six-lane Disraeli Bridge and Overpass until he sees an engineer’s report.

City engineers are only exploring four-lane options.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted May 29, 2008, 1:07 AM
JayM's Avatar
JayM JayM is offline
Youth of a Nation
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1,196
They should be upgrading Redwood/Louise bridges to take the extra loads when the time comes. Build another 2 lane bridge by Louise northbound and southbound.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted May 29, 2008, 1:54 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayM View Post
They should be upgrading Redwood/Louise bridges to take the extra loads when the time comes. Build another 2 lane bridge by Louise northbound and southbound.


They should have upgraded Redwood first instead of retrofitting it, they knew at that time that the Disreli was in dire need of repairs. Is there even a planning dept. in Winnipeg?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted May 29, 2008, 1:58 AM
JayM's Avatar
JayM JayM is offline
Youth of a Nation
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
They should have upgraded Redwood first instead of retrofitting it, they knew at that time that the Disreli was in dire need of repairs. Is there even a planning dept. in Winnipeg?
Apparently the only thing they prepare for is when things get the most extreme. Thinking about the future is something they don't do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted May 29, 2008, 2:00 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,867
the plan i herd from city guys was a 4 lane bridge to replace the liouse
and the redwood to be removed eventualy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted May 29, 2008, 2:20 AM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 2,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
the plan i herd from city guys was a 4 lane bridge to replace the liouse
and the redwood to be removed eventualy
Eventually, since they obviously gave Redwood Bridge another 40 years to stand the test of time.

I really don't know which seems more logical and fits more to what Northeastern Winnipeg REALLY needs; either a refurbished double humped Disraeli "Freeway," or a "single humped" Disraeli Bridge straight through with six lanes instead of 4?

I wonder what the residents of Point Douglas has to say about this...?
__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted May 29, 2008, 4:38 AM
JayM's Avatar
JayM JayM is offline
Youth of a Nation
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jabroni View Post
Eventually, since they obviously gave Redwood Bridge another 40 years to stand the test of time.

I really don't know which seems more logical and fits more to what Northeastern Winnipeg REALLY needs; either a refurbished double humped Disraeli "Freeway," or a "single humped" Disraeli Bridge straight through with six lanes instead of 4?

I wonder what the residents of Point Douglas has to say about this...?
Either way a new bridge with the capability of handling 4 lanes of car traffic along with biking/walking is needed. I suggest they enhance the Higgins/Narin traffic with a 4 lane then shutdown Disraeli this way there is atleast still a double lane traffic bridge into East Kildonan/Elmwood area. Then they can take the pos down then maybe they can have a better look at it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted May 30, 2008, 3:56 AM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 2,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayM View Post
Either way a new bridge with the capability of handling 4 lanes of car traffic along with biking/walking is needed. I suggest they enhance the Higgins/Narin traffic with a 4 lane then shutdown Disraeli this way there is atleast still a double lane traffic bridge into East Kildonan/Elmwood area. Then they can take the pos down then maybe they can have a better look at it.
Or just say "fuck it" and pull a Boston by building a tunnel underneath and kill the "Green Monster" for good.
__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted May 30, 2008, 5:14 PM
fengshui fengshui is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 390
We need to learn from Toronto, who are rethinking the wisdom of the Gardiner Expressway. Even the Mayor there has apparently reversed his position and wants to get rid of the elevated freeway. The whole Disraeli should be rethought in conjunction with a plan for Point Douglas. Do it once and do it right.
----------------
Chop Gardiner Expressway, Toronto Mayor Miller says - In a major turnaround, Mayor David Miller now says he supports removing a portion of the Gardiner Expressway to revitalize Toronto's waterfront. And he will probably have the votes to get it through city council, according to a prominent councillor not aligned with the mayor. Waterfront Toronto, the government agency that manages much of the city's lakefront, issued a news release last night saying it would outline plans today to tear down the Gardiner from Jarvis St. to the Don Valley Parkway.
Toronto Star, May 30, 2008 Globe and Mail, May 30, 2008
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted May 30, 2008, 10:47 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Jabroni View Post
Eventually, since they obviously gave Redwood Bridge another 40 years to stand the test of time.

I really don't know which seems more logical and fits more to what Northeastern Winnipeg REALLY needs; either a refurbished double humped Disraeli "Freeway," or a "single humped" Disraeli Bridge straight through with six lanes instead of 4?

