HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4101  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2019, 4:02 PM
OTA in Winnipeg's Avatar
OTA in Winnipeg OTA in Winnipeg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Silver Heights
Posts: 1,631
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4102  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2019, 4:06 PM
OTA in Winnipeg's Avatar
OTA in Winnipeg OTA in Winnipeg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Silver Heights
Posts: 1,631
Next page:
Quote:





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4103  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2019, 5:42 PM
davequanbury davequanbury is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTA in Winnipeg View Post
Thanks so much!

I love how there wasn't a curb cut in this rendering.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4104  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2019, 5:17 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 5,482
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.

Instagram
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4105  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2019, 2:46 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,764
Where's the one with the mountains? haha
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4106  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2019, 3:03 PM
Bluenote Bluenote is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Winnipeg / St Vital
Posts: 1,101
When you compare the footprint of the original tower that was planned and taking into account that thr foundations were built for that structure back in 1979, why is this tower using only half the original structures foundation. It seems weird as its placment is so far away from the originals i wonder if the original plans foundation was truely that large.
Seeing as the elevator shaft is exactly where it wluld have been in 1979. Or was there a plan for two sets of shafts?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4107  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2019, 4:35 PM
GarryEllice's Avatar
GarryEllice GarryEllice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenote View Post
When you compare the footprint of the original tower that was planned and taking into account that thr foundations were built for that structure back in 1979, why is this tower using only half the original structures foundation. It seems weird as its placment is so far away from the originals i wonder if the original plans foundation was truely that large.
Seeing as the elevator shaft is exactly where it wluld have been in 1979. Or was there a plan for two sets of shafts?
The original tower was planned to be an office tower. A residential tower inherently has to be skinnier because everyone needs a window.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4108  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2019, 6:39 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Seems that both iterations have their pros and cons.

Original plan
-2nd tower would have been much bigger and taken up a larger amount of space
-building in between was much more substantial

Actual
-2nd tower is taller
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4109  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2019, 7:31 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
I wonder if BMO is going to try and negotiate 201 removing the RBC naming rights from the building. Would be pretty funny to see BMO set up in what is positioned as an RBC building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4110  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2019, 9:11 PM
Wolf13 Wolf13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
Where's the one with the mountains? haha
I think that's phase 4 of the project. I'd support that gofundme page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenote View Post
When you compare the footprint of the original tower that was planned and taking into account that thr foundations were built for that structure back in 1979, why is this tower using only half the original structures foundation. It seems weird as its placment is so far away from the originals i wonder if the original plans foundation was truely that large.
Seeing as the elevator shaft is exactly where it wluld have been in 1979. Or was there a plan for two sets of shafts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryEllice View Post
The original tower was planned to be an office tower. A residential tower inherently has to be skinnier because everyone needs a window.
Exactly. The office market was reasonably ok here (by Winnipeg standards) and the TNS came up, so that killed any office ideas they may have had (doubt they wanted that anyway, otherwise this would have been built decades ago). The smaller floorplate and thus less weight per floor allowed them to build taller.

However, I'd guess that the original 300 main rendering was larger in size overall... I think 360 Main is around 550,000 sf excluding the mall, and the second tower is noticeably girth-ier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Seems that both iterations have their pros and cons.

Original plan
-2nd tower would have been much bigger and taken up a larger amount of space
-building in between was much more substantial

Actual
-2nd tower is taller
I'd consider the age old real estate principle of highest and best use here... especially now more than in the past, experienced developers will try to maximize their site. The foundation for the majority of the central portion was, despite rumours and renderings, not structurally capable of handling more than one floor. So they appear to be doing what they can.

Similarly, they are building apartments... much better use than office these days.

Hell, even back then in the 80s, the highest and best use for the site turned out to be take the money and run... clearly seeing the development through wasn't worth the trouble of building out the block. How they got away with it, I don't know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4111  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 3:09 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,738
Amazing how shallow the residential floors look compared to the podium floors.

__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4112  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 4:12 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,851
^the core has not moved in a few weeks now. Is that because they want to let the steelwork catch up a bit?
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4113  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 5:11 PM
Wolf13 Wolf13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
^the core has not moved in a few weeks now. Is that because they want to let the steelwork catch up a bit?
Cores can go quite high above steel. Not sure what their limit is but I wouldn't think they're near that. Maybe, though, although steel isn't exactly moving slowly anymore. In any case I want to see that core climb more, it's a nice laypersons progress barometer.

There's a ton of work on the 300 podium level and inside 330. My guess is that's the focus. I imagine it would be to ensure lease obligations for the centre portion are safely met.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4114  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 6:05 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,738
My guess is that the crane is near its limit for being free-standing. It needs to be anchored to the building every so often and they are waiting for the steel structure to reach it's first anchor point. Then it will be jumped and the core will raise again.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4115  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 6:10 PM
3de14eec6a 3de14eec6a is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
^the core has not moved in a few weeks now. Is that because they want to let the steelwork catch up a bit?
It looks like they can't go higher on the core until the crane goes higher. And comparing the crane height to the grain commission building, they may be at max unsupported height on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4116  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 7:53 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,010
The core freestand structural limitation is 15-storeys.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4117  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2019, 1:40 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,738
So to me, it looks like if all things go well and all materials are on site at the appropriate time, it takes about 4 days to complete a floor.

2 days to install the exterior beams and the white Delta Beams and 2 days to install the hollowcore decking.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4118  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2019, 1:58 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,648
So the next two floors should go up pretty quickly, maybe one a week. I'm sure adding the columns will will take up a couple days when they need to be installed but we should see some real movement now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4119  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2019, 2:57 AM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 2,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmacc View Post
So the next two floors should go up pretty quickly, maybe one a week. I'm sure adding the columns will will take up a couple days when they need to be installed but we should see some real movement now.
And the erection continues...

__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4120  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2019, 5:01 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 5,482
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.

Instagram
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:49 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.