I wonder what the residents of Point Douglas has to say about this...?
theres enuff room to do it............ manitoba hydros centra gas sight splits the nieborhood up more then the bridge ever did....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted May 30, 2008, 10:55 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by fengshui View Post
We need to learn from Toronto, who are rethinking the wisdom of the Gardiner Expressway. Even the Mayor there has apparently reversed his position and wants to get rid of the elevated freeway. The whole Disraeli should be rethought in conjunction with a plan for Point Douglas. Do it once and do it right.
If you learn from Toronto nothing will ever get done, because nothing gets done here. This is approximately the five zillionth "plan" for Toronto's waterfront to emerge since I've been here and it's still a combination of derelict land and obnoxious condo developments. Winnipeg's city council is a model of efficiency compared to our dimbulbs.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted May 30, 2008, 11:07 PM
fengshui fengshui is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 390
^ Understood. But by "learn", I really mean deciding whether an elevated roadway serves to enhance or detract from a viable urban neighbourhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2008, 1:09 AM
flatlander's Avatar
flatlander flatlander is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,369
^^^Couldn't agree more. Would be nice to improve the disraeil/main intersection too, with a bit more of a gateway to downtown and chinatown.
__________________
For best results play at maximum volume.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2008, 7:18 PM
fengshui fengshui is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 390
The City has posted the notice for DBFM of the Disraeli on their procurement page. The document indicates that the request for qualifications will be issued by June 30.

An information session for prospective bidders is scheduled for June 18 at the Millennium Library. Weird how the date on the photo below could be almost anything - not much has really changed in that view for a long time.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2008, 7:31 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,867
that photos gota be early 90's late 80's
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2008, 7:50 PM
fengshui fengshui is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 390
No to Six Lanes

From the Freep
----
Mayor Sam Katz's cabinet has voted to ignore another committee's recommendation to ask Premier Gary Doer to fund a six-lane Disraeli Freeway.
Last week, city council's public works committee -- whose members include two northeast Winnipeg councillors -- voted to press Premier Gary Doer to come up with extra money to help the city build a two-span, six-lane Disraeli Freeway, instead of rehabilitating the existing four-lane structure
The move was a symbolic gesture, as Winnipeg is already pursuing plans to fix the Disraeli at an expected cost of $125 million to $160 million.
As expected, council's executive policy committee quashed the recommendation, voting 4-1 to "receive it as information."
Transcona Coun. Russ Wyatt voted against his fellow EPC members. Couns. Mike O'Shaughnessy (Old Kildonan) and Brenda Leipsic (River Heights) were not present.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2008, 9:28 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,867
good 6 lanes is not needed though would be cool if they did it and built a cable stay bridge
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2008, 10:07 PM
Only The Lonely..'s Avatar
Only The Lonely.. Only The Lonely.. is offline
Portage & Main 50 below
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by fengshui View Post
From the Freep
----
Mayor Sam Katz's cabinet has voted to ignore another committee's recommendation to ask Premier Gary Doer to fund a six-lane Disraeli Freeway.
Last week, city council's public works committee -- whose members include two northeast Winnipeg councillors -- voted to press Premier Gary Doer to come up with extra money to help the city build a two-span, six-lane Disraeli Freeway, instead of rehabilitating the existing four-lane structure
The move was a symbolic gesture, as Winnipeg is already pursuing plans to fix the Disraeli at an expected cost of $125 million to $160 million.
As expected, council's executive policy committee quashed the recommendation, voting 4-1 to "receive it as information."
Transcona Coun. Russ Wyatt voted against his fellow EPC members. Couns. Mike O'Shaughnessy (Old Kildonan) and Brenda Leipsic (River Heights) were not present.
I'm not going to argue the merits of a four or six lane Disraeli, but has Katz ever said 'YES' to anything?

Just curious..
__________________
WINNIPEG: Home of Canada's first skyscraper!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2008, 11:02 PM
Jimbo's Avatar
Jimbo Jimbo is offline
Mr. Winnipeg
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Where the 2 rivers meet
Posts: 344
Yeah, we may not need 6 lanes now, but the city is growing and will continue to grow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2008, 6:20 PM
bimbamboom bimbamboom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 29
New group opposes Disraeli bridge closure
CJOB's Robert Holland reporting
6/5/2008


About 100 people gathered Wednesday night to form a new Citizens Group opposed to the closure of the Disraeli Bridge..
Elmwood MLA Jim Maloway told CJOB they want the city to opt for a six lane bridge so one span can be built and opened before re-construction work starts on the current span.
He says closing the bridge for 16 months, as proposed, would create a traffic nightmare on other bridges..

Maloway says the community interest in the issue has been phenomenal..
He says they have received more than one thousand responses including e-mails and tear outs from the Herald magazine and almost all oppose the bridge's closure..
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